| Papers [481-495] of 2759 :: [Page 33 of 184] | | Go to page : <— 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 —> | |
|
|
The War in Iraq: A Mistake of Epic Proportions, 2006. The author's viewpoint of the situation in Iraq as a mistake. 1,981 words (approx. 7.9 pages), 18 sources, APA, $ 62.95 »
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract In this study the author raises many points that question the validity of the war in Iraq. The paper centers on the lives lost and America's greed in wanting control of the oil resources in the Middle East.This paper presents the point of view of the author only and is quite biased in that respect. In conclusion the author admonishes the government for entering Iraq and recommends the immediate cease of the fighting and a full pull out from Iraq.
Intelligence Failures
Willingness to Believe the "Evidence"
Construction Contracts
Cost to the U.S. Taxpayer
Death of U.S. Troops
From the Paper "Quite simply, there was an enormous misinterpretation of CIA gathered intelligence concerning the weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs and supply stocks of Hussein. The mistake was made not only by the U.S. agencies and leading decision-makers, but also by U.S. allies such as England. It was well-documented that Hussein had used chemical weapons against Iran and Iraqi Kurds. It was also documented that chemical weapons and biological and nuclear development programs were discovered after the first Gulf War and that Hussein strongly resisted international inspection efforts in recent years. "
| |
|
Cuba and North Korea and U.S. Policy, 2006. A look at the similarities in U.S. policy towards North Korea and U.S. policy towards Cuba. 853 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 30.95 »
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract Through a historical examination of both North Korea and Cuba, this paper compares U.S. policy towards both countries, explaining the similarity in the policies and the reasons for that similarity. The paper compares significant political events in both countries and explains that U.S. policy towards these countries has been based on the goal of containing communism and the spread of nuclear weapons.
From the Paper "As the political climate in Cuba changed, so did the United States' policy towards the country. In the period immediately following Cuba's independence, the United States dominated Cuba both economically and politically; this domination continued until the Castro-led Cuban revolution. The Castro government's first move was to buy back land from private companies to give to agrarians. The United States became upset because it felt that its land holdings were worth more than the Cuban government was willing to pay. The United States responded by placing a trade embargo on Cuba in 1960 and soon after broke off diplomatic relations entirely. Next, the United States sponsored the Bay of Pigs invasion, an unsuccessful attempt to incite rebellion against Castro. The next major event in United States-Cuba history was the Cuban missile crisis in 1962, in which the United States "blockaded Cuba to force the USSR to withdraw their newly-installed MRBMs from the country." Cuba's close ally was the USSR, and after its fall in 1991, conditions in Cuba worsened. Today, the trade sanction still stands between the United States and Cuba, with an exception made for humanitarian aid in the form of food and medicine."
| |
|
The Philippine Insurrection, 2005. An overview of the conflict between the United States and the Philippines. 2,840 words (approx. 11.4 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 84.95 »
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract After the United States' victory in the Spanish-American war, it purchased the Philippines from Spain for twenty million dollars. However, the U.S. neglected to acknowledge that the Philippines had grown very nationalistic during their bloody revolution with Spain. The paper shows that during that revolution and the Spanish-American wars, the United States and Philippines had joined as allies in the fight against Spain. After their victory and not looking to become the colony of yet another imperialistic nation, the Philippines directed their aggression at their new colonizer, the United States. The paper shows that the United States, intent on growing as both a new world power and imperialistic force, decided that they would retain the Philippines as a colony. The Philippines, intent on finally discovering their freedom, had different ideas, and set their focus on getting the United States, their forces and influence out of the Philippines. The paper explains that this competing set of goals and ideals led to the bloody conflict that would become known rhetorically as the "Philippine Insurrection".
Paper Outline:
Introduction
The Conflict
Interpretation of War
American Freedom and Democracy
Bibliography
From the Paper "The battle of Tirad Pass, just months later, was further confirmation that in a traditional war, the United States superior technology and might was too much for Filipino forces. With American forces advancing on President Aguinaldo, twenty-four year old general Gregorio del Pilar led a specially trained sixty-man force to repel over five hundred American troops and propel his President to safety. The young general, fighting in territory that his men had constructed (with tunnels, trenches and barricades), volleyed fire at American forces inflicting numerous casualties. With such a tight and shallow entrance through Filipino forces, the American forces quickly abandoned a frontal assault. Instead, the American forces split, half flanking the opposition. The Americans, now surrounding del Pilar's forces, easily attacked and killed 52 of the 60 soldiers under Pilar's command."
| |
|
"Backfire" - A Book Report, 2006. A book report on "Backfire: A History of How American Culture Led Us into Vietnam and Made Us Fight the Way We Did", by Loren Baritz. 1,490 words (approx. 6.0 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 49.95 »
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract The writer states that there have been many books written about America's role in the Vietnam War, however, most of these books have a general focus on the war from either a political or military perspective. In contrast, "Backfire" examines the visceral dimensions of the war. The writer explains that Baritz relentlessly pursues the truth, no matter how painful or disturbing it may be. The writer shows how Baritz divides the book into three parts, somewhat like the acts of a theatrical production. In conclusion, the paper states that "Backfire" challenges readers with soul-searching issues and lessons to ponder with regard to the war and its aftermath.
