Abstract
This paper explores the three branches of the US federal government: legislative branch, the judicial branch and the presidential branch. Specifically, the paper looks at how this system is balanced and controlled as well as the very beginnings of the government we know today.

Table of Contents:
Introduction
The Three Branches of the U.S. Federal Government
The Interactions of the Three Branches of Government
The Success or Lack Thereof of the Three Branches of Government
The Choice of Strong Federal Government or State Rights?
A More Efficient Government
Conclusion

From the Paper
"Our forefathers wanted to ensure that if one specific branch of government overstepped its bounds or was not operating properly that it wouldn't be able to execute its plans without the agreement of the other two branches of government. These branches were a stark difference from the all-powering rule the people had experienced under the rule of Great Britain. The government the U.S. had established was of the people, by the people and for the people and not an inherited title down an immensely long line of royal lineage."

Tags:utopian self-regulation values, decision-making power, state

Abstract
The paper explains that when comparing the executive branch of the US government and the executive branch of the German government, it is essential to keep in mind that the essential difference between the two relates to the fact that the US political system follows the presidential model, while the German political system follows the parliamentary model. The paper shows how this essential difference is the source of the differences we find in the two countrys' executive branches.

From the Paper
"When comparing the Executive Branch of the US Government and the Executive Branch of the German Government, it is essential to keep in mind that the essential difference between the two relates to the fact that the US political system follows the presidential model, while the German political system follows the parliamentary model. This essential difference is the source of the differences we find in the two country's executive branches. As we will see, it is difficult to say which system is "better" - both have their own advantages and proponents. However, as will..."

Tags:parliamentary, presidential, executive

Abstract
This paper describes the structure of the three branches of the federal government as defined by the framers of the U.S. Constitution. Starting with the upholding of the Supreme Court case "Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas", the paper traces the battle for civil rights changes through the courts, the strong direction of the executive especially Presidents Kennedy and Johnson and the eventual passage of the Civil Rights Act by the legislative branch of government. The paper concludes that this act of Congress brought the civil rights issue in line with the ambitions of the judiciary and the executive branch.

From the Paper
"Upon Kennedy's assassination in 1963, his vice-president and the formerly powerful Senate, Lyndon Baines Johnson demonstrated the way in which the two branches sometimes interact. In this case, he used his influence and power to apply pressure upon representatives to pass the bill. This dynamic, in fact, is perhaps most uniquely indicative of the way the branches interact with one another. Based upon the perception that a precedent had been established by the judicial branch in its striking down of any rationale for segregation, the executive branch, channeled through very different but equally instrumental personalities in Kennedy and Johnson."

Tags:structure inequality compromise, public mandate, collective interaction

Abstract
This paper explains that the constitutional system of checks and balances has served the country well over the years, notwithstanding its original intent to avoid majoritarian power. The author points out that the amount of power wielded by one branch of the federal government compared to the others has tended to swing from one extreme to another, expanding in scope and power until brought under control by the checks and balances of the others. The paper relates that, since 9/11, the president has emerged as the temporary heavyweight champion among the three branches of government today; however, when the real and perceived threats to the nation's interests have been resolved, it would seem certain that the system of checks and balances would provide the impetus needed to once again diminish the powers of an "imperial presidency".

From the Paper
"According to "Black's Law Dictionary" (1990), checks and balances are an "arrangement of government powers whereby powers of one governmental branch check or balance those of other branches." This separation of powers, of course, has been a fundamental feature of the American federal government from the outset, but the intent, purpose and net effect of this approach has not been exactly what the Founders may have envisioned. When the nation's Founders gathered to forge a constitution, Goldwin and Schambra (1980) suggest that the checks and balances provisions that were adopted were not intended to keep the forces of government under control but were rather intended to keep the popular majority from exercising any substantive degree of influence over its operation."

Tags:majoritarian, checks, balances, 9/11, control

Abstract
The paper explores the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government and how they are designed to keep power in the hands of the people. Then, the paper examines the nature of federalism, and how it aims to decentralize the federal government. The paper analyzes the effectiveness of this system and asserts that for the most part, the system works. The paper does note several problems, but argues that this system has still proven exemplary in the years since its creation.

