Abstract
This essay discusses the architectural significance of the palace/villa of the Emperor Diocletian, who abdicated from power in 305 and lived for eight years in a villa on the Dalmatian coast. The writer describes the villa and how it was an amazing self-contained community. The paper explains that, after the emperor's death, it was eventually taken over by locals who needed a secure hiding place from barbarians, and it eventually became the City of Split.

From the Paper
"The Emperor Diocletian rose through the orders by virtue of military skill, brilliance, and flexible scruples. Though he had little formal education, he proved an able soldier and a skilled statesman in power. Coming to the throne after a period of anarchy, he reorganized the empire, carried out a number of necessary reforms, and gave the empire a peace and security it had not know for years. (Durant, 639-400; Wilkes, 1-3) A complex figure, Dalmatian, and reflecting its part Roman/part Byzantine character, he was by temperament Oriental and despotic. At the same time, he was a military precisian, an untiring worker, logical and thorough..."

Tags:diocletian, split, palace

Abstract
This paper relates that the Emperor Diocletian rose through the orders by virtue of military skill, brilliance, and flexible scruples and how in preparation for his retirement, Diocletian had built a huge structure on the Dalmatian coast, a few miles from Salona. It also looks at how what began as a villa eventually became a a permanent settlement as the city of Split developed.

From the Paper
"While there will probably never be definitive evidence of when the inhabitation which became Split took place, it is unlikely that the palace was ever entirely derelict. It was simply to fine a resource to pass up, and while it may have been many decades before there was any substantial permanent settlement here, it seems highly doubtful that the palace was ever truly deserted. (Wilkes, 88) While the precise nature of the inhabitation at Split during the early years remains questionable, the city always seems to have been regarded as autonomous, and by the time Constantine Porphyrogenitus chronicled it, it was essentially independent and remained so until the Venetians gained control in the fifteenth century. (Plommer, 256) "

Tags:rome, Constantine, Dalmatian, fortress

Abstract
This paper explains that the Christians were singled out because they rejected the everyday, pagan lifestyle of Rome; no one likes the outcasts of a social order. The author points out that the Jews were allowed to live peacefully because they were perceived as a national, cultural heritage, which Rome had learned to tolerate, but the Christian church raised the ire of Rome because of its evangelistic efforts. The paper states that Diocletian, Pliny, and those who persecuted the Christian church for decades did not realize that their efforts to destroy a small sect only served as a catalyst to strengthen and harden the church's resolve to expand its influence throughout the Roman world.

From the Paper
"As the power was divested among the different provinces and between the sometimes cooperative, sometimes competitive leaders, the sense of absolute ruler was slipping away. In the Eastern territory, possibly because of its distance from Rome, Diocletian took steps to firmly establish his reign. The Roman emperor has always walked a fine line between secular authority and assumed divine inspiration. The pantheon of Roman gods and goddesses was slowly evolving to include the emperor, and his divine royalty. In the west, the consulship became the personal power block of a narrow circle of aristocratic Roman families. In the East, the office tended to be monopolized by emperors, or used by them to reward both military and civic service."

Tags:provinces, evangelist, citizen, pagan, influence

Abstract
This paper discusses the Baths of Diocletian that were built during the Roman Empire. These baths were a very public and very integral part of the Roman Empire. All members of this Empire went to these facilities every day regardless of class. Inside the baths were not only baths, but exercise facilities.

From the Paper
Baths of Diocletian (Thermae Diocletiani) During the Roman Empire, bathing was a very significant part of everyday Roman life. Whether from a rich or poor demographic, all citizens in the Roman culture would engage in a daily bath at one of the many bathhouse structures through the Empire. Nearly all Roman men bathed every day and most every woman did as well, although separately. While in modern times we consider bathing a very personal and private matter, this was not the case in the Roman Empire whatsoever. In this time period during the first few centuries of the Common Era, there were anywhere from one-hundred and seventy to nine hundred baths in existence at any given time throughout

Tags:roman, baths, diocletian

Abstract
This paper explores how Diocletian's reform of Roman coinage and the "Tetrarchic" style of representation served in literally changing the face of Rome's coins. Furthermore, it assesses how these two dramatic changes in the coinage served to bring a sense of stability back to the Empire. These questions are dealt with through an examination of the history of coinage in the Roman Empire and how it changed under Diocletian. The paper suggests that issues faced by the Empire were reflected in its coinage. The author concludes that in Diocletian's coinage reform, he attempted to not only bring about economic stability for the Empire, but to also ensure the presence of such stability on the coins themselves.

