An overview of the use of niche diplomacy with a focus on its use in Canadian foreign policy.
Research Paper # 97339 |
3,542 words (
approx. 14.2 pages ) |
11 sources |
MLA | 2007
|
$ 59.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper examines how the main focus of niche diplomacy, as its name implies, is that of selecting specific "niches", which a nation's foreign policy will follow. It gives an overview of niche diplomacy; its definition, importance and examples of this diplomacy from history around the world. It uses the Canadian diplomacy as a case study and reviews argumentative essays around this topic, mainly the collection of argumentative essays titled "International Relations In The Post Cold War Era" by Evan H. Potter.
From the Paper
"Smith then points out three limitations of niche diplomacy. These limitations are: Firstly, the vagueness of niche criteria combined with the lack of a clear method of niche inception, as well as there being no clear definition of when a niche ceases to exist; secondly, that there is an elitist element at the hart of niche diplomacy; and thirdly, that the policy of niche diplomacy with its over-focus on economics legitimizes what Smith defines as, "balance sheet diplomacy" (Smith 172). Smith then suggests that these limitations contribute significantly to the widening of the commitment-credibility gap, which niche diplomacy is supposed to narrow."
Tags:cold, war, diplomacy
A discussion of the benefits of using diplomacy over military action to resolve international conflicts.
Essay # 97194 |
1,244 words (
approx. 5 pages ) |
4 sources |
MLA | 2007
|
$ 25.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper explores the pros and cons of war versus diplomacy. The author argues that skilled diplomacy could have avoided the US entry into World War II, as well as other major military conflicts. The paper further states that defeat of an opponent ought not to be the ultimate aim in a conflict. Achieving long-term goals in international relations are more important and possible through diplomacy rather than by violent means such as military action.
From the Paper
" The period between 1930 and 1956 was probably the most turbulent era in recent human history. It saw the start and end of the Great Depression that destroyed the economies of most of the industrial world at one time; witnessed the rise of expansionist fascist powers in Europe and the Far-East resulting in probably the bloodiest conflict in human history; the gradual change of the US foreign policy from isolationism to intervention in the Second World War; the victory of the Allies over the Axis powers; the emergence of the US and the USSR as the two major world powers and the start of almost half a century of a Cold War between them, besides the American involvement in the eventually stalemated Korean War."
Tags:conflict, resolution, diplomacy, military, intervention, war, World, War, II
A survey of the use of media to further public diplomacy.
Essay # 71051 |
1,150 words (
approx. 4.6 pages ) |
7 sources |
MLA | 2003
|
$ 23.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper examines the use of media to further public diplomacy. It defines public diplomacy and how it promotes the national interests of a country. The recent use of television and the World Wide Web by governments in the area of public diplomacy is also explored.
From the Paper
" Public diplomacy deals with the ways the citizens of one country communicate their national personality and goals to other countries. It attempts to promote the national interests of one country through understanding ..."
Tags:Media studies, Public Diplomacy
A review of the public diplomacy program led by the U.S. State Department and it's lack of success.
Research Paper # 86136 |
3,600 words (
approx. 14.4 pages ) |
11 sources |
2005
|
$ 60.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper reviews the role of the U.S. state department in deploying the public diplomacy program nationally and world wide. According to this paper, the most prevalent opinion that seems to be held worldwide is that the United States is a domineering global superpower fueled by greed and bent on conquest.
From the Paper
"What is Public Diplomacy? Public diplomacy is the method by which the United States government seeks to create an image in the eyes of the citizens of other countries. According to the U.S. Department of State, Dictionary of International Relations Terms, "public diplomacy refers to government-sponsored programs intended to inform or influence public opinion in other countries; its chief instruments are publications, motion pictures, cultural exchanges, radio, and television" (cited in United States Information Agency Alumni Association [USIAAA] 2002, par. 8). This term was first used in 1965, when the Edward R. Murrow Center for Public Diplomacy was established at Tufts University (USIAAA 2002, par. 11). The USIAAA states that some sources equate public diplomacy with propaganda. Although both forms of communication are intended to persuade people, propaganda generally has a negative connotation of "disinformation" (2002, par. 12)."