From the Paper "Baritz cleverly divides this book into three parts, not unlike the parts of a theatrical production. In doing so, perhaps Baritz is attempting to portray the war as a "stage" of sorts on which several "acts" are presented as integral pieces of a whole, to help readers to understand the complex tapestry that was intricately woven into the fabric of the Vietnam War.
"In Part I, Tinder, he takes readers on a surreal exploration of the deepest depths of Americana and tells us in no uncertain terms, that we never understood the Vietnamese - and why we never understood them, and how this was one of the essential elements of the war that ultimately contributed to fatal miscalculations and misconceptions that profoundly affected the Americans and the Vietnamese. (Backfire, p. 3)"
| |
|
Realism, Liberalism and Radicalism, 2005. This paper compares three political theories--realism, liberalism and radicalism--and their stand on international relations especially war. 1,345 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 45.95 »
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract This paper explains that realism, liberalism, and radicalism assert that the state should promote the best interests of a specific group above all else: For realists, the interests of the state are paramount; for liberals, individual and, for radicals, the interests of the majority should be promoted above both the interests of the state and the interests of individuals. The author points out that the differences dictate the way war is viewed: For realists, war is necessary when it is in the best interests of the state; for liberals, war is never in the best interests of the individual and, for radicals, international war is usually not in the best interests of the majority, but civil war in the form of violent revolution is very much in the majority's interests. The paper concludes that the best ways of engaging in or avoiding international conflict can be deduced from each of these general principles.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Realism
Liberalism
Radicalism
Conclusion
From the Paper "According to the realist view, war is caused when two or more nation-states compete for the same resources. These resources may be of any sort. If all of the nations involved are pursuing their own interests, a conflict-possibly a violent conflict-will inevitably result. When this occurs, it is the state's obligation to fight the war in whatever manner is in the state's best interests. This could involve devoting all of the state's resources to the war, or saving some resources on reserve if a drawn-out war is expected. When it is no longer in the state's best interests to fight the war, it must surrender or use another method for the cessation of hostility."
| |
|
The Korean War, 2005. This paper discusses "Heartbreak Ridge" and other areas of wasteful conflict in the Korean War. 3,030 words (approx. 12.1 pages), 2 sources, MLA, $ 89.95 »
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract This paper relates that the battle of control of "Heartbreak Ridge", like most battles glorified by the media of the time, is filled with nothing but half truths and downright lies; in reality, it was nothing more than a pawn for the negotiators at the peace tables. The author uses the newly released, under the Freedom of Information Act, "After-action Reports" (DF-214s) by the Department of Defense to graphic report about this "Police Action", which began in 1950, with the cease fire agreement signed and implemented in July, 1953, although a a state of war still exists on the peninsula of Korea. The casualties were heavy and soon the war on the home-front became quite unpopular and a political football; the main thrust of the 1952 election campaign between Truman and Eisenhower was this single issue.
From the Paper "This created a salient in the lines which the Chinese quickly capitalized on. They drove Southeastward and cut off the 1st Marine Division and a contingent of other United Nations forces totaling nearly 40,000 from the remainder of the troops. Their only route of escape would be a forced march to the Sea to the port of Tanchon where they could be picked up by Naval forces and be returned to Pusan. This too is where the 2nd Division received its now infamous nickname. Previously and proudly the members of this proud Division proclaimed they were "Second to None." GI's being what they were at this time once they realized what had happened quickly tacked onto the proud motto the words "And First to Run" a motto that has forever stuck with this Division however unfairly attached it is."
| |
|
"The Rape of Nanking", 2006. A book report on this text by Iris Chang on the Japanese invasion of Chinese Nanking. 1,572 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 51.95 »
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract This paper presents a book report on Iris Chang's "The Rape of Nanking" which relates the grisly and macabre Japanese invasion on the ancient Chinese capital in December, 1937 and January, 1938. The paper examines how Chang brings home the senseless and cruel way in which the invasion was carried out.