Coin Value: Debasement, Degeneration, and Revaluation
Faces on the Coins: All for One
Hand in Hand: Stability as Brought About Through the Coins
Works Cited

From the Paper
"Fifty years after the end of the Pax Romana, the emperor Diocletian was tasked with securing order in the Roman Empire. Chief among the issues Dicoletian faced was an increasing devaluation of imperial coinage. Although the almost half a century of barbarian invasions and bickering warlords was now behind the Empire, the effects of such tensions were still felt in monetary exchange rates."

Tags:Roman Empire, numismatics, iconography, Emporers

Abstract
Thematic paper discussing what is known as Eusebius's "Church History" (histor Eccles) and what is known of it, what it does relate, in contrast with propagandist purpose of explaining the end of Diocletian's persecutions and the rise of Constantine towards an assured Roman Catholic religion and empire. More than one version of the primary text; several references addressing different aspects of an important historiographical issue.

From the Paper
Assignment 3: Comparison and Contrast Topic 3: John Donne and Virginia Woolf On the Theme of Death John Donne's "Meditation XVII" and Virginia Woolf's "The Death of the Moth" present readers with reflections upon death and its significance. This essay will compare and contrast these two works, exploring both similarities and differences in how each represents the theme of death. As will be seen, although their immediate subjects and styles are very distinct in their respective world views, both works are similar in how they represent death and life in a single instance as being an integral

Tags:eusebius, caesarea, church history

Abstract
This seven-page paper looks at the democracy of Rome and the changes made by the Emperors Diocletian (284-305 CE) and Constantine (308-337 CE) in their efforts to stabilize the failing Roman Empire.

Abstract
The letter explains that the reasons for the continued success of the Christian religion in the Roman empire lies in its policies of tolerating alien gods, the belief and practice of martyrs which strengthened the Christian religion, and the willingness of the elite, the educated and the general masses in accepting the Christian religion.

From the Paper
"My dear Emperor, another reason for the speedy rise and growth of Christianity amongst the Romans is our belief in many gods, and their strong belief in one god, also termed as Monotheism. As you are well aware, that Roman Pagan religion does accept the presence of a dominant god, yet, the presence of other gods makes our religion polytheism, and it is here where our true conflict begins."

Tags:god, martyr, Christian

Abstract
This paper examines how the Roman Empire, while maintaining a measure of personal freedom for many of its subjects, did not allow religious freedom to prosper under its rule. It looks at how Rome mingled the identity of the Caesar with that of its pantheon of gods and how, in order to be an accepted Roman citizen, a person had to be willing to bow down to the Emperor. It explores the spread of Christianity within the Roman Empire and attempts to understand the events that led up to Diocletian?s edict and Constantine?s Edict of Milan, which reversed Diocletian?s policy. It does this through an analysis of the political setting of Rome and the slow erosion of Roman authority.

From the Paper
"Due to the size of the empire, Diocletian created a division of power and responsibilities for administrative purposes. He divided the empire into two spheres, eastern and western. The division was enforced sporadically and became permanent with Arcadius and Honorius in 395 AD. Diocletian devised a system of co-emperors, which included two co-ruling senior emperors, one in the east, and the other in the west who each chose an assistant who would be mentored as his successor. This system was called the tetrarchy. The senior rulers were titled "Augustus" while their sub-rulers were entitled "Caesars". Imperial edicts could be issued in the names of all four of the emperors and Caesars, or in any of their names."

Tags:diocletian, edict, milan, caesar

Abstract
The paper describes the birth of the Roman republic and the rise and fall of Julius Caesar and notes the aspects that are common to the Roman and the Greek cultures. The paper then discusses the end of the Republic and the beginning of the Empire that was marked by the naming of Octavian Augustus emperor for life. The paper outlines the era of the Five Good Emperors and focuses on Diocletian and Constantine who were some of the most important figures of the Roman Empire at that time and had a role in the spread of Christianity. Finally, the paper overviews the main reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire.

From the Paper
"The history of the Roman republic and then empire represents one of the most important segments of the history of the world. It represents the first elements of the organization of the state. However, at the same time the development of the system of government pointed out the different means through which a community can evolve from a political point of view. From the early days of the republic to the late years of the Empire, the Roman state and its institutions were a representative example for the political development of a form of government."

Tags:Byzantine, Empire, Caesar, Augustus, Diocletian, Constantine