Abstract
In this article, the writer firstly defines creationism as a system of belief that maintains that humans, the earth, and the universe were created by a supreme being or deity. The writer explains that creationists believe in a god who is absolute creator of heaven and earth, out of nothing, by an act of free will. The writer then examines the history of creationism.

From the Paper
"Creationism is generally defined as a belief system which holds that human beings, the earth, and the universe were created by a supreme being or deity, either ex nihilo or from preexisting chaos. Many Creationists consider their beliefs to be compatible with science, explain that certain scriptural accounts of creation should be interpreted as metaphors, or believe that scientific laws and mechanisms were created by supernatural intervention."

Tags:creationism, issues, evolution

Abstract
This paper examines evolution and creationism, including a bibliography of sources.

From the Paper
"The debate between creationism and evolution separates faith from science at a fundamental social level, but there is also much gray area here as well. For example, not all creationists necessarily believe in the literal telling of the world's creation in Genesis. Nor do they necessarily dismiss evolution. People who believe in evolutionists can also be deists, and believe evolution is part of a Grand Design. According to Selk, Genesis stories and evolution can coexist because, "This, in fact, is the most trivial of the issues raised by evolution and the one most easily resolved. The conflict exists only for biblical literalists. Give up biblical literalism...""

Tags:evolution, verses, creationism

Abstract
This paper attempts to discuss, in a non-judging manner, creationism and evolutionary thought. The paper reviews the theory and scientific facts of evolution. Then the paper extrapolates on the creationists' theory of Intelligent Design.

From the Paper
"As humankind continues to move forward into the future, it also searches the past to reveal what the past can teach it in an effort to understand where life-kind as a whole is going. In some cases people..."

Tags:Creationism, Evolutionary Theory, Intelligent Design.

Abstract
This paper examines the case in Dover, Pennsylvania, in which the school board adopted intelligent design as a purported alternative to the theory of evolution. The paper describes how this led to a case in which the trial judge heard a 40-day trial, and in a voluminous opinion ruled that "ID" is creationism under another name, that it is not science, and that it is religion, and therefore cannot be taught in public schools.

From the Paper
"When the subject of evolution comes up, our public schools often become a battleground. One of the most loudly voiced claims made by the opponents of evolution is that they never get a chance to present their views. These people claim that if they were given a fair chance, they could teach science at least as sound as the theory of evolution. I am here today to say that, given a fair chance to present their views, the anti-evolution people got slapped down hard. The case came out of Dover, Pennsylvania. The new "anti-evolution theory" was labeled "intelligent design," and its supporters insisted that it was..."

Tags:creationism, evolution, trial

Abstract
This paper presents extreme arguments made by both scientific and religious communities revolving around the origins of life on earth. The author concludes that the anti-creationism argument is more persuasive because of Tenenbaums' emphasis on scientific facts, figures, and reasoning in hist justification for the theory of evolution.

From the Paper
"Gish uses the quotes that supports his view points from two newspaper articles, one journal and from one book that is refuting Darwinism as evidence for building his case in favor of teaching creationism in the class room. Further he advocates that a scientific theory must be based on repeatable observations, subjected to scientific tests, and potentially falsifiable. No human being has observed the origin, and so the opponent of creationism, i.e. theory of evolution, cannot be proved. By virtue of his educational qualification of Doctorate and his position as Senior Vice President of Institute for Creation Research, the author seems to be a person with rich experience and credibility. His high motivational level in defending the biblical concepts can be ascertained from the welcome note of the web site of IRC that starts with the wordings of, 'We believe God has raised up ICR to spearhead Biblical Christianity's defense against the godless and compromising dogma of evolutionary humanism.' The logic on which the author is building his case is entirely based on the mythical and religious faith only. Having found no scientific proof in support of creationism he urges that the students and teachers are to be encouraged to search out and find scientific evidence that contradicts the assumptions and claims of the validity of the theory of evolution. However he quotes that the fossil records found so far are totally complete and fully formed and there is no transitional form of fossil is so far found to prove the Darwinian theory of evolution. But he fails to provide data from any reliable source to substantiate his claim. Unable to provide foolproof evidence that the universe was created by a Creator, he resorts to emotional appeal of invoking the faith and belief of God. The author quotes Dr. Michael Ruse, who was one of the witnesses in support of evolution in the 1981 Arkansas trail related with the same topic, as a completely changed man after 20 years to say that evolution is being developed as an alternative to Christianity. By giving a religious dimension to a scientific question, the author is attempting to invoke religious emotions to the scientific dispute. The objective of the author in writing this article seems to give the creationism a dominant position in the science curriculum of the school by creating a mass opinion that evolution is a threat to Christianity. In the pursuance of his objective the author targets the parents, students, and science teachers to develop such a massive movement against the scientific study of biology. "

Tags:creation christianity science darwin, theory of evolution

Abstract
This paper looks at how creationism is referred as the spiritual belief that humankind, life, the world, and the earth were created by a supernatural creature. It argues that the concept of creationism in public schools provide scholars with an open mind and how it is important to teach it in its entirety and present it as a feasible alternative to the creation of the world. The paper also argues that most educators believe that teaching students about creationism does not mean educating religious conviction since creationism can be taught from a non-sectarian point of view.