Tags:public, diplomacy, policy
A paper which shows the ineffectiveness of Howard's "Megaphone Diplomacy" and the need for Australia's good neighborhood policy towards Indonesia.
Research Paper # 7560 |
3,035 words (
approx. 12.1 pages ) |
14 sources |
APA | 2002
|
$ 53.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
An essay which analyzes the ineffectiveness of Australia's 'megaphone diplomacy' under John Howard in dealing with the refugees and asylum seekers issue particularly with its largest neighbor, Indonesia. It also suggests a more appropriate formula for Australia to establish better relationships with Indonesia after the East Timor crises.
From the Paper
"In analyzing the effect of "megaphone diplomacy" to Australia-Indonesia relations and to Australian engagement with the region, Kevin's statement that "a country's foreign policy succeeds if its political leaders have a clear understanding of their country's national interests and place in the world, so that they may set appropriate foreign policy goals; and if its diplomats are trained and resourced to carry out their specialist tasks of analysis and representation" could be used as the consideration. Based on his experience while serving as Australian diplomat in many Asian countries, Kevin also states that in most of the Asian regions, economic rationalism is not the dominant value system. There remains a large place for courtesy, for accommodating differences, for breaking bread together, for helping the needy, for recognizing abiding values of family and friendship."
Tags:asia, diplomacy, foreign, pacific, people, policy, smuggling
This paper discusses effective public diplomacy concentrating on goals, challenges and opportunities for African States.
Research Paper # 111649 |
4,306 words (
approx. 17.2 pages ) |
13 sources |
APA | 2009
|
$ 68.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
In this article, the writer examines the concept of effective public diplomacy. This work focuses on the importance of effective diplomacy in branding African States. This work explains and analyzes the current challenges of effective diplomacy to African States on influencing people. Finally, this work analyzes the tools and mechanisms that could be best utilized to reach these goals and answers the question of what impacts can effective public diplomacy have to African States and whether these impacts can be measured and if so, then how. This work identifies the opportunities for African States to have effective diplomacy and concludes with a long-term investment project that can be secured through effective diplomacy and not only in African States but worldwide as well.
Outline:
Objective
Examination of Historical Diplomacy
Domestic and International Politics
Private Sector Business Development
Tourism and Effective Public Diplomacy
Summary and Conclusion
Bibliography
From the Paper
"First, it is important that the country or state develop business practices that reflect public diplomacy and that this be accomplished at the level of business within that country or state. Stated that part of this process includes making public diplomacy actions a corporate officer's responsibility. Secondly, it is important to promote an understanding of the society, culture and values in other countries. Stated third, is the importance of trust and respect across cultures. It is stated that the following eleven models of action were chosen because of their potential of impact on public diplomacy being that highest potential for an impact believed to be present. For the purpose of this work, African States has been inserted where previously specified America or American and are the models of actions as follows ... "
Tags:ambassadors, internationalization, cooperation, trust, country
A review and comparison of Roosevelt's "Big-Stick Diplomacy" and Taft's "Dollar Diplomacy".
Comparison Essay # 115931 |
1,040 words (
approx. 4.2 pages ) |
4 sources |
APA | 2009
|
$ 21.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper explains the term "Big Stick Diplomacy", which refers to President Roosevelt's administration's foreign policy. The paper describes how Roosevelt metaphorically used his big stick on several occasions, particularly in Latin America. The paper then discusses President William Taft's "Dollar Diplomacy" that describes the United States' efforts to use money in the form of loans to countries in Latin America and East Asia to further US aims. The paper compares the leadership of both presidents and asserts that while Roosevelt prevented wars using creative tactics and mediated disputes between foreign nations to sustain peace and protect U.S. interests, Taft just used economic power to manipulate foreign relations.
From the Paper
"President Theodore Roosevelt felt, throughout his entire political career that being well-prepared for a conflict was the United States' best strategy as a preventative measure to avoid war. His belief, taken from the African proverb, "speak softly and carry a big stick, and you will go far," summarizes his leadership (Abrams, 1978). Forcing the United States to flaunt its power was, in his mind, the most effective way to keep other countries from attacking. Simply carrying the big stick without using it would hopefully be enough to discourage their challenges. The media helped to hype this statement coining the term Big Stick Diplomacy to refer to his administration's foreign policy. Political cartoons during his presidency often depicted Roosevelt with a large object, usually a club or stick, swinging it at others to force them into submission with mere threat."
