A review of the famous painting "Washington Crossing the Delaware".
Essay # 44414 |
650 words (
approx. 2.6 pages ) |
2 sources |
2002
|
$ 13.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper analyzes Emanuel Leutze's 1851 painting "Washington Crossing the Delaware". The artwork is examined in terms of the subject chosen and how the artist used light, color, form, mood and symbolism to recreate the historic event on canvas.
Tags:washington, crossing, delaware
This paper examines the case of Pennell v. State of Delaware in which the court addressed issues surrounding an expert's testimony about serial killers.
Case Study # 95788 |
1,702 words (
approx. 6.8 pages ) |
4 sources |
APA | 2006
|
$ 33.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper explains that the distinctive elements, which help an expert develop a profile on a criminal and are referred to as a criminal signature, are elements of a crime that appear somewhat unique and allow the crime to stand out from similar crimes. The author points out that, in the Pennel v. State of Delaware case, the court made the correct decision to allow the expert to testify regarding the signature elements of the murders because these elements were crucial in linking the defendant to two of the murders. The paper relates that the fact that the defendant was found not guilty of one of the murders demonstrates that juries use signature elements as tools for decision making but do substitute the presence of certain criminal signatures for a lack of reasonable doubt.
From the Paper
"Because of their frequent use in television, books, and movies, the general public may believe that criminal profilers are involved in all aspects of crime detection and prosecution. This perception is inaccurate, but criminal profiling does play an important role in the investigation of serial criminals. While the Pennell court did not allow the expert to testify regarding the criminal profile used to narrow down the range of suspects, it did permit the expert to testify regarding those elements of the crime that helped the expert develop his signature."
Tags:signature, profile, linkage, tools, cases
An analysis of "Washington Crossing the Delaware", painted by Leutze.
Essay # 87269 |
675 words (
approx. 2.7 pages ) |
0 sources |
2005
|
$ 14.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper analyzes of Leutze's painting, "Washington Crossing the Delaware". It looks at the painting through different means, such as line, space, texture, color and overall composition. The paper describes the painting as historical in nature, detailing the Washington's involvement in the American Revolution, as well as an effective painting utilizing space, color and the emotions of the period.
From the Paper
"Washington Crossing the Delaware: A Formal Analysis Emmanuel Gottlieb Leutze painted Washington Crossing the Delaware in 1851, which is now on exhibit at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in the American Wing. It is an oil painting on canvas, and is a fairly large piece, 12 2/5 x 21 1/4. The painting is historical in theme, detailing the moment that General George Washington guided American revolutionary forces across the Delaware River for a surprise attack the day after Christmas in the year 1776. The history painting shows Washington and troops in a boat, crossing the river. Washington and the American flag play a central role in the piece about the Battle of Trenton. "
Tags:leutze, painting, washington
This paper examines the case of Pennell v. State of Delaware in which the court addressed issues surrounding an expert's testimony about serial killers.
Case Study # 95771 |
1,695 words (
approx. 6.8 pages ) |
4 sources |
APA | 2007
|
$ 32.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper explains that the distinctive elements, which help an expert develop a profile on a criminal and are referred to as a criminal signature, are elements of a crime that appear somewhat unique and allow the crime to stand out from similar crimes. The author points out that, in the Pennel v. State of Delaware case, the court made the correct decision to allow the expert to testify regarding the signature elements of the murders because these elements were crucial in linking the defendant to two of the murders. The paper relates that the fact that the defendant was found not guilty of one of the murders demonstrates that juries use signature elements as tools for decision making but do substitute the presence of certain criminal signatures for a lack of reasonable doubt.
From the Paper
"Because of their frequent use in television, books, and movies, the general public may believe that criminal profilers are involved in all aspects of crime detection and prosecution. This perception is inaccurate, but criminal profiling does play an important role in the investigation of serial criminals. While the Pennell court did not allow the expert to testify regarding the criminal profile used to narrow down the range of suspects, it did permit the expert to testify regarding those elements of the crime that helped the expert develop his signature."
