Abstract
This paper discusses a dialog between Socrates and Euthyphro which takes place when Euthyphro seeks to bring his father to trial for having allowed a man to be killed. According to the paper's author, whilst the issue under discussion seems to be justice, it is, in fact, about morality, since morality is the basis for justice. The writer examines and reviews the discussion between the two and the points raised by each before drawing his own conclusions.

From the Paper
"The dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro takes place under the circumstances in which the latter one wishes to bring his own father to trial for having allowed a man to be killed. The situation is highly unusual because normally only the direct relatives of the person who was killed could have instigated the trial of the culprit.
"The issue under discussion seems to be justice, but on a more profound insight we realize that it is actually morality, since morality is the ground for justice. Euthyphro is doing something which may be considered spectacular, since he gives more importance to the concept of morality and its application than to his own family. Since he seems willing to deal with the concept of morality in a pure state overlooking all subjective and personal implications, Socrates provokes him to a debate which is meant to discover what is the real nature of morality."

Tags:morality, piousness, justice, omniscient, gods, religion, rules, truth, universally

Abstract
An outline of the implication of dialogue teaching in a class room with reference to Paulo Freire's "The Banking concept of Education".

Tags:importance, dialogue, classroom

Abstract
The paper discusses Prabu's argument in his article "The Clash or Dialogue of Civilizations" that international dialogue among cultures and religions will satisfy the contradictory issues of globalization and nationalism. The paper analyzes his article and explains how he makes his argument for his audience of academia well. The paper shows how he presents clear language and uses familiar, reasoned and logical arguments to make his case.

From the Paper
"In his article, "The Clash or Dialogue of Civilizations," author Joseph Prabhu suggests that conversations about diversity need to move from "intranational dialogues to international dialogues" to achieve world peace (15). The author supports and develops his thesis by discussing the contradictory nature of the two trends that encapsulate today's international politics--globalization and nationalism. Because these trends are contradictory, Prabhu implies that they are not working to create a world based on peace. Furthermore, he uses the events of September 11, 2001 to make this point even clearer, by suggesting it as both a "Clash of Civilizations" and an attack based on political and economic issues. Because of its dual characterization, Prabhu suggests that "dialogue between religions" and cultures is a tactic much more superior to war to resolve the international issues of the world (14). Finally, Prabu uses the example of the United States to support his thesis by stating that the United States has been able to use the grantee of rights to establish a common ground that opens dialogue among cultures."

Tags:globalization, nationalism, language, style, audience

Abstract
This natural science paper is comprised of three parts. The first part of the paper sets up the basic premise of a dramatic dialogue between Edison and Einstein. The second part is a dramatic dialogue between Edison and Einstein. The final part of the paper is an annotated bibliography.

From the Paper
"Thomas Edison (1847-1931) was one of the most prolific and important inventors in the United States during the late 19th and early 20th Century. As a scientist Edison was more interested in designing products that would be useful for the average person. This means that Edison is a believer in technology and does not put a lot of stock in theory. As an inventor Edison is also a business man. "

Tags:edison, einstein, science

Abstract
This paper explains that, although there certainly are connections and parallels between different religions and faith structures, the relationship between interfaith dialogue and peace negotiation is hampered by the fact that today most world conflicts are the result of fundamentalist differences and disagreements between religious faiths and worldviews. Next, the author looks at modern religious myth and secularization, the concepts of non-duality, nothingness and attachment and the relationship of sufism, Kabala and the writings of Jung. The paper concludes that the works of Jung and others within the secular world can act as integrators of essential religious views thus accelerating the movement towards world peace.


Table of Contents:
Introduction and Overview
Religious Foundation
Points of Interconnection and Correspondence
The Modern Context: Religious Myth and Secularization
Points of Interconnection and Correspondence
Non-duality, Nothingness and Attachment
Sufism, Kabala and Jung
Conclusion

From the Paper
"Despite these examples it is equally true that there has been in many sensitive areas of the world a contemporary 'hardening' of views and attitudes between different faiths, a fact that is often culturally driven. There are intense differences in dogma and ideologically that are endlessly debated and which hamper the true understanding and interconnections between religious faiths. One example is the difference between Buddhism and Catholicism with regard to certain central religious concepts; for example in a comparison between Theravada Buddhist and Catholic views on the subject of salvation."

Tags:nondualism, truth, transcendence, soteriology, secularization

Abstract
The paper interprets a dialogue between a Confucian and a Christian. It then goes on to discuss the differences between the religions of Confucianism, Christianity and Buddhism - their history and practice. The author ends with a personal comment about his relationship and feelings toward to the religions he discusses in his paper.

