Abstract
The paper analyzes Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas and his actions in twelve years as the only African American in the court, concentrating on the topic of affirmative action. The paper highlights Thomas' conservative bent.

From the Paper
"Justice Clarence Thomas is the only black member of the United States Supreme Court. Thomas is one of the most conservative Justices in the current court. Based on a recent vote, it appears Justice Thomas is an opponent of affirmative action programs. In a case that was decided in June, Judge Thomas disagreed with the majority of the Supreme Court's decision to uphold a University of Michigan Law School program that seeks to boost minority enrollment through an affirmative action type program."

Tags:Clarence Thomas, Supreme Court, affirmative action, discrimination, University of Michigan, voting records, conservative, black, minority, admissions

Abstract
This paper describes the controversial nomination and confirmation of Supreme Court Justice, Clarence Thomas. The paper looks at some of the organizations that opposed Thomas's nomination, the role of the American Bar Association in the selection process of Supreme Court justices, their evaluation of Thomas, and the intense controversy surrounding Thomas's nomination. The paper also examines the positions and the role of different interest groups throughout the controversy, as well as the conduct of journalists reporting on the story.

The American Bar Association
Conservative Victory Party and Citizens United
Alliance for Justice
Democratic Caucus
African American Women in Defense of Ourselves
The Press

From the Paper
"The nomination of Clarence Thomas launched a great deal of concern among liberal interest groups. Like Robert Bork, Clarence Thomas was an unashamed conservative. During the Thomas confirmation hearings, the traditional liberal African American special interest groups, such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), moved away from other liberal groups to support the nomination of only the second African American to the Court (Herrnson, Shaiko & Wilcox 1998)."

Tags:women's, rights, groups, anita, hill, sexual, harassment, charges, nominees, liberal, conservative

Abstract
This paper looks at the life of Clarence Darrow, famous defense lawyer in the 20th century. The author examines the lawyer's accomplishments and contributions to the world of law and society in general. The author examines some of his ideals such as his approach to capital punishment.

From the Paper
"Anyone who knows anything about the history of the law in the United States knows about Clarence Darrow, who was one of the most famous defense lawyers of the later 19th and early 20th centuries. While he probably remains most famous for his work in what has come to be known as the Scopes Monkey Trial, he was involved in scores of cases, including the defense of Leopold and Loeb and Eugene V. Debs. This paper examines the accomplishments and contributions of a man who was always part showman along with part lawyer, as well as a great public speaker and debater. A staunch opponent of capital punishment, he was perhaps at his most impressive in the courtroom when pleading capital cases: of the more than 100 persons charged with murder none was ever sentenced to death."

Tags:law, sentence, crime, prison, life, sentence, death, penalty

Abstract
This paper discusses the life and career of Clarence Thomas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice. The author looks briefly at his childhood, his education, then at his rise in the judiciary, and controversial nomination to the Court . The paper examines Justice Thomas' role as a conservative African-American and how his conservatism is shown through his decisions.

From the Paper
"It is hard to imagine that few justices of the 20th century will remain as marked throughout their entire tenure by their confirmation process as Clarence Thomas, who was nominated by George Bush, Sr. for one of the associate justice positions on the U.S. Supreme Court in 1991. Surviving the controversy of this nomination, in which he was accused of sexual harassment as well as of being of insufficient legal acumen and gravity- many liberals believed that his primary qualifications for office were his conservatism along with the fact that he was relatively young and healthy and therefore could serve on the court for many years. Thomas succeeded to the seat of the ultraliberal Thurgood Marshall, and in doing so gave to the court a decidedly conservative cast, undoing many of the measures that Marshall had dedicated his own life to achieving."

Tags:court, scalia, supreme, antonin, justice, bush, hill, anita, nomination, abortion

Abstract
In this paper, the writer discusses that 'Gideon's Trumpet' defines the life and legal battles that were essential for changing the idea of legal representation in the 20th century American court system. The writer maintains that Gideon's criminal past had made it impossible for him to attain legal representation (because of monetary cost and their exclusivity to class ranges that could afford them), which he then fought through Gideon v. Wainwright to gain access to the a lawyer.

Abstract
This paper begins with a brief introduction to Justice Thomas's political philosophy and an assessment of how he is viewed by the African-American public. The paper then offers a critique and analysis of a speech made by Thomas to the largest organization of black lawyers, the National Bar Association.

