Abstract The basic premise in Machiavelli's "The Qualities of a Prince" states that as long as a prince is not hated, his subjects will be loyal and his reign successful. Therefore, the abuses outlined in "The Declaration of Independence" coincide with the attributes listed by Machiavelli of an unsuccessful prince. One can tell by the tone in which "The Declaration of Independence" is written that KingGeorgeIII is hated by the colonists. On more than one occasion, Thomas Jefferson refers to the King as a tyrant. This paper discusses how KingGeorgeIII's actions support Machiavelli's claim that a prince is most hated when he, among other things, disrespects the land and women of his subjects, deprives men of their honor, and shows excessive cruelty.
From the Paper "Machiavelli states, ?so long as you do not deprive them of "their honor, the majority of men live happily" (Machiavelli, "The Qualities of a Prince", 48). Comparatively, Thomas Jefferson also lists grievances that pertain to men being deprived of their honor "By [constraining] our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their County, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands" (Thomas Jefferson, "The Declaration of Independence", 80). King George III stripped men taken captive of all honor and dignity by making them choose to either murder their family or take their own life. King George III also deprived the colonists "the benefits of Trial by Jury" (80). The fact that King George III repeatedly "called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures" (79) is quite demeaning in a society governed by Representation."
Abstract This paper examines the effectiveness of GeorgeIII's leadership in England during the 18th century. The author discusses the king's loss of the American colonies, England's financial difficulties and his policies during the American Revolution and the Seven Years War. The paper also discusses KingGeorge's bouts of insanity.
From the Paper "King George III may be one of the most maligned and most understood leaders in the history of England. He is most infamous for losing the American colonies, waging wars against the French and Spanish, and ultimately going insane. However, many of the mistakes King George III allegedly made may just be products of unfortunate circumstances of the time. King George III may just have been King of England at the wrong time in world history. King George III was the King of England when they had no choice but to be involved in certain controversies that put their country in debt. This debt forced the king to pass tax laws onto the colonists of the America, which led to the Revolutionary War."
Tags: great, britain, reign, england, american, colonies, stamp, act, taxes, military, seven, years, war, mental, insanity, townsend, east, india, company, debt, paris, treaty
Abstract This history paper takes a detailed look at a document from 18th century England. The writer chose to examine a speech/declaration by KingGeorge the Third in which he proclaimed the colonies to be in open rebellion. The language used and the thoughts shared are indicative of the time he lived in.
From the Paper "
Because America has grown to such a large and powerful status we often forget that when we started we were nothing more than a handful of colonies with a few residents rebelling against the mother nation, Britain. Over the years this country has become so widely accepted as the most powerful nation on earth it is hard to imagine that at one time we were small and working to gain our foothold in the society of mankind. The 18th century was filled with turmoil as America struggled to be recognized as its own entity. Without fax machines and telephones there was no choice but to communicate with letters and other documents. It was in 1775 that King George the Third Proclaimed through documents that the colonies were indeed rebelling against England and he wanted England to do whatever it took to stop it."
Abstract This paper examines whether the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights protects its citizens from the tyranny. The paper describes the oppression the colonist experienced from the British KingGeorgeIII, which is described in the Declaration of Independence. It questions if the young American democracy replaced this British monarchy with the tyranny of local government greed.
From the Paper "When the Thirteen Colonies declared their independence in 1776 they broke away from one of the most powerful nations in the world at the time, with the signing and ratification of the Bill of Right and the Constitution they brought forward a series of legal documents that were envisioned to provide for any instance and grievance they had felt under Great Britain. Moreover, the idea of removing themselves from any contact with Great Britain was to secure a free future from the tyranny of the Crown. "
Abstract The author compares and contrasts the rule of the two kings in Shakespeare plays, "Winter's Tale" and "The Tragedy of King Richard III." The theme running through both plays is that power corrupts, and this is the theme that runs through both of these plays. King Richard is portrayed as an absolute ruler destroyed by his thirst for absolute power. King Leontes, is a king more paranoid than perhaps even Lear who refuses to believe even the gods who say that his wife and friend are not involved in an adulterous relationship. He is also an absolute ruler who believes that he knows even better, than the gods themselves.
