This paper explores the early life of Gaius Julius Caesar and offers an extensive review of his victory over the Gauls.
Essay # 73511 |
1,350 words (
approx. 5.4 pages ) |
2 sources |
MLA | 2004
|
$ 27.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper covers the early life of Gaius Julius Caesar and gives an extensive account of his defeat of the Gauls. The paper also includes an outline of Caesar's life after the Gallic wars.
From the Paper
"Gaius Julius Caesar was born by Caesarian section, according to legend, to Aurelia and Gaius Julius Caesar, a praetor, on July BCE. His family had noble patrician roots but they were not rich or influential during the period of his birth. His aunt Julia on his father's side was the wife of Gaius Marius, the leader of the Popular faction who had saved the Roman Republic several years earlier by defeating two German tribes, the Teutones and the Cimbri."
Tags:Julius Caesar, Gauls
A comparison of the characters Okonkwo from Chinua Achebe's 'Things Fall Apart' and Shakespeare's Julius Caesar.
Comparison Essay # 126999 |
1,000 words (
approx. 4 pages ) |
9 sources |
MLA | 2008
|
$ 21.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts the characters Okonkwo from Chinua Achebe's 'Things Fall Apart' and Julius Caesar from Shakespeare's play, focusing on the problem of pride.
From the Paper
"The character Okonkwo in 'Things Fall Apart' by Chinua Achebe and the character Julius Caesar in Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar are both very much alike in some ways and different in others. Both characters are tragic figures who die a violent death, Okonkwo by his own hand and Julius Caesar by the hands of a group of conspirators in the Roman Senate that includes his closest friend Brutus. Both Okonkwo and Julius Caesar have a fatal flaw-a stubborn resistance to acknowledging the truth-that ..."
Tags:Okonkwo, Things Fall Apart, Chinua Achebe, Julius Caesar, Shakespeare, pride
A discussion on the main players in "Moby Dick" by Herman Melville and "Julius Caesar" by William Shakespeare.
Comparison Essay # 106701 |
874 words (
approx. 3.5 pages ) |
2 sources |
MLA | 2008
|
$ 18.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper compares the similarities of two literary characters. More specifically, the paper compares and contrasts the character of Ahab from Herman Melville's "Moby Dick" with the character of Julius Caesar from Shakespeare's famous story of the same name. The paper concludes that like "Moby Dick", "Julius Caesar" is a historical incident which Shakespeare puts meaning into in retrospect, imbuing the characters with traits which we admire or hate and placing around them others who seemingly act only in accordance with fate.
Outline:
Ways in which Ahab and Julius are similar
Ways in which Ahab and Julius Caesar are different
From the Paper
"Caesar is hard to like. Ahab is also hard to like, but he appears more sympathetic as he is so dogged in his quest of the white whale. Ahab is shown to be a brooding and dark character that we sometimes see in literature, ambiguously evil, yet we sympathize with his madness. He sacrifices everything, including his life and his crew to capture Moby Dick, whom he has sought for so long: "Now it was that there lurked a something in the old man's eyes, which it was hardly sufferable for feeble souls to see. As the unsetting polar star, which through the livelong, arctic, six months' night sustains its piercing, steady, central gaze; so Ahab's purpose now fixedly gleamed down upon the constant midnight of the gloomy crew." (Melville, Chapter 130).
"The book Moby Dick is about a quest and a challenge to the universe in which Ahab lives. He will fight it to the death because he believes he can conquer it. He does not know that no matter how big he may be, it is bigger than he, but he will die in the attempt. "He piled upon the whale's white hump the sum of all the general rage and hate felt by his whole race from Adam down; and then, as if his chest had been a mortar, he burst his hot heart's shell upon it." (Melville, Chapter 135). Like Moby Dick, Julius Caesar is a historical incident which Shakespeare puts meaning into in retrospect, imbuing the characters with traits which we admire or hate and placing around them others who seemingly act only in accordance with fate."
Tags:Moby Dick, Shakespeare, Ahab
An outline of the accomplishments of Julius Caesar during the height of his power and a description of the cause of his downfall.