From the Paper
"Justice Thomas Clarence occupies an important position in the legal circles since he is only the second black American to have been appointed to the Supreme Court. Being a Supreme Court Justice is an honor for anyone regardless of the race he/she belongs to but for Thomas Clarence, this achievement holds greater significance since only one person from his community ever made it to the Supreme Court before himself. Thurgood Marshall was a highly revered legal figure. During his tenure, Marshall did everything in his power to further the interests of black community. The same community however vehemently opposed Clarence's appointment to Supreme Court because Thomas? racial politics has done his community more harm than good."

Tags:black, cause, opposing, racial, gap, discrimination, racism, color-blind, society, ethos, pathos, defiant, counter-attack

From the Paper
"The purpose of this paper is to perform a rhetorical analysis on Clarence Darrow's closing speech in his own defense, given on August 14 and 15, 1912. It will evaluate the effectiveness of the speech in terms of his winning an acquittal of the charges of suborning bribery of a juror in another case, but also in terms of his overall goals as a lawyer.

Introduction
This specific speech was chosen for analysis for two reasons. First, it is clear that the speech was effective as a defense speech, because Darrow was acquitted; hence, an analysis can focus on why the speech was effective in this way. Second, the speech is nevertheless a tour de force. In other cases he argued, Darrow was in no personal danger if he lost the case, but in this situation he was in great danger; he would have gone to prison.."

From the Paper
"Clarence Thomas was born in a small town outside of Savannah, Georgia, in 1948 (Brock, 1993, 62). When his father left the family, Thomas was still a young child, and his mother had to support Thomas, his older sister, and younger brother. At the age of 8, Thomas went to live with his mother's parents and helped his grandfather work on a truck. Thomas then attended a segregated Catholic school (Brock, 1993, 62). Later, during one of Thomas's speeches, he commented about this education, saying, "I grew up under state enforced segregation, which is as close to totalitarianism as I would like to get (Ibid., 63)." He also said that the household he grew up in was "more conservative than many who fashion themselves as conservative today (Ibid.)."


By the 11th grade, Thomas was attending the St. John Vianney Minor Seminary and was the only black student in his class."

Tags:

Abstract
This paper first relates that, from a prison cell in Florida, written in pencil, Clarence Gideon, with an eight-grade education and without a legal knowledge base, petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to hear his case. Next, the author describes Gideon's crime, court proceedings, petition and his insistence on justice under the law. The paper underscores that this case, "Gideon vs. Wainwright", guarantees that proper legal representation for the defendant, regardless of wealth, privilege or education, is fundamental to a fair justice system.

From the Paper
"While serving out the five-year prison sentence, Gideon began to study the legal system and concluded that Judge Robert McCrary's denial of legal assistance violated rights granted by the constitution. Gideon submitted a petition to the local FBI office and the Florida Supreme Court, requesting immediate release, citing writ of habeas corpus. Article I, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution guarantees the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, a mandate that requires prisoners to be brought before the court to determine if the government has cause for detainment."

Tags:guilty, court appoint legal defense, in forma pauperis, writ of habeas corpus, second trial

Abstract
This paper examines Anthony Lewis' "Gideon's Trumpet", which evaluates the Supreme Court case of Clarence Earl Gideon. Gideon was tried and convicted in the Fourteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida but maintained, under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, that he was entitled to counsel by the state because he couldn't afford his own. The author points out that the case on which the Supreme Court based its ruling was 'Betts v. Brady', and that it rejected the contention that due process under the Fourteenth Amendment provided a flat guarantee of counsel in state criminal trials. The paper relates that the rule of the case is simply that a person charged with a crime anywhere in the United States has the right to counsel, a right deemed fundamental and essential to any fair trial (Sixth Amendment), and, when the person cannot afford one, the state is obligated to provide one under the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause.

From the Paper
"Ever since 'Betts' in 1942, the court struggled to apply the "special circumstances" aspect of the rule, and the legal problems inherent in the 'Betts' decision were all too evident. Professional comments on the 'Betts' decision, as maintained in law reviews following the decision, had at first been critical, and several Justices within the Supreme Court were already leaning towards its overruling. In fact, between the 'Betts' decision and the time Gideon wrote his letter, the Supreme Court held in favor of every state prisoner whose counsel claim it agreed to hear."

Tags:amendment, counsel, process, bett, justices