Abstract
This paper presents a detailed description of the impeachment of Samuel Chase. The writer provides an overview of what an impeachment is and how it is implemented. The writer takes the reader on an exploratory journey through the life of Samuel Chase and discusses the impeachment proceedings that he was subjected to. The writer ends the paper with the conclusion of the impeachment attempt.

From the Paper
"Mention the name Monica Lewinski and it brings immediate recognition. It is the name of the intern whom then president William Jefferson Clinton had an affair with. That affair and the disclosure of the affair led to a snowball of disaster for the president that ended in an impeachment. Mention the name Richard Nixon and it brings an immediate recognition of another former president who violated public trust. He was about to face impeachment proceedings when he resigned from the presidency. These are very famous cases but they are not the only cases of impeachment that have ever been heard in America. Many years ago, when the nation was still in its infancy there was another impeachment hearing. The impeachment proceedings of Samuel Chase occurred during the 18th century and provided a blueprint for future American proceedings."

Tags:court, america, president, trust, nation, hearing, eisangleia, senate, constitution, declaration, independence, politics

Abstract
This paper examines the impeachment process in the United States. It outlines the basis, conditions and process of impeachment. Then it examines various impeachments and threats to impeach including Presidents Johnson, Nixon and most recently, Clinton.

Abstract
Discusses Anddre Johnson as first American President to be impeached (he missed impeachment by a single vote). Johnson's political ideas. His importance in the aftermath of the Civil War. Conflicts between Congress and President Johnson. Cause of his impeachment as based in the political struggles between conservatives & radicals. Implications of Johnson's Presidency on the principle of the separation-of-powers.

From the Paper
"THE MOST MISUNDERSTOOD AMERICAN PRESIDENT: ANDREW JOHNSON

Most people, if they know anything at all about Andrew Johnson, know he was the first American President ever to be impeached, and that he missed it by only a single vote. In fact, the two books used for reference here, picture Johnson similarly, in lots of ways. First of all, it would have been nearly impossible for anyone to successfully follow the appeal of the martyred Lincoln. Yet, he was not at all like Lincoln- not in personality, in attitude, nor in his devotion to a strict interpretation of the Constitution. In fact, he seemed to be not so much for the slaves as he was against their masters. He had become an advocate of the small farmers against the privileges of the large planters. He also shared the racial attitudes of most white yeomen. Damn the Negroes, he exclaimed to a friend ..."

Abstract
Discusses the first impeachment trial of an American President. Issue of accountability. Presidential aggression and Congress. Political issues that led to Johnson's trial. Actions of the Republican majority. Conflict between the President and Edwin Stanton. Details of the impeachment trial of 1868. Public support for Johnson. His aquittal by one vote.

From the Paper
"THE IMPEACHMENT OF ANDREW JOHNSON

The recent attempts to impeach President Clinton re-focused historians and politicians on the first impeachment trial of a U.S. President, Andrew Johnson, in 1868.

The widely held view that the impeachment was a political abuse of constitutional power and an attempt to make the president subservient to Congress is greatly exaggerated. It was reluctantly undertaken by representatives who felt compelled to defend their institution against presidential aggression (Stathis, 29).

The key is accountability . Among American presidents, Andrew Johnson experienced one of the major tests of accountability. His political future as well as the fate of several members ..."

Abstract
The paper discusses the major factors in the Watergate scandal that brought about difficult obstacles for Congress to impart impeachment hearings, and explains that if Nixon had not resigned, they would have been legally valid for this type of action. The paper relates that facts in the evidence linking Nixon to payments for saboteurs and spies in the Democratic Party's epicenter would have fueled more intensive investigations that would have led to other operations being enacted by Nixon.

Tags:president, power, politics

Abstract
This paper takes a look at the history of President Andrew Johnson and his rise in the political arena. This paper also discusses how he reconstructed the former Confederate states and how his impeachment effected the history of the United States of America.

