Abstract
Discussion of the topic of honor and trust found in stories in "Gilgamesh" and "Genesis" 1-3 and 6-9. The stories are compared to a contract whether verbally or written. In the story of "The Flood" in Gilgamesh and in Genesis, God or the Higher Power is asking Utnapishtim and Noel to put their trust in Him and believe what he directs them to do in building a ship. In any contract, whether verbal or written, the parties must honor and trust the other parties involved. In the two stories both men are asked to trust and honor the higher power or they will die along with wicked mankind. Both men willingly listen and follow the specific directions given to them. Whether it is the story of Gilgamesh or Noah, both men put their trust and honor in their Gods and obey the instructions given to both.

Tags:honor, gilgamesh, genesis

Abstract
This paper discusses the historical, grammatical and literary aspects of Genesis 22:1-19. The historical analysis in this article suggests that Genesis may be myth or it may be rooted in history. At any rate, the writer claims that its religious significance surely outweighs its historical significance. The writer discusses that research on grammatical points has hopefully aided in a better understanding of the text. Further, the writer suggests that literary analysis has highlighted the development of the story, its theme and implications.

From the Paper
"The story of God's command for Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac, found in Genesis, is perhaps one of the more well-known biblical stories. Genesis may or may not be a story of actual people but most will agree that its religious meaning is more important than proof. The grammatical structure of the modern English translation of biblical Hebrew provides some difficulty to understanding the text. This paper briefly explains research conducted on grammatical points in relation to ... "

Tags:Genesis, Abraham, Isaac

Abstract
This paper compares how Genesis 12 and Genesis 20 treat the subject of incest. The writer notes that one of the most taboo topics, even in our own society, is the question of what constitutes incest. The writer then relates that in Genesis, this topic is addressed not once, but twice, in Genesis 12 and Genesis 20. These incidents in the life of the patriarch Abraham (Abram) and his wife Sarah (Sarai) are, like other significant episodes in the first book of the Pentateuch, told and retold, virtually right after one another in ways that are similar but with some critical differences in plot and tone. The writer maintains that these two different versions of the same incident of the life of Abraham and Sarah are used to shed new light upon the meaning of the same anecdote. The writer concludes that although it has the same plot of the sister-as-wife, Genesis 12 is more interested in showing how God will intervene to protect Abraham on earth, and to show this is a demonstration of God's plan for Abraham to be a father of Israel. Further, the writer maintains that textual resonances with the later Mosaic covenant take predominance over character development, or even explaining basic details of the plot, like how Pharaoh understands the relationship between the husband and wife.

From the Paper
"Abraham believes that as a woman, Sarah's life (still Sarai) will be protected although very likely she will be violated, if the two of them are known to be married. He fears his own life will be at risk. But if the two are taken to be unmarried strangers, the Egyptians will be less hostile to them as foreigners. He anticipates her resistance to this idea (as it may still put her chastity in danger) but begs her to do so, so his soul might live. Abraham seems to make a plea that this is a God-fearing thing to do by invoking the soul, rather than merely asking his wife to engage in a potentially immoral deception to save his life.
"Interestingly, in both versions of the incidents, Abraham is not blamed for his deception by either his wife, the man he deceives, or the Lord, even though it places Sarai's life at risk, not his own."

Tags:Abraham, Sarah, God, wife

Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts the first two chapters of the 'Book of Genesis' within the Old Testament. It describes the events that occurred during the first two chapters and discusses their literary style. The paper particularly focuses on the way that God maintained full control of all created in 'Genesis':1, while in 'Genesis': 2, God gives humans both the autonomy of choice and free will, thereby setting up the conflicts that ensue in 'Genesis':3.

From the Paper
"Chapter 1 of Genesis is different from Chapter 2 of Genesis, in that in Chapter 1, the very beginning, most basic elements of the earth are created from waters and darkness. In Chapter 2, God creates the first man, and then, to keep the man company, creates the first woman to live with the man on the earth, and everything around them that they need in the Garden of Eden. The tree of knowledge is also created in Chapter 2, and God instructs the man" "Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die. (Genesis 2: 16-17, p. 58). But it is not until Chapter 3 of Genesis that the woman and then the man are tempted by the tree of Knowledge."

Tags:control, knowledge, creation

Abstract
This in-depth paper examines the views and opinions of author Daniel Quinn in his novel which focuses on an alternative take on human history as compared to that told in the book of "Genesis." This paper delves into the characters of Adam, Eve, Cain and Abel as portrayed in "Genesis" and as Quinn perceived them in his own novel. This paper compares the actions of Cain and Abel in the book of "Genesis" to those depicted in Quinn's novel which presents a somewhat different version of events. This paper examines the traditional teachings related to the creation of the world while comparing them to the differing views and perceptions of Daniel Quinn. One example focuses on the story of Cain and Abel and the traditional yet simplistic explanation which recounts the first recorded murder. Quinn delves deeper and more critically into this specific story exposing a much more complex and underlying meaning to that of a simple disagreement between two brothers which are detailed in this paper. The writer attempts to prove in this paper that the book of "Genesis" may be more than just simple tales of morality but an actual plausible glimpse into the development of human culture and man's own inner-psyche.

From the Paper
"It is here where the stage is set for the first man's imminent self-condemnation. Shortly afterward, the book documents God's abstraction of Eve from Adams rib. The author makes it clear that in this golden age, Human beings could co-exist with their environment in perfect harmony until the emergence of the enigmatic character of the serpent.
When Eve tells the serpent what God has said will happen were she and Adam to eat of the tree of knowledge of good and bad, he says to Eve,
"You won't die! Because God knows that in the day you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you'll be like God- knowing good and bad." The snake, whose intentions are ambiguous, tempts Eve to eat of the tree. She does so and then takes the fruit to Adam, who eats of it as well."

