This paper explores the early life of Gaius Julius Caesar and offers an extensive review of his victory over the Gauls.
Essay # 73511 |
1,350 words (
approx. 5.4 pages ) |
2 sources |
MLA | 2004
|
$ 27.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper covers the early life of Gaius Julius Caesar and gives an extensive account of his defeat of the Gauls. The paper also includes an outline of Caesar's life after the Gallic wars.
From the Paper
"Gaius Julius Caesar was born by Caesarian section, according to legend, to Aurelia and Gaius Julius Caesar, a praetor, on July BCE. His family had noble patrician roots but they were not rich or influential during the period of his birth. His aunt Julia on his father's side was the wife of Gaius Marius, the leader of the Popular faction who had saved the Roman Republic several years earlier by defeating two German tribes, the Teutones and the Cimbri."
Tags:Julius Caesar, Gauls
Although Caesar was reputed to be a master of the civil art of politics, he alienated so many important individuals and factions in Rome that he provoked his own assassination. He gave the rule of Egypt to Cleopatra and her younger brother/husband in ...
Essay # 137403 |
2,500 words (
approx. 10 pages ) |
0 sources |
|
$ 45.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
Although Caesar was reputed to be a master of the civil art of politics, he alienated so many important individuals and factions in Rome that he provoked his own assassination. He gave the rule of Egypt to Cleopatra and her younger brother/husband in 47 B.C., which led to his eventual demise. Nevertheless, he was a great politician and from some accounts an even nobler man.
From the Paper
The Evaluation of Caesar through the Writings of Plutarch, Tacitus, and Suetonius Introduction Although Caesar was reputed to be a master of the civil art of politics, he alienated so many important individuals and factions in Rome that he provoked his own assassination. He gave the rule of Egypt to Cleopatra and her younger brother/husband in 47 B.C., which led to his eventual demise. Nevertheless, he was a great politician and from some accounts an even nobler man. Plutarch's Evaluation of Caesar
Tags:caesar, plutarch, tacitus
A comparison of the characters Okonkwo from Chinua Achebe's 'Things Fall Apart' and Shakespeare's Julius Caesar.
Comparison Essay # 126999 |
1,000 words (
approx. 4 pages ) |
9 sources |
MLA | 2008
|
$ 21.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts the characters Okonkwo from Chinua Achebe's 'Things Fall Apart' and Julius Caesar from Shakespeare's play, focusing on the problem of pride.
From the Paper
"The character Okonkwo in 'Things Fall Apart' by Chinua Achebe and the character Julius Caesar in Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar are both very much alike in some ways and different in others. Both characters are tragic figures who die a violent death, Okonkwo by his own hand and Julius Caesar by the hands of a group of conspirators in the Roman Senate that includes his closest friend Brutus. Both Okonkwo and Julius Caesar have a fatal flaw-a stubborn resistance to acknowledging the truth-that ..."
Tags:Okonkwo, Things Fall Apart, Chinua Achebe, Julius Caesar, Shakespeare, pride
This paper explores how Julius Caesar is portrayed in Shakespeare's play of the same name and how this portrayal fits the idea of kingship.
Essay # 36138 |
900 words (
approx. 3.6 pages ) |
3 sources |
2002
|
$ 19.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper exemplifies Caesar as a man portrayed as an example of an king in the Elizabethan times.
Tags:caesar, portrayed, shakespeare
An examination of the motivation for the 'liberators' in their assassination of Julius Caesar.
Term Paper # 109134 |
1,842 words (
approx. 7.4 pages ) |
8 sources |
APA | 2008
$ 35.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper discusses whether Julius Caesar was assassinated out of fear, idealism or jealousy. It argues that fear, idealism and jealousy were all present among the 'liberators' when they assassinated Caesar. It specifically looks at the idealism of Brutus, the fear of Cicero and the jealousy of Cassius in their responsibility for causing the final downfall of Caesar.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Probable Causes Of Caesar's Assassination:
Historical Background/Political Situation
Idealism Of The 'Liberators' Or The Conspirators
The Opposing View And The Role Of Jealousy Or Fear
Fear Among Friends
Jealousy Amidst The Power Seekers
Understanding The Underlying Factors
Conclusion
From the Paper
"According to Taylor, though the struggle against Caesar was triggered by idealism, in course of time it became more influenced by 'personal interests' rather than any ideal of Free State. Storch suggests that 'relative depravity' possibly played a role in Caesar's assassination. He explains that those who were pardoned or favored by Caesar were not happy as they in many cases did not get as much as they wanted. Moreover even inside the inner circle of friends dissatisfaction remained because of advancing someone's career over others, like that of Anotony's. Though there were many eligible people in line to be chosen as consul, violating the tradition Caesar appointed Antony for the position, which enraged Labienus, one of the hopefuls for consulship and a member of Caesarian camp."