From the Paper "Shakespeare's Richard is a thoroughly rotten villain. This is made clear to us in Act One, scene 1. Angry over the limits of his physical deformity, and, perhaps, the low social status accorded him as the very sparest of spare heirs, Richard vows to overcome his limitations. In line 30 of this speech, Richard says, "I am determined to prove a villain." Most would agree that these are not the words of a person who has the best interests of his fellow human beings at heart. If one needs further proof, Richard goes on to describe a plot that pits his two brothers, Clarence and Edward, against each other - hopefully resulting in both brothers' deaths."
Tags: absolute, iii, power, richard, shakespeare, tale, winter
Abstract This paper examines the play, "Richard III", focusing on the main character, King Richard III of England. It discusses whether he should be considered a villain and asks, "Did he repent in time?" It explains that, in the play, Edward IV is on the throne, but his brother Richard plans to usurp Edward and be crowned king. To accomplish this goal, he must manipulate and murder, but in the midst of all the chaos he creates, there are glimmers of a better man.
From the Paper "He has decided that since he is no good at being happy, he will become an outstanding villain. He will soon show just how power-hungry he is. His reasons for acting as he does seem thin, and at this point it is hard to imagine how any good traits could be spotted in such a man. Richard is intelligent and manipulative, and has the ability to lie through his teeth and bee believed. He convinces a just-widowed noble woman, Lady Anne, that she should marry him, even though she knows he murdered her husband. He has his trusting and na ve older brother executed. King Edward is already in poor health, and Richard uses Clarence s death to hasten Edward s death."
Abstract This paper reviews one of Edgar Allan Poe's least popular short stories, "King Pest". This paper also takes a look at the life and history of Poe, and the various factors that influenced his opinions and outlook as expressed in "King Pest".
From the Paper "The title character directly proclaims himself a "monarch" who rules over an "undivided empire under the title of 'King Pest the First.'" Here it would seem that Poe is clearly taking stabs at the British Monarchy, even more so because the story is set in England, not in the author's native country the United States. The phrase "undivided empire" is a sarcastic jab at the United Kingdom, especially as it had recently lost the War of American Independence at the time Poe was writing.
King Pest speaks glowingly about the undertaker's apartment as the "Dais-Chamber of our Palace," and to his cohorts as "the councils of our kingdom." His "Serene Consort" is called Queen Pest, and the other members of the grotesque council are humorously named "His Grace the Arch Duke Pest-Iferous," "His Grace the Duke Pest-Ilential," "His Grace the Duke Tem-Pest," "Her Serene Highness the Arch Duchess Ana-Pest." Finally, King Pest refers to the council's "sacred and lofty purposes." Juxtaposing monarchic titles and regalia with gory imagery of rotting corpses and paralyzed mummies half alive in coffins, Poe is unquestionably snickering at the British monarchy. The supposedly "sacred and lofty purpose" of drinking every sip of wine, ale, and spirit in the undertaker's apartment proves to be a powerful critique of arrogant British political maneuvers during colonization and the nation's egomaniacal self-aggrandizement."
Tags: analytical, literary, criticism, King, Edward, III, England, Bubonic, plague
Abstract The seeds of eventual American independence were sown long before the event actually took place. This paper shows that a series of events and acts of the British themselves, including their military generals, the King and the British Parliament ensured their own defeat rather than the Americans having had to win it. This essay examines the political, social, and economic reasons behind Britain's defeat.
