$59.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
This paper explains that inherent in the policing function is a requirement for ethical behavior on the part of the police themselves, who are expected to be beyond reproach as they guard against the crimes of others. The paper examines community policing programs in Los Angeles and Pittsburgh and explains that the structures of these programs differ because the two communities are very different. The paper discusses how, for both cities, a racial element is part of the process, necessitating particular care to avoid making the police seem to be an invading army while also making a police presence clear.
Sample of Sources Used:
- Christopher, W. & Arguelles, J. (1991, July 9). Report of the Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department.
- Cohen H.S. & Feldberg, M. (1991). Power and restraint: The Moral dimension of police work. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
- Community policing works if all take part (2000, February 19). Seattle Post Intelligencer.
- Delattre, E.J. (1989). Character and cops: Ethics in policing. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
- Dinse, C.F. & Sheehan, K. (1998, January 1). Competence and character: Developing leaders in the LAPD. The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 67, 18-23.
Cite this Comparison Essay:
Police Functions (2007, May 31) Retrieved February 26, 2017, from http://www.academon.com/comparison-essay/police-functions-95763/
"Police Functions" 31 May 2007. Web. 26 February. 2017. <http://www.academon.com/comparison-essay/police-functions-95763/>