Abstract
In this article, the writer discusses Willa Cather's "Death Comes for the Archbishop". The writer explains that the book depicts the life journey of Father Latour as he is assigned to serve as the Catholic bishop in the New Mexico territory after it is annexed by the United States. The writer points out that starting with the prologue, Cather makes clear that setting will play a critical role in the story and that one must look at New Mexico as a setting in terms of both geography and morality. The writer notes that as three cardinals first discuss the need to assign a bishop to the New Mexico territory, the reader is given a glimpse at the geographic and moral challenges Latour will face. The writer concludes that in the end, Latour successfully confronts inhospitable natural and moral settings and, in finding a way to succeed in these environments, reveals himself as an exceptional character.

Outline:
The Archbishop vs. Nature
Overcoming a Difficult Moral Setting
Conclusion

From the Paper
"Latour's pending greatness is further demonstrated when he is not accepted in Santa Fe and must travel to Durango, Mexico - 1,500 miles each way - to obtain confirmation from the Bishop of Durango that he does, indeed, now have religious authority over the New Mexico territory. The reader is left to consider how easy it would be for Latour to turn around and leave this new assignment that has caused him nothing but sorrow. But, instead, Latour mounts a horse and makes the trip to Durango through dry, barren country. We are beginning to see the development of a character whose personality, imagination and faith are strong enough to withstand the most difficult of challenges. Latour, only a year removed from the relative comforts of Ohio, has become an improviser - a man who overcomes hardships as they are presented."

Tags:Latour, bishop, New, Mexico, morality

Abstract
"This study will examine the human ideals which are important to Charlotte Perkins Gilman in Herland and to Willa Cather in Death Comes for the Archbishop. The study will argue that both authors emphasize the importance of living a humane, tolerant life, whatever one's gender, whatever one's religion.

From the Paper
"This study will examine the human ideals which are important to Charlotte Perkins Gilman in Herland and to Willa Cather in Death Comes for the Archbishop. The study will argue that both authors emphasize the importance of living a humane, tolerant life, whatever one's gender, whatever one's religion. At the same time, both authors are thorough in exposing the human tendency to judge, to be hypocritical, self-centered, and prejudiced. Gilman focuses on gender differences to show what is valuable in human life and what is detrimental to humanity, while Cather focuses on religious aspects of existence and how religion can enhance an individual's humanity my calling him or her to live up the highest ideals of love and friendship.

Gilman's female utopia shows that she believes in the power of human beings to work cooperatively to improve their society ..."

Abstract
This paper compares and contrast the two priests in "Death Comes for the Archbishop." Father Vaillant is described as persistent and non-materialistic. Father Latour, however, is viewed as inconsistent when when dealing with others. His motivation for a French-styled church is also underscored. Together Father Vaillant and Father Latour posses some desirable strengths and some hopeless weaknesses. The author concludes that as one person, their personality traits would create a perfect being.

From the Paper
"In "Death Comes for the Archbishop", Father Jean Marie Latour is a French Catholic Priest who is sent to New Mexico to restructure the diocese. Father Latour's life long friend, Father Joseph Vaillant lends a helping hand. Father Latour is in charge of correcting the inappropriate behaviors of the priest already in the region. Father Latour is met by extreme resistance upon his arrival to New Mexico and is forced to take a 3,000-mile journey to the Archbishop of Durango. Upon his return to New Mexico, Father Latour finds that many of the corrupt priests are resigning from their positions. In ending the corruption, Father Latour has made himself valuable to the natives of New Mexico. Father Vaillant replaces one of the corrupt priests in Santa Fe. Over many years Father Latour and Father Vaillant are extremely successful. Father Latour has grown accustomed to having Father Vaillant around; however, Father Vaillant is eventually sent to Denver to spread Catholicism. Father Latour is upset that he will probably not see his friend again, but knows that this is what Father Vaillant must do."

Tags:cather, death, father, latour, personality, strengths, traits, valliant, weaknesses, willa

Abstract
This paper opposed the 2001 U.S. Supreme Court decision to prohibit capital developmental delay capital punishment for the mentally retarded. It objects to the Court leaving the States power to define who is mentally retarded, instead of looking at who is capable of standing trial.

From the Paper
"It was on Friday 2001 when the Supreme Court took the final decision of prohibiting or banning the capital punishment of the mentally retarded. There were around fifteen states out of the 38 states that excused the mentally retarded from its reach, as done by the federal government. While, on the other hand, the remaining thirty-eight states had permit death penalty (Wilson, 2002). However, lately a group of retired American diplomats insisted the Supreme Court to ban such executions in general, and argued that the lack of such a ban "will strain diplomatic relations with close American allies (Fournier, 2002)."

