Abstract
The paper examines the 1983 film, "Grenada P.M. Maurice Bishop, Speaker at Hunter College" and outline this viewer's reaction to the film, how the main character - in this instance, Maurice Bishop - gets his or her point across, what this writer took away from the film, and what impact the film had upon this particular reviewer. The paper asserts that while there is the suggestion in some circles that Mr. Bishop did a great deal of good while in power, a quick examination of films such as the aforementioned one also indicates that it is never a good idea to take what any authoritarian leader says at "face value" - even if his comments about the errors of U.S. foreign policy remain trenchant and "spot-on".

From the Paper
'The following paper will briefly explore the 1983 film, "Grenada P.M. Maurice Bishop, Speaker at Hunter College". The paper will outline this viewer's reaction to the film, how the main character - in this instance, Maurice Bishop - gets his or her point across, what this writer took away from the film, and what impact the film had upon this particular reviewer. In the final analysis, while there is the suggestion in some circles that Mr. Bishop did a great deal of good while in power, a quick examination of films such as the aforementioned one also indicates that it is never a..."

Tags:maurice, bishop, grenada

Abstract
The debate raging about whether or not Billy Bishop is a war hero or a war fraud has driven deep divisions into the historical field. This paper explores the enduring controversy and argues that while the arguments against Bishop appear compelling at first they are met by thoughtful opposition by respected scholars who are quick to note that Bishop's critics hardly have the sort of unambiguous information they need to make sweeping denunciations about the man and his legacy.

Tags:billy, bishop, legacy

Abstract
This paper discusses the 1946 poem "The Fish," by Elizabeth Bishop, a well-known poet of the middle part of the 20th century. The writer explains that she was a painter as well as a poet, and her talent for visual artistry often shows in the strong visual details of her poems, including "The Fish," written in 1946. The paper looks at how Elizabeth Bishop's poem is interesting because of its effective use of simile and metaphor.

From the Paper
"Elizabeth Bishop (1911-1979) was a well-known poet of the middle part of the 20th century, but what is not so widely known is that she was a painter as well as a poet, and it seems that her talent for visual artistry often comes through in the strong visual details of her poems, including the one to be discussed here, "The Fish," written in 1946. An early mentor of hers in the field of poetry was fellow poet Marianne Moore, who shared Bishop's early interest in the detailed visual depiction of objects of the natural world and from whom she may have picked up her fascination with metaphor, a literary figure which she uses to good."

Tags:elizabeth bishop, the fish, metaphor

Abstract
This paper discusses the concept of the separation of Church and State, as applied in the United States today. The paper discusses the history of this concept and suggests that according to Thomas Jefferson, the concept was originally created in order to protect religion from government intervention, not the other way around. It discusses and presents other points of view that agree with this analysis.

From the Paper
"Next, we have Jefferson's view on the subject, which seems to be quite evident. Jefferson believed that this amendment was specifically put in place to protect the church for the state's governing. He believed that the government should never impose a state-wide religion that was mