Abstract
This paper discusses the issue of pornography, seen as one of the most controversial sexual issues in North America. The paper reports that a large part of the controversy is centered on the battle between individuals who argue that pornography is an oppressive activity that subordinates women and advocates of free-speech. The topic is complex and charged with emotion.

Tags:pornography, speech, act

Abstract
The paper explains that there can be little question that pornography has sparked a great deal of heated debate for a number of years now. Critics charge that the industry promotes the sexualization and exploitation of women and distorts human relationships, while its supporters argue that pornography is really a form of erotica, an instructional tool for those who need it, and - whatever its controversial elements - something protected under the Freedom of Expression provisions outlined in the United States Constitution. The following paper compares and contrasts the arguments of both sides and concludes that those opposed to pornography raise a much more compelling case than those in favor of it.

Tags:pornography, comparison, contrast

Abstract
This paper discusses the controversial subject of pornography as both an emotional subject and one that deals with morals, privacy, and the 1st Amendment. This paper discusses two extreme views about pornography. One stance takes the side for pornography, defending the naked body as art, or an expression of passion between two people, a venue of materials, which is meant for adults. The other case argues that pornography is sick, immoral, obscene, and to an extreme, some believe it should be illegal. By reading this paper, the author hopes to prove that not all pornography is obscene, and perhaps should be given a second chance.

From the Paper
"This fundamental argument is what will keep people in a disagreement on pornography forever. But what people need to understand is that everybody has the right to view what the want to view, whether is be obscene or not. Just as people have their rights to view it, people have their rights not to view and to not be forced to watch it. This is why playboy TV and the spice channel and shows such as red shoe diaries, are all on pay channels, which a person makes a choice to subscribe to. Just as Hustler, Cheri, Penthouse, and other adult publications are ordered by choice, and by law are mailed in black plastic bags, and in this manner everybody is protected under the first amendment. People who are pro censure have been protected, they are not forced to view it, and the choice to view or not to view is preserved. On the topic of age limits, there may be some common ground among censures and pornographers. They will agree that interior of specialty stores such as Le Sex Shoppe be blocked from view from outside, liquor stores choosing to carry adult magazines stock such materials in a blocked adults only section, and the sale of pornographic materials may be made only to adults ages 18 and over. But still many people will argue that the only solution to pornography is that it be banned all together."

Tags:emotional, morals, amendment, art, obscenity, controversy

Abstract
Pornography has been a topic of heated debate in this country for decades. It is an issue that deals with freedom of speech and what is considered "decent" by many Americans. Many consider pornography degrading toward women, although many women freely participate in pornographic activities. The Internet poses many problems concerning this issue, with the exploitation of children being at the forefront of many legitimate concerns. This paper examines both sides of the issue and the complications that arise when considering the controversial issue.

I. Introduction
A. The Business of Pornography
B. National Sales
II. Definition of Pornography
A. Joseph Slade Defines Complexity of the Term Pornography
B. Obscene versus Erotic
C. Supreme Court Definition of Obscene
III. Pornography and Exploitation of Women
A. Ann Garry's Position
IV. Child Pornography
A. The Internet's Influence on Child Pornography
B. Laws Pertaining to Child Pornography
C. Philip Jenkins' Position on Child Pornography
V. Conclusion
A. Education and Fair Application of Law

From the Paper
"William F. Buckley, in an article published in the National Review, points out that journalist Frank Rich wrote an article that uncovered the huge moneymaking business of pornography. The figures he reported, according to Buckley, "astonish." From the article "$4 billion a year is spent on video pornography, that this sum of money is greater than what is spent on major league baseball" (Buckley). Surprisingly, pornography is a business that outsells professional baseball. Buckley also adds that people rent 700 million porn movies every year and that Americans pay more money for pornography than they do for "non-adult" movies. In a striking comparison, Buckley says that every year, 400 regular movies are produced and 11,000 porn movies are produced. (Buckley) That was in the early 90s. In his book, Pornography in America: A Reference Handbook, which was published in 2001, Joseph Slade reports that although most Americans won't admit to participating in pornography, they spend "somewhere between $8 billion and $10 billion a year on sexual representations of some sort" (Slade 3) In a bizarre comparison, Slade also notes that Americans spend $36 billion on fast food hamburgers. Clearly, these figures indicate that the business of pornography is growing by leaps and bounds."

Tags:internet, child, obsense, offensive, jenkins, law

Abstract
This paper takes the position that pornography promotes sexual violence against women and cites several factors that support this position. It also explores some of the reasons the issue of pornography has been so controversial and some of the arguments made by proponents of pornography.