Tags:signature, profile, linkage, tools, cases
An overview of the ongoing problem of pollution in the Delaware River.
Essay # 57584 |
1,164 words (
approx. 4.7 pages ) |
6 sources |
MLA | 2005
|
$ 24.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper examines how the Delaware River is currently being polluted from industries along its banks and from runoff from rainwater and how, although it is cleaner than it has been in years, the fish from it are still unsafe to eat due to high levels of PCBs in the water. It looks at how, although efforts are currently underway to reduce the amounts of pollutants in the river, oil spills like the one that recently occurred, undermine these efforts and kill or sicken large numbers of wildlife in the area.
Outline
Introduction
Water Pollution
Dubious Honor
Problems with PCBs
Failing Pollution Standards
Protectors
Recent Problems
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Although the executive director of the "Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC) stated that the Delaware River in 2003 is the cleanest it has been in decades, the presence of PCBs remains a problem (Unknown, Newswire)." The high amount of PCBs in the river have forced states to issue warnings about consuming fish from the river due to the detection of high amounts of PCBs in their tissues. The DRBC hopes to eventually eliminate these warnings by finding ways to lower the amounts of PCBs in the river. They are currently working with "Pennsylvania, Delaware, New Jersey, and the EPA to develop the technical basis for four TMDLs to address four different water quality zones in the river's tidal reach, the 85-mile stretch from Trenton, N.J., downstream to the head of the Delaware Bay, and near Liston Point, Delaware (Unknown, Newswire).""
Tags:wildlife, pcb, water, standards
This paper argues against the Supreme Court decision regarding drug testing in the case of "Theodore vs. The Delaware Valley School District".
Argumentative Essay # 63119 |
3,275 words (
approx. 13.1 pages ) |
10 sources |
APA | 2005
$ 56.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper explains that the Delaware Valley School District (Pennsylvania) implemented Policy 227 stating that all middle and high school students who seek to participate in extracurricular activities or request permission to drive to school would be required to submit themselves to random drug and alcohol testing; thereafter, Louis and Mary Ellen Theodore, parents of two exemplary students, filed suit to prevent the School District from continuing to drug test students by stating that Article 1, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which prevents unreasonable searches and seizures, protects their daughters and all students from Policy 227. The author reports that the United States Supreme Court ruled against the school district stating that a drug testing policy without suspicion will survive constitutional challenge only if the school district makes some actual reasons for the specific need for the policy and gives an explanation for believing that the policy would address that need, rejecting any such symbolic purpose as an appropriate reason for drug testing any group of students. The paper argues that Policy 227 is a fine policy with good intentions; instead, the paper contends that Policy 227 should be changing to only test athletes and student drivers, allowing the school district to cite the "Earls" and "Vernonia" cases as being more comparable thus possibly changing the outcome.
From the Paper
"Another pro for the appellees were their ability to further distinguish themselves from "Vernonia" in the fact that case concerned a "strong drug culture in that school led by student athletes who had a lower expectation of privacy than the general body or even students involved in non-athletics extra-curricular activities." Appellees noted that the District had not even attempted to justify its program by proving the existence of an actual drug crisis in the District, much less within the targeted class of students" (J-97-2003, 7). In fact, since Article 1, section 8, provides greater protection than the 4th amendment, the appellees where able to further argue that "even showing of special need could not be viewed as justifying the sort of random, suspicionless searches conducted under policy 227" (J-97-2003, 7)."
Tags:veronia, extra-curricular, crisis, symbolic, pennsylvania
A comapartive analysis of the paintings "Washington Crossing the Delaware" by Emanuel Gottlieb Leutze and "Spirit of '76" by Archibald McNeal Willard.
Essay # 34706 |
1,150 words (
approx. 4.6 pages ) |
7 sources |
2002
|
$ 23.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts Emanuel Gottlieb Leutze's painting "Washington Crossing the Delaware" and the painting "Spirit of '76" by Archibald McNeal Willard.
A discussion of the conflict and amity of the Algonquian Indians with the incoming settlers.
Term Paper # 146110 |
1,191 words (
approx. 4.8 pages ) |
5 sources |
MLA | 2010
|
$ 24.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper describes the displacement and loss that characterized the relationship between the Natives and the settlers, but points out how the Delaware tribe and other Algonquian Indians had harmonious relationships with the settlers. The paper also discusses the spread of disease among Native Americans that drastically reduced their resistance and notes the settlers' insistence on converting the Natives to Christianity. The paper therefore concludes that there was amity between the new settlers and the Algonquians at times, but for the most part, the relationship was less than harmonious due to the continued demands of the settlers.
From the Paper
"It is important to remember there are many different tribes of Native Americans considered Algonquian because of the language they speak. One of these tribes that had very early interactions with European explorers and settlers is the Delaware tribe. Because they lived on the coast, they met some of the early European explorers and interacted with them. They also met the first settlers in the area, and interacted with them as well. Author Bragdon continues, "Because of their long interaction with Europeans, large and scattered populations, and linguistic skills, the Delaware often functioned as diplomats, negotiators, and translators between Indians and colonists" (Bragdon 121). Their relationship with the settlers was largely harmonious, although the settlers displaced them, like the rest of the Native Americans, from their historic tribal lands as settlers moved westward."
Tags:Native, Americans, Delaware, tribe, disease, Christianity
An analysis of the policies and procedures of two universities on the issue of academic dishonesty.
Analytical Essay # 56967 |
1,800 words (
approx. 7.2 pages ) |
9 sources |
MLA | 2004
|
$ 34.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts the policies and procedures of two institutions of higher learning on the issue of academic dishonesty, and more specifically, plagiarism. The academic dishonesty policies of the University of Delaware and West Virginia University are examined. The paper shows, through the analysis of the three most important points, clearly defined definitions of infractions, consistency of definitions, and a consequence system that includes a hierarchy of sanctions that are equal to the severity of infractions. The paper contends that the University of Delaware policies are more effective than those of West Virginia University.
From the Paper
"The issue of academic dishonesty is one that is both controversial and important in the changing state of education and information. Technology has brought the modern world into a position of overwhelming information availability. The ability to work in a word processing program, alone has significantly reduced the amount of time needed to produce equivalent document as one written just 40 years ago. Automatically formatted footnotes and the ability to cut and paste passages from other documents into your own work significantly reduces the historically laborious task of research assimilation, and it has also given a tool to students that can advertently or inadvertently result in plagiarism."
Tags:copying, cheating, punishment
A discussion of who should reap the benefits from technological innovation through a case study of the Duval Research Center.
Case Study # 26070 |
1,243 words (
approx. 5 pages ) |
1 source |
MLA | 2002
|
$ 25.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper discusses the issue of to what extent the creators of technology should be compensated if that technology is created under the aegis of a company. As an example it takes Duval Plastics, a 100-year-old company located in Delaware, that for many years operated on a dual career track, someone could come into the company on the sales and management side, or on the technical side. It looks at how members of the technical side feel that the marketing and management side of the dual ladder receive greater and faster compensation and how this strikes the technical people as unfair since it was their research and application that created the products that the company is selling. Through an analysis of key issues and factors, it attempts to determine who really should be compensated for the success of technological innovation.
From the Paper
"If the company decides to go on a one-ladder program, it will be initiating more problems, perhaps, than it will be solving. The company must keep two separate programs going. If the advancement up the technical ladder is predicated only by time spent with the company (as some researchers feel) then they are being rewarded solely for time spent. The sales and marketing people, on the other hand, must constantly keep finding new or expanded markets for the same product. Assuming that the company does go on a single career track, that prospect can be analyzed using a SWOT analysis."
Tags:sales, marketing, research, development