Abstract
In this article, the writer first explains that in nursing, the concept of consent means informed consent. The writer discusses that the concept involves other concepts and principles of ethics such as respect for persons and patient autonomy. Further, the writer discusses that autonomy is respected when nurses assist patients to express needs and concerns, and ensure that they have the information to make informed decisions. The writer notes that informed consent is necessary before the beginning of any procedure or treatment.

Tags:patient, informed, consent

Abstract
This paper looks at consent theory and discusses some of its reformist protagonists, Locke, Walzer and Otsuka and its antagonists Simmons and Klosko. It also looks at the basis of the theory as it originated in ancient Greece and at Locke's consent-or-leave belief and how unrealistic it is.

From the Paper
" Both Locke and Rousseau assumed that residence in a state implied tacit consent but Simmons does not agree with their assessment. He says that this cannot be reasonably assumed because continued residence would them imply a lack of response to ..."

Tags:cosnent theory, tacit consent

Abstract
This paper studies the problematic age of legal consent in the United States in general and Maryland specifically. It analyzes the importance of maturity in making this decision and argues that maturity and reason is not necessarily decided by age. The author sees that the law seems to divert focus to age rather than to consent. It gives an example of a story about minors having consensual sex but not necessarily willingly. It concludes that children who are immature should be protected from rash decisions in order to make sure they don't get emotionally and physically scarred.

From the Paper
"Here's something you probably didn't know, boys and girls! According to the "Legal Age of Consent Website," the legal age of consent in the state of Maryland is fifteen. In layperson's terms this means that before the age of fifteen, even if you want to say "yes, yes, yes," a la Meg Ryan in "When Harry Met Sally," certain rules and restrictions may apply. This is reasonable, correct? After all, you are minors. You all have certain special legal protections and privileges (Such as making sure your legal guardian gives you bread, McDonald's milkshakes, and board. Such as the fact mall security noticed those platform shoes you just happened to walk out of Delia's with won't be a part of your permanent record). Why shouldn't the law also reserve an interest in protecting you from your own potential lapses in judgment so you can better become a happy and healthy adult? The image of a fifteen-year-old-girl dating a college student probably not only seems like a huge lapse to your parents and to the world at large but to many of your own minds as well."

Tags:legal, age, consent, 15, Maryland, minors, sexual, law, juvenile, offense, emotional, physical, children

Abstract
This paper discusses the effect that race has on consent for organ donations. The paper looks at the problem of shortages of organ donors for transplants as well as the various approaches for increasing organ donations. The paper contends that no significant correlation exists between race of the requester and the potential donor and the number of organ donor consents.

From the Paper
"The following research paper explores the effects of race on organ donation Specifically, the research objective is to determine if there is a relationship between organ donor consent rates and the matching of race requester to race of potential donor families. Pearson's correlation was used to demonstrate significant relationships. It was expected that there would be a significant relationship between the variables, however the study findings did not support the study hypothesis that there is a significant correlation between..."

Tags:consent, for, organ, donation

Abstract
This paper examines the definition of informed medical consent and situations in which it is necessary and others in which it can be waived. First, the paper defines informed medical consent, further elaborating on the concept of implied consent. Then, it considers the legal aspects of informed medical consent, which include full informational disclosure by the health care professional, and voluntary consent of the patient. Next, the paper takes a look at liability for failure to disclose medical information and getting patient consent, citing relevant cases. Finally, the paper discusses recent changes in the law and how this impacts liability.


Outline:
Introduction to Informed Consent
Modern Principles of Informed Consent Law in the United States
Potential Avenues for Civil Liability Under Contemporary Informed Consent Principles
Exceptions to Implied Consent Requirements and Implications of Recent Legal Changes

From the Paper
"Likewise, under extremely exigent circumstances such as life-or-death emergencies, specific informed consent of the patient is not required, simply because withholding necessary treatment until the patient is capable of providing consent would be unreasonable under the circumstances. Other situations in which specific consent is not required before providing medical treatment include where consent is obtained from a family member or representative with legal standing to make medical decisions for another, as well as where patients are either functionally lacking in mental capacity or merely legally defined as lacking that capacity, such as in the case of minor patients accompanied by parents or other adult guardians."

