Abstract
This paper reviews two dissimilar court systems: the criminal courts in Washington, D.C. in the United States; and the International Court of Justice (the World Court).

From the Paper
"This paper provides of brief review of the a local criminal courts in the District of Columbia Washington D C in the United States .."

Tags:District, of, Columbia, Criminal, Courts, International, Court, of, Justics, World, Court

Abstract
This paper looks at how drug courts treat drug addicts as opposed to law courts. The paper explains how law courts send drug offenders to prison where few receive treatment, while drug courts send drug addicts for treatment.

From the Paper
"Several places across the country are now using drug courts rather than criminal courts to process non-violent drug offenders, to offer them treatment rather than imprisonment. The prisons are becoming so overcrowded since the war on drugs began, and most of this is due to those who have committed minor drug offenses such as possession of small amounts of marijuana or crack cocaine. Worcester in MD has one of the most successful alternative programs to imprisonment, funded by the state, which is proving..."

Tags:drugs, treatment, incarceration, Law, courts, addicts

Abstract
This paper focuses the effects of Supreme Court decisions on public opinion as debated by Johnson and Martin in "The Public Conditional Responses to Supreme Court Decisions," Mishler and Sheenan's "The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions" and Rosenberg in his book "The Hollow Hope". This paper argues that the Supreme Court does have an effect on public opinion but that such effects are conditional.

From the Paper
"It would be simple to conclude that the Supreme Court either has an effect on public opinion or that it has no effect whatsoever on public opinion. The correct conclusion would be to say that the Supreme Court has an effect on public opinion and that such effect is not always clearly determinable. In other words, "The Supreme Court can and does influence public attitudes toward highly salient issues, but its effect is conditional" (Johnson and Martin, 1998, 306). This is known as the Conditional Response Theory, as established by Johnson and Martin in their article The Public's Conditional Response to Supreme Court Decisions. Johnson and Martin assert that the Conditional Response Theory is based on three facts: First, the Supreme Court is viewed as a creditable institution and therefore a highly legitimate one. "

Tags:change, conditional, constrained, court, courts, decisions, dynamic, hollow, opinion, public, response, social, supreme, theory, view

Abstract
This paper provides the background to the U.S. Supreme Court through a brief history of the Court, as well as an explanation as to how cases from trial court work their way up to the Supreme Court for review. Both topics are rich with layers of complexity and for the purposes of this paper, an overview of the history and process of the Supreme Court is provided.

From the Paper
"This paper provides the background to the U.S. Supreme Court through a brief history of the Court, as well as an explanation as to how cases from trial court work their way up to the Supreme Court for review. Both topics are rich with layers of complexity and for the purposes of this paper, an overview of the history and process of the Supreme Court is provided.
"The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States. The Supreme Court is composed of nine justices - eight associate justices and one chief justice. Review of court decisions by this court is limited to..."

Tags:us, supreme, court

Abstract
The paper discusses the United States Supreme Court and history of the justices that comprise it. The paper further examines the background of the justices and how the court became associated with the matter of the U.S. Constitution. The paper also discusses the requirements of office, the duties of the court, and the nomination and confirmation process that is associated with positions on the court. Finally, the paper examines current issues within the court and makes determinations based on the research.

From the Paper
"The Supreme Court of the United States has been responsible for law that has altered the lives of every American. Cases such as Roe v. Wade, Plessey v. Ferguson, and Brown v Board of Education have spoken to significant issues within society, and have created the framework for how society will function throughout time. While it did not appear that the initial court would ever have such an impact on the country, the expertise of the judges that have served on the court altered that opinion, allowing the court to become the most dominant judicial force within the United States. The United States Constitution gave the duties of forming a court system in the country to the United States Congress through Article III, Section I. "

Tags:supreme, court, justices

Abstract
The paper looks at the historical process of Supreme Court nominations and confirmations. It looks at the individuals the current president has nominated for the highest court in the land, his reasons for selecting these individuals, the arguments for and against each one, and what has happened to the nominations and to the nomination process in recent months. Finally, the paper concludes with an examination of what President Bush's nominations portend for the future direction of the American Supreme Court and for the ideological make-up of the court in the present and future.

