Abstract
The paper explains that the term euthanasia refers to a good death without suffering, and euthanasia is always about ending suffering. The paper discusses two forms of euthanasia: active and passive; in active euthanasia, one person takes some action to actively end another person's pain and kills that person, while passive euthanasia is more complicated because it involves withdrawing or withholding treatment which also ends in the person's death but the patient is not actually killed. The paper then explains that another type of euthanasia is assisted suicide. The paper notes that euthanasia can be voluntary where the person gives consent or it can be involuntary.

From the Paper
"The term euthanasia refers to a good death without suffering. Euthanasia is always about ending suffering. There are two forms of euthanasia: active and passive. In active euthanasia, one person takes some action to actively end another person's pain and kills that person. Passive euthanasia is more complicated because it involves withdrawing or withholding treatment which also ends in the person's death but the patient is not actually killed. Another type of euthanasia is assisted suicide. Euthanasia can be voluntary where the person gives consent or it can be involuntary. We read about both types of euthanasia each day and..."

Tags:euthanasia, ethics, position

Abstract
This paper focuses on euthanasia or assisted suicide and in particular the differences between its active and passive forms. It examines how passive euthanasia refers to hastening the death of a person by not treating a life threatening condition or by not taking any extraordinary measures to save a patients life who may either be in severe pain or terminally ill. Active euthanasia means causing death of a person through an action which directly contributes to that person's death.

Outline
Passive and Active Euthanasia
The Conflict Between Active and Passive Euthanasia
When is Physician Assisted Suicide Permissible?
What is an Incompetent or Vegetable-Like State?
Personal Opinion

From the Paper
"The American Medical Association and the American judicial system clearly state that "active euthanasia" and "passive euthanasia" are different and that in simple terms the difference between the two is killing (active) and allowing to die (passive). Active Euthanasia is punishable by the strictest penalties to be found in our legal system, while Passive Euthanasia is not even a misdemeanor. The question does arise though, whether, in terms of outcome and how that outcome is achieved, do these two terms really differ?"

Tags:active, assisted, euthanasia, incompetent, like, passive, physician, state, suicide, vegetable

Abstract
This paper examines the controversial issue of euthanasia and examines why it is taboo in the United States. The author analyzes the arguments presented by all sides in the debate, and focuses on the positions of the religious, medical, and political communities. He concludes that despite the opposition of these groups to euthanasia, there is a small but growing consensus in the United States that for the sake of human decency and dignity, doctor assisted suicide in the form of passive euthanasia and sometimes active euthanasia should be legalized so that human suffering will not be prolonged by medical science simply to extend physical life.

Tags:SOCIOLOGY / EUTHANASIA, euthanasia in america

Abstract
This paper examines the different types of euthanasia. This topic is divided into two general categories, passive and active assisted suicide. Active euthanasia refers to actions that either result in death or hasten death and comprises two categories, voluntary and involuntary euthanasia. The author contends that active euthanasia is morally wrong since it involves killing and disregards another person autonomy whether or not consent is given.

Tags:euthanasia, law, canada

Abstract
This paper discusses two types of euthanasia. The first, or passive or negative euthanasia, involves withholding the medical care that would prolong life. Active or positive euthanasia, is defined as painlessly killing to prevent further suffering. The paper argues against both forms of euthanasia.

From the Paper
"There are two kinds of euthanasia: passive or negative euthanasia, which may also be defined as withholding the medical care that would prolong life; and active or positive euthanasia, which can be defined as painlessly killing to prevent further suffering, or as "... a deliberate act that causes death undertaken by one person with the primary intention of ending the life of another person, in order to relieve that person's suffering" (Somerville 33). This kind of euthanasia is also referred to as assisted suicide - although this implies that the person has requested help to die. This essay will review euthanasia and assisted suicide, and..."

Tags:euthanasia, suicide, carmichael

Abstract
This paper discusses Euthanasia, the right to die; the history and legislation concerning this controversial subject, as well as information on recent public and doctor opinion polls leading to a conclusion of support. It also details several cases and court decisions on this issue and how they have affected the laws on Euthanasia. The issue of active euthanasia, or assisted suicide, turns on whether it would have social consequences that refraining would not, on whether it would be possible to establish procedural safeguards for limited active euthanasia and whether such practices would have a significant adverse effect on the treatment of terminal patients in general.

From the Paper
"It its September, 1997 issue, the journal Medical Economics reported ("No longer an Option for One AIDS Patient and His Doctor") that the Florida Supreme Court had ruled against physician-assisted suicide in a decision overturning a trial judge's finding, giving AIDS patient Charles E. Hall the right to die as he wished. According to the Florida court, his intention to commit suicide through medical intervention was against the state's policy to preserve life. Several legal issues have been raised regarding the court's decision, involving the fact that it was based upon cases where application of artificial treatment could indefinitely prolong life."

Tags:medical, Euthanasia, history, doctor, opinion, polls, court, Florida, suicide, intervention, decisions

Abstract
This paper discusses a variety of issues involved in natural, or passive, euthanasia. The paper details the pros and cons of natural passive euthanasia. Then the paper compares passive and active euthanasia, including the moral issues involved. The paper also reviews the religious points of view on this issues, focusing on Christian ethics. The paper concludes by offering guidelines for making life and death decisions.

From the Paper
"Euthanasia, a term which means a good or happy death, is one of the most controversial subjects addressed in medicine, law and ethics. Norman L Geisler stated that there are two types of euthanasia...."

Tags:euthanasia, passive natural euthanasia, active euthasia, Christian ethics

Abstract
This paper argues that voluntary euthanasia preserves dignity. Examined in this paper are such ideas as the right to die, the ethical parameters of euthanasia, the quality of life perspective and a place for euthanasia within varied perspectives. The author argues that one of the greatest ways to preserve another person's dignity is through an act of mercy. Voluntary euthanasia is an act of mercy, which therefore, preserves dignity with the bestowment of final compassion.

From the Paper
"A step in awareness is the enactment of careful laws that permit forms of voluntary euthanasia. In the United States, the state of Oregon's Death With Dignity Act, allowing "limited physician-assisted suicide," is an example of a start for public understanding. In ideal cases of merciful euthanasia, a person makes a painstaking, well thought-out decision. Voluntary euthanasia is rarely carried out at the first knowledge of impending death, especially if medical help is available to treat the terminal disease. Voluntary euthanasia is an act of mercy, and therefore, preserves dignity with the bestowment of final compassion. "

Tags:die, dignity, ethical, euthanasia, life, parameters, perspective, quality, right, voluntary

Abstract
This paper examines the arguments concerning euthanasia and whether the practice of euthanasia can be considered ethical or even justified. The paper discusses and explains voluntary and involuntary euthanasia and looks at how the Utilitarian philosophy can be applied to this issue. The paper also looks at how arguments of Peter Singer apply to this topic.

From the Paper
"The debate over euthanasia begins with the definition of the word itself. Today people distinguish between active and passive euthanasia as well as voluntary and involuntary euthanasia. The distinction between active and passive euthanasia would seem to be straightforward. Active euthanasia occurs when someone actively brings about someone's death as in through an injection of a toxic substance. Passive euthanasia, on the other hand, occurs when someone refuses to intervene actively in order to prevent someone else's death. For example, in a real life hospital setting a..."

Tags:voluntary, involuntary, passive, active, euthanasia, utilitarianism

Abstract
An examination of the issues and reasons which formed the decision in the Canadian cases of Sue Rodriguez and Robert Latimer. This paper examines the decision of the court in relation to the law, as well as the effects of the decision on disabled persons in Canada.

From the paper:

"The cases of Rodriguez and Latimer were landmark decisions, which set precedents over the practice of euthanasia in Canada. It is likely that these two decisions will be the cornerstones of future challenges to the laws which are currently in place prohibiting this practice. While both of these cases dealt with instances of euthanasia, the circumstances behind the cases were very different. Both have given rise to debate within Canadian society about the freedom each individual has over when and how we will die. Do we have the right to choose? Do others have the right to choose for us if we are not capable ourselves? The moral and ethical dimensions within these questions, difficult as they are, are even more complicated when the same questions are raised in relation to the criminal law. Both Rodriguez and Latimer were highly divisive cases which inflamed the emotions of those who support euthanasia, and those who oppose."

Tags:assisted, british, canada, columbia, court, criminology, die, disabled, euthanasia, latimer, law, people, right, rights, robert, rodriguez, sue, suicide, supreme