From the Paper
"Some Western scholars have delineated the fundamental difference between Christianity and Confucianism in that "Confucianism is very much a religion for the purposes of the Chinese," in other words located in the Chinese sense of social order. (Hoad, 2005) However, Christianity began as a nationalistic tradition, a splinter radical group that broke away from the Pharisees and Sadducees of Israel. Christ's reference to the commandments would make no sense to an audience unfamiliar with the religious tradition of Israel. Also, although Christianity may now exist as a theistic rather than a humanistic religion like Confucianism, that is a religion focused on the relationship between God and humans, rather than human interrelationships, Christ explicitly sets out a code of conduct for individuals to obey, and an ideal to uphold in terms of personal piety that is in relation to others as well as to the Father."

Tags:religion, ideology, theology

Abstract
This paper examines the defense of Socrates at his fateful trial, as it appears in the dialog "The Apology". The paper arrives at the conclusion that the charges against Socrates are unfounded and although the judges were not convinced, this essay shows that a proper analysis of "The Apology" exonerates Socrates from the charges leveled against him.

From the Paper
"To certain quarters of society truth is inimical. When we hear the charges brought up against Socrates we are in little doubt that they are raised by people wishing to protect their privileged position in society, and where the privilege very much depends on the truth being disguised. In the process of his defense Socrates manages to provide an unmistakable map of exactly which sections of society the objection against him originates. They are the poets, the craftsmen, and the rhetoricians. The three main disputants are Meletus, Anytus and Lycon, and Socrates points out that they are representing those sections of society respectively. Their actions stem from a fear of truth plainly spoken. For this they hate Socrates, whose life is dedicated to speaking the plain truth, and to exposing as ignorant those who hold themselves up as wise. So Socrates says: "And yet I know that this plainness of speech makes them hate me, and what is their hatred but a proof that I am speaking the truth? - this is the occasion and reason of their slander of me, as you will find out either in this or in any future inquiry."

Tags:philosophy, corrupt, youth, trial

Abstract
This paper is a dialog between Susan Sontag and Bob Dylan, surrounding Alan Ginsburg's poem, "Howl." It is a point of common interest in different ways for the two of them: for Dylan, content-wise the poem has importance, and for Sontag, the aesthetics and poem "breathing" is what's important. They argue over these key points of their artistic philosophies and the poem itself.

From the Paper
A Conversation between Susan Sontag and Bob Dylan on the Alan Ginsburg Poem, "Howl." Abstract This paper is a dialogue between Susan Sontag and Bob Dylan, surrounding Alan Ginsburg's poem, "Howl." It is a point of common interest in different ways for the two of them: for Dylan, content-wise, and for Sontag, the aesthetics. They argue over these key points of their artistic philosophies and the poem itself. A conversation between Susan Sontag and Bob Dylan on the Alan Ginsburg Poem, "Howl."

Tags:susan sontag, bob dylan, howl

Abstract
The writer of this paper contends and explains why the 'soul' is the inner part of us, while at the same time the 'body' is our outer part, as portrayed in Marvell's poem. The soul suffers from the effects of being influenced by external factors and the social and moral decline which Marvell identifies as the 'disease' that plagues the body. The body's lamentation is actually a series of complaints against the soul's obvious reference to the individual's conscience and morality. This paper discusses the manner in which Marvell addresses the issue of duality in people. This paper examines the main focus of the poem, which is about the social and moral disease, wherein blindness, deafness and torture of the inner self were the consequences brought about by the individual's exposure to the social and moral decline of human society.

From the Paper
"This passage provided an enlightening insight between the Body and Soul's relationship. By identifying the Soul as 'tyrannical,' Marvell laid bare the fact that morality and conscience, which the Soul represents, bring difficulty and complexity to the lives of humans. The Body's lamentation argued the fact that humanity would be better off without these restrictive standards of morality, which only bring about prejudice, discrimination, and conflict among people, in the same way that Body and Soul experienced conflict within the individual. What Marvell had presented in the poem was a 'glimpse' into the nature of the Body and Soul as he interpreted it from his experience."

Tags:poetry, literature, analysis, perception

Abstract
The Buddhist-Christian dialogue can be regarded as a more than academic and institutional exercise, on account of more than a century of interaction between Buddhists and Christians throughout the once colonized world. Buddhism and Christianity have shared the tendency to make their founders more symbolic indicators of faith and practice. Moreover, as this paper also argues, the Buddhist-Christian dialogue has been aided by several points of convergence, including their shared feature of concentration upon a founder-mystic, in the language of the post-industrial world -- an 'icon' -- in the form of an historical person whose symbolism transcends many levels and inspirations. 14 pgs. 27 f/c. 10b.

Tags:buddhist, christian, dialogue