From the Paper "By the spring of 1938, Nanking shops were reopened, electricity, water and telephone service were back on and there was even a brand new Japanese-run bus service. So on the surface, at least, Nanking was big and bustling again. But it was a thin veneer, indeed. Underneath it all, taxes were levied at extortionate rates to finance the new bureaucracy of Japanese officials. And opium, once smoked quietly in back rooms by a relative handful of local aristocrats and wealthy merchants, now became a street drug in which one could brazenly light up in public or patronize opium dens without fear of reprisal. The Japanese openly encouraged the addiction by frequently offering opium in place of cash for Chinese laborers."
| |
|
Economy of Chile, 2006. A study in the economic growth of Chile. 1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 39.95 »
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract This paper studies the economy of Chile, concentrating on the reasons for its economic growth over the past fourteen years. The author asserts that the growth has been led by a boom in exports, concentrated primarily in products and processed natural resources, namely copper, fresh fruit, and forestry and fisheries. The paper then details how the export boom has been sparked by soaring investment, both foreign and domestic. The author also explains how both Chile's mix of products and markets for exports are becoming increasingly diversified.
From the Paper "Open trade policies and a sensitivity to market needs have developed commodity and value-added exports with trading partners in the United States, Europe, and Asia over the past year. Chile steadfastly remains committed to free trade, lower barriers and open investment rules. The Chilean economy is clearly working well in a world economic system which no longer functions as it did. Yet, growth in Chile is based on the principle that one nation does not grow at the expense of another."
| |
|
Lebanon: Whither its' Independence?, 2006. An overview of Lebanon's history since its independence. 1,492 words (approx. 6.0 pages), 10 sources, APA, $ 49.95 »
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract This paper discusses the political strife, civil wars and social and economic chaos that have been a part of Lebanon's history almost since the country achieved its independence in 1941. The paper also looks at past leaders of Lebanon who were assassinated, tensions between Lebanon and its neighbors, Syria and Israel, and the persistent problem created by radical Palestinians and Hezbollah members who reside with Lebanon.
From the Paper "In 1975, an even worse civil war broke out, and it is estimated (Brunner 808) that some 40,000 Lebanese of all religious persuasions, were killed. Again, there was an uneasy truce, with a lot of political shuffling among the politicians who wanted to, or claimed, they had the power to rule. "Civil war erupted again in 1983. From 1987 to 1990, fighting was heavy and thousands died. The government could not operate normally or sponsor elections for parliament, which was last elected in 1972. Amin Gamayel became president after Bashir Gamayel was assassinated in 1982. He served until 1988, when General Michel Aoun took control of the government. Aoun, a Maronite, ordered parliament dissolved in 1989. However, parliament did not recognize his authority and elected Rene Moawad president. He was assassinated a few days later by Aoun loyalists. Elias Hrawi was then elected president of Lebanon. Aoun was dismissed, but he continued to battle rival Christian forces" (CultureGram 2006 2). Worse yet, Beirut, the capital was bitterly dfivided, and a "Green Line"was drawn up separating the city into East and West sides, who did not want to interact with one another."
| |
|
NATO, 2006. An expansive discussion on NATO today. 2,968 words (approx. 11.9 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 87.95 »
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract This paper discusses the actions and tactics of NATO in Kosovo. It continues to discuss the organization's history, its politics, perspective, and perception. The paper further expands on the status quo of NATO and whether it needs expansion or revamping. In conclusion it explores the organization's potential in the next century.
From the Paper "It would appear that the "scholar General" is doing military things precisely backwards. According to one high ranking Pentagon source, Clark is in "total panic mode," trying to amass the air and ground forces he's finally realized he needs to win this initiative. Mass is a principle of war, and Clark has violated not only this one, but other eight vital principles as well. Any seasoned soldier can tell you that if you don't follow the principles of war, you lose. Wellington triumphed over Napoleon at Waterloo in 1815, because the latter commander elected to piece meal his forces. Similar gradualism was one of the reasons for defeat in Vietnam, and now Clark is doing exactly the same thing in Kosovo, with his air power."
| |
|
Malta, 2006. An study in the culture and economy of Malta. 2,350 words (approx. 9.4 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 72.95 »
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract This paper explores the people of Malta and their economy. Specifically, the author examines the effect of the world economy on Malta domestically over the past three years, and possible solutions for the Maltese to improve their situation.
From the Paper "A constitution that became effective on November 1, 1961 gave Malta, for the first time in recorded history, an internal self-government. In the campaign the came before the rest election under the new constitution, the Labour Party called for independence outside of the Commonwealth; the Nationalists, the other major political party in Malta, advocated independence within the commonwealth. This party won the election and George Borg Oliver became the first Prime Minister of Malta. Malta became independent on September 21, 1964 and a member of the United Nations on December 1 of that same year. Currently, the country is applying for membership to the EU, although there is strong internal resistance to joining the EU."
| |
|
The F-22 Raptor - An Investment in America's Future, 2006. An examination of the pros and cons of continued development and deployment of the F-22 Raptor fighter jet. 4,454 words (approx. 17.8 pages), 16 sources, MLA, $ 116.95 »
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract The writer explains the history of development of the F-22 Raptor fighter jet. The plane is compared to the existing F-15. The paper reviews the history of spending and the estimates for the cost of project completion. It recaps current arguments for and against the additional spending. The writer concludes that the additional money should be spent to complete and deploy the plane as a strong new addition to the United States' Air Force.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Brief Background of the F-22 Raptor
Current Government Spending
Pros and Cons
Conclusion
Bibliography
From the Paper "Those in favor of the continued spending on the F-22 argue that without the plane, our tactical air systems will soon be outstripped by technology being developed by potentially hostile countries. Air dominance, they say, has been an instrumental factor in every modern military victory. Without upgrading our current stock of planes, we risk losing our current air dominance.
