Abstract An exploration of the characteristics of the main protagonist of 'The Lost Honor of Katharina Blum', discussing whether these characteristics are realistic or idealized, and what impact they have on the force of Boell's critique of the press.
From the Paper "When asked "wird [Katharina] nicht tats"chlich eine positive Heldin??(Isn"t Katharina really a positive heroine") B?ll replied: ?Die Gefahr ist drin,? (There is a danger of that.) acknowledging the potential for the reader to perceive her as an ideal whilst remaining free to form his own opinion on the consequences of this idealisation. B?ll went on in the same discussion to outline the ways in which Katharina Blum falls short of his ideal, which will be discussed later, concluding that ?sie ist keine Heilige, und sie ist erst recht keine Heldin.? (She isn"t a saint, and she isn"t even a heroine.) However, he did not deny that others might perceive the aspects of her character which he subjectively views as negative, to be positive, even exemplary. It is difficult to pass judgement on Katharina because much of what is said in the novel about her is by definition untrue. The reader is given the opportunity to make comparisons between the reports in the ZEITUNG (NEWS), often quoted verbatim, what other characters say about her, and what she says about herself. However, doubt is cast over what she says in the police interview by the fact that she is clearly either lying or withholding information about some aspects of her involvement in the affair. Whether we are to believe the rest of information offered or not, clearly it cannot be accepted uncritically. Even if the facts about her childhood, for example, are accepted, they are no more than that ? bare facts that give little insight into the mind of Katharina herself. It may be that what her actions reveal is most illuminating of all."
Tags: ehre, german, honor, lost, post, verlorene, war, wirtschaftswunder
Abstract This paper reviews, compares and contrasts the headstrong women presented in Jane Austen's novel "Pride and Prejudice" and Shakespeare's play "Taming of the Shrew." The paper first discusses the different intentions of the two authors, explaining that "Pride and Prejudice" was a sort of comedy of manners, written by a maiden lady, while "The Taming of the Shrew" was intended for the bawdy audience of the Globe Theatre, willing to get a good laugh at the sight of a prospective suitor paddling his prospective bride. The paper looks at the characters of Elizabeth -- who was quite proper -- and Katharina, who was not.
From the Paper "Elizabeth Bennet would never say those words. She might smile and offer to honor and obey her wedding vows. She might DO what Kate SAYS, but it simply would not be in her character to be really that subservient. While Shakespeare literally changes his "shrew" into a doting wife, definitely the "weaker sex", Elizabeth will be sure to uphold her husband's profession and demeanor, and no doubt, keep his books. These two opinionated people will find a common, middle ground, and their wit and demeanor will surely bring them happiness and a large family (which Darcy will admire from afar) Kate, it seems to me, upon bearing children, will raucously demand a wet nurse at once. Her act of obedience is more of a temporary expedient, from my point of view."
Abstract The paper discusses the Elizabethan society of Shakespeare's time where the women were no more than possessions of the men, with no power or freedom of their own. The paper examines the roles of Katharina (Kate) and Petruchio in Shakespeare's "The Taming of the Shrew" and shows how the man waged wars and made a fortune, while the woman had to be the servant of her husband, her only duty being to obey him completely.
From the Paper "William Shakespeare's The Taming of the Shrew is probably the play which is most liable to feminist interpretations among the writer's works. The main heroine of the play, the 'shrew' is Katharina, a young, unmarried woman who is well known for her ill temper and her shrill tongue. Katharina is also the elder sister of Bianca, a much more gentle and temperate character who is wooed by no less than three men at the same time. The old Baptista Minola, the father of the two young women, refuses to consent to the marriage of his younger daughter before Katharina herself finds a husband."
Abstract This paper examines the role of women in Shakespeare's classic play; their reactions and coping abilities within the Elizabethan patriarchal society. Katharina is often looked upon as a threat to the system. She defies the expectations of society upon women and plays with masculine characteristics. In her defiance, she gains power. She discovers a power within her choices. To play along, or not to play along? Her realization of existing oppression is power in itself.
From the Paper "Elizabethans were attentive to the world's digression from the ideal order. Shakespearean comedy is farcical with a comic re evaluation of social norms. The ideal order consists of a hierarchical system in which everything and everyone has a fixed place. The family was to follow a corresponding order within the divine system. Tensions concerning Elizabethan faith in the order were heightened by the Puritan challenge to the established regime. The feisty and independent Katharina reflects the increasing threats to authority in society. Katharina inflates the attempt to re establish order within the familial system in Shakespeare?s, "The Taming of the Shrew". Katharina communicates the notion that freedom is not absolute as she plays with accepted social restraints."
Tags: constraints, elizabethan, oppression, patriarchy, women
Abstract Through his comedies, William Shakespeare was able to address many taboo subjects in the name of entertainment. His comedies provided him an avenue to express marginalized voices that were sometimes muffled in Renaissance society. This cannot be truer for the voice of women. This paper shows how, in his plays, "The Taming of the Shrew" and "A Midsummer Night's Dream", Shakespeare gives voice to strong women who refuse to become victims of society. Kate is what we would call a strong-willed child with a mind of her own, with no fear of expressing her opinions. Despite the mistreatment she endures in the play, she emerges a winner for many reasons. The paper shows how, similarly, Hippolyta and Hermia demonstrate independence uncommon to their female counterparts. These women illustrate that true love is its own reward in any age.
From the Paper "Both sisters are playing a game of sorts. Kate is a shrew and cannot be manhandled while Bianca pretends to be the image of feminine sweetness. Bianca is revealed to be the true manipulator because she does not follow the demands of her husband. In the end, we come to appreciate Kate for her genuine character as opposed to Bianca's fraud. Margaret Ranald believes that "Katharina's liberated spirit remains unbroken, but that she has learned the value of realpolitik not only in marriage, but also in the even wider world of sociopolitics" (Ranald 1994). However, when we observe the entire action of the play, we can only surmise that Shakespeare is supporting the role and voice of the independent woman of his age."
Abstract This paper discusses how Eastern and Western philosophies have differed in terms of medical treatment and knowledge for many centuries. It goes on to describe how the contents of "Healing East and West Ancient Wisdom and Modern Psychology", by Anees A, Sheikh and Katharina S. Sheikh, explores both the differences and similarities of the fundamental elements of each tradition's methods in the field of psychology, along with how they can be successfully integrated.
From the Paper "For centuries, Eastern and Western philosophies have differed in terms of medical treatment and knowledge. These differences have been misinterpreted time and time again; however, many of the same basic elements of counseling are found in both traditions. The authors of Healing East and West Ancient Wisdom and Modern Psychology, Anees A, Sheikh and Katharina S. Sheikh, aim to explore both the differences and similarities of the fundamental elements of each tradition's methods in the field of psychology, along with how they can be successfully integrated."
