Abstract This paper looks into the practice of politics in the United States. The writer discusses the polarity in conservative/liberal political views, as represented by the two major political parties, the Democrats and the Republicans. The writer demonstrates that the significance of this study is to foster an understanding of how the pluralistic dimension of political discourse affects politics in the United States.
From the Paper "The prevalent political culture of the United States has shaped the way politics are practiced. Political culture is the inherited set of beliefs, attitudes and opinions Americans have about how their government ought to operate. We know that there is an overall shared culture through information derived from voting, polls, books, speeches and what we see on the media. The foundation of political culture is based on certain common values including the freedoms in the Bill of Rights, liberty, equality, individual responsibility, democracy ... "
Tags: ideologies, political parties, democrat, republican, pluralistic society, rights, political culture
Abstract At a rally on September 9, in Dayton, Ohio Senator Barack Obama gave a speech on "A 21st Century Education". The author of the paper uses that speech as a platform to examine and analyze Senator Obama's abilities as a public speaker. The writer describes Obama's use of words and imagery and examines their effects on the audience. He goes on to show how Obama uses his linguistic ability to establish his credibility and promote the image of a caring, forward thinking, everyday American in an attempt to win support not only from Democratic party supporters but also Republicans.
From the Paper "Besides revealing character qualities, Obama uses ethos to establish his credibility as a leader who makes wise decisions. He includes a bit of his track record when he brings up the successful law he passed in Illinois to double the number of charter schools in Chicago, and his plan to do the same thing nationwide. He mentions several statistics about the literacy rates in America and the rate of jobs offered to different levels of education to raise awareness of our current state, and more so to show that he is educated and passionate about this issue. He further shows his ability to solve this problem by mentioning a couple of programs he had developed last year, such as the Service Scholarship fund to solve the problem of finding good teachers."
Tags:democraticpresidentsenatorrepublican, american dream, elections public
Abstract This paper discusses when Nixon stood for presdiency in 1968. The author looks at how the candidates tried to attract voters and the various initiatives of the Republicans and Democrats. It illustrates how nowadays the Republican Party can be thought of as a coalition consisting of Christian fundamentalists, free market ideologues, and contractors eager to capitalize on the United States? perceived future military obligations.
From the Paper "In 1962, Americans didn?t have Richard Nixon to kick around anymore. Nixon, disillusioned at having lost California to the Democrats after having battled for the White House two years earlier, was on the retreat alongside most of the old-guard conservatives in America. This trend is one that had favored only moderate Republicans like Eisenhower after the anti-communists of the early 50's had squandered the Grand Old Party's last congressional majority. Kennedy was a centrist that wished to modify his party's "New Deal" legacy for a more middle-class electorate while continuing to champion the traditions of America as an alternative to Bolshevism. By 1980, the conservative movement came to dominate the governments of the United States and United Kingdom as it employed rhetoric that appealed to traditional Christians and to libertarians who wished to curtail government spending. An analysis of what took place between these two events reveals an electorate disillusioned with the sweeping social changes of the 1960's and ready to embrace the stability promised by what was at the time an opposition party."
Tags: Nixon, Richard kennedy democratic reagan chicago republican
This paper discusses how the battle for House and Senate left both Republicans and Democrats alike exhausted after the political battle that ensued as a result of Election 2002.
Abstract The battle for control over the House and Senate made historic the quest for Election 2002; not only were incumbents losing to newcomers, but a longtime respected name throughout the political world was defeated in what many believed to be one of the most shocking outcomes of the entire race. The buzz around the nation reflected a potential change in the House and Senate that would cause historians to rewrite the outcome expected to take place prior to fourteen months ago. Indeed, the extent to which September 11th played a significant role in this tremendous political upheaval has more than just a few wondering what such a change will now mean for the nation's safety.