From the Paper
"The changes on the Supreme Court: What it means for America Each time the President of the United States nominates someone to the Supreme Court, he is making a decision that is among the most important of his administration - perhaps the most important."

Tags:alito, roberts, court

Abstract
In this article, the writer refers to how Supreme Court judges are appointed. The writer explains that the Minister of Justice advises the Prime Minister, and looks at PM Harper's wish to make the process more transparent. The writer discusses that Harper saw that Justice Marshall Rothstein was aired in a TV interview by the Ad Hoc Parliamentary committee and various legal experts, responding to questions on activist courts and the possible tightening of the criminal justice system. The writer argues that this was a good development, pointing out that no other court in the western hemisphere has quite as much power as the Supreme Court of Canada.

From the Paper
"This paper examines how judges are appointed to the Supreme Court of Canada when new openings appear. Critics have seen the longstanding method of appointing new judges as not very democratic, because politics or favoritism or regional questions can mean that not always the very best qualified candidate is chosen. The Prime Minister chooses from names or other advice given by the Minister of Justice so that much depends on the quality of the ministers or their different interests in matters of the Supreme Court, at large. Jacob S. Ziegel, a Professor of Law emeritus at ..."

Tags:Harper, supreme, court, transparency

Abstract
This paper looks at an overview of the juvenile justice system and then compares the juvenile court process with the adult court process. The paper points out the advantages of the juvenile court, and predicts what changes should be made in the future.

From the Paper
"There are many differences between the Juvenile Justice system and the Adult Justice system which are designed to protect juveniles and aid in their rehabilitation. The goal is to catch delinquents early and deter them from a life of crime rather than to punish them. The rise in juvenile crime caused many to call for an end to the juvenile justice system which they believed was too soft on these young criminals and to have them all tried in adult criminal..."

Tags:juvenile adult court, justice system

Abstract
This paper examines the existence of the courtly love theme in popular culture. The paper refers to traditional texts, such as Chaucer's "Complaint to his Lady" and John Donne's poem, "The Canonization"; in relation to the contemporary television program, "Buffy the Vampire Slayer". The paper defines three essential elements of Courtly love poetry: The ennobling force of human love, the elevation of the beloved above the lover and love as ever unsatisfied, ever increasing desire. It describes that modern courtly love are usually adaptations, and that how they adapt the traditional story reflects the values and attitudes of the courtly love convention appropriate to a contemporary audience.

From the Paper
"Courtly Love has developed from the later Middle Ages through to modern times as a highly conventionalized code. Examples are evident in popular culture though are usually adaptations - adopting selective aspects. This can be seen through the similar values and attitudes portrayed in the texts."

Tags:buffy, convention, courtly, elizabethan, love, poetry, poet, slayer, values, vampire, tradition, modern, contemporary

Abstract
A detailed examination of the U.S. Supreme court and the type of matters it addresses. The author argues that issues of politics and political controversies should be taken into account by the supreme court as often they form constitutional issues, and supports this view by emphasizing the chief objective of the U.S. supreme court: to preserve the principles and rights guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution. The paper includes an analysis of various politicians and an explanation of the roles of the supreme court and judiciary.

From the Paper
"When political beliefs and thoughts evolve into law, often times, constitutional issues arise alongside. Although the U.S. Supreme Court has the license to decide whether or not to adjudicate matters involving hot political topics, past history has indicated that the Court has not been inclined to evade such questions, but rather, to thoroughly delve into such controversies. As a staunch Federalist, Alexander Hamilton had strong beliefs and ideas as to how the infant U.S. government should be set up and efficiently run. As opposed to Thomas Jefferson's notions on the importance of strong state governments, Hamilton believed in the superiority of a powerful central government body. He set forth his political views in the Federalist papers, examining all aspects of government and focusing on the role of the judicial branch in numbers 78, 79 and 80."

Tags:jury, judiciary, law, rights, constitution, legislation, court