This paper discusses chaos theory based on James Gleick's "Chaos: Making a New Science" and Ian Stewart's "Does God Play Dice?: The Mathematics of Chaos".
Essay # 68253 |
1,500 words (
approx. 6 pages ) |
2 sources |
MLA | 2005
|
$ 29.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper explains that James Gleick believes that chaos theory is revolution in thinking, a major shift from the ordered universe of Newton and even the less mechanical universe of Einstein. The author points out that chaos theory says that the universe is decided on the basis of chance to a great degree and that the aggregate of those chances cannot be predicted or even discerned to allow a clear cause-and-effect assessment. The paper relates that chaos theory says that a small change in a system, which takes place all the time and cannot be tracked or even relied upon, can produce more and more changes until something much greater and unforeseen occurs.
From the Paper
"Ian Stewart is trained as a mathematician, while Gleick writes about science for the New York Times. Stewart is British, and Gleick American. They write about the same subject from different points of view. Stewart begins his book noting that the direction for creation has been first from chaos into order, and that physics has now found that order is something of an illusion masking the continuing chaos of reality. He also cites Newton and the Newtonian era as affirming that nature has laws and man can discover what these laws are. The world described by Newton was a clockwork world which operated like a machine, and Stewart discusses the nature of that world and world-view much more directly than does Gleick."
Tags:change, small, aggregate, butterfly-effect, applications
This paper discusses the possibility of more accurately forecasting weather through the application of Edward Lorenz' chaos theory as based on James Gleick's book "Chaos: Making a New Science".
Essay # 68592 |
2,315 words (
approx. 9.3 pages ) |
4 sources |
MLA | 2005
|
$ 42.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper explains that James Gleick in his book "Chaos: Making a New Science" reports the work of meteorologist and pioneer of the chaos theory, Edward Lorenz, to computerize the forecasting of weather based on physical laws. The author points out that Gleick explains, even though the straight-forward mathematical attempt by Lorenz to find weather averages was a "failure", Lorenz discovered that the phenomenon of climate instability was related to the chaos theory. The paper relates that Lorenz' two non-linear discoveries are (1) that models of chaotic systems have an exquisitely sensitive dependence on initial dependence called the butterfly effect and (2) that even simple systems can show complex, chaotic behavior proving that the "clockwork" universe doesn't exist.
Table of Contents
Gleick's Belief of the Possibility to Forecast Weather
The Butterfly Effect
Nonlinear and Linear Systems
Similar to Predicting the Motions of Planets
Link between Aperiodic Behavior and Unpredictable Behavior
Thermal Convection
From the Paper
"The very act of predicting weather is "fragile" when it comes to computer modeling, even though the data may be "reasonable trustworthy" and the laws of science are "purely physical" (20). But the computer modeling of weather patterns and air movement and temperatures and all the other ingredients that go into the stew, are only good for a day or two; "beyond two or three days the world's best forecasts" are / were speculative, and "beyond six or seven," Gleick writes, "they were worthless." Why were they worthless? "The Butterfly Effect was the reason.""
Tags:butterfly, modeling, universe, nonlinear, thermals
This paper applies chaos theory to business management.
Essay # 68267 |
1,070 words (
approx. 4.3 pages ) |
6 sources |
MLA | 2005
|
$ 22.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper explains that organizations are becoming aware of the serious need to cope with and quickly adapt to change; therefore, they increasingly are turning to chaos theory in order to understand and manage change in a dynamic business environment. The author points out that chaos theory, also known as non-linear systems theory, is based on the premise that the world is made up of complex systems that are non-linear, dynamic, unstable and unpredictable, contrasting sharp with Newtonian science, which believed that the universe functioned in an ordered, stable, linear and predictable manner. The paper relates that chaos theory has led to organizations being viewed as organic or living systems that will find orderly solutions if they are allowed to do so; however, organizational management needs to be more sensitized to environmental changes, leading to flexibility, responsiveness, dynamism and a reduced reliance on precise planning.
