Abstract
The paper discusses the fact that optimizing performance in all fronts is of utmost concern for businesses today which are operating under intense competition. The paper states that the airline industry in particular, is witnessing a bad phase with many big airlines going bankrupt. Cost cutting and performance tuning measures are indispensable to aviation industry for survival. The paper discusses the case of Cessna, a leading aircraft company, which is a good example of how rationalizing supply chain management can result in considerable performance improvements and the profitability of the company.

Outline;
Abstract
Introduction
Conclusion

From the Paper
" The center point of Cessna's new initiatives aimed at rationalizing the Supplier chain management system, is the MPD process. The Maturity Path Development Process (MPD) is a process where Cessna officials sit together with their Suppliers on a regular basis and review the expectations and the quality and performance status met by them. Plans are drawn to highlight areas that need improvement and suppliers are expected to fulfill these requirements. In short, every month the suppliers are given a status briefing that explains how they fair with respect to the Baldrige benchmarks and the goals they have to meet in the short and long run. Within one year, it is expected that suppliers reach the 'growth supplier status' or be phased out."

Tags:improvement, quality, performance, status, Baldrige, benchmarks

Abstract
This paper firstly discusses the most important component that fails in a reciprocating engine, the human component. It investigates an accident of a big aircraft, Lockheed Super Constellation, in order to qualify this opinion. The paper then examines the Cessna as an example of engine problems as a cause of aircraft accidents. The author stresses that it is the pilot error that causes 95 percent of the accidents for reciprocating engine aircraft.

Table of Contents:
Abstract
Introduction
Analysis
Conclusion
References

From the Paper
"Now let us look at the causes of accidents from an engine point of view. Both turbine engines and reciprocating engines process air in the same manner and that means that they both have intake, compression, combustion and exhaust. In the reciprocating engine one step has to follow the other and in the turbine engine all the processes proceed all at the same time and without any interruption. The other difference is that in the turbine engine there are separate components decided for the particular operation of the cycle, while in the reciprocating engine, all the functions take place in the same combustion chamber. The design of each engine gives certain benefits and advantages, and when the issue is considered from thermal efficiency, reciprocating engines are easily more efficient. They have a complex design, but the engine has had a longer period to be developed and perfected. The general view is that turbine engines have simplicity of motion and this has given a reputation for being more reliable, though it burns more fuel than a reciprocating engine."

Tags:aeroplane, pilot, Cessna, Lockheed, Super, Constellation