From the Paper "The election of 2002 stood for more than America's basic right to choose its varied political representatives; rather, it reflected a significant change in the overall governmental fabric that comprises the nation's people. That both the House and the Senate were caught in the midst of an unprecedented struggle between Republican and Democratic designation speaks volumes regarding the modified political landscape United States citizens have recently adopted."
Abstract This paper examines the 1998 Senate race between the Republican, Alfonse D"Amato and the Democrat Charles Schumer. In particular it discusses how D"Amato and Schumer both employed similar strategies in their political campaigns: selling their credentials on being tough on crime and undercutting their opponents for their "weakness". While D"Amato proposed the use of tougher penalties to reduce crime, Schumer provided a comprehensive approach that encompasses preventive and deterrent approaches. It also evaluates how because of his unpopular anti-gun control stance, D"Amato relied heavily on his ammunition for counterattacking Schumer on his votes against stricter mandatory sentencing and how apart from attacking his opponent, Schumer was able to use his formidable track record of writing crime bills and relatives of shooting victims in news conferences to project himself as a representative of the people.
From the Paper "In contrast, Schumer had a broader perspective about the issue of crime and had proposed an integrated set of solutions for resolving the problem. He was the creator of the 1994 crime bill that included a wide range of policies: 1) mandated life sentences with parole for three-time criminals; 2) increased the number of crimes punishable by capital punishment; 3) provided funding for police officers, prisons, along with drug treatment and youth programs; 4) classified stalking and domestic abuse as Federal crimes; 5) banned specific assault weapons; and 6) made the import of child pornography illegal (Dao, "Schumer and D?Amato," 1998, p. B5). Therefore, Schumer had always adopted a comprehensive approach towards crime control. "
Abstract This paper addresses the issue of conflict between the U.S. President and Congress. It provides an historical overview of the establishment of these two institutions. It lists a number of factors which are cause for conflict such as public opinion, budget restraints, security concerns and split government.
From the paper:
"Having just rid themselves of one tyrant, the framers of the United States Constitution were reluctant to create another to take his place. Therefore, in developing a new government, they devised three separate branches of government with a complex series of checks and balances so that no one person or branch could ever claim the power of a king. Two of these branches of government, the Congress, or legislative branch, and the President, or executive branch, were given the task of working together to shape the laws and policies of the country. A certain amount of conflict between these two branches of government would not have surprised or distressed the founding fathers in the least (Heineman, Peterson, & Rasmussen 33-36). The amount of the conflict and some of its causes, though, probably would have amazed them."
Abstract In this article, the writer notes that when President George W. Bush leaves office after the 2008 U.S. Presidential Elections, he would be leaving behind a legacy to the American nation not only of his own but his father and the Republican Party's as well. The writer argues that, despite negative publicity, the legacy of the Bushes and the Republican Party served to strengthen the nation. The writer also maintains that it is a pity that we have a Democrat- run congress at present. But in a democracy such as ours, it is a good thing because having a Republican-sitting President and a Democrat-led congress serve as check-and-balance to each other. The writer argues that in the next election, we have to maintain this status quo. The writer concludes that it is important to elect a Republican to hold the highest seat of the land to maintain this check-and-balance so America will always be the America we all love and cherish - America, the good, the just and the free.
From the Paper "We should instead let people keep more of their earnings and spend it to boost the economy through consumer spending, but let us also remind our citizens that savings and insurance is part of the American way and also helps boost economic growth. We are a party that believes in spending only what we can and avoid deficit spending. As such, by voting another Republican president we can ensure that our dream of attaining a balance budget will not be kept a dream but made into reality. Just like our founding fathers, God was a major factor in the creation of this nation. We will not take away this belief in a Supreme Being but rather strengthen it in our institutions and those with different convictions, teach them tolerance and respect."