Tags:developmental, delay, capital, punishment, international, relations

Abstract
This paper is an argument in favor of the death penalty. It uses several different sources to support the author's argument that the death penalty saves lives, and does not unjustly take the life of someone who has committed a violent crime.

From the paper:

"Execution is forever. So is murder. Therefore, execution is the appropriate punishment for the murder of an innocent victim. If we apply the ?Golden Rule? to the situation (do unto others, as you wish done to yourself), we see that execution is inevitably the correct step for us to make (Shell, 120). A person?s right to live is lost when one intentionally takes an innocent life, everyone has the right to one life, his own. If he unlawfully takes the life of another he, eo ipso, loses his own right to life. Every person who can understand the nature and effects of his acts is responsible for them, and should be blamed and punished accordingly, if he could know that what he did was wrong."

Tags:death, penalty, capital, punishment, execution, murderer, lives, convict

Abstract
This paper examines death as addressed by two influential philosophers, Socrates and Epicurus. These philosophers take different approaches in viewing death and both have their own distinct reasons regarding it, however they reach the same conclusion, that death should not be feared. The paper discusses how Socrates addressees the uncertainty that follows death and how death may be even more pleasant than the life we once lived, while Epicurus addressees the non-existence of death, and illustrates how death does not affect us.

From the Paper
"We shall begin our examination by looking at Socrates and the various arguments he makes. Socrates, a prolific philosopher in ancient Greece, was sentenced to execution and though given the chance to escape chose to stay and accept his punishment. According to Socrates, death is the will of the Gods and they alone know what lies after death. Mankind does not have the ability to acquire such knowledge, and therefore the afterlife is unknown to man. Socrates believes that individuals fear death because they fear the unknown, he therefore concludes that "fear of death is indeed the pretence of wisdom" (Plato, p. 3-4). Socrates gives two possible scenarios of what the afterlife may be like: "Either death is a state of nothingness and utter unconsciousness, or... there is a change and migration of the soul from this world to another" (Plato, p. 8). Socrates contends that there is no reason to fear an endless sleep, as it is a placid period which is pleasant to oneself."

Tags:death, epicurus, socrates

Abstract
This paper discusses the history of the death penalty in the United States, noting that it demonstrates a society that has been divided on the issue of executing criminals. The paper explains that opponents of the death penalty believe that as long as the process of the state committing executions exists there will be a violation of Constitutional laws intended to prevent cruel and unusual punishment. The paper also discusses the contention of those in favor of the death penalty that the punishment for a criminal act should fit the crime and that there are some crimes that are so horrendous that the death penalty is the only just punishment. Additionally, the paper points out that, although the debate has created periods in the nation's history in which executions have passed through a moratorium, most states in modern society continue to pass laws that provide for state executions, with the rate of modern executions climbing each year.

Tags:history, death, penalty

Abstract
This paper discusses the death of Alexander the Great. The paper puts forward the circumstance surrounding his death and the various versions of his death as recalled by various people and cultures.

Tags:alexander, great, death

Abstract
This paper argues that the death penalty does nothing to deter crime, as we are commonly led to believe, that it is an inhumane way to die and often botched in the process and is a human experience of emotional justice that is served up by good old fashioned revenge. It discusses the various methods of execution (hanging, firing squad, lethal gas, electrocution and finally lethal injection), how each are administered and discusses their pros and cons. It examines the legal stance by most States on the death penalty as well as some famous cases.

From the Paper
"The most common argument against the death penalty has been the argument of deterrence. That is to say if we as a society continue to execute our most precarious criminals, the effect we will have on those who might commit capital crimes in the future will be logical and rational thoughts of reconsideration and re-evaluation based on what may happen to them as a consequence of their actions. According to many who have studied the deterrent effects of the death penalty the following three points have been raised. First, if a punishment is to be considered an actual deterrent, it must be administered in a consistent and punctual manner."

Tags:criminal, death, hanging, firing, squad, lethal, gas, electrocution, injection

Abstract
This paper discusses the theme and content of MacArthur's "The Master's Plan for the Church". It explains that the book is based upon sermons the author delivered to his church. It focuses on making the modern church an institution for the glory of God through heeding God's scriptural design for the church, which the Bible clearly defines and delineates in numerous passages.

From the Paper
""The Master's Plan for the Church" was written by John MacArthur and published by Moody Publishers in 1991. The theme and content of this book are based upon sermons the author delivered to his church, and focus upon making the modern church an institution for the glory of God through heeding God's scriptural design for the church, which the Bible clearly defines and delineates in numerous passages. MacArthur emphasizes the validity and crucial importance of this master's plan for the church throughout his book, and rejects misguided efforts to expand church membership by offering congregations pleasing homilies. MacArthur's title emphasizes his firm belief that if the church truly desires to follow God's teachings, it must acknowledge the fact that many pastors are not heeding God's scriptural message to the world. They are either ..."

Tags:christian, book, reviews