From the Paper "Economics was not the only reason behind the promulgation of the Stamp Act. The British Parliament also wanted to assert its sovereignty over its American colonies by the Act. It was a politically unwise step since the Americans felt that they were not represented in the British Parliament; hence it had no right to tax them under the philosophy of ?no taxation without representation.? The Parliament further exacerbated the situation when instead of compromising, introduced further punitive measures, including a wider range of custom duties in 1767."
Tags: Navigation, Act, Seven, Year, War, Stamp, King, George, III
This paper is an analysis of William Shakespeare's "Hamlet,", and goes into detail about Hamlet's elaborate plan to expose the king as the murderer of his father.
1,185 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 0 sources, 2002, $ 40.95
Abstract This is an analysis of the play "Hamlet" by William Shakespeare. Special attention is paid to the scene where the real murderer of the king is divulged. The author explains how this is a pivotal scene as it solves the mystery that has been building up until that point.
From the paper:
"Act III, Scene II is important for a number of reasons. Essentially, it is the start of the second half of the play. It could be argued that the first half of the play is when Hamlet sets up his strategy to avenge his father's death. Naturally, the second half would then be Hamlet taking the vengeance he so baldy wants. Unfortunately for nearly all parties involved, it does not happen how he planned. In Act III Scene II, Claudius? guilt as well as his moral values had been exposed for all to see. Hamlet's underhanded slyness was also revealed by his non-confrontational means of proving the king's role in the murder of his father. Lastly, the reader also discovers the queen's apparent innocence."
Abstract This paper takes a look at William Shakespeare's play 'Richard III' and two movie versions based on this play. According to the paper, 'Richard III' is both a tragedy and a historical account of the short career of the last medieval English king. The paper discusses how Shakespeare's 'Richard III' depicts Richard and his "reign of terror" both unflatteringly and beyond historical accuracy.
From the Paper " In the movie version, "Looking for Richard," Al Pacino creates, directs and stars as Richard III's obsession for power, lust and betrayal through the streets of New York to the birthplace of Shakespeare to an emotionally charged production of Richard III (Richard III Society 1996) It is a presentation of Shakespeare with an untraditional format more accessible to the modern audience and with which this modern audience can relate better. The cast includes Estelle Parsons as Queen Margaret, Alec Baldwin as Clarence, Kevin Spacey as Buckingham, Winona Ryder as Lady Anne and Aidan Quinn as Richmond. Al Pacino also puts in the enthusiasm and help of Sir John Gielgud, Sir Derek Jacobi, Kenneth Branagh, Vanessa Redgrave, James Earl Jones and Kevin Kline in an attempt at making everyone enjoy Shakespeare and his tales truly timeless in exploring human nature. This version is different from the first two interpretations in that Al Pacino and his actors needed to break down the barriers, which render Shakespeare's history complicated and intimidating. Al Pacino allows his viewer to go behind the scenes and witness the actual process of acting. The heavier aspects of the play are made mild by informal shots of actors dealing with their roles in either a comic or heated forum. Al Pacino's methods of analysis are insightful, amusing and engrossing. He transcends the barrier between actors and their audience as he stands in London's legendary Globe Theater and the halls of New York City's Cloisters Museum (Richard III Society)."
Tags:king, england, Edward, lady, anne, society, civil, war, power, lust
Abstract This paper concentrates on exploring why the Duke of Buckingham helped Richard III as extensively as he did to lie, cheat, steal, and murder his way to being king. It also explores why Buckingham left Richard III at a certain point after he was asked to arrange for the murder of Edward. The author argues that Buckingham left Richard not because of his conscience regarding the murder of the boy, but out of a fear that by helping the tyrant to gain his power, he would not get anything in return but his own death.
From the Paper "Shakespeare's "Richard III" was a play in the series of historical texts that also includes ?Henry IV.? With these texts, the author left the convention of setting his plays is exotic places like Athens and Italy, and concentrated on the theme of English history. Richard III was a monarch who is shown in Shakespeare's "Richard III" to have lost touch with reality more than a little bit in his quest for power, which has corrupted him deeply. At the end of the play there is little that can be done to redeem Richard III, such is his rejection of morality and his overriding ambition. These qualities caused Richard III to murder many of his own family members, and throughout the play he treats everyone as either someone to use or a potential threat. One of the people whom Richard III used was the Duke of Buckingham, who became his right-hand man during his quest for the throne."