Tags:Latin, America, foreign, relations, economic, power, mediation, negotiations
This paper examines the role of media diplomacy, public diplomacy and propaganda in the reporting of the meeting between the President of the United States and the Prime Minister of Israel on April 15, 2004.
Term Paper # 102223 |
1,068 words (
approx. 4.3 pages ) |
4 sources |
APA | 2006
|
$ 22.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper looks at several different reports of this event and analyzes how the use of media and public diplomacy, along with propaganda, shape the way in which news is actually reported. The paper discusses how the United States focused on the commitment to fighting terrorism as its outcome of the meeting, the Middle-East focused on the United States' public support of the continued oppression of the Palestinians while the United Kingdom saw it as another act of arrogance by the Bush administration and used it as an attack on its own Prime Minister. The paper shows how vastly different the reports of one event can be and what one event can mean to so many different people.
From the Paper
"Public and media diplomacy are closely related and often confused with each other. Public diplomacy is defined as a one-sided, usually half truthful communication designed to persuade public opinion where media diplomacy is essentially the same but uses a television medium to get the point across either locally or internationally. Many media and press outlets utilized this particular event to get their one-sided point across to the only audience that mattered, the one that was listening."
Tags:press, television, audience, communication, news, Middle, East, Britain
This paper discusses US diplomacy during the Second World War.
Term Paper # 96701 |
1,909 words (
approx. 7.6 pages ) |
3 sources |
MLA | 2007
|
$ 36.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper describes how the United States tried to stay neutral at the start of WWII but was ultimately drawn into the thick of the conflict, in Europe and the Pacific. The paper shows how the US foreign policy became firmly 'internationalist' as opposed to 'isolationist'. The paper discusses how, although several features of the US wartime policy are considered to have been controversial, such as its alliance with the Soviet Union, the main aims of the US policy were fully achieved.
Outline:
Background
US Policies of Neutrality, "Cash and Carry" and "Lend-Lease"
Getting Directly Involved in the War
Roosevelt's Wartime Diplomacy: Deviousness or Statesmanship?
The Goals and Outcome of American Diplomacy
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The US diplomacy during the Second World War had its roots in the aftermath of the First World War. Having taken his country into the First World War to "make the world safe for democracy," President Woodrow Wilson unveiled his vision for collective world security after the War and worked fervently for his country's entry into a "League of Nations." However, Wilson failed to get the backing of the Congress for his plan and America entered into an isolationist phase. Hence, when the Second World War started in 1939, the US public opinion, preoccupied with its domestic fight against the economic depression, was in no mood to get entangled in the War."
Tags:isolationism, internationalism, Wilson, Roosevelt, Soviet, Union
A look at different theories of international diplomacy focusing on conflict resolution.
Analytical Essay # 9554 |
1,930 words (
approx. 7.7 pages ) |
9 sources |
MLA | 2002
|
$ 36.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper begins by reviewing and analyzing the book "Multi-Track Diplomacy: A Systems Approach to Peace", co-authored by Dr. Louise Diamond and Ambassador John McDonald. The paper then discusses why Quebec has experienced relatively little violence, while Northern Ireland has experienced a great deal of violence although the two conflicts have similar backgrounds. The paper shows how diplomacy is an activity of conflict resolution and not of the creation of a potential utopia.
From the Paper
"The book Multi-Track Diplomacy: A Systems Approach to Peace, co-authored by Dr. Louise Diamond and Ambassador John McDonald, articulates an innovative new strategy for international diplomacy. Traditionally, diplomacy has been focused upon highly specific objectives within specific situations. Negotiating nuclear proliferation treaties is perhaps the most obvious example of this, where the former superpowers often engaged in long, protracted arguments about how many warheads and of what kind either the Soviet Union or the United States could produce or maintain over a period of time."
Tags:world, war, conflict, politics