Analytical Essay # 146168 |
1,094 words (
approx. 4.4 pages ) |
4 sources |
MLA | 2010
|
$ 22.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper is a detailed account of Julius Caesar during his ultimate reign. It touches on the many battles he participated in, and a description of how his downfall came about. The paper describes Julius Caesar as a great man who was an honorable leader and a courageous commander. The paper also provides a detailed list of Julius Caesar's accomplishments, to include his capture of Gaul, despite his forces being outnumbered; and, that he continued on to conquer Germany and make an example of the Roman superiority in the field of engineering.
From the Paper
"Gauis Julius Caesar, born July 12, 100 B.C, accomplished a number of things in his life. After leading troops in the Gallic and _ Wars, Caesar earned his place in history as a man of great honor. He brought about a major change to Rome, and ruled with authority until his assassination on March 15, 44 B.C., or the Ides of March."
Tags:feats, power, betterment
An analysis of why Augustus was able to found a stable and enduring
monarchy while Julius Caesar failed.
Comparison Essay # 100457 |
1,416 words (
approx. 5.7 pages ) |
2 sources |
MLA | 2007
|
$ 28.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper discusses how, although both Julius Caesar and Augustus improvised political strategies to support their respective dominance of the Roman world, Augustus was successful while Julius Caesar was not due to the respect that Augustus paid to the formalities and conventions of Roman political life. The paper looks at how Julius Caesar relied on the overt exercise of power and relegated the senate to a marginal position in the state and how, in comparison, Augustus employed power in covert ways and understood that he could retain absolute power as long as he paid "lip service" to republican values.
From the Paper
"The office of "dictator" in the Roman Republic was a position that granted its holder extraordinary powers. It was thus rarely granted by the state, and usually in times of emergency when a unified command was critical to the survival of Rome. However, given the echoes of absolute royal power in this office, Romans carefully limited the powers of the office to six months or the duration of the emergency; whichever was shorter (BGT 26-27). Julius Caesar, in his calculated political improvisation in a time of Civil War, relied heavily upon repeated grants of the dictatorship to give a veneer of legitimacy and legal authority to his supreme military and political power. In February 44, Caesar finally decided to assume the dictatorship for life as a matter of convenience (BGT 160)."
Tags:rome, senate, republican, dictatorship
This paper examines Julius Caesar's life and his demand for power.
Essay # 66638 |
1,465 words (
approx. 5.9 pages ) |
9 sources |
MLA | 2005
|
$ 29.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper explains that to have absolute control or power over another human being, or, in the case of Julius Caesar, an entire nation, is an awesome responsibility. If the person in authority is convinced that their way is the only way, it can only produce negative results. The author points out that Julius Caesar is known in Roman history as the first dictator who was declared Dictator for Life with no limit on how long he could remain a ruler and retain his ultimate power over the people. The paper relates that, prior to his assassination, Caesar faced steadily growing opposition from the senators of Rome, who believed that he would put an end to the Republic and that he was a threat to all Roman traditions. However, the assassination only led to the renewal of civil wars and ultimately the Roman Republic was finally destroyed.
From the Paper
"Caesar lived his live by the motto, that he himself said "I came, I saw, I conquered!". These words expressed his incredible strong will and compelling attitude. He was also known as being very courageous and quick-witted. More than anything else this motto declared his definite need to control and conquer all he came into contact with. Caesar had ambitious plans for changing Rome and proposed to make a digest of the whole Roman law to found libraries, to drain the Pontine Marshes, to enlarge the harbor at Ostia, to dig a can throughout Isthmus, and to launch a war against the Dacians in Europe and the Parthiians in the East."
Tags:assasination, destruction, absolute, roman, control
A paper which discusses the murder of Julius Caesar in Shakespeare's play "Julius Caesar".
Analytical Essay # 7768 |
1,095 words (
approx. 4.4 pages ) |
1 source |
2002
|
$ 22.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This essay studies William Shakespeare's play, "Julius Caesar". It approaches the antagonism of both Caesar and the conspirators and the motivations of the conspirators. The themes of political achievement and popular responsibility are also discussed.
From the Paper
"Caesar was popular on the streets. His popularity was his source of power. Manipulation is a vice of politicians; on the converse side, influence is a political virtue. These are characteristics of Caesar. Because of his popularity, he can do anything he wants, as the Plebes rule Rome indirectly. This sets the stage for the political statement of the play. As there is an order set, this pure democracy of Rome is one of a kind. The people cast no votes as a whole, but only the elite. However, the approval of the Plebes is the primary concern of all politicians in Rome. This power of the people, however, is flexible in an uneducated society, as is most of Rome. Those who ran the politicians could easily be persuaded by those they ran (i.e. the politicians), who offered supremacy to Caesar."