From the Paper
"True, that discerning the underlying structure of the complex systems that bring about change is often difficult because there are a number of myriad factors involved. However, chaos theory is nevertheless useful in understanding and managing what was previously considered to be uncontrollable, chaotic events and behavior. This is achieved by defining chaos as "the range of behaviors that deterministic processes can adopt." One such deterministic process is deemed as the organizational culture and structure itself. Indeed, this is precisely the reason why modern organizations are moving towards decentralized, leaner, flatter structures that allow for employee empowerment, self-organization and emergence."
Tags:nonlinear, systems, unpredictable, organic, flexibility
A look at the pros and cons of the application of chaos theory in the classroom.
Analytical Essay # 116298 |
1,679 words (
approx. 6.7 pages ) |
2 sources |
APA | 2009
|
$ 32.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper explains chaos theory and looks at how it can be applied to the educational field, noting that the classroom is a place where the initial state is one where students know nothing of the class ahead of them, and teachers are faced with a group of students that are, in the beginning, completely foreign to them in their backgrounds, behavior, and the way they learn. By employing methods set out in "Chaos in the Classroom: A New Theory of Teaching and Learning" by E. Davis and D. Smith, the paper examines both the pros and cons of the practical introduction of chaos theory in the area of education.
From the Paper
"The "cons" of the chaos theory in its application to education are minimal, if they exist at all. Though one can be considered the fact that all students learn differently and therefore the chaos theory can not possibly encompass all students' needs, the work done by the authors of Chaos in the Classroom have accounted for this in their theory by describing the innate uncertainty and variety of students' functioning in the classroom. The authors state that students come to class with their own unique set of experiences, beliefs, problems, and assumptions. There is no way to truly coordinate every student's needs, but the authors say that this should set teachers free of the worry and belief that they can meet every need. Instead, teachers must approach their job by expressing the educational material in a way that mimics how we receive information in the "real world". "
Tags:students, teachers, education
A discussion on "In Commentary: The Potential of Chaos Theory and Complexity Theory for Health Services Management", by Margaret Arndt and Barbara Bigelow.
Essay # 88124 |
1,350 words (
approx. 5.4 pages ) |
1 source |
2005
|
$ 27.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper examines Margaret Arndt and Barbara Bigelow's book which discusses the relevance and potential of the chaos and complexity theories in terms of improving health services management in the United States. It highlights that reevaluating professional knowledge and assumptions in a field as complex as health care can be unsettling, but it can also invigorating.
From the Paper
"In "Commentary: The Potential of Chaos Theory and Complexity Theory for Health Services Management", Margaret Arndt and Barbara Bigelow examine the relevance and potential of these theories in terms of improving health services management in the United States. They emphasize that reevaluating professional knowledge and assumptions in a field as complex as health care can be unsettling, but it can also invigorating. Because of the potential benefits of such an approach, Arndt and Bigelow (2000) argue in their article that applying chaos theory and complexity theory to health services management is worthy of pursuit, despite potential controversy or disputes regarding the validity of this approach. Since America's health care system is plagued by inherent complexity and chaos, applying ..."
Tags:chaos, and, complexity
Defines and assesses the truth and usefulness of the theory on the breakdown of ordered systems.
Essay # 14301 |
2,475 words (
approx. 9.9 pages ) |
6 sources |
1999
|
$ 45.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
To assess whether chaos theory is a good theory one must first do two things define chaos theory itself and then define what one means in general as a good theory. The initial proposition is the easier of the two, and so is taken up first in this paper.
.
From the Paper
"Chaos Theory
To assess whether chaos theory is a good theory one must first do two things define chaos theory itself and then define what one means in general as a good theory. The initial proposition is the easier of the two, and so is taken up first in this paper.
Chaos theory is in fact a broader-ranging set of ideas than is usually described by the title theory , for it puts forth not a proposition about a particular and specific set of events (such as in the case in something like the theory of angular momentum) but instead makes a rather sweeping generalization about the way the natural as well as perhaps also the social world is put together. Chaos theory is in fact a sort of meta-theory, the basic ideas of which can be extracted and applied in a variety of situations. Some of these ..."
Describes scientific theory of unpredictability of life & its relation to modern art (Picasso, Pollock, computer effects).