Outline:
Three Branches of Government
Federalism and the States
Analysis

From the Paper
"Branches of government. Separation of powers. Checks and balances. All of these are terms used to describe the system of federal government designed by the forefathers, a system that was both unique and based in history. In fact, the members of the constitutional convention drew on tenants of ancient Greek government in order to build the first three articles of the constitution. For example, Aristotle saw branches of government as a combination of monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy. In this way, by combining the best features of each system, Aristotle thought the best type of government could be achieved. Philosophers James Harrington, John Locke, and Montesquieu refined these ideas for application in the Western world, separating them into the powers of legislative, executive, and judicial (Mount 2007). Although the founders most definitely relied on these philosophical ideas when designing this system of federal government, they were most interested in avoiding the tyrannical leadership."

Tags:executive, legislative, judicial, Supreme, Court, Congress, checks, balances

From the Paper
"The Framers of the Constitution created a document in which three branches of government were described. The branches were set in a perpetual balance so that each would have some oversight over the other two, and thus prevent any one from gaining complete ascendancy. However, this balance has not remained the same at all times, and at different times critics of the way government is operating have described an imperial presidency, an imperial congress, and an imperial judiciary. The implication of this being in each case that one branch of government has developed so as to gain an unwarranted ascendancy over the other two, and to make use of its power to impose undesirable policies on the American people. Alexander Hamilton in The Federalist Papers stated that the Supreme Court would be the least likely to become an imperial body given that it would be ..."

Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts the executive branch of government at the federal and state level -- i.e. the presidency and the governorship. The paper studies how both use the budget as a tool. The paper investigates the principles set forth in the U.S. Constitution regarding the Executive branch, specifically the powers of the U.S. President, such as the role of Commander in Chief. The paper also looks at the broad scope of activity of governors at the state level.

Tags:governor, president, executive branch, states, federal government

Abstract
Realizing that its growth was limited domestically, Home Depot began considering foreign penetration to energize consistent but not accelerating balance sheets. The writer studies the economic strategies employed by the company to increase revenue by branching into the largely untested countries of South America. The paper outlines the risks involved as well as the potential benefits.

From the Paper
"The Home Depot business model relies on either a strong home-owner market segment or an economy where there is much construction going on. Like most developing nations, Brazil's population is young; the percentage of people under 20, however, declined to less than half of the total population between the 1970s and the 1980s, while older age groups increased. There are few homeowners in Brazil, so the assumption can be made that Home Depot was relying on the construction industry to support future growth."

Tags:growth, homeowners, building, supply, Brazil

Abstract
Compares and contrasts two different Buddhist paths to enlightenment. The Mahayana and the Theravada. Geographical location of each branch. Ciety belief of the Mayayana present in the three Bodies (Forms) of Buddha. Theravada notion of revering the "Awakened one" as a supreme sage and model. Approaches to salvation.

From the Paper
"Buddhism is a belief system that has been around since around the 6th century B.C. and most Buddhists today still hold to the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path that the Buddha is said to have taught back then, along with his concept of the middle path, or moderation in all things. Several different branches of Buddhism have developed since then, however, with Buddhists primarily following two different paths to enlightenment. The two main branches of Buddhism currently in existence are the Mahayana and the Theravada.

The Mahayana sect is otherwise known as the Greater Vehicle or Northern Buddhism. The Mahayana Buddhists are based mostly in China, Korea, Japan and Tibet. The Theravada, the other main path, is also known as the Smaller ..."

Abstract
The paper discusses how the United States Constitution mandates that each of the three branches of the federal government exists in order to provide a constitutional check on the powers of the other two branches. The paper describes how Congress has express and implied powers, as does the chief executive and the judiciary, and these respective powers are intended to serve as checks and balances in order to prevent any one branch of government from abusing its power.

From the Paper
"The United States Constitution mandates that each of the three branches of the federal government exists in order to provide a constitutional check on the powers of the other two branches. Congress has express and implied powers, as does the chief executive and the judiciary, and these respective powers are intended to serve as checks and balances in order to prevent any one branch of government from abusing its power. Congress has the power to declare war, regulate interstate commerce,..."

Tags:american, government, powers