Abstract
This paper explores the processes by which Otto Von Bismarck engineered the unification of Germany between 1854 and 1885. It argues that Bismarck used three wars as the key stages in this process: the Second War of Schleswig, the Austro-Prussian War and the Franco-Prussian War. The paper also discusses the central role that Bismarck played in these conflicts, even where he did not actually initiate them.

Table of Contents:
Introduction
Bismarck's Rise: The Plan Take Shape
The Second War of Schleswig and the Austro-Prussian War
The Franco-Prussian War and German Unification
Conclusion

From the Paper
"One of the most fascinating aspects of the Second War of Schleswig was how Bismarck embarked upon the conflict against the opposition of most other German states, as expressed in the Diet's refusal to give Prussia a loan for the war. It was due to this deficiency that Bismarck entered into an alliance with Austria (Stern 40). In this analysis, this war is particularly significant as we can see in it a concrete example of how deftly Bismarck was pursuing his plan for Prussian dominance of Germany. From the perspective of the other German states, one historian notes, "their less flexible minds could never grasp that Bismarck harbored several alternatives, hoping to realize the most desirable one that political conditions would allow" (Stern 40)."

Tags:alliance, Austria, conflict

Abstract
This paper explores the processes by which Bismarck engineered the unification of Germany. The paper argues that Bismarck used three wars as the key stages in this process, these being the Second War of Schleswig, the Austro-Prussian War and the Franco-Prussian War. The paper further notes that Bismarck played a central role in these conflicts, even where he did not actually initiate them.

From the Paper
"Few individuals have dominated their times as did Otto Von Bismarck, Minister-President of Prussia, Chancellor of the North German Federation and, after 1871, the first Chancellor of the German Empire. Indeed, it is the general consensus of historians that in the context of 19th century European history, after Napoleon, Bismarck "fills the largest space on the nineteenth century stage" (Williamson 47). Bismarck dominated the political fortunes of the European continent for decades, striving towards..."

Tags:german, unity, leader

Abstract
The paper discusses Otto Von Bismarck's role and impact upon the unification of the German states during the late nineteenth century. The writer of this paper examines the views of several authors and agrees with the opinion of Friedrich B.M. Hollyday that von Bismarck planted the seeds for Germany's destruction. The writer emphasizes how although Bismarck brought peace for a period of approximately forty years, he also set the stage for two of the worst wars in history, World War I and World War II.

From the Paper
"Otto von Bismarck (1815-1898), the Iron Chancellor of Germany has been a source of constant debate among historians. Bismarck: Father of Germany's creation or destruction? is the central question of the continual debate. Undoubtedly, Bismarck was instrumental in the Unification of the German States, but the question remains, did he create or destroy an Empire.
"Friedrich B.M. Hollyday, Assistant Professor of History at Duke University, feels that Bismarck unified a great people and preserved the general peace of Europe for a time, but in his pragmatic, short term approach to his creation, he inadvertently planted the seeds of destruction."

Tags:Iron, Chancellor, Franco-Prussian, war, socialism, alliances

Abstract
This paper discusses the nineteen year reign of Bismarck as Chancellor of Germany at the end of the nineteenth century. It looks at his domestic and foreign policies and how these affected Germany itself and also its position in the rest of Europe. The paper discusses the wars fought under Bismarck's rule and how he strove for German expansion. The writer concludes that during his rule Bismarck was considered great, but only after the end of the era, did people realize that his policies were not in Germany's best interest.

From the Paper
"A great man, a great manipulator, Otto von Bismarck held the position of Chancellor in Germany for nineteen years. It was these years that saw such accolades bestowed upon him. It is true, he did do a number of admirable things, but it was not until the end of his term that people began to see the error in his ways. His alliance driven politics and ideas on colonialism were only appreciated when the short-term effect was considered: the long term effect was that Germany was held back by Bismarck and only truly flourished with his resignation."

Tags:chancellor, war, colonialism, power, austria

Abstract
This paper contrasts the burglary rates in the Macon GA and Bismarck ND Metropolitan Statistical Areas. The writer discusses that the rate for Macon is nearly three times the rate for Bismark. The rate seems to be increasing for Macon while decreasing for Bismarck. The burglary rates for 1995, 2000, and 2005 are compared. The factors that contribute to crime are outlined, but no conclusion as to why is made.

From the Paper
"This paper shall compare and contrast the crime indeces of burglary in the Bismarck North Dakota Metropolitan Statistical Areas ("MSA") to that of the Macon Georgia MSA as reported by the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") in its annual Crime in the United States publication. These two MSA were selected as the rate per one hundred thousand of population showed a nearly three to one contrast. This was the primary factor in considering the two MSA, and no other factors were considered. The indices were sampled from the current report for 2005, the report for 2000 and the report for 1995. The contrast is further exemplified by the crime indices ..."

