Abstract
This paper explains that Helen Longino argues in her article "Pornography, Oppression and Freedom: A Closer Look" that pornography by its nature is harmful to women and should be controlled and eliminated. The author maintains that Longino bases this position on tenuous distinctions between pornography and erotica and on the liberal use of universal claims about the effect that pornography has on women and their place in society. The paper contends that, despite her superficially well-reasoned article, a closer examination of Longino's claims and analysis reveals problems that undermine her argument. The paper then asserts that pornography cannot be considered necessarily and categorically harmful to women. The paper concludes that the marginal harm that pornography might cause in isolated incidents is not great enough to justify banning pornography and restricting this form of sexual expression.

From the Paper
"Longino argues that these harms are cause enough to invoke laws and regulations that would limit freedom of expression and sexual expression. But are these harms entirely plausible? Is the potential for these harms to be realized justification enough to ban pornography. F.M. Christensen would say no, that efforts to ban pornography through limitations on freedoms--especially freedom of expression--is reprehensible and much more harmful to society than the potential ills of pornography. On this point, I agree with Christensen."

Tags:freedoms, erotica, degrading, explicit, dignity

Abstract
This paper provides an analytical review of Helen Longino's book, "Pornography, Oppression, and Freedom: A Closer Look." The paper asserts that Longino's position on pornography is problematic at best. In "Pornography, Oppression, and Freedom: A Closer Look," she argues that pornography by its nature is harmful to women and should be controlled and eliminated. She bases this position on tenuous distinctions between pornography and erotica, and through the liberal use of universal claims about the effect that pornography has on women and their place in society. Despite her superficially well-reasoned article, a closer examination of Longino's claims and analysis reveals problems that undermine her argument. The paper concludes that pornography cannot be considered necessarily and categorically harmful to women.

From the Paper
"Helen Longino's position on pornography is problematic at best. In "Pornography, Oppression, and Freedom: A Closer Look," she argues that pornography by its nature is harmful to women and should be controlled and eliminated. She basis this position on tenuous distinctions between pornography and erotica, and through the liberal use of universal claims about the effect that pornography has on women and their place in society. Despite her superficially well-reasoned article, a closer examination of Longino's claims and analysis reveals problems that undermine her argument. Pornography cannot be considered necessarily and categorically ..."

Tags:free, speech, expression, sexual, obscenity

Abstract
This paper discusses the issue of pornography, seen as one of the most controversial sexual issues in North America. The paper reports that a large part of the controversy is centered on the battle between individuals who argue that pornography is an oppressive activity that subordinates women and advocates of free-speech. The topic is complex and charged with emotion.

Tags:pornography, speech, act

Abstract
This paper discusses the government's attempt to censor pornographic material on the internet which the writer feels would infringe on the freedom of expression. This paper also includes a brief but detailed history of the internet. This paper examines the various bills the U.S. government is trying to pass to prevent misuse of the Net. The writer of this paper also discusses the installation of censoring software as an alternative solution to government censorship.

From the Paper
"The Internet can also be compared to a church. In many ways the Internet is like a church: it has its council of elders, every member has an opinion about how things should work, and they can either take part or not. It's the choice of the user. The Internet has no president, chief operating officer, or Pope. The constituent networks may have presidents and CEO's, but that's a different issue; there is no single authority figure for the Internet as a whole."

Tags:pornography, censorship, freedom, of, expression, rights, government, law, minors, legislation

Abstract
This paper justifies an evaluation which holds that pornography is not something that should be given carte blanche protection under the Freedom of Expression prerogatives outlined in the American Constitution. In particular the paper looks at the injurious social effects associated with pornography and the paper also goes to some length to distinguish pornography from erotica. With regards to the last point the paper notes in particular the dehumanizing characteristics of pornography.

From the Paper
"Few topics are more divisive and contentious than pornography. The following paper will examine the subject of pornography and argue that any thoughtful consideration of the matter cannot help but lead to the conclusion that pornography dehumanizes women (and, arguably, men too) and also offers a profoundly distorted view of human relationships. To support this view, the author will cite a number of studies which corroborate the above view as well as examining the arguments commonly put forward by supporters of pornography. In the final analysis, freedom of expression is not absolute and society owes it to itself and to its posterity to ensure that citizens are protected from the ill effects of pornographic material. As mentioned above, the judgment of this writer is that pornography is an unacceptable form of expression."