Abstract This paper discusses the arguments for and against Senator Barack Obama becoming the President of the Unitd States. The paper specifically discusses the arguments with regard to his religion and background. The paper argues that there are many facts to support Senator Barack Obama as the best choice for the next President of the United States.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
The Taste of "New"
Talk to the Mullahs
Voting for McCain is almost like Voting for George W. Bush
Why Choose Senator Barack Obama for President Summary and Conclusion
From the Paper "There are many facts to support Senator Barack Obama as the best choice for the next President of the United States however; the truth is that the Senator just happens to fit the template that is envisioned by many in today's highly globalized and diverse society. A society in which many of the old shells of societal standards and norms have fallen away and a veritable metamorphosis has occurred giving rise to a higher consciousness and higher level of cognition among the fresh voting groups in the United States. Groups of voters comprised of all races, ethnicities, nationalities, religions, and in fact, a group of U.S. citizens who have attended school, worked, attended church and other community and societal and institutional functions side-by-side with one another."
A review of the book, "The Buying of the President 2004: Who's Really Bankrolling Bush and His Democratic Challengers and What They Expect in Return", by Charles Lewis.
Abstract This paper examines how, in his book, "The Buying of the President 2004: Who's Really Bankrolling Bush and His Democratic Challengers and What They Expect in Return", Charles Lewis investigates the influence of financial interests in the United States political system. It looks at how he carefully argues that financial interests are now the most powerful influence in American politics, replacing the voting public, and how Lewis's careful and painstaking research lends credibility to his argument that political action committees (PACs) play a crucial role in influencing the politics of Republicans and Democrats alike.
From the Paper "Lewis wrote the book in order to provide the American public with an understanding of how the political system and financial interests are intertwined in today's political landscape. A former journalist, Lewis purports to be non-partisan, and indeed his book contains scathing indictments of both Republican and Democratic political players. Within The Buying of the President 2004, Lewis investigates such major players as John Kerry and incumbent President George Bush, giving both personal histories of the candidates and an overview of their campaign finances. Further, Lewis is unflinching in revealing the extent to which big business has financed President George W. Bush and the Republicans, and notes perhaps surprisingly that News Corp (owners of Fox News Channel) is one of the Democrat's top 50 donors in the last 25 years."
Abstract This paper pretends the author is running for the U.S. Senate and outlines the concerns and hurdles that will have to be faced in getting elected.
From the Paper "I have decided to run for the United States senate in order to advance a policy of finding and using alternative energy sources to reduce and eventually eliminate our reliance on oil. I am running on the Green Party ticket, which presents some difficulties in an of itself. However, I have a strong campaign staff behind me, a positive and popular public message, and some amazing and dedicated volunteers to help me. I know that I can do this."
Abstract This paper discusses the thesis: The Presidents of the United States took on activist roles in response to wars and progressive social reform. Whereas powers assumed during war were to recede following war's conclusion, the increased role of the President were always increased with social reform that put social programs under the command of the executive. This was to alter dramatically after Truman's administration decided to introduce atomic weapons to warfare.
Paper Outline:
1. Lincoln's Presidency 2. The Gilt Age Presidents 3. Gilt Age Presidents 4. Normalcy
5. Roosevelt's New Deal
6. Truman and the Post-War Era
From the Paper "Wilson's conduct during and independent of the First World War was a testament to the caprice of an ideological leader who embodied many of the sentiments common to progressive idealists in the first decades of the 20th century. Wartime taxes on the wealthiest Americans jumped to above 70%, prompting most of them to put their money into tax-free municipal bonds. Many thought well of this move at the time, along with the subsequent inheritance tax, also known as the death tax. Degler is among them, and claims ?in taxing incomes according to the ability to pay, the progressives were taking notice of the highly interdependent nature of society.? (5)"
Abstract This paper analyzes how the American president is treated by the media. It examines the opinions of the media on the president's role and shows how this portrayal can influence the president's functioning, both positively and negatively. The paper uses, as an example, the portrayal of George W. Bush, current U.S.A. president, and shows how different newspapers offer differing opinions, depending on their political affiliations. The paper analyzes three articles that show the diverse portrayals of George W. Bush in America's press.
