An examination of Moore's film, "Bowling For Columbine" as a work of propaganda.
Film Review # 73188 |
1,125 words (
approx. 4.5 pages ) |
6 sources |
MLA | 2005
|
$ 23.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper provides an examination of Michael Moore's documentary film, "Bowling For Columbine" as a work of propaganda. It looks at Moore's exposure of the roots of violence, his techniques and how they support his thesis. The paper also looks at Moore's desire to provoke as well as to inform.
From the Paper
"When Michael Moore's film Bowling for Columbine was released it was certainly a controversial film. Closely following the tragic incidents at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado Moore's film set out to expose the root of the problems behind such acts of violence. In doing so he learns that the conventional answers of easy availability of guns, violent national history, violent entertainment and even poverty are inadequate to explain this violence when other cultures share those same factors without the equivalent ..."
Tags:bowling for columbine, michael moore, propaganda
A look at Michael Moore's perspective on gun control in his documentary "Bowling for Columbine".
Film Review # 120511 |
1,500 words (
approx. 6 pages ) |
12 sources |
MLA | 2008
|
$ 29.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper discusses Michael Moore's thesis in the film "Bowling for Columbine" and examines how Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim might respond to Moore's analysis of the culture of guns in America.
From the Paper
"In the documentary "Bowling for Columbine" writer-director Michael Moore argues both directly and by illustrative evidence, that ready access to guns goes far to explain the high incidence of death and injury in the United States, due to the use of guns as weapons, whether illegally or legally obtained. As Moore points out, the annual U.S. toll of gun deaths accounts for the combined gun death toll of several of the world's industrialized democracies including Great Britain and Canada."
Tags:Gun control, Michael Moore, Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx, BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE
A review and analysis of the film "Bowling for Columbine" and its portrayal of gun violence.
Essay # 68097 |
900 words (
approx. 3.6 pages ) |
2 sources |
MLA | 2006
|
$ 19.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper studies Michael Moore's award winning docudrama "Bowling for Columbine" (2002), which provided an eye-opening look at the social problem of violence in the United States, particularly violence with guns. The film focused on events leading up to the Columbine High School shootings. The paper demonstrates how, from a sociological perspective, Moore effectively showed that both social institutions (e.g., the community, the school) and social relationships (e.g., within the community, between students) played a role in the Columbine tragedy. The paper also lauds Moore for effectively presenting the causes and consequences of this recurring social problem (i.e. gun violence) in an effective manner.
From the Paper
"One portion of the film that I found extremely revealing was when Michael Moore went up to Canada with his film crew for this movie, and interviewed people up there, who seemed less afraid, and said they were less afraid, than Americans he had interviewed for the film earlier. These two sets of interviews illustrated the point, very convincingly, that America has far more general fear bred into its culture, in terms of anxieties people feel just living life, than does Canada. For that reason, Moore implies, many Americans feel they need guns simply to protect themselves against the frightening elements "out there", a feeling that then feeds on itself, with more fear and more gun ownership. In contrast, Canadians who were interviewed for the film do not even lock their front doors, and most do not own guns or feel any need to own guns. Moore convincingly explored, also, how the mythology of the Wild West (e.g., Western movies starring actors like John Wayne and Clint Eastwood) are so much a part of the American identity that Americans actually also identify with guns and gun ownership as if it were needed in order to feel safe."
Tags:gun, shooting, school, columbine, teenager, crime, death, bullet, 2nd, amendment, bear, arms
An analysis of the cinematic techniques in Michael Moore's documentary "Bowling for Columbine".
Film Review # 115174 |
955 words (
approx. 3.8 pages ) |
1 source |
MLA | 2009
|
$ 20.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper illustrates how the cinematic techniques used by the documentary "Bowling for Columbine" are crafted upon the use of irony. The paper also shows how "Bowling for Columbine" is compelling because directory Michael Moore uses slice-of-life film in 'real time' to show how he, along with the viewer, is searching for answers as to what is real, in a culture where so much unreality characterizes the depiction of American violence. The paper discusses Moore's belief that greater corporate and individual responsibility in America is necessary to prevent the Columbine tragedy from occurring again.
From the Paper
"The cinematic techniques used by the documentary "Bowling for Columbine" by Michael Moore are entirely crafted upon the use of carefully delineated irony. The film contrasts the real need to protect the nation's citizens with the zealous love affair that Americans have with guns. The title of the film refers to the tragedy at Columbine High School, Ohio where the all-too typical adolescent angst of a group of troubled teens was the tinder that combined with the spark of easy access to guns. This cumulated in a conflagration of violence, as they vented their frustrations upon their fellow pupils. Only in America, Moore suggests, could such a horrific event occur. It is not that teens are not unhappy or bulled in other lands, but no other land makes it so easy and acceptable to wield the deadly power of firearms as a way to vent anger."
Tags:gun, control, firearms, weapons, shootings
A review of the documentary "Bowling for Columbine".
Film Review # 60643 |
899 words (
approx. 3.6 pages ) |
0 sources |
2005
|
$ 19.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper examines how "Bowling for Columbine" is a piece of filmmaking designed to provoke viewers regardless of their political beliefs and how underlying the film are solid truths about the history of and current state of affairs in the United States. It looks at how it examines in particular three main themes: racism, gun control, and the psychological and sociological impacts of mass media by using the Columbine shooting incident as an anchor.
From the Paper
"No one need watch Bowling for Columbine to discover that race relations in the United States have been poor since the birth of the nation. Wresting millions of Africans from their home countries, treating them worse than cattle, and enslaving them and their families in deplorable conditions for centuries do little to foster good race relations. The abolition of slavery contributed little to the improvement of white-black relations in the United States, since Reconstruction was a dismal failure in this respect and in fact permitted hate groups like the Ku Klux Klan to thrive. The animated sequence in Bowling for Columbine, combined with Moore's treatment of racial profiling, show that Moore is keenly aware of and sensitive to race-related issues. Moore also shows how race relations in the United States contributed indirectly to the Columbine shootings, which occurred in a mainly white, middle-class suburban town. According to Moore, blacks have been convenient scapegoats of violent crimes."
Tags:racism, gun, control, united, states
Reviews Michael Moore's documentary film about gun control and violence in America.
Film Review # 49539 |
1,534 words (
approx. 6.1 pages ) |
2 sources |
MLA | 2004
|
$ 30.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper provides a summary and review of the film, "Bowling for Columbine", which explores the problem of guns and casualties resulting from them in American society. The film is made against the backdrop of the Columbine high school shootings, and the paper shows that, through his documentary, Michael Moore searches for answers of why this kind of tragedy happens in America.
From the Paper
"Towards the end of the film, Moore got in touch with two Columbine survivors. Both of them had the bullets purchased from K-Mart still in them, and one has been confined to a wheelchair ever since he was wounded. The two boys accompanied Moore to a K-Mart convention and asked the corporate executives if they would halt all sales of ammunition in their stores. After the first try resulted in little progress, the three of them returned to the convention with the entire inventory of ammunition from a local K-Mart. This time they listened. Since then, gun ammunition is no longer available at any K-Mart store in America."
Tags:charlton, dylan, klebold, manson
A comparison of the issues of violence in two movies - "Bowling for Columbine" and "Elephant".
Comparison Essay # 64593 |
1,036 words (
approx. 4.1 pages ) |
0 sources |
MLA | 2005
|
$ 21.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper discusses the different approaches of persuasion in the two movies "Bowling for Columbine" and "Elephant". Particular emphasis is placed on poetic and argumentative rhetoric. The paper focuses on the way that the movies deal with the issue of violence in society.
From the Paper
"Violence is a problem that every society has experienced as far back as we have any evidence of humans living in groups; ancient man with their skulls bashed in, the crusades, world wars and many others are just a few examples. One may even argue that it is in human nature to commit violence upon one another to create a hierarchy such as many animals do, however living in a society requires to get rid of the impulses driving such behavior because the essential reason for the existence of societies is to achieve a level of safety and security that can otherwise not be reached. The question that logically follows from this is how does society affect the level of violence of all its members? Assuming that one can consider different countries as different societies it is legitimate to compare different countries in order to try to answer this question."