Tags:bible, history, religion, adam, eve, cain, abel, literature, argument, human, development, perception

Abstract
The writer of this paper states that Genesis is a book about creation and condemnation, survival and death, families and spirituality, and the struggles of the Jewish people. He contends that, like the book of Genesis, the Odyssey contains themes of leadership, spirituality, and strength in times of trouble and that both the book of Genesis and the Odyssey suggest a great deal of interaction between the supernatural and humans. After briefly summing up the two books, he goes on to postulate that both books have many similarities. According to the writer, the two themes that stand out in both works are temptation and exile. By comparing these themes the papers author attempts to determine the similarities between ancient Greek and Middle Eastern, or Jewish, cultures.

From the Paper
"In both the Odyssey and the book of Genesis, temptation is a reoccurring theme of much importance. In Genesis, probably the most famous instance of temptation is that of Adam and Eve. An important story in Judeo-Christian beliefs, the temptation of Adam and Eve suggests and explains the fallen nature of mankind. In other words, because Adam and Eve were unable to resist temptation, some who hold Judeo-Christian beliefs believe that each person is born with original sin. Others simply believe that this is why humans have trouble standing up to temptation today. In the story of Adam and Eve, Satan comes to Eve in the form of a serpent, requesting that she eat from the one special tree that God has forbidden. Satan tempts Eve with the promise of knowledge, as this tree is the tree that will open up humans' eyes to the things of God. Eve then tempts her husband, Adam, to take the fruit. Just as this is the story that is sued to describe mankind's fallen nature, it is also used to justify the subservient position of women by many cultures and those of different religious beliefs."

Tags:god, deity, relationship, human, culture, divine

Abstract
Throughout the book of Genesis, each generation features brothers or sisters who competed, often bitterly and often for their parent's attention. This paper shows that the sibling rivalries between Cain and Abel (Genesis 4:1-26), Esau and Jacob, Ishmael and Isaac, and Joseph and his brothers were similar in some ways and different in others. The conflicts and actions between all the siblings can all be tied together by responsibly dealing with conflict and resolution. The paper shows that the Book of Genesis poses the well-known question, "Am I my brothers keeper?," which gets answered by the end of the book. In addition, the actions of the parents may have had an impact on the actions of their children.

From the Paper
"The portion that illustrates Jacob's moral maturation is by the tale of Jacob's struggle with a godly being the night before he was to meet his estranged brother (Genesis 32:23-32). Jacob wrestled with the god sent figure and left the attack morally enhanced but physically injured. He then received a new name, "Israel," which is interpreted to mean, "the one who strives with beings divine and human and prevails". Therefore, when he finally meets Esau, he is no longer the proud youngster who is out to take advantage of his brother, but a mature man, bearing the scars of life and offering gifts to his brother."

Tags:abraham, judaism, God

Abstract
This paper explains that, in Genesis, the modelss of righteous characters in Noah, Joseph and Abraham is described as a complete obedience to God, which is shown continuously throughout the book. The author believes that one of the greatest examples of righteousness in Genesis is Abraham's willingness to risk an unknown future under God's guidance when he leaves his land of birth and the place of his father to journey to Canaan. The paper stresses that Abraham also maintains a resolute faith in God at all times and obediently follows His orders such as when God demands that Abraham sacrifice his long-desired dear son Isaac.

From the Paper
"Joseph also shows obedience to God. In fact, Joseph is righteous in the way that no one else around him is. Though God does not explicitly state His will to Joseph, Joseph seems to intuitively know His will. . In chapter 40, Joseph says, "Are not solutions from God? Pray, recount them to me." It shows that he considers himself such a person God favors with insight into the meaning of the dream. Then things eventually turn out exactly as he interprets, proving his ability to know God's will. When he works in the house of his Egyptian master, the master's wife asks Joseph to lay with her. It is difficult for him to decline as she holds great control over him."

Tags:noah, joseph, abraham, obedience, sacrifice

Abstract
This paper analyzes sibling rivalry relationships from two perspectives of analysis: structuralism and by emphasizing the importance of the concept of sacrifice, drawing on the relationships of Jacob and Esau, Cain and Abel and Leah and Rachael, taken from the "Book of Genesis."

From the paper:

"One of the predominant themes in the Book of Genesis is that of sibling rivalry: We see in the pairs of Jacob and Esau, Cain and Abel and Leah and Rachel a series of oppositions presented to us in the form of these sibling relationships. This paper analyzes those relationships from two different perspectives. The first of these is the Structuralist one, which allows us to see these sibling relationships within the broader context of sacred and folk writings in a number of cultures and the second is within the framework of sacrifice as the ancient Jews understood this concept."

Tags:bible, siblings, brothers, twins, social, order, psychological, dynamics

Abstract
The following paper analyzes sibling rivalry relationships from two perspectives of analysis: that of structuralism and that of emphasizing the importance of the concept of sacrifice, drawing on the relationships of Jacob and Esau, Cain and Abel and Leah and Rachel's, taken from the "Book of Genesis."

From the paper:

"One of the predominant themes in the Book of Genesis is that of sibling rivalry: We see in the pairs of Jacob and Esau, Cain and Abel and Leah and Rachel a series of oppositions presented to us in the form of these sibling relationships. This paper analyzes those relationships from two different perspectives. The first of these is the Structuralist one, which allows us to see these sibling relationships within the broader context of sacred and folk writings in a number of cultures and the second is within the framework of sacrifice as the ancient Jews understood this concept."

Tags:Jesus, bible, figures, Jews, cultures, tradition, living, dead