A biography of economist John Kenneth Galbraith.
Essay # 36573 |
2,150 words (
approx. 8.6 pages ) |
12 sources |
2002
|
$ 40.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
A discussion of the life and work of economist, John Kenneth Galbraith. John Kenneth Galbraith was a Professor of Economics Emeritus at Harvard University. He was internationally known for his development of Keynesian and post-Keynesian economics, the economics of the modem large firm, as well as for his writing and his active involvement in American politics
Tags:biography, john, galbraith
This paper analyzes John Kenneth Galbraith's book 'The Great Crash: 1929' and its economic aspects.
Analytical Essay # 5879 |
775 words (
approx. 3.1 pages ) |
0 sources |
MLA | 2001
|
$ 16.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper studies the possible reasons for the stock market crash in 1929. It examines John Kenneth Galbraith's book 'The Great Crash: 1929' which claims that the reason for the Great Crash was the over-zealousness and miscalculations of financial analysts and brokers at the time. It discusses how the basis economic theories were suddenly irrelevant afterward. Finally, it blames the stock market crash on investors that did not want to see the reality.
From the Paper
"John Kenneth Galbraith's book "The Great Crash: 1929 claims that the depression of 1929 was a direct result of the miscalculations of the financial analysts and the other brokers which caused the crash of the stocks. He states that these actors of the economic field had a direct involvement in the stock market and had become too greedy to actually see what was happening to the market around them---too greedy to actually fear the recuperation's of what was easily predictable as the downfall."
Tags:financial, analysts, brokers, John, Kenneth, Galbraith's, 'The, Great, Crash:, 1929', stock, market
A review of John Kenneth Galbraith's book "The Great Crash: 1929."
Book Review # 108569 |
1,786 words (
approx. 7.1 pages ) |
2 sources |
MLA | 2008
$ 34.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper examines "The Great Crash: 1929," by John Kenneth Galbraith, and the reasons that it gives for the economic downfall of that period. The writer explains some of Galbraith's chief arguments, such as buying on margin and rampant speculation, the lack of responsibility among the higher institutions like the city banks and the Federal Reserve, and the disorganization and miscommunication between governing bodies. The writer concludes that Galbraith gives not only a historical representation of the era, but an almost behind the scenes look at how the higher up were affected as well.
From the Paper
"What Galbraith attempts to do is paint the reader a picture of the entire era both before and after the historic crash. The writing itself flows very uniformly in regards to historical accuracy filled with milestone dates and stock exchange numbers, however, the real importance of the text deals with the overall theory or mental perception of both the higher acting officials all the way down to the average middleclass American worker. It is from this perspective that Galbraith's true message throughout the book will claim that the reason for the crash of 1929 is not necessarily the lack of willingness or financial backing of the people; as was the ending result, but rather the high levels of incompetence, denial, lacking responsibility, and speculation that will ultimately lead to the market's untimely demise."
Tags:economy, president, index, industrial, twenties, securities, greed, production
This paper analyzes governmental influences on case poverty and insular poverty in Southeast Asia based on the article "John Kenneth Galbraith: The Position of Poverty" by Lee Jacobs.
Article Review # 103151 |
940 words (
approx. 3.8 pages ) |
4 sources |
APA | 2008
$ 20.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This study critically analyzes the idea of case poverty and insular ioverty in the article "John Kenneth Galbraith: The Position of Poverty" by Lee Jacobs. The paper explains that, by understanding the different types of poverty that keep many in the lower echelons of society, Galbraith positions that case poverty is a real concept in determining those that cannot function effectively within society. The paper further suggest that, by critical evaluating this concept, one can argue that Galbraith shows a great deal of insight into poverty, and what factors keep members of a population in the lower classes through government intervention. The paper then applies this concept to the poor in Southeast Asian countries.
From the Paper
"These ironic features that are contained within economic barren areas reflect the way that governmental development influences what is to be deemed insular poverty. For instance, if a country like Cambodia has resources in rice, a lack of government development could make Cambodia behave within Galbraith's definition of insular poverty without geographical isolation. ...
"This factor further helps develop the terms of poverty that are imposed upon people, through the so-called insular factors of poverty."
Tags:elitist, vietnam, corruption, structure, cambodia
This paper discusses the economic theories of John Kenneth Galbraith in his book "The Affluent Society", which made him famous.
Analytical Essay # 26274 |
1,665 words (
approx. 6.7 pages ) |
6 sources |
MLA | 2002
|
$ 32.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper explains that when Galbraith wrote "The Affluent Society", in 1958, he spotted problems in American society that were caused, not by the drive that accompanies the desire to escape from need, but by the blindness that results from excessive gain. This paper points out that Galbraith promoted a version of Keynes' idea that when economic growth is inadequate, "state expenditure for useful purposes" (including a certain amount of deficit spending) was the prop the economy needed. The author states that, despite the immense popularity of the book, now in its fourth edition, Galbraith's ideas were little heeded in practical terms.