Tags:pornography, evaluation, argument

Abstract
The paper explains that there can be little question that pornography has sparked a great deal of heated debate for a number of years now. Critics charge that the industry promotes the sexualization and exploitation of women and distorts human relationships, while its supporters argue that pornography is really a form of erotica, an instructional tool for those who need it, and - whatever its controversial elements - something protected under the Freedom of Expression provisions outlined in the United States Constitution. The following paper compares and contrasts the arguments of both sides and concludes that those opposed to pornography raise a much more compelling case than those in favor of it.

Tags:pornography, comparison, contrast

Abstract
The paper argues that pornography should not be banned, per se, (which would, in any case, be impossible) but that access to it should be restricted to "adult" video stores which sell these products exclusively. The paper argues further that the industry itself should be closely monitored by government agencies (government agencies charged in particular with the responsibility of overseeing who can enter the business and who cannot) and workers within the adult film industry - especially female workers - should be encouraged to speak to state and federal officials whenever they have reasonable grounds for believing that they are being exploited. If these measures are followed, this writer is confident that pornography can be restricted in a manner that will not unduly abridge freedom of expression guarantees (a major fear of libertarians and some constitutional experts) but will, nonetheless, protect the general public from being irresponsibly inundated with imagery that has been scientifically linked with sexual assault.

From the Paper
"We will perhaps never know just how many women in America (or in Canada) are raped each year because their attacker was seeking to act out some twisted sexual fantasy he first encountered when viewing a sordid video from the local corner store. Be that as it may, it seems pretty inarguable that a culture which facilitates the portrayal of women as mere "play things" is a culture which runs the risk of turning itself into a "rape culture" endangering wives, sisters and - most of all - daughters. With that in mind, the following paper will argue that pornography should not be banned, per se, (which would, in any case, be impossible) but that..."

Tags:pornography, banned, women

Abstract
As with most genres, pornography could be interpreted as demeaning or even empowering, as art or trash, as aesthetic or offensive. This paper shows that material that was considered pornographic a few decades years ago is considered acceptable today. These changes illustrate the shifting notions of what material constitutes pornography or obscenity. The paper explores the three general criteria the United States Supreme Court has drafted to determine whether a work or material could be considered pornographic

From the Paper
"Catherine Itzin and other critics of pornography argue that the porn industry harms society in many ways. First, many women and young girls are physically and psychologically harmed in the production of pornographic magazines and films. Other sex workers testified of being raped and beaten by "johns" who were carrying S&M magazines. A recent case in the United Kingdom involved the filming of a young boy who was bound and raped by a group of men. This film is currently selling for 50 pounds (Itzin)."

Tags:freedom, of, expression, Free, Speech, Coalition

Abstract
The paper describes V.P. Naipaul's novel, "A House for Mr Biswas," a story about a Mr. Mohun Biswas who experiences various forms of oppression and misfortune and who desires his own house. The paper explains how the house can be seen as a central symbol for freedom from oppression and humiliation and a representation of the desire for self-fulfillment and self-actualization. The paper also points out that the novel can be interpreted from the larger social and political perspective of the challenges of a postcolonial world.

From the Paper
"The main character continually meets obstacles and failure in his endeavors. His life is difficult and traumatic from the very beginning. A pandit or scholarly teacher predicts that his life will not be successful and that he will cause the death of his father. It seems that fate is against Mohun from the very beginning.
"His early life is filled with obstacles and difficulties and after his father drowns, Mohun and his family have to live with wealthy relatives. This again emphasizes the theme of loss of freedom and humiliation. It should also be taken into account that the society and culture in which the novel takes is very class and caste conscious. In other words, the divisions evident in the society and the fact that the main character has to live with his affluent relatives, serves to exacerbate his sense of failure and humility. The subsequent development of his life becomes even more traumatic and difficult. After staying with the alcoholic Bhandat, Mohun leaves to find freedom and success in the world."

Tags:oppression, misfortune, humiliation, failure, colonialism