From the Paper
"For almost a century now, educating students on Creationism in public schools has been a contentious matter in America's communal schools. Unluckily, while the argument is an issue and almost each American has his/her view about it, it is moreover a subject which lot of the Americans knows little about. Research carried out by NCSE (National Center of Science Education) indicated that; only a small number of Americans are aware of the basic notion of evolutionary theory. Majority of Americans assert to attend house of worship frequently, decades of study by Wheaton institution indicates that; a small portion of Americans are acquainted with the Bible and what it actually says. "

Tags:world, scopes, trial, evolution

Abstract
This paper offers a comparative discussion of the science of evolution and the doctrine of creationism. The paper explains that advocates of creationism maintain that the universe was created by an Almighty Being, while those who believe in evolution argue that natural processes have shaped the world humans live in today. The paper takes the position that the theory of evolution does not necessarily negate the existence of a Supreme Being, only that the evidence of favor of evolution appears to be sufficiently compelling to make a serious case for it. The paper opines that neither evolution nor creationism has been proven to date, and reviews literature concerning the debate. After touching on the respective arguments in support of each position, the paper concludes that what is missing from the debate is any reasonable middle ground suggesting that even an omnipotent being might want to use natural processes to accomplish his or her goals for the universe.

Outline:
Review and Discussion
Background and Overview
Arguments in Support of Creationism
Arguments in Support of Evolution
Current and Future Trends
Conclusion
References

From the Paper
"If the debate over creationism versus the theory of evolution was restricted to the pundits, there probably would not be such a controversy about the issue today at all. Nevertheless, there are some important political and cultural issues involved in the debate that continue to affect the way educational services are delivered in the United States. As Vitello (2006) points out, when Darwin's published his seminal work in the 19th century, The Origin of Species, a controversy immediately ensued. According to Vitello, not much has changed in the 170 years since Darwin first set foot on the Galapagos Islands: "In the early 20th century, it sparked a furious evolution versus creationism debate that culminated in the famous 1925 trial of John Scopes, charged with teaching evolution in violation of Tennessee state law. Dubbed the 'Scopes Monkey Trial,' it pitted lawyer- statesman and devout Christian William Jennings Bryan against civil libertarian attorney Clarence Darrow" (p. 18). In his text, From Genesis to Genetics: The Case of Evolution and Creationism, Moore (2002 reports that, "A major challenge to the dominance of creationism and the rejection of evolution occurred in Dayton, Tennessee, in 1925. John Thomas Scopes was tried for teaching Darwinism in his high school biology class--in defiance of an act recently passed by the General Assembly of the State of Tennessee. The trial brought the evolution-creationism controversy to the nation's attention and emphasized the polar positions of the two sides" (p. 148)."

Tags:creator, science, classroom, debate, fundamentalist

Abstract
This paper explains that the two basic theories about the origin of human life are evolution (or Darwinism) and creationism about which there are conflicting opinions as to which theory is correct and which theory should be taught in schools. Some people feel that creationism and evolution should both be discussed in the classroom and presented as equally valid theories. The author points out that many people feel that it is inappropriate to be teaching creationism in public school classrooms because it is religious doctrine, which is not appropriate under the Constitution of the United States that separates church and state. The paper concludes that both theories should be presented in the classroom as opposing but not necessarily mutually exclusive explanations for the origin of humanity.

From the Paper
"A large percentage of Americans, including many teachers, believe that creationism is a more valid theory than evolution. A study in 1996 found that most American completely reject the idea that evolution is the origin of humans. Another survey conducted in 2000 found that nearly 40 percent of Americans believe that creationism should be taught instead of evolution in the classroom, and many believe that evolution should be outright banned from the classroom. Further studies show that half of all Americans and Canadians do not consider evolution to be a valid scientific concept. Many have not been convinced by the scientific evidence with which they have been presented, and believe that evolution is scientifically unfounded."

Tags:theory, christian, darwin, constitution, science

Abstract
This paper relates that creationists reject the scientific theories regarding the origin of life, the origin of the human species, the geologic history of the earth, the formation of the solar system and the origin of the universe. The author points out that a second kind of creationism, "creational spirituality", holds that, rather than theory, awe is the appropriate response to the unfathomable wonder of creation. The paper also explains that Neo-Creationists want to allow the Bible to be one of the choices of theories that are given to school children in public schools as to how the earth was formed and mankind came into being.

From the Paper
"A wave of Revivalism swept the South to counteract Modernism and Intellectualism. There was conflict between the liberals and the conservatives in society, between the Evolutionists and the Fundamentalists. Things came to a head in the small town of Dayton, Tennessee, when John Scopes, a high school biology teacher, was tried for teaching the theory of evolution. The trial was widely covered by the most famous broadcasters in the nation. In the trial, also called the "Scopes Monkey Trial," it was decided that it would be legal to teach evolution in the public schools."

Tags:scopes, revivalism, origin, theory, choice

Abstract
This ten-page undergraduate paper examines and analyzes the issue of Creationism vs. Evolution, and the impact and meaning of the two theories in contemporary North American society, culture and politics. The discussion includes the Scopes trial and America's continuing debate over science and religion and the impact of each on North American culture today.