Tags:argumentative, bowling, columbine, compare, contrast, death, elephant, gun, guns, gus, identification, micheal, moore, poetic, rhetoric, sant, van, violence
A comparison between the films 'Fahrenheit 911' and 'Bowling for Columbine' versus films 'FahrenHype 9/11' and 'Celsius 41.11 - The Temperature at Which the Brain Begins to Die'.
Comparison Essay # 94577 |
4,669 words (
approx. 18.7 pages ) |
12 sources |
MLA | 2006
|
$ 72.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper takes a look at, and compares, the docudrama films 'Fahrenheit 911' and 'Bowling for Columbine' versus the docudrama films 'FahrenHype 9/11' and 'Celsius 41.11 - The Temperature at Which the Brain Begins to Die'. The paper takes a look at how these films influence the reputation of docudrama as a film genre.
From the Paper
"Within Fahrenheit 911 Michael Moore uses footage that is simultaneously disturbing and humorous, in which President George W. Bush is shown, immediately after hearing the news of the September 11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, continuing to read the children's book My Pet Goat to a group of Florida elementary school children, while also looking blankly off into the distance trying to figure out what to do next. The sequence of events leading up to that series of shots, in which Bush reads "My Pet Goat" and looks perplexed, for at least five full minutes, is obviously intended by Moore to illustrate that, even though Bush comes from a powerful, privileged family, he is still unfit, on his own, to be President. "
Tags:Michael, Moore, Citizens, United, dvd, K-Mart, social, canada, bush, Ron, Silver
How Manipulative is Michael Moore in His Filmmaking?
An analysis of filmmaker Michael Moore and his filming techniques.
Film Review # 115875 |
2,414 words (
approx. 9.7 pages ) |
7 sources |
MLA | 2009
|
$ 44.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper takes a look at one of America's top documentary producers Michael Moore. In particular, the paper focuses on Moore's documentary, "Bowling for Columbine", a film on the gun culture and its wider political significance in the United States. The paper describes several creative and dramatic techniques of Moore's filmmaking to manipulate the audience into sharing his disdain of America's fascination with firearms and violence and discusses the ethical obligations involved in producing documentaries such as "Bowling for Columbine". The paper analyzes possible reasons as to why Moore chooses to use such exploitative techniques to express his views on gun culture but concedes that in spite of the controversy surrounding the film, it has undoubtedly succeeded in bringing the complex issue of America's relationship with firearms to the foreground of public debate.
From the Paper
"This has led to suspicions being raised concerning the modern documentary's commitment to realism, along with the ethical obligations involved in producing such a film. On the other hand, the considerable disagreement over the very definition of the term "documentary", has prompted some to praise Moore's approach to filmmaking, describing it as a dramatic and creative expression of reality. In spite of the controversy surrounding the film, however, it has undoubtedly succeeded in bringing the complex issue of America's relationship with firearms to the foreground of public debate."
Tags:documentaries, firearms, politics, ethics
A paper which studies the influence of the media and its negative portrayal of African-Americans.
Analytical Essay # 23893 |
842 words (
approx. 3.4 pages ) |
2 sources |
MLA | 2002
|
$ 17.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper shows that media reports today are not presented through the "world view" lens, rather, they are a depiction of the Western "white" ideology that has been seen as the "majority" view. The paper shows that the reporting has such a subtle bias that it is at times unrecognizable, but with when critically analyzed the bias is made clear. The paper examines "Making Whiteness", Grace Elizabeth Hale which focuses on the history of prejudice and Michael Moore's "Bowling for Columbine" which examines how the media portrays certain actions.
From the Paper
"Both Moore and Hale suggest that racism is a fact of American life that has been aggravated by the American History and "white" worldview. By ignoring the Black past and the black experience we have allowed our society to ignore many facets of societal problems that are causing societal deterioration. The solution is to reanalyze history from different viewpoints and use the media to propagate a new message that accepts past mistakes and looks forward towards a new conceptual black history. In order to justify past violence, we are ignoring our mistakes and by oppressing the slave past we are giving way to new and modern problems. The solution the two recommend is too challenge social norms and demands reaction."
Tags:Rodney, King, Civil, War, Marilyn, Manson