Contents:
Reconstruction as Conducted by President Andrew Johnson
Andrew Johnson: The Making of a Martyr to the Republic?
Juggernaut Toward a Restored Union

From the Paper
"It was also the era in which American understanding of the law changed, and that change was responsible, along with the actions of President Andrew Johnson, for helping the Union remain intact when continued strong forces for a separate North and South still held sway.
Spaulding makes an essential point for understanding Reconstruction, and one that is particularly apt concerning the impeachment of Andrew Johnson. Spaulding notes that "Although the modern legal profession has its roots in the same time period (legal formalism, education in law schools rather than apprenticeships, Socratic instruction, bar associations, large firm practice, and a distinct brand of constitutional conservatism all emerge in the 1870s), historians of the legal profession have largely ignored the relationship between professional organization and lawyers' experience of the Civil War and Reconstruction" (2005, p. 2001+)."

Tags:federalism, republican, democratic, Congress, legal, Civil, Rights, Act, slavery

Abstract
This paper presents a discussion on the hypothetical language the constitution should include in its body regarding the topic or presidential impeachment. Lying before a jury, threatening national security and moral conduct are all outlined.

Abstract
This paper discusses how Clinton's impeachment trial and Davis's recall share the dubious honor of being considered two of the most embarrassing moments in America's political history. It discusses the two incidents and how they reflect the worst side of American democracy.

From the Paper
"That Davis is being recalled by an overly zealous Californian democracy says a great deal about how the contemporary political process is, to a great extent, working on behalf of the people. Having given a less than acceptable performance since put into office, Davis is being forcibly asked to step down and allow another political contender to clean up the mess he made. While this alternative is not unusual in and of itself, the complete circus that has transpired since announcement of the recall is what has turned the event into a who's who and made California a laughingstock. Clinton and his morally questionable behavior, on the other hand, was solely responsible for reflecting poorly upon one of the world's super powers."

Tags:california, election, president

Abstract
This paper outlines the follies and negligence of the presidency of George W. Bush. It cites several mistakes that he has made while in office, but at the same time argues against his impeachment. The paper suggests that impeachment would only result in a further decline in the American people's ability to trust their leaders and it expounds on these points.

From the Paper
"Imagine a hypocrite. Imagine a coward sending thousands of people to their deaths to do his biddings that were established on false claims. Imagine a man who can blatantly lie to the masses but never admit he was wrong. Now imagine a country that would elect this person to their highest position of power. Twice. President George W. Bush has done several things wrong in office aside from claiming there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. He has also destroyed a budget surplus from the Clinton administration, altered the meaning of habeas corpus, and handled the most devastating natural disaster in recent years extremely poorly. Even though President Bush is guilty of all these atrocities on the American public, the House of Representatives should not bring forward articles of impeachment. Doing so would only result in a further decline in the American people's ability to trust their leaders."

Tags:conspiracy, democracy, democrat, republican

Abstract
The paper examines Benjamin Ginsberg and Martin Shefter's "Politics By Other Means," a well-documented analysis of contemporary American politics. The paper discusses how, as politicians were unable to win decisive victories in electoral battles, they had to develop new methods of fighting; law suits and media scandals. The paper looks at the impeachment procedure during the Clinton administration. The paper contends that the Democrats should not propose impeachment of the current President Bush due to the negative effects long term investigations have on administrations and on the general public.

From the Paper
"Due to these practices in politics, there is a considerable low voter turnout because politicians do not make a considerable effort in bringing out the vote. By making politics by other means, politicians lose voter's support and transform American politics in a very negative way. Politics of institutional combat "undermines the governing capacities of the nation's institutions, diminishing the ability of America's government to manage domestic and foreign affairs, and contributing to the erosion of the nation's international political and economic standing."(Ginsberg and Shefter, 1990)."

Tags:voter, turnout, lawsuits, media, scandals, investigations