From the Paper "For example, Washington Post reporter Mike Allen was one of only a select few journalists invited to ride along on the President's recent top-secret trip to Baghdad to visit American troops on Thanksgiving. While the newspaper tends to take a Democratic or liberal tone, Allen's story went behind the scenes on Air Force One to show just how the Bush team pulled off the top-secret mission. He shows how dangerous the mission really was when he says, "Much of the president's staff donned camouflage tops and bottoms, both for security reasons and to avoid spoiling the pictures. The reporters were fitted for "ballistic vests" en route" (Allen A47)."
Abstract The paper looks at Forest McDonald's book, "The American Presidency", and how it addresses the shift in the conception of the American presidency from weak to quasi-monarchial as well as how the shift occurred. Additionally, the paper discusses NcDonald's philosophical methodology and explains why McDonald calls Reagan the greatest president since Jefferson. The paper concludes that the ultimate message of McDonald is that Congress and the populace should step aside and let those who know 'best' govern.
From the Paper "According to historian and scholar Forest McDonald, The American Presidency was and is a unique institution. Although other nations have since developed elected executives called presidents, the American presidency has evolved along its own special course, because of the birth of America as a new nation without a long-standing tradition of previous history, monarchy or common law. Some of the Founding Fathers, particularly James Madison, were initially reluctant to invest the new executive office with much power, for fear of creating a new king. Madison, for example, wished to prohibit unilateral executive action in foreign affairs (238). This would, according to McDonald, have made it impossible for the United States to engage effectively as a nation on the world stage, although of course it would also have limited some of the military actions not officially declared 'wars' by Congress as well."
Tags: Madison, Constitution, Republican, Democrat, Reagan, Congress
Abstract This paper discusses the recommendation to amend the Unites States Constitution in order to to make it possible for foreign-born citizens to become president. The paper contends that some of the most loyal and patriotic citizens of the country are not natural-born citizens, but rather are foreign-born citizens who have worked hard to assimilate. The paper assesses that foreign-born citizens could ostensibly make better presidents than their natural-born counterparts because of their solid affection for the nation.
From the Paper "It's no secret that Arnold Schwarzenegger has his Terminator's eyes on the American presidency. The Governor of California recently campaigned with President Bush, and he told 60 Minutes reporter Morley Safer that he would "absolutely" consider running--if he could. Arnold is prevented from even running for the office of Presidency because of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. The clause reads, "No person except a natural born citizen"shall be eligible to the Office of President.? However, Arnold Schwarzenegger is proving to be popular enough to warrant serious legal and political discussions about the validity of the constitutional clause. In July of 2003, Republican Senator Orrin Hatch introduced a proposed constitutional amendment into the Senate. Under Hatch's proposal, anyone who has been an American citizen for more than twenty years who is otherwise eligible for the office of Presidency can run and be elected. A similar proposed amendment was also introduced into the House of Representatives, with the provision that anyone who has been a citizen for at least 35 years can run for the highest office in the nation. In addition to these official proposals to amend the United States Constitution, several grassroots movements have sprouted up in favor of amending the Constitution."
Abstract This paper outlines the follies and negligence of the presidency of George W. Bush. It cites several mistakes that he has made while in office, but at the same time argues against his impeachment. The paper suggests that impeachment would only result in a further decline in the American people's ability to trust their leaders and it expounds on these points.
From the Paper "Imagine a hypocrite. Imagine a coward sending thousands of people to their deaths to do his biddings that were established on false claims. Imagine a man who can blatantly lie to the masses but never admit he was wrong. Now imagine a country that would elect this person to their highest position of power. Twice. President George W. Bush has done several things wrong in office aside from claiming there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. He has also destroyed a budget surplus from the Clinton administration, altered the meaning of habeas corpus, and handled the most devastating natural disaster in recent years extremely poorly. Even though President Bush is guilty of all these atrocities on the American public, the House of Representatives should not bring forward articles of impeachment. Doing so would only result in a further decline in the American people's ability to trust their leaders."
