Abstract
This paper discusses two famous speeches in the United States calling for freedom: Thomas Jefferson's "Declaration of Independence" and Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream". The paper compares the two speeches from a structural point of view and describes the differing content. The paper explains the different audiences targeted by each speech.

From the Paper
"The intended audience affected how each man wrote his statement. Jefferson used elaborately structured language, because his message was to the upper class and royalty of England. For instance, his opening sentence starts, "When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another ...". This sentence contains seventy-one words. By comparison, King's audience was the entire United States. His opening sentence is only seventeen words and immediately refers to the main issue directly by mentioning the Emancipation Proclamation. Jefferson's speech continues with complex vocabulary and extremely long sentences, while King' speech is almost like poetry in some places, creating clear images and using language that is easy to understand and to listen to. This is why we call it the "I have a dream" speech. That simple sentence resonates in the speech and communicates his intent very clearly."

Tags:images, vocabulary, intent

Abstract
This essay quotes sections from the speeches by Frederick Douglass and Martin Luther King Jr. and provides a comparison between the two. The paper points out that while King does win over his followers he speaks very little of himself and rarely even acknowledges his audience. Douglass spends more effort humbling himself, and emphasizes a greater division between himself and his audience. The paper concludes that while they both provide excellent arguments, Douglass more effectively explains, proves, and expresses his points than does King, possibly due to the simple fact that his speech is much longer.

From the Paper
"Both of the speeches given by Frederick Douglass and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. rely on similar arguments based on the foundations of liberty and justice which frame the creation of the United States. Also similarly, both of these orators are speaking to a generally friendly and encouraging audience. Although both of the arguments presented in these speeches are convincing and well-crafted, Douglass's speech would be more likely to persuade an unfriendly audience, as can be argued was actually the intent of both speakers, because Douglass spends more effort humbling himself, provides more evidence for his arguments, and emphasizes a greater division between himself and his audience.
"While both speakers find a warm welcome from their audiences, Douglass takes more time to establish the differing social status between himself and his audience while King immediately commits to presenting his argument, which would help Douglass sway opponents more effectively than King. In his opening statement, Douglass proclaims, ''He who could address this audience without a quailing sensation, has stronger nerves than I have."

Tags:Frederick Douglass, Martin Luther King Jr., I have a dream, Meaning of the 4th of July to the Negro, Black History speeches

Abstract
This paper discusses and analyzes Winston Churchill's famous 1946 speech referring to Russia's power and the Iron Curtain. The paper then goes on to analyze the Marshall Plan of 1947, in which George Marshall's primary intent (on behalf of Harry Truman) was economic in nature with the focus being on the restructuring and rebuilding of Europe by means of financial aid and assistance. The paper compares and contrasts the intent and outcome of the two speeches.

Table of Contents:
Winston Churchill's Iron Curtain Speech, 1946
The Marshall Plan, 1947
Analysis and Contrast

From the Paper
"Many analysts have viewed the Iron Curtain speech of Winston Churchill during post war era as an evident form of warmongering. He made assumptions and pre-conclusive statements about a cold war that might happen between the US and its allies against communist Russia and it did. Even at the time when he was no longer the Prime minister of the UK, Churchill is still being revered by nations as an influential figure in the post war era. His thoughts and presumptions were in his accustomed ruthless statement of reality. The "Iron Curtain" speech gave Stalin a pretext for mobilizing the Soviet people against their former allies (Vladislov Suvok, Inside Kremlin's Cold War). Churchill's statements in the Iron Curtain speech speaks of his influence among nations and must have preceded policies integrated in US' Marshall Plan in accordance to the containment of Russian power and Communism in Europe. Analyzing both circumstances, should there have been no Iron Curtain Speech lay the possibility that Russian people would still be induced to the idea that the US and other European countries, beyond the borders of communist ideology would still be considered an ally of Russia. And that the US with its initial reluctance to believe the conclusion of Churchill might still consider other means in resolving issues of power containment of Russia in Europe."

Tags:Russia, European, economy

Abstract
The paper discusses the American ideal of universally protecting constitutional rights to free speech and contrasts this to Canada's support of hate speech and hate crime laws. The paper focuses on "R. v. Keegstra", the famous Canadian hate speech case, and shows how the Canadian stand on hate speech is supported by the constitution and promotes the uniquely Canadian vision of a free and democratic society. The paper asserts that resistance in the US to take such a stand is reflective of the continual desire to retain ideology that does not reflect a real need for change.

From the Paper
"It is a clear that the issue of hate crimes and hate speech is an essential and important issue that must be debated in nearly every nation, as all nations have and live discrimination to one degree or another. Discrimination invades the standards and actions of some against others and whether covertly or overtly affects the advantage or opportunity of others and can also create circumstances of depravity of needs or even overt physical and mental abuse. Discrimination, usually against minorities, but most often against any population that does not serve as the central authority to decisions making is an insidious aspect of civilization and must be addressed fundamentally by all. Hate speech is a particularly insidious aspect of overt discrimination that falls only just short of being physical abuse. This type of discrimination is based entirely upon circumstances of one's life over which one has absolutely no control over, often race, gender or even sexual preference. It then goes without saying that hate speech, in written or spoken form is something that needs to be addressed when and where it occurs and in many cases this attempt is made at the core with social mores and taboos, often beginning when individuals are very young."

