Abstract
This paper presents a character analysis of Henry and Hal, two of the main characters in Shakespeare's play, "King Henry IV", and shows how Shakespeare, by comparing and contrasting these two characters, was able to display the attitudes of both the nobility and the commoners and foreshadow Hal's ability to become a stable, successful ruler.

From the Paper
"Hal's feelings towards his father reflect the feelings of the commoners towards the king. Hal's soliloquy, "I know you all..." (I, ii 183-205) reveals Hal's moral awareness and scorn towards the character he has used to disguise his true frustration with the standards that the king has disgraced. A noble and virtuous young man deliberately masquerading as a dissolute prodigal, Hal is not likely to overlook the deep moral blemishes in his father nor the hypocrisy of Henry IV's assumption of rightful kingship. However, as the King's subject and heir, Hal is denied all means of expressing his contempt for the dishonorable means by which Henry IV has maintained and stolen power. By showing contempt for the king, Hal would be following the example of Henry IV's disloyal behavior towards Richard II, and siding with the rebels who now challenge Henry IV's fitness to rule."

Tags:overthrew, richard, ii, stability, nation, scorn, prodigal, son, dishonorable, stolen, maintained, power

Abstract
This paper traces the evolution of Common Law in Canada. First, the paper defines Common Law as that which develops and continues to evolve in the courts,yet is differentiated from law as passed by a legislature. It further describes Canadian Common Law's roots in the British legal system. According to the paper, Common Law relies heavily on precedent and is reasonably uniform throughout the nation and in all states.

From the Paper
"Common Law is law which develops and continues to evolve in the courts, differentiated from law as passed by a legislature. This is also known as judge-made law, and the system is found in many countries and is related to the British system which first developed the concept. Common Law relies heavily on precedent and is reasonably uniform throughout the nation and in all states, and because of its origins, it is sometimes referred to as unenacted law. Such law still pertains in systems where it is accepted, however, and cases are decided on that basis. While some see the common law as unchanging because it is not subject to the political forces that may shape and change enacted law over time, in fact it is not really..."

Tags:common, law, canada

Abstract
In this essay, the writer supports the claim that some intelligent people lack common sense. Several examples are provided. The conclusion attempts to provide brief explanations for the lack.

From the Paper
"Mingroni reports that a fairly common definition of intelligence is that it constitutes the ability to learn to understand and to deal with novel even challenging situations in an effective manner. In this same vein Hogan discusses intelligence as the ability to apply knowledge so as to manipulate one's environment and think abstractly. Psychologists often measure intelligence using an IQ test and report back scores to people telling them just where they stand higher or lower in intelligence relative to the ..."

Tags:intelligence, common sense

Abstract
The paper provides a critique of the "The Tragedy of the Commons" by Garrett Hardin and then addresses issues of climate change.

From the Paper
"Some works are groundbreaking and change the way the academics in many disciplines think about important issues. Often these works achieve this effect by having a powerful narrative that people can really relate to. One of the best examples of this type of work is the "The Tragedy of the Commons" by Garrett Hardin (Hardin 1968). This particular work had major effects on ecology, environmental studies, economics, sociology, anthropology and a range of disciplines. This is why it is often required reading in many university courses. This essay will not look at the strengths of "The Tragedy of the Commons"..."

Tags:tragedy, commons, analysis

Abstract
This paper is an overview of sixteen common fallacies used in debate. The paper provides two examples of each in the hopes that students can better discern these fallacies when they emerge in debate and/or in academic literature. As a useful point, these examples can also be used to highlight the partisanship of leading politicians eager to spread their own agenda.

From the Paper
"Ad Hominem: personal attacks of any kind are ad hominem attacks. Two examples would be Al Franken's loud denunciations of Bill O'Reilly and others while another would be someone dismissing George W. Bush's policies because he is (allegedly) "stupid". Ad Populum: Two examples of ad populum fallacies would be recent gall-up polls showing weak support for the war in Iraq and/or an argument that insists that "most people" do not want gay marriage or an end to abortion."

Tags:common, fallacies, debate

Abstract
This paper examines the foreign policy established by the European Union during 1993. The paper explains that the aims of the policy include issues such as safeguarding common values and fundamental interests shared by all Member States as well as strengthening the security and co-operation between Member States. The paper points out that the European Union functions as part of a larger conglomerate of countries that foster relationships to the advantage of all partners involved. The paper also looks at how the EU is exemplary of the amiable collaboration between countries to find common ground rather than points of conflict. In conclusion, the paper shows that the relationship between Russia and the EU promotes the mutual trust and respect necessary for countries to function well together. By collaborating, these countries then become more than the sum of their parts, and become beacons of excellence and an example for the rest of the world to follow.

Outline:
Introduction: Foreign Policy
History of EU/Russia Relations
The Way Forward: Common Spaces
- The Common Economic Space
- The Common Space of Freedom, Security and Justice
- The Common Space of External Security
- The Common Space on Research, Education, and Culture

From the Paper
"A common European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP) was established in 1999 in order to streamline security operations such as peacekeeping and conflict prevention. This has been applied successfully in locations such as Bosnia and the Republic of Congo. On the domestic front security and peace are two issues that enjoy top priority in the European Union. Indeed securing peace in Europe as a whole is one of the reasons behind the integration of the continent into a single entity. As such the EU has followed a paradigm of expansion inviting all to share in its collective paradigms of democracy and peace across the European continent. Countries are invited to join the Union under its European Neighborhood Policy. Under this policy, the EU is also collaborating with countries such as Russia in order to create mutually beneficial paradigms that will eventually extend beyond the borders of these alliances in order to benefit the earth as a whole."

Tags:Russia, expansion, security, freedom

Abstract
The paper discusses common law and explains its interpretations and many applications. The paper examines the history of the development of common law, and explores its connection to and the differences between equity law. The paper further details common law and explains it as an adversarial judiciary system of laws. The paper continues by explaining equity law and its origins. The paper concludes that in 1873 courts of law and equity were united in England. In the United States, courts of equity also developed, however there was no distinct separation between courts of law and equity in the federal system.

Outline:
Introduction
What is Common Law?
What is Equity Law?
Differences between Common Law and Equity Law
Conclusion

From the Paper
"The common law is made out of the dust of conflict - the Judges will have their feelings powerfully evoked on behalf of the various dramatis personae. They will experience emotions from appreciation to indignation and from approval to disapproval. It is only against that vivid background that the rationales for the decisions of cases are created. Common Law Judges do not often sail into the oceans of abstraction."

Tags:fraud, breach, of, confidence, criminal, matters, dramatis, personae

Abstract
In this article, the writer explains that common law on the federal level is embodied in the decisions of the courts at every level. The writer maintains that the final decisions on many such issues are decided by the Supreme Court, which itself is governed by the body of common law in its emphasis on precedent. The writer points out that common law is law that developed and continues to evolve in the courts. The writer concludes that in the federal system, common law is part of the mix used by judges in interpreting statutes and in deciding rights and responsibilities, and the decisions they make then become part of the body of common law to be tapped by others in the future.

From the Paper
"The common law is the law of precedent as set by the courts in using, interpreting, and adjudicating these laws and other legal traditions. This is the process in many countries, with the courts carrying out the mandates of the legislature and giving different degrees of deference to those statutes or to a written constitution. This process has been examined from a number of standpoints to determine how it aids or hinders in development and carrying out social policy. Edwin Stevens Robinson examines more specifically the role of law and lawyers as roles operating as rules. The judicial mind operates by a process of deliberation based on contents that are largely social, and the social role thus again becomes an issue in the development and application of rules."

Tags:courts, legal, system, reasoning

Abstract
The paper defines public goods as things which can be used by the masses without diminishing in value, such as street signs, traffic lights, or clean air. The paper explains that with common resources, there is not enough to serve everyone equally. They face problems of congestion or overuse. Common resources include forests, fishing grounds and pastures. The paper discusses why they are frequently overused, why private firms are reluctant or unable to supply them and why they are often unavailable in sufficient quantities in free markets. Finally, the paper examines the failures associated with public goods and common resources. The paper discusses how law enforcement is a common resource that can be overused and the paper presents a solution to remedy this.

From the Paper
"Because both public goods and common resources are non-excludible, they are frequently overused. Since it is difficult to restrict use, the user normally does not have to pay for the use of the good or resource and therefore will have no motivation to limit his or her consumption; if a private firm were to try to charge for use of a public good or common resource, because they are non-excludible no one would be willing to pay for them but instead would want someone else to pay while they get to use the resource for free. This is known as the free-rider problem."

Tags:markets, free, private, value

Abstract
This paper details the main themes in Paine's renowned pamphlet "Common Sense", written and published in 1776. It discusses Paine's main goal, which was simply to convince the people of America that a revolution was needed, which would result in the establishment of an independent nation. Paine's publication was generally met with considerable interest by its audience and more than a little ill-humor by academics who considered his writing style to fall far short of the neoclassical ideal. It examines the main themes in "Common Sense" as well as the author's unique method of appealing directly to the highest sentiments of the most common people and the simplest convictions of the most literate. It also discusses the views of various critics who found and continue to find fault with the content and style of writing in Paine's work.

From the Paper
"The original publication of Thomas Paine's work was generally met with considerable interest by its audience, and more than a little ill-humor by academics who considered his writing style to fall far short of the neoclassical ideal. One contemporary said that his style was"so coarse, that you would think he meant to degrade the language as much as the government." Even a relatively sympathetic colonial magazine, The Monthly Review, recorded in 1791 that Paine was "desultory, uncouth, and inelegant. His wit is coarse, and sometimes disgraced by wretched puns, and his language, though energetic, is awkward, ungrammatical, and often debased by vulgar phraseology."

Tags:revolution, war, style