"Yet others believe that the money is being poorly spent. The Raptor, they argue, has been troubled by design flaws and cost problems. Its development is far behind schedule. Our country's current aircraft commitments equal a meager 10 percent of the nearly 3600 planes in our existing force. The existing planes are the finest and most effective fighter planes in the world. Hence, given the current political environment, the overall spending on F-22 development is unwarranted."
| |
|
An American Free Trade Area: NAFTA, 2006. An analysis of whether the NAFTA agreement has lived up to its expectations. 1,583 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 9 sources, MLA, $ 51.95 »
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract The writer discusses whether the NAFTA agreement has boosted investment and trade as substantially as was promised by the negotiators of the agreement. The paper shows that there are positive results from NAFTA, however, workers, communities and the environment in all three countries (Canada, Mexico and the United States) have also suffered from the agreement's flaws. In summation, the results of the agreement are more negative than positive. But, despite its shortcomings, there is continued hope that the three trading partners can come to a firm, better understanding that recognizes shortcomings and works to eliminate them.
From the Paper "There are some positive results, however. "The North American Free Trade Agreement has realized its goal of increasing trade between the United States, Mexico and Canada, even though some business sectors have lost ground, U.S. Rep. E. Clay Shaw said Monday. NAFTA, implemented in 1994, lowered trade barriers among the three countries. From 1993 to 2001, trade among the NAFTA nations climbed 109 percent to $622 billion from $297 billion, according to the U.S. Commerce Department. But Shaw acknowledged that some Florida farmers, especially tomato growers, have been damaged by cheaper imports from Mexico. U.S. jobs also have been lost in the textile and apparel industries" (Salisbury 7B). It is the serious inequality of Mexico's income distribution remains a major problem, fundamentally explained by deep educational and cultural factors rather than by specific trade regimes. But if anything, one could argue that trade protection boosts profit margins, reduces the scale of operations of firms, and maintains high unemployment and underemployment rates, thus keeping wages low. Mexico was a heavily protected economy for over six decades and has only been liberalizing its trade for the last 15 years. And NAFTA has only reached its tenth anniversary. There are many steps needed to improve income distribution. Depending on temporary fixes isn't the answer."
| |
|
The Assassination of Slobodan Milosevic, 2006. A paper arguing that world leaders should have had Slobodan Milosevic assassinated before he was able to murder so many countless individuals. 3,891 words (approx. 15.6 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 106.95 »
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract This paper argues that if Slobodan Milosevic had been eliminated at the start of the Bosnian crisis, the tremendous amount of bloodshed and loss of life that took place under Milosevic's rule could have been prevented. The paper argues that the decision by major military leaders to remove Milosevic by military means rather than by ordering his assassination resulted in an unnecessary loss of lives.
From the Paper "There is a saying that warns that those who don't remember the past are condemned to repeat it. Despite the truism inherent in these powerful words, history is repeating. The horrific genocide which resulted in the deaths of millions of Jews under the murderous and maniacal Adolph Hitler during World War II is being repeated. This time, instead of Hitler, the maniacal dictator is Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic. The catchword these days isn't "genocide," but rather "ethnic cleansing," a seemingly innocuous term that belies the mass destruction of the lives of countless ethnic Albanians in and around the Yugoslavian province of Kosovo."
| |
|
?Different Games, Different Rules?, 2005. An overview of this book by Haru Yamada which explores the relationship between the Japanese and the Americans. 868 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 0 sources, $ 30.95 »
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract In his book "Different Games, Different Rules: Why Americans and Japanese Misunderstand Each Other", Haru Yamada attempts to explain the cultural disconnection that commonly occurs between people from the two very different cultures of the United States and Japan. The paper shows that, for Yamada, the explanation lies in linguistic differences. The paper examines the key thesis of the book that the main difference between the two cultures is found in the implicit and explicit delivery of messages.
From the Paper "The language of both cultures functions to display and reinforce the values that the individual is brought up with. When people from each of these cultures attempts to communicate, the differences in values is what leads to misunderstandings. Words, phrases, and expressions in one language may have the same literal meaning in the other language, but because the connotations are completely different, they do not actually mean the same thing."
|
|
|