Tags:power of attorney, legal guardian

Abstract
This paper explains that American common law, which formed the basis for later legislatures, set the ?age of sexual consent? at ten; but, today, the laws are different in different states: California, Oregon, Arizona, and Wisconsin set age 18 as the minimum age for consensual sex (for girls); most other states set age 16 or 17. The author points out that, recently, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has filed a case in a Kansas appeals court demanding the reduction of the age of consent back to 13, as was originally defined in the ?Common Law?. The paper stresses that 'age of consent law' has an important restrictive role in our present day society and serves to protect young children from undue exploitation.

Table of Contents
Introduction
A Brief History
The Present Law
Controversial Reactions
Conclusion

From the Paper
"Topics of such controversial nature carry arguments from both groups. One the one hand are the parents, social reformers and religious leaders who are concerned about the declining moral values and the health disorders that will result from premature sexual indulgence. This group of people is trying to raise the limit of the age of consent and hope that a legal barrier would prevent what they perceive a moral disaster and protect young and innocent children from exploitation. On the other hand are those (ACLU) who revolt against the law as an intrusion into children's personal rights. These groups consider the restrictive laws as ?a cogent and passionate critique of the war against young people's sexuality.? "

Tags:values, moral, common, aclu, pill

Abstract
The paper provides a description of informed consent, the legal and ethical obligation of primary care providers to engage in informed consent with patients, and the various protections and/or risks associated with using or failing to use informed consent.

From the Paper
"It is significant for patients to obtain informed consent as a preliminary to the administration or delivery of any primary care. There are a number of ethical requirements impacting upon informed consent and legal ramifications of failure to obtain informed consent. The focus is the fact that obtaining informed consent from a patient before any and all primary care procedures respects the patient's right to choose and protects caregivers from any legal liability which might arise. Given that primary care procedures have an accompanying level of..."

Tags:practitioners, health care, health, medical, malpractice, lawsuits, radiology, x-rays

Abstract
The paper emphasizes Locke?s contention on consent, according to which Locke states that consent is the only basis for legitimate political authority. Consideration and analysis of this contention, along with discussions of the following questions are elaborated further in the essay. What are Astell's criticisms of Locke on consent? Are they good ones? Why or why not? Are there others? Does Locke's criterion rule out too little or too much?

From the Paper
"John Locke was born in the year 1632; his name is still counted amongst the renowned philosophers of that era. Although he has written many works related to philosophy but he is widely known and accepted for his formulation of liberal political philosophy. John Locke presented his own views and opinions regarding the liberal political philosophy and gradually his formulation was read and understood."

Tags:power, tripartate, right, legislative, executive, federative, civil, society, freedom, government, rule

Abstract
This paper focuses on the importance of obtaining informed consent before a surgical procedure. The patient, whose body is to be operated upon, needs to know about possible risks and complications involved in the procedure along with all the benefits that he can reap from the surgery in order to make an informed decision. The paper highlights the common features of an informed consent document and also discusses the role played by registered nurses in this process.

Abstract
An analysis of the Consent Theory based on books by John Locke "A Letter Concerning Toleration" (1689) and David Hume "Of the Original Contract (1748). " The author of the paper shows that the Lockean theory of consent and Hume's idea of original contract are similar in that both believe the importance of the law, the recognition of who is the supreme ruler, and no property should be taken from someone without good and just cause. The paper ties the theory up with the question of law and obedience in the United States.

From the Paper
"Locke believed in religious right but stood firm in that the laws of the magistrate should be obeyed. He believed that no one should take another person s belongings should not be taken by others in regard to religious threats. However, Locke believed that if members of the society transgressed the laws, then the society has power to remove any of its members who transgress the rules of its institution; but it cannot, by the accession of any new members, acquire any right of jurisdiction over those that are not joined with it. He believed that if someone did not obey the law, then they should be removed from its society. If a person wants to come to the United States, then he/she should follow the laws of the country."

Tags:Higher, Power, peace, order, United, States, Declaration, of, Independence, government