Table of Contents
Keynes' Notion of Increasing Production
Keynes and State Spending
Biography
History of the Book
Galbraith's Central Argument
Pessimism of the Central Tradition
Accommodating Inequality and Insecurity
Making Increased Production the Only Economic Good
From the Paper
"Galbraith constructed his argument in four stages. First, he demonstrated that postwar thought about the economy depended on the essential pessimism inherited from the central tradition in economics stretching back to Ricardo in the early nineteenth century. Second, he showed how an implicit accommodation to affluence was constructed. Third, he examined how the pessimistic assumption that poverty was inevitable, "which stemmed from a world where nearly all were poor," was institutionalized in affluent America. Finally, he attempted to show how, once one escaped the grip of the conventional wisdom that inequality and economic insecurity are inevitable, it was possible to imagine alternative courses of action."
Tags:kennedy, excessive, gain, growth, deficit
A critical review of the work on the stock market collapse and the possibility of a repeat crash.
Essay # 20407 |
1,350 words (
approx. 5.4 pages ) |
1 source |
1993
|
$ 27.95
More information
|
Add to cart
From the Paper
"John Kenneth Galbraith, in The Great Crash: 1929, writes that his book has limitations: "The task of this book . . . is only to tell what happened in 1929. It is not to tell whether or when the misfortunes of 1929 will recur" (190). In the same passage, however, Galbraith makes clear the moral lesson of 1929 and of his book: "It is that very specific and personal misfortune awaits those who presume to believe that the future is revealed to them" (190). However, after having set forth these limitations, Galbraith goes on to speculate on the future:
. . . The chances for a recurrence of a speculative orgy are rather good. No one can doubt that the American people remain susceptible to the speculative mood---to the conviction that enterprise can be attended by unlimited rewards in which they..."
Examines economist's theories on the affluent state; criticisms; compared to Adam Smith, Malthus, Milton Friedman; political aspects; production; poverty and industrial power.
Comparison Essay # 17804 |
2,025 words (
approx. 8.1 pages ) |
7 sources |
1989
|
$ 38.95
More information
|
Add to cart
From the Paper
" The French political scientist, Alex deToqueville, visited the United States almost 200 hundred years ago for the rare opportunity of examining a foundling nation in an isolated system. America had adopted a political system greatly influenced by European philosophical thought and which could be nurtured free of outside factors like invasion or warfare. Similarly, the economics of free trade were implemented in this isolated system, which developed into America's unique form of capitalism. In The Affluent Society (1958), John Kenneth Galbraith examines American capitalism not only though current (...)"
Tags:ECONOMISTS
A review of the work on the causes, effects and economic lessons of stock market crash.
Essay # 15645 |
900 words (
approx. 3.6 pages ) |
1 source |
2000
|
$ 19.95
More information
|
Add to cart
From the Paper
"In his book The Great Crash 1929, John Kenneth Galbraith, a leading economist, examines the meaning of the stock market crash of 1929 which has become a persistent fear for Wall Street ever since. Recent downturns in the market were compared to the Great Crash, for instance, and many were watching to see if the protections put in place to stop this kind of crash would work and prevent a repeat. They did seem to work, and many believe that a crash such as occurred in 1929 is simply impossible given the current structure of the market and of governmental and other controls. Galbraith finds that what happened in 1929 was not an isolated action, however, and that earlier in history there had been other speculative splurges, beginning in 1637 when Dutch speculators invested in tulip bulbs. Galbraith also notes that we are now going through a similar period, but he makes no..."
A review of the work on the economic theory behind the negative aspects of post-WWII American affluence.
Book Review # 15496 |
1,575 words (
approx. 6.3 pages ) |
6 sources |
2000
|
$ 30.95
More information
|
Add to cart
From the Paper
"On the first page of his 1958 bestseller, The Affluent Society, John Kenneth Galbraith wrote that "wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" (1). What he tried to point out was that, although getting gain had been a primary pursuit of Americans long before 1958, endless increases in production--even with an increasing ability to take a guiding hand in manufacturing demand--had become the key to contemporary affluence. And, while this had been producing ever-greater gain for some, it was also engendering severe want and other social problems at a correspondingly rapid rate. Those whose primary goal is the getting of gain had been proceeding without regard for the way this shaped society. And, wrapped up in increasing gain, these Americans seemed incapable of appreciating that want in others would eventually reach critical mass and prove to work..."
A critical review of this work on the need for more government involvement in the economy to right socioeconomic injustice.
Analytical Essay # 14332 |
2,025 words (
approx. 8.1 pages ) |
1 source |
1999
|
$ 38.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
According to high school civics classes, we live in a democratic society based on one person one vote. Even when the fact that this is a representative democracy where each citizen votes for another to represent his or her interests in legislatures, the concept remains that each of us has a voice in the political system.
From the Paper
"Introduction
According to high school civics classes, we live in a democratic society based on one person one vote. Even when the fact that this is a representative democracy where each citizen votes for another to represent his or her interests in legislatures, the concept remains that each of us has a voice in the political system. The low number of eligible voters who actually participate in the process has brought some to question the validity of this approach, however, and one author, John Kenneth Galbraith, has suggested that the lack of participation in government has serious consequences for the long-term viability of the United States from both an economic and political perspective, and that it encouraged and continues to encourage the emergence and maintenance of a permanent underclass in American society."