Tags:fear, jealousy, idealism, Rome
A book review of "Caesar: Life of a Colossus" by Adrian Goldsworthy.
Book Review # 102664 |
924 words (
approx. 3.7 pages ) |
1 source |
MLA | 2008
|
$ 19.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper examines "Caesar: Life of a Colossus", the biography of the greatest of Rome's generals. The paper describes how Goldsworthy provides a biography that is comprehensive on the many different facets of leadership and personality traits that Caesar had in his long and successful career as a general and a public servant. The paper relates that Goldsworthy provides primary and secondary sources as well as historically authentic documents written by Caesar. The paper concludes that although Goldsworthy might have delved deeper into the ethical aspects of Caesar's megalomania and ruthless actions, he still provides an important and scholarly account of the famous Roman general and emperor.
Outline:
Summary
Analysis
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Caesar: Life of a Colossus by Adrian Goldsworthy examines the life of one of the greatest of the Rome's generals and reveals a biography from his earliest years, to his final downfall as a dictator of Rome. The basis of Caesar's military and educational training are essential parts of the biography, which Goldsworthy covers from childhood and early adulthood to his adult life as a general. The story then revolves around Caesar's military conquests, which result in his latter life being centered on his leadership as an emperor and finally, a dictator that is eventually put to death."
Tags:general, emperor, Rome, sources, biography
Caesar's "Conquest of Gaul"
This is an essay outlining Julius Caesar's imperial conquest of Gaul during the last century B.C. Special attention is paid to Caesar's military strategy and the motivational techniques that he used with his troops.
Essay # 50417 |
2,900 words (
approx. 11.6 pages ) |
6 sources |
MLA | 2001
|
$ 51.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper explains how, through analysis of Caesar's "The Conquest of Gaul", among other works, one may begin to put together an explanation as to why and how Julius Caesar was so successful in defeating his enemies in such a routine fashion. It shows that, although Caesar has been subject to many subsequent criticisms about the embellishments of his campaigns in his own work, and even his military abilities at the tactical level, his feats are simply too astounding and too well-documented and praised to go unnoticed.
From the Paper
"Caesar's campaigns in Gaul began in fifty-eight BC when the Helvetii, among other peoples, began a mass migration from their homes in Switzerland. Caesar declined their request to pass through Roman territory due to the fact that the Helvetii had killed Roman consul, Lucius Visutskie 2 Cassius, years previous. For this reason, Caesar viewed the Helvetii as a threat to the well-being of their allies, the Sequani and the Aedui, who had been loyal to Rome in the past, and whose territory the Helvetii wished to pass through.3 Since the Helvetii had burned their own towns and villages to the ground, Caesar viewed them as even more dangerous since they had nowhere to retreat to, thus, they would be more willing to face the consequences that resulted from any of their actions.4 Despite Caesar's refusal for the Helvetii to travel through Roman territory, they marched anyway. Caesar reacted to this manoeuver posthaste. By the time Caesar's army had reached the Helvetii army, they had already pillaged the towns and fields of the Aedui and the Sequani, and taken all of their children into slavery.5 This infuriated Caesar, he planned a careful attack on the Helvetii, determined to make them pay. Caesar first attacked a small portion of the Helvetii, whom had not yet crossed the Saone River with the rest of the army, and ravaged them, making somewhat of an example of them. Caesar caught up with the rest of the Helvetii tribe days later and damaged them more in a grueling battle which ended with the retreat of a hundred and thirty thousand Helvetii soldiers. Caesar intelligently sent messages to other allied settlements where the Helvetii could surface, warning them not to provide the Helvetii with food or shelter as they would become the enemy of the Romans if they did. Due to lack of food and nutrition, the Helvetii surrendered within three days and were divided into several groups in accordance with Caesar's wishes.6 Thus, the first campaign of Caesar's conquest into Gaul was not really intended to be a victory for Caesar, and a step in expanding the Roman Empire, but more or less a gesture of assistance to a group who had remained loyal to Rome over many years(as understood by the writings of Caesar himself). Besides being successful in getting the Helvetii out of Rome, Caesar also was quite successful in removing Ariovistus from Roman territory."