Essay # 12936 |
2,700 words (
approx. 10.8 pages ) |
11 sources |
1997
|
$ 48.95
More information
|
Add to cart
From the Paper
"This paper is a study of the relationship between the relatively recent scientific development of chaos theory and art. Chaos theory recognizes and attempts to analyze the points at which regularity becomes unpredictable, form turns into formlessness, Euclidean geometry yields to pandemonium. This apparent abandonment of established order also describes the dramatic changes that inspired impressionistic art and most of what are now termed modern arts - wild breaks with traditional approaches to the representation of human beings and nature, even to the point of choosing nontraditional subject matter or no apparent subject matter at all. Just as the chaos scientists upset the establishment by ignoring disciplinary boundaries and ways of examining a problem, so too did .."
The following paper will look at computer simulation and at how we can learn many things about the flocking behaviour of birds (and maybe other animals, as well) by simply applying the basic principles and rules first popularized more than two ...
Essay # 138258 |
1,000 words (
approx. 4 pages ) |
3 sources |
MLA |
|
$ 21.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The following paper will look at computer simulation and at how we can learn many things about the flocking behaviour of birds (and maybe other animals, as well) by simply applying the basic principles and rules first popularized more than two decades ago by Craig Reynolds. As time allows, the paper will look at what has been learned about 'flocking' from computer simulations, and the paper will then briefly look at how such simulations work. Finally, the paper will end by looking at whether or not animal behaviour can be learned from these sorts of simulations. In the end, the answer to that last query is a resounding 'yes'.
From the Paper
Particle Physics and Chaos Theory: Computer Simulation, "Flocking," and what we can learn The following paper will look at computer simulation and at how we can learn many things about the flocking behaviour of birds (and maybe other animals, as well) by simply applying the basic principles and rules first popularized more than two decades ago by Craig Reynolds. As time allows, the paper will look at what has been learned about `flocking' from computer simulations, and the paper will then briefly look at how such simulations work. Finally, the paper will end by looking at whether or not animal behaviour can be learned from these sorts of simulations. In the
Tags:flocking, computer, simulation
A look at the use of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) in the financial industry.
Term Paper # 133701 |
1,250 words (
approx. 5 pages ) |
5 sources |
|
$ 25.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper discusses how the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) are both valid models utilized by financial professionals in determining an appropriate market price or value of a given financial product or commodity. The paper posits that it is important to note that without one or the other, financial industry professionals could not adequately determine the value of a financial device and, consequently, the financial markets would quickly fall into chaos.
From the Paper
"The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) are both valid models utilized by financial professionals in determining an appropriate market price or value of a given financial product or commodity. It is important to note that without one or the other, financial industry professionals could not adequately determine the value of a financial device and, consequently, the financial markets would quickly fall into chaos. However, much debate in the financial industry..."
Tags:arbitrage, pricing, theory
A discussion of the perspectives of positivist science and postmodern science on organization theory, contrasting the two.
Comparison Essay # 110038 |
2,001 words (
approx. 8 pages ) |
5 sources |
APA | 2008
|
$ 38.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper discusses organization theory, which originated with Max Weber, and two of the ways in which it has evolved since its conception. The author defines positivism and postmodernism and explains both points of view in detail. The author then analyzes the gap between them, and concludes that postmodernism is the antipode of positivism, as the two perspectives have only differences and no similarities, and respectively favor the subjective and objective nature of reality.
From the Paper
"The term positivism was introduced, in 1853, by French philosopher Auguste Comte who believed that humans could stand back and observe the already existing reality, without influencing what they observed provided that the appropriate methodology was used. This means that the guiding principle of the above theory is "facts speak for themselves". Moreover, scientists believe that objective reality is made up of those elements that are tangible or that can be perceived with the help of our senses. Therefore, any phenomenon that isn't validated by smell, taste, touch, hearing or sight, is denied existence in the real world and is considered to be the result of superstition, dogma or fantasy. However, a human being's senses can be misleading. This is why positivists embrace those objective methods that derive from physical or hard sciences and that are said to be the keystone against which validity is decided."
Tags:ontology, epistemology, chaos, capitalist, discourse, discrepancy, meaning, unpredictability, trajectory