A discussion and analysis of Alexis de Tocqueville's ideas on the American political system in his work "Democracy in America".
Analytical Essay # 113986 |
2,360 words (
approx. 9.4 pages ) |
10 sources |
MLA | 2009
|
$ 43.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper discusses Alexis de Tocqueville's prediction that, in viewing equality as the ultimate imperative, Americans would forego their freedom. The paper explains Tocqueville's ideas on taxing the rich and poor and his belief that the American federal government would moderate and regulate aspects of the lives of the people it was put in place to serve. The paper then relates that Tocqueville did not realize the strength that America would eventually exhibit, that it would become the most powerful empire in the world and a moderator for world activities.
From the Paper
""Americans are so enamored of equality that they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom," Tocqueville wrote in Democracy in America, after visiting the country in 1831 to document the prison and political systems. Though at the time Americans were not communists or true socialists, it turns out that, particularly in the modern United States, he was on the right track. His best prediction was the one that allowed that Americans will give their liberty away for anything. But to credit him in his prediction, it is necessary not to include the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, as much of what was going on was racially charged, and the actions of many did not have equality as a main goal. Slavery, the reconstruction period, and the Civil Rights Era were filled with discriminatory policies and segregation, but what Tocqueville was describing was America's attempt to epitomize the true democracy, where people are not necessarily free, but they are at least somewhat equal. This ideal he found in America was for everyone to have some protection by the federal government, as everyone donates to it by participating in society."
Tags:taxation, liberties, equality, superpower, moderator
A paper arguing that the American government is no longer a government of the people.
Analytical Essay # 65319 |
2,553 words (
approx. 10.2 pages ) |
5 sources |
MLA | 2006
|
$ 46.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper makes the argument that America has become a government of the elite rather than a government of the people. The paper points to the fact that elections are financed and controlled by interest groups and that the cost of elections makes it prohibitive for anyone but the very elite to run for office. The paper details how these two factors are the primary reasons why America no longer has a government for the people, by the people and of the people but rather has a government that follows the political Golden Rule: He who has the gold rules.
From the Paper
""Every civilization has a government of some sort...The Americans make their state, as they make their armies and corporations, a vast organizational achievement; they speak of 'the business of government'." (Lerner, p. 353) The problem is that government, and the election of so-called "representatives" has become a business. Big business. And, the bigger the business the more influence it has on the elections, on legislation, on the future of the ordinary citizen who does not have the financial influence to participate."
Tags:detoqueville, institutions, democratic, directly, elect, power, representative, centralized