From the Paper
"Defining and regulating pornography has been a difficult task for the United States where free speech is protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and is the backbone of what defines us as a free society. Webster's Dictionary defines pornography as: writings, pictures, etc. intended primarily to arouse sexual desire. (Neufeldt et al.) Though different people may argue over the definitions and reasons for pornography "the producers, sellers, and consumers of pornography have a clear understanding of its meaning. For them it is a written or visual product showing sexual anatomy and/or sexual activity designed to promote sexual arousal." (McCuen) But does pornography in and of itself promote sexual violence against women? There is no doubt that through the ages many men have sought and attained sexual access through violent action or the threat of such action. No national culture has been without rape. The forcible sexual assault of strangers, associates, friends and relatives alike has been a universal occurrence throughout the history of mankind, and it has remained so in contemporary society."

Tags:rape, dehumanize, object, anti-female, propaganda, free, speech, erotica, first, ammendment

Abstract
This paper discusses the government's attempt to censor pornographic material on the internet which the writer feels would infringe on the freedom of expression. This paper also includes a brief but detailed history of the internet. This paper examines the various bills the U.S. government is trying to pass to prevent misuse of the Net. The writer of this paper also discusses the installation of censoring software as an alternative solution to government censorship.

From the Paper
"The Internet can also be compared to a church. In many ways the Internet is like a church: it has its council of elders, every member has an opinion about how things should work, and they can either take part or not. It's the choice of the user. The Internet has no president, chief operating officer, or Pope. The constituent networks may have presidents and CEO's, but that's a different issue; there is no single authority figure for the Internet as a whole."

Tags:pornography, censorship, freedom, of, expression, rights, government, law, minors, legislation

Abstract
This paper examines Vladimir Nabokov's novel, "Lolita," on the relationship between a middle-aged man and a 12-year-old girl. It argues that it is art and not pornography.

Tags:pornography, art, art aesthetic, novel, sexuality, characterization, allegory

Abstract
In the world of radio talk shows, there can be no question that shock-jock personality Howard Stern is one of the most controversial show leads in history. This paper discusses the fines levied against the Howard Stern Show by the FCC and outlines the reasons for those fines. Additionally, this paper discusses Stern's long history of battle against censorship in relation to the FCC, and briefly discusses Stern's popularity among certain groups within the United States. The paper shows that while Stern is certainly controversial and disliked by many in religious, political, and women's rights communities, his strong voice acts as a symbol of free speech for many fans.

From the Paper
"Specifically, Infinity Broadcasting Corporation of Pennsylvania was fined for airing Howard Stern episodes containing explicit sexual material. While the decision was appealed, the appeal was lost. Following the initial complaint, the FCC heard complaints from Americans for Responsible Television, concerned about Stern's sexual content, and the African-American Business Administration, which was concerned over Stern's attitude towards blacks. By 1993, stations had incurred over $1.7 million in fines over Stern's radio show (Foerstel, 1997)."

Tags:pornography, racism, decency, Infinity, Broadcasting, sattelite

Abstract
This paper discusses the good and bad sides of censorship and points out the need for a balance. The paper focuses on three types of censorship: military censorship, censorship of pornography and violence, and ideological censorship. The paper contains an annotated bibliography.

From the Paper
"The concept of censorship is relatively simple: material that is harmful to people in some way should not be allowed to circulate where they can see, hear or be influenced by it. Material that incites people to commit acts of violence..."

Tags:censorship, military, pornography, violence, ideological, Christian, protection, annotated bibliography

Abstract
This paper analyzes the David Lynch film, "Blue Velvet", and attempts to answer critical questions about its origins and its meaning. It looks at how the film itself is considered a controversial expansion upon the dichotomous 'good versus bad' nature of people as a whole and how it was seen by some as pornography hiding behind art and by others as pure art through the eyes of confused humanity. It begins with a short synopsis of the film and then discusses the setting, its position as a auteur film, its expression of culture, and the controversies the film engendered. The next section breaks down the most controversial scene, the primal scene between Frank, Dorothy, and Jeffrey, and analyzes the "gaze" and how it is captured within the film, as well as its meaning. The final section places "Blue Velvet" within the context of postmodern art, discussing the responsibility of the artist for the depiction of humanity in a candid yet fair way.

From the Paper
"Within the original screen-play, Lynch develops the righteous character of Jeffrey, as he intervenes, at college between a cooed and his girlfriend, in a rape scene. Just before he receives the disappointing news that he must quit college and return home, because he is needed to both run the family business and save the money being spent on his tuition, to pay for the treatment of his father. Also at college he has a wholesome relationship, already being challenged by his curious nature and desire to see and experience the undercurrent of his world. (Lynch, 1986) Though there is much removed from the film, as compared to the original Lynch screen-play the feelings of the challenges of the awareness of the hidden undercurrent of life and Jeffrey's reluctant awareness of it are depicted well by Lynch in the film."

Tags:frank, dorothy, jeffrey, pornography