Abstract
In William Shakespeare?s "The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark", Hamlet?s mother, Gertrude, is subject to interpretations of womanhood and responsibility for the death of her husband and her marriage to his brother. The paper shows that inconsistencies in her roles of wife and mother make Gertrude?s position in Hamlet?s life a point of confusion. Her faults are an outlet for Hamlet?s rage and shame towards his father?s situation as cuckold and corpse.

From the Paper
"The subjectivity given to Gertrude's roles is a dividing point between the king and Hamlet in their plans for revenge. Gertrude is inconsistent in her affection, her drive and her degree of involvement in the death and cuckolding of the king uncertain. Nonetheless it is what others believe that shape their actions toward her. She is object to Hamlet's rage and his desires, the confusion of blame and identity. The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark examines the role of the female in a masculine world overturned by its own establishments of marriage and inheritance as well as the function of the subversive feminine."

Tags:Ophelia, Claudius, Rosencratz, Laertes

Abstract
This paper discusses how the differences in the two characters can be seen in their roles as avengers in the play, how they deal with this role, their personal characteristics, their ability to react spontaneously and their relationships with Ophelia.

From the Paper
"One of the major similarities between Laertes and Hamlet is in their role as avengers in the play. Laertes takes revenge against his father Polonius' death, where he immediately assumes Claudius is responsible and returns from France immediately to revenge the death. Hamlet also has a role as an avenger, where his father's ghost speaks to him, telling him Claudius is responsible for his death and asking him to "revenge his foul and most unnatural murder" (I,iv).
The major difference between Laertes and Hamlet is how they deal with their role as avengers. Laertes on learning of his father's death reacts immediately, by speaking of revenge, "I dare damnation: to this point I stand, that both worlds I give to negligence, let come what comes; only I'll be revenged most thoroughly for my father" (IV,v). In contrast, Hamlet, on learning of his father's murder is asked by the ghost of his father to revenge the death. He hesitates and procrastinates, wishing he had not been asked to complete such a task, "the time is out of joint. O cursed spite, that ever I was born to set it right!" (I,iv). It is ultimately this indecision and hesitation of Hamlet's that leads to the tragedy of the play."

Tags:second, difference, characters, responses, avengers, will, vowing, revenge, ghost, murder, action

Abstract
This paper reviews William Shakespeare's "Hamlet" and, in particular, examines how it is a play about an intellectual prince that ultimately demonstrates the limited value of the intellect and rationalization when there is a need to take a public action. It looks at how, by searching for the right role, Hamlet must play an avenger in order to verify the importance of intelligence in ruling a country. It discusses how it possible to contend that Hamlet's intelligence is what makes him unable to act as an effective protagonist, ruler, or son, and how, despite the sympathy his intelligence creates in the mind of a viewer, ultimately, Hamlet's reliance upon reflection reveals him as an over-educated prince, rather than a truly inspired leader.

From the Paper
"This can be seen in two of Hamlet's most famous speeches. "O, what a Rouge and Peasant Slave am I," he muses, after the departure of the Player-King, during the first half of the play. At this juncture of the play, Hamlet is "buying time" by pretending to be insane, and a troop of players has visited the Danish kingdom. After greeting the players and viewing a selection of their performance, Hamlet lambastes himself that he is not able to revenge his dead father. The actor pretending at grief is a more active participant in the drama, at that moment, than Hamlet, the "real person" next to him. However, after experiencing this revelation, Hamlet decides, not to take revenge but to engage in more intellectual activity in other words, to become involved in the setting and production of a play about a murder."

Tags:denmark, prince, king, murder, leader

Abstract
This is an analysis of the play "Hamlet" by William Shakespeare. Special attention is paid to the scene where the real murderer of the king is divulged. The author explains how this is a pivotal scene as it solves the mystery that has been building up until that point.

From the paper:

"Act III, Scene II is important for a number of reasons. Essentially, it is the start of the second half of the play. It could be argued that the first half of the play is when Hamlet sets up his strategy to avenge his father?s death. Naturally, the second half would then be Hamlet taking the vengeance he so baldy wants. Unfortunately for nearly all parties involved, it does not happen how he planned. In Act III Scene II, Claudius? guilt as well as his moral values had been exposed for all to see. Hamlet?s underhanded slyness was also revealed by his non-confrontational means of proving the king?s role in the murder of his father. Lastly, the reader also discovers the queen?s apparent innocence."

Tags:shakespeare, hamlet, king, death, murder, mother, father, denmark, claudius, gertrude, mystery

Abstract
In this paper, the writer discusses that the misogyny of Hamlet's behaviors in this play occur due to his inability to find strong female role models, but also because of his ghostly father's patriarchal influence. The writer points out that in this capacity, Hamlet finds himself abandoned by the female figures he adored previous to his father's death, but he extends this misogynist hatred to embody all of womankind. The writer discusses that by following the guidelines set by the ghost at the beginning of the play, hamlet follows a generalized misogyny towards the women in the play.

Tags:hamlet, play, drama

Abstract
This paper discusses how the role of fate in determining an individual's destiny is a question that has preoccupied humanity for millennia. The paper goes on to discuss two of the most prominent tragedies in global literature, Sophocles' 'King Oedipus' and Shakespeare's 'Hamlet'. From these two examples, we can see how two authors - separated by centuries and vast cultural differences - approached this question in similar, yet distinct, ways. This essay argues the thesis that while the protagonists of each play, Oedipus and Hamlet, are victims of fate, the latter character is distinguished from his Greek counterpart by his complex reflections upon his condition and his efforts to resist his destiny.

Tags:hamlet, oedipus, literature

Abstract
This paper proposes that the women in "Hamlet" are not frail but rather are seen as frail due to the male conception of their self.

Tags:gertrude, ophelia's, role

Abstract
A paper on the perception of the reality of the ghost and the significance of its role in the play "Hamlet".

Tags:the, ghost, role

Abstract
This essay discusses the role and the character of the ghost in William Shakespeare's play "Hamlet".

Tags:hamlet