Tags:Rome, Brutus, Cassius, Republic
An examination of the motivation for the 'liberators' in their assassination of Julius Caesar.
Term Paper # 109134 |
1,842 words (
approx. 7.4 pages ) |
8 sources |
APA | 2008
$ 35.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper discusses whether Julius Caesar was assassinated out of fear, idealism or jealousy. It argues that fear, idealism and jealousy were all present among the 'liberators' when they assassinated Caesar. It specifically looks at the idealism of Brutus, the fear of Cicero and the jealousy of Cassius in their responsibility for causing the final downfall of Caesar.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Probable Causes Of Caesar's Assassination:
Historical Background/Political Situation
Idealism Of The 'Liberators' Or The Conspirators
The Opposing View And The Role Of Jealousy Or Fear
Fear Among Friends
Jealousy Amidst The Power Seekers
Understanding The Underlying Factors
Conclusion
From the Paper
"According to Taylor, though the struggle against Caesar was triggered by idealism, in course of time it became more influenced by 'personal interests' rather than any ideal of Free State. Storch suggests that 'relative depravity' possibly played a role in Caesar's assassination. He explains that those who were pardoned or favored by Caesar were not happy as they in many cases did not get as much as they wanted. Moreover even inside the inner circle of friends dissatisfaction remained because of advancing someone's career over others, like that of Anotony's. Though there were many eligible people in line to be chosen as consul, violating the tradition Caesar appointed Antony for the position, which enraged Labienus, one of the hopefuls for consulship and a member of Caesarian camp."
Tags:fear, jealousy, idealism, Rome
A review of the life and influence of Julius Caesar.
Essay # 66921 |
800 words (
approx. 3.2 pages ) |
9 sources |
MLA | 2006
|
$ 17.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper examines the rise to power of Julius Caesar. The paper begins with a discussion of Caesar's early leadership and his calculated moves toward military greatness. Next, the paper analyzes Caesar's role in crushing Pompey's army in Pharsalus. The paper concludes with the plot to assassin Caesar, as well as brief commentary on his historical legacy.
From the Paper
"Gaius Julius Caesar was born in Rome on July 12, 100 BC, as a member of the Julian clan. It seemed as though Julius was almost born a radical. At a young age, his uncle by marriage, Gaius Marius, leader of the Populares, had ruled seven times as consul, or chief magistrate. It was in this seventh term that he appointed young Caesar to the position of flamen dialis, a position of archaic priesthood, but with no power. Thus, he was classified as one who agreed with his uncle's extremist ideas, and even further influenced this opinion when he broke off his first engagement with Cossutia, and married Cornelia, the daughter of Marius's associate, Cinna, in 84 BC."
Tags:cornelia, marius, gaius, pompey, brute, dictator
A discussion of William Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar" and life in Elizabethan England.
Analytical Essay # 17033 |
1,855 words (
approx. 7.4 pages ) |
4 sources |
MLA | 2002
|
$ 35.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper reviews William Shakespeare's play "Julius Caesar" and examines how it was accepted and performed at the time in Elizabethan England. It provides a history of the Globe theater where many of Shakespeare's plays were performed beginning with "Julius Caesar" and examines life in the theater district of London at the time. It attempts to analyze why the play was so popular when it first came out and why a subject such as tyrannicide was presentable in a country governed by a monarch. It looks at how it contained all of the political and social intrigues necessary to make it a timeless classic and all the puerile blood and gore that was needed to entertain a group of theater-hopping commoners in what was considered London's seediest neighborhood.
From the Paper
"The play was written and performed in 1599 at the Globe theater in Southwark, London. Southwark is located on the south bank of the Thames river, and was traditionally considered the vice district. This section of London was home to 10% of its population, and more than its share of the city's beggars. In 1594 the Lord Mayor, Sir John Spencer, asserted that parts of Southwark were "very nurseries and breeding-places of the begging poor" who swarmed the streets of the City. He estimated the number of these beggars at 12,000, and requested a meeting of several local magistrates in an attempt to banish them from the City or prevent them from crossing the Bridge."
Tags:brutus, globe, southwark, theatre, tyrannicide, monarch