Abstract
The writer describes the details of his project on conscientious objection and the dispensation of drugs in emergency contraception cases. The paper explains that the project is justified and desirable on the grounds that determining a professional pharmacist's moral and ethical responsibilities to his or her patients in crisis situations will go a long way towards establishing appropriate ethical parameters for professionals who are trying to reconcile their duties with their own conscience. The writer relates that the research paper is both an ethical treatise and a personal journey.

From the Paper
"Dear Instructor: The following few pages are devoted to describing the details of my project on conscientious objection and the dispensation of drugs in emergency contraception cases. The project is justified and desirable on the grounds that determining a professional pharmacist's moral and ethical responsibilities to his or her patients in crisis situations will go a long way towards establishing appropriate ethical parameters for professionals who are trying to reconcile their duties with their own..."

Tags:cases, emergency, contraception

Abstract
This paper addresses two historic business law cases--Hightec and The Quality Crusader. The paper further identifies the problems and proposes solutions in each. The Issues of expansion and present value of expenditures are also considered in detail.

From the Paper
"Glenn Moore can expand either by renewing Hightec's rental contract for five more years and renting portable units to ease the cramped conditions, purchasing land and building a new square-foot facility or renewing the rental contract on the current building for five more years and renting an adjacent square-foot building. Moore has already rejected option as being inadequate. Hightec's best option is to purchase the land and build its own building. First the present value of cash inflows and outflows and..."

Tags:Hightec case, The Quality Crusader case, operations management, quality, communication, alternatives, decision making

Abstract
This paper focuses on two cases of de-motivated workplaces: 1. Easy Money Department and 2. the Police Department. This paper examines and compares the level of motivation on two different workplaces; the field offices of the governmental Easy-Money department and a police department. The paper also discusses the communication and leadership in the two workplaces.

From the Paper
"The thesis of this paper is that each case study concerns a specific Department, a "subsystem" (Greenberg, P.11) within a larger entity, that Displays "deviant organizational behavior" (Greenberg, P.222), and that an accurate analysis of feasible solutions needs to reference the harmful external forces and inadequate internal responses that characterize both of them. The Fourth Division of the Police Department of a city in Mid- western Canada is severely impacted by new budgetary constraints and..."

Tags:case study, motivation, leadership/communication

Abstract
The steelworkers' trilogy cases greatly changed the way that arbitration is dealt with in America. In light of this, the paper discusses and analyzes these three cases and determines what arbitration was like before and after the cases took place. This study looks at arbitration in various cases (most notably the steelworkers' trilogy) based on unfair labor practices. There is significance to this based on the fact that the way that arbitration is conducted was changed based on these cases and they made a significant difference in the way that the laws regarding arbitration were handled. Looked at here are the steelworkers' trilogy cases, the history of arbitration both before and after the cases, and the impact that these cases had on arbitration in this country.

Outline
Abstract
Introduction
Arbitration Before the Steelworkers' Trilogy Cases
The Steelworker Trilogy Cases
Case #1 - United Steelworkers of America v. American Manufacturing Co.
Case #2 - United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.
Case #3 - United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.
Conclusion

From the Paper
"The steelworkers trilogy cases of 1960 gained much attention at the time and remained famous for years afterward as being the most significant cases where the arbitration of grievances were concerned. In these cases, the United States Supreme Court was aware of the necessity of strict rules to keep arbitration honest and fair for all of the parties that are involved with it. One of the laws under which arbitration awards may be forced or vacated is Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, which has been used for some time in various cases. The Federal Arbitration Act also created guidelines to ensure that arbitration is fair, and there are only four circumstances under Federal law where an arbitration award may be changed or vacated under this Act."

Tags:strike, union

Abstract
The paper looks at "Miller v. Schoene et al." (1928) and "Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co." (1970) to see two cases in which the courts have been asked to consider conflicting rights issues. This paper explores these cases from a Coasean law and economics approach, arguing that while the rulings of the judges in both cases may promote efficiency, this is not their sole consideration. Nonetheless, the paper argues that both rulings reaffirm the importance of promoting efficiency and the consideration of relative utility in weighing property rights.

From the Paper
"In "Miller v. Schoene et al." (1928) and "Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co. (1970)" we see two cases in which the courts have been asked to consider conflicting rights issues. This essay will explore these cases from a Coasean law and economics approach, arguing that while the rulings of the judges in both cases may promote efficiency this is not their sole consideration. Nonetheless, both rulings reaffirm the importance of promoting efficiency and the consideration of relative utility in weighing..."

Tags:law, property, rights

Abstract
This paper analyzes the role of human dignity and individual rights in cases involving the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The analysis finds that individual rights were accorded greater weight by the courts in Section 15(1) cases than in Section 7 cases.

Tags:Canadian, Charter, of, Rights, and, Freedom, Human, Dignity, Individual, Rights, Free, Choice

Abstract
The paper reviews and analyzes several cases in which students claim that their First Amendment rights were violated - "Tinker v. Des Moines School District," "Board of Ed v. Pico," and "Bethel School District No.403 et al. v. Fraser." The paper defines and explains the First Amendment, and explores how it is applied and interpreted in each of the three cases. The paper also poses questions of interpretation, such as whether the First Amendment allows one to manifest a view of hatred toward others. The paper concludes as the author shares relevant personal experience and commentary, and states his opinion that the First Amendment should not be used to protect stupidity.

Outline:
Abstract
Summary of the Issue
Questions To Be Addressed
Summary of Related Supreme Court Cases/Rulings:
"Tinker v. Des Moines School District"
"Board of Ed v. Pico"
"Bethel School District No.403 et al. v. Fraser"
Application to Instructional Practice
References

From the Paper
"My school recently had an issue with the "Clique" books. The books promoted using eating disorders to stay skinny, talking badly about other students, and lying to get what you want. The author has since written saying she regrets writing the books. My district managed the problem by removing the books from the accelerated reader list. A note was circulated to parents saying that it was not the districts policy to ban books. However, parents should be aware of what their children should be reading. I think this was a good way to handle the situation. The students could still read the books, but would not receive school credit to do so because of their removal from the test list. Furthermore, it made parents aware of the books' content, and allowed them to make the decision on their children's reading habits."

Tags:First Amendment, Law, Education, Freedom of Speech, Freedom, Special Education

Abstract
This paper relates that marketing is a vital part of the successful cases of BMW Films, Prozac/Paxil, Sony's EyeToy and Tivo. The author points out that, because BMW's customers are technologically oriented, BMW Films must consider marketing collateral based on pod-casts, blogs and an RSS news/advertisement campaign distributed via the Internet. The paper relates that the strategy of marketing pharmaceutical product for diseases, like "social phobia", whose discovery were at least partially funded by the major pharmaceuticals themselves, is highly effective and creates a market where previously none existed. The author underscores that the strategy of bundling the EyeToy product with Sony's existing computer game stations eliminates the consumer perception that EyeToy is a low cost device. The paper realizes that Tivo's marketing department is limited by the confines of its retail distribution and manufacturing agreements.

Table of Contents:
Abstract
Case Analysis
BMW Films
Marketing Antidepressants Case Study
Sony EyeToy Case
Tivo Case Study

From the Paper
"BMW's target market differs somewhat with each of its product lines although in all cases its overall target market is considered affluent to some degree. For the 3 series product line, BMW's target market is described as the upwardly mobile, young professional who declaring him or herself to be on the way up the ladder of success. For the 5 series product line, BMW's target market is largely a repeat customer who has reached a degree of established success and can afford the added accoutrement of the mid-range BMW luxury product."

Tags:strategy, bundling, internet, leadership, extensions

Abstract
This paper takes a look at the book 'Celebrated Cases of Judge Dee', translated from Chinese to English by Robert Van Gulik. The paper discusses Judge Dee's unquenchable thirst for finding the truth, when solving legal cases. The paper further discusses how the Judge Dee novels are grounded in large societal ethical hermeneutic of Confucian and Taoist morals, where finding the truth is a sacred duty of Judge Dee's office and great dishonor would fall upon the head of any judge who accidentally condemns an innocent man.

From the Paper
"There are some features of Dee's detection are similar to modern police work, and do not cause a non-Confucian reader to raise an eyebrow. Dee deploys psychological insight and observation to come to the root of a mystery, noting that, good Confucian he is, he has studied carefully the ancient handbooks of detection, which values the importance of knowing the character, daily life and habits of the victim and that personality supplies the clues to solve the crime. Know a person's ethics, and know the man or woman. Know the person's place in society, and know how they 'should' behave. Having an upright character is also an essential component to being a good, that is, an ethical Confucian, and defects in character must be scrutinized and used as clues, as they leave a person open to the danger of becoming a victim."

Tags:Confucian, Taoist, hierarchy, social, status, morality, district, magistrate

Abstract
This paper examines racial discrimination, as enforced through law enforcement personnel and in clear violation of the U.S Constitution. It discusses three landmark cases where the same racial justice in America was differently interpreted and the impact on the performance of the duty of the law enforcement officers. The cases are Mapp vs. Ohio, 1961; Terry vs. Ohio, 1968; and Miranda vs. Arizona, 1966.

From the Paper
"In the Miranda vs. Arizona case, petitioner Ernesto Miranda was taken into custody from his home and locked up in the Phoenix Police lock up facility. Upon identification by the complaining witness, Miranda was taken in to one of the interrogations rooms of the police station, and questioned by police officers. Miranda was not advised of his constitutional rights, nor his right to an attorney. Instead, Miranda was made to a sign a pre-typed statement, where-in it was categorically typed and mentioned that the confession by him was voluntarily made, was without any threats, or promises of immunity, and "with full knowledge of my legal rights, understanding any statement I make may be used against me". (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966)."

Tags:miranda, arizona, ohio, blacks, police