Tags:burglary

Abstract
This paper discusses Otto von Bismarck, the prime minister of Prussia from 1862-73 and 1873-90 and founder and first chancellor of the German Empire from 1871-90. It looks at how, having established the empire, Bismarck actively and skillfully pursued pacific policies in foreign affairs, succeeding in preserving the peace in Europe for about two decades. It examines the part he played in the eventual unification of Germany through his efforts to unify the country using nationalistic sentiment.

From the Paper
"His biographers consistently report a background that would contribute to his sense of nationalism. For instance, at school he was exposed to German national sentiment. In Gottingen he toyed briefly with the Burschenschaft, but objected to the "extravagance of their political views" and their unwillingness to "give satisfaction" by dueling. Further, his sense of German patriotism was limited to the "spirit of 1812," as the conservative nobility had understood it. "Most of the Junkers who went to war in 1812 did so to liberate German soil from the foreigner, not to unify Germany. hat men of this conviction wished was the solidarity of Germany's princes, rather than the sovereign union of its peoples" (Pflanze 1963:73). "

Tags:imperial, prussia, republic, war, weimar

Abstract
Discusses Otto von Bismarck's political goals. German nationalism and Prussian hegemony over the German states. His brilliant statesmanship. His early ambitions and principles. His role as Prussia's minister president and minister of foreign affairs. Impact of his "iron and blood" speech. His domestic and external concerns. Difficulties of unification.

From the Paper
"Otto von Bismarck (1815-98) became Prussia's minister president and minister of foreign affairs in 1862. At the time he undoubtedly seemed like one of the last men who would preside over the unification of the German states--a goal associated with liberalism and nationalism but not with Junker aristocrats. But by 1871, due primarily to his diplomacy and his overwhelming pragmatism, this is what had happened. The "Iron Chancellor" was, however, famously difficult to read and it has long been debated whether he had any interest in German nationalism or if the entire effort simply disguised the desire for Prussian hegemony over the German states. Bismarck managed to cut off the Austrian rulers' hopes for leadership of a unified Great Germany and ensured that a "Bismarckian (Prusso-Little German) version of unification" won out (Hobsbawm 273). Did Bismarck have a grand ..."

Abstract
This paper discusses how the German unification of 1871 occupies a significant place in the history of this great European power and how Otto Von Bismarck, once the prime minister of Prussia, is responsible for single-handedly engineering this unification through clever strategies and creative tactics. It gives a biography of his life and political career and shows how although he was one of those leaders who led Germany to glory, at the same time displayed some cruel traits. He cannot be considered a perfect ruler as he believed immensely in the powers of aristocracy and monarchy and thus wanted to rule Germany with an iron hand.

From the Paper
"Whether we admire or despise this leader, one thing cannot change: he was the man solely responsible for first unification of Germany. Very few leaders have been able to attach such glorious victories and achievements to their name. He almost single-handedly devised a clever plan to crush his enemies in two vital wars, which resulted in unification of Northern and Southern German states and turned Germany into a mighty force. Though Bismarck certainly led to the unification of Germany, he cannot be considered a perfect ruler as he believed immensely in the powers of aristocracy and monarchy and thus wanted to rule Germany with an iron hand."

Tags:prussia, military, king, wilhelm, I, war, politics, parliament, austro-prussian, war

Abstract
This paper analyzes the way in which Bismarck conducted himself as a statesmen and how he managed to rule a very volatile area in the late 1800's. The writer examines his personal life and then moves on to how his foreign policies affected his power - with regard to wars, treaties and internal domestic stability.

From the Paper
"Machiavelli was a man who was solely interested in how to be an effective ruler who has solid grasp over his subjects. Machiavelli knew that being moral and consistent was not the way to do this, and thus those things do not factor into his idea of how to rule effectively and it is also why, rightfully so, the name Machiavelli has become synonymous with crafty, shady, and power-hungry. Bismarck's ruling style was a great example of Machiavelli's theories being put into real life use and succeeding. He started a war with France just to increase his power; he would "seem" merciful in treaties and make his country "seem" powerful. He allied with Austria, only to crush them in a 7-week war, and he would stir up nationalistic feelings in his opponents' conquered territories simply to give him better position for attack. Bismarck was a man who thought of humans as tools and objects for his purposes."

Tags:germany, prince, prussia, rule, govern, Machiavelli, austria

Abstract
This paper discusses the people associated with this event. The author points out how this event influenced the world at the time. The paper looks at how this milestone continues to influence the world in the 21st century.