Abstract This paper relates that Shakespeare's primary intent in "Othello" was to develop the villainous character of Iago, whose motives are represented as being highly complex and ambiguous, but villainous in the extreme. The author points out that Richard is shown to be a villain of the highest caliber, whose power-mad lust for the crown compels him to confirm his claim that, "I am determined to prove a villain". The paper concludes that Shakespeare portrays Iago and Richard in much the same light, as sociopaths who view others as merely objects representing obstacles in their path to fame and glory, which makes them villains by any definition.
From the Paper "However, much like Richard, Iago's ambition is the source of his villainy rather than his resentment at being overlooked for promotion, sexual jealousy or the racial prejudice he had consistently faced; rather: ?A man motivated by simple jealously and hatred would have no such need. He is not inspired by pure evil and desire to torment Othello either. In reality, Iago's main motivation, born out of an inferiority complex, is a desire to heighten his sense of superiority and power.? According to Agrawal, Samuel Coleridge's phrase, ?. . . motive hunting of motiveless malignity,? may best describe Iago's strange actions and behavior. "Motive hunting" exactly describes Iago's soliloquies. He continuously ponders over and tries to understand his emotions. It is clear that he wants to torment and destroy Othello. However, he is not sure of the motivations underlying that desire.? "
Abstract Research paper focusing on the Syrian leader Antiochus III who was the Seleucid king of the Hellenistic Syrian Empire from 223 to 187 BC. This paper examines his conflict with Rome, which brought his downfall and the demise of the Hellenistic Syrian empire.
From the Paper "Antiochus III was the son of Seleucus II and younger brother of Seleucus III, whom he succeeded. He was known as a soldier who possessed great ability. ("Antiochus III: Jerusalem Through Coins") When Antiochus III took the throne, the Seleucid Empire was in decline. Although Antiochus did not succeed in totally restoring the greatness of the Seleucid dynasty, he did much to revive its glory during his reign."
Tags: antiochus, empire, great, hellenistic, history, iii, roman, rome, syria, syrian, world
Abstract This paper studies the styles, techniques and works of these two very famous historical poets. It compares Herbert who is classified as a metaphysical poet and Taylor who is classified as a Puritan era poet. It studies Puritan life as Edward Taylor's direct writing influence. It studies the classification issue of these poets and concludes that Taylor should be classified as a metaphysical poet as well because of the properties of his poems. It analyzes several poems by these poets and details their style, meaning and the techniques used. It also examines their great belief and faith in God and how this affected their poetry.
Table of Contents:
I. Introduction
II. Metaphysical Properties of Works
III. Motivations for Writing
IV. Criticisms of Works
V. Writing Styles
VI. Methodology
VII. Biblical References and Themes
VIII. Metrical Forms
IX. Man's Unworthiness
X. Summary
From the Paper "The works of Edward Taylor not only provide us with a glimpse into Puritan life of the 1600?s, they also give us a direct insight into the very heart and soul of the man who penned them. His works relate the Puritan emphasis on one's own spiritual examination of the soul, and well as the high moral standards the Puritans lived by. Although his style varies somewhat in his major works, his unbending love of God remains constant. His imagery not only allows the reader to view his words through a Puritan's eyes, but to also get a feel for what it meant to devote one's self totally to God. Taylor's reasons for writing were grounded in his own personal desire to communicate with God, to express his heartfelt love of God, and to prepare himself for sharing the Lord's Supper with his congregation. Like Herbert, Taylor's poetry expressed deep piety and love for Christ. Likewise, both authors express the view of Salvation as being completely reliant on God's grace rather than human merit (Rowe). (175)"