Tags:diversity, discrimination, Keegstra, anti-Semitism, free, speech

Abstract
"Peace Without Conquest" was one of the most significant speeches of the 20th Century. It evoked the passions of Americans all over the country and cemented the nation's commitment to the War in Vietnam. "Peace Without Conquest" is Lyndon Johnson's explanation of the American involvement in the war as a means to bring harmony to the region while avoiding occupation. This paper presents a reaction to the reasons why America engaged in battle in Vietnam. It specifically explores the legitimacy of Johnson's assertions. The writer also explores whether Johnson's assertions were sufficient to justify America's continued involvement. In addition, it considers what reasoning he failed to discuss that would have argued against America's involvement.

From the Paper
"In this statement, Johnson asserts that the ability to exist in a world where nations have the right to dictate their own lives is dependent upon America's willingness to fight for this right. Johnson asserts that the only way to preserve freedom is to use force. This assertion seems accurate there is a price to be paid for freedom. In addition, the argument that American freedom is only truly secure when other countries are also allowed to be free is also legitimate. History has proven that humanity is a continuum and that "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere". In this section of Johnson's speech it is clear that the war in Vietnam is viewed as a necessary agent. Johnson asserts that in some cases force must precede reason it is obvious that he believes that the war in Vietnam is one of those cases. The point that he makes in this section of the speech is legitimate and justifies our involvement in the war."

Tags:war

Abstract
This paper explains that Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech was delivered before 250,000 people, black and white, who came to Washington, D.C. to protest how black citizens were treated and to promote the passage of laws that would help black people get equal treatment. The author points out that King's strategies were (1) to justify and encourage his black followers, (2) to reassure moderate whites that blacks only wanted their rights as American citizens and did not intend to be violent and (3) to warn the opposition (southern white racists) that blacks would not give up until they were given equal rights and legal protections. The paper relates that the pathos of the speech was delivered in poetic terms, often using Biblical language, repetition and references to famous American phrases such as "... all men are created equal".

From the Paper
"In the audience at the Lincoln Memorial were both black people (about 80%) who wanted equality, jobs, and freedom and white people (about 20%) who sympathized and wanted to help. King said black members of that audience had come "out of great trials and tribulations." They were people who had endured terrible persecutions, including lynching and police brutality. He called it "creative suffering." He implied that God would reward them because "unearned suffering is redemptive." Many of the people were from the South--Mississippi, Alabama, South Carolina, Georgia, and ..."

Tags:audience, ethos, logos, pathos, language

Abstract
This paper analyzes George Patton's famous D-Day eve speech to his troops. Logical mistakes, fallacies, and questionable premises are examined, and a brief discussion is offered concerning whether the speech met its objectives.

Abstract
This paper looks at the social and racial context contained in Malcolm X's speech known as "The Ballot or the Bullet". The writer looks at Malcolm X, his background, and influence on the civil rights movement in the 1960s in America. The speech explores issues of race, black power, government, and the potential for social change.

From the Paper
"Of course, Malcolm X proposes a concrete plan for his fellowmen to promote social changes in the black American society. He believes in the power and influence of the United Nations in acting as intermediary for the black American society and the US government to negotiate about their proposed changes in the American society, since, according to Malcolm X, "[w]hen you take your case to Washington D.C., you're asking it to the criminal who's responsible? They're all in cahoots together." Apart from seeking the help of the UN, he also proposes that his fellowmen empower themselves in the country and against the forces that oppress them (the government) by becoming self-reliant economically and being assertive enough to illicit fear among these oppressive powers."

Tags:society, black, white, american, african, race

Abstract
This paper discusses the tragedy of the commons, explaining the concept of "commons" as any kind of resource which is divided up and shared by a group of people. The paper examines issues of ownership as opposed to stewardship. The paper analyzes Chief Seattle's well-known 1854 speech regarding possession of the land, in which he expounds upon a Native-American belief of stewardship of the land.

From the Paper
"As capitalists first and Americans second, we believe strongly in the concept of ownership. We own and use the Earth and the material goods Earth's raw materials help us produce, and feel a proprietary command over them. When Communism developed as an alternative to the concept of unadulterated ownership, we responded with the fear and anger of one whose child had been taken. Ownership of the land, its materials and its spoils are more integral to American society and thought than any other characteristics or facets. However, this concept is subject to the limitations and inevitable truth of the tragedy of the commons, and we will eventually be dupes to this incontrovertible logic."

Tags:stewardship, possession, earth, native, american

Abstract
This paper analyzes the repetition and emotional imagery used by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. in his famous civil rights speech known as "I Have a Dream." First, the paper describes the meaning and content of this oration. Then, it examines Dr. King's style of delivery, citing the building momentum and repetition. Finally, it notes how Dr. King effectively utilized repetition and vivid emotional description and imagery to promote his ideas of community, unity, and the need for immediate action against segregation. The paper concludes with a call for people to forgo minor squabbles with sights set on promoting peace among humanity, as in Dr. King's speech.

From the Paper
"In Dr. King's "I Have a Dream" speech, King effectively utilizes repetition and vivid emotional description / imagery to promote his ideas of community, unity, and the need for immediate action against segregation. Dr. King's repetition is found in multiple areas of the essay and not only builds energy and momentum in his speech, but increases the magnanimity of the suffering of the Negroes, thus making the issue seem much more significant. Also, Dr. King's vivid emotional descriptions promote both his ideas on immediate action and unity / community. Dr. King initially describes the suffering of the Negro with highly emotionally appealing language, thus making the suffering seem significant and creating empathy among the audience. He then effectively utilizes emotional imagery to not only support his message of peace, justice, and brotherhood, but also to condemn injustice / racism by juxtaposing these two ideas together..."

Tags:famous speeches, oration, oratory devices