Tags:ancient, army, battle, history, imperial, roman, rome, triumvirate
A review of the life and influence of Julius Caesar.
Essay # 66921 |
800 words (
approx. 3.2 pages ) |
9 sources |
MLA | 2006
|
$ 17.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper examines the rise to power of Julius Caesar. The paper begins with a discussion of Caesar's early leadership and his calculated moves toward military greatness. Next, the paper analyzes Caesar's role in crushing Pompey's army in Pharsalus. The paper concludes with the plot to assassin Caesar, as well as brief commentary on his historical legacy.
From the Paper
"Gaius Julius Caesar was born in Rome on July 12, 100 BC, as a member of the Julian clan. It seemed as though Julius was almost born a radical. At a young age, his uncle by marriage, Gaius Marius, leader of the Populares, had ruled seven times as consul, or chief magistrate. It was in this seventh term that he appointed young Caesar to the position of flamen dialis, a position of archaic priesthood, but with no power. Thus, he was classified as one who agreed with his uncle's extremist ideas, and even further influenced this opinion when he broke off his first engagement with Cossutia, and married Cornelia, the daughter of Marius's associate, Cinna, in 84 BC."
Tags:cornelia, marius, gaius, pompey, brute, dictator
This paper examines Julius Caesar's life and his demand for power.
Essay # 66638 |
1,465 words (
approx. 5.9 pages ) |
9 sources |
MLA | 2005
|
$ 29.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper explains that to have absolute control or power over another human being, or, in the case of Julius Caesar, an entire nation, is an awesome responsibility. If the person in authority is convinced that their way is the only way, it can only produce negative results. The author points out that Julius Caesar is known in Roman history as the first dictator who was declared Dictator for Life with no limit on how long he could remain a ruler and retain his ultimate power over the people. The paper relates that, prior to his assassination, Caesar faced steadily growing opposition from the senators of Rome, who believed that he would put an end to the Republic and that he was a threat to all Roman traditions. However, the assassination only led to the renewal of civil wars and ultimately the Roman Republic was finally destroyed.
From the Paper
"Caesar lived his live by the motto, that he himself said "I came, I saw, I conquered!". These words expressed his incredible strong will and compelling attitude. He was also known as being very courageous and quick-witted. More than anything else this motto declared his definite need to control and conquer all he came into contact with. Caesar had ambitious plans for changing Rome and proposed to make a digest of the whole Roman law to found libraries, to drain the Pontine Marshes, to enlarge the harbor at Ostia, to dig a can throughout Isthmus, and to launch a war against the Dacians in Europe and the Parthiians in the East."
Tags:assasination, destruction, absolute, roman, control
A paper which discusses the murder of Julius Caesar in Shakespeare's play "Julius Caesar".
Analytical Essay # 7768 |
1,095 words (
approx. 4.4 pages ) |
1 source |
2002
|
$ 22.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This essay studies William Shakespeare's play, "Julius Caesar". It approaches the antagonism of both Caesar and the conspirators and the motivations of the conspirators. The themes of political achievement and popular responsibility are also discussed.
From the Paper
"Caesar was popular on the streets. His popularity was his source of power. Manipulation is a vice of politicians; on the converse side, influence is a political virtue. These are characteristics of Caesar. Because of his popularity, he can do anything he wants, as the Plebes rule Rome indirectly. This sets the stage for the political statement of the play. As there is an order set, this pure democracy of Rome is one of a kind. The people cast no votes as a whole, but only the elite. However, the approval of the Plebes is the primary concern of all politicians in Rome. This power of the people, however, is flexible in an uneducated society, as is most of Rome. Those who ran the politicians could easily be persuaded by those they ran (i.e. the politicians), who offered supremacy to Caesar."
Tags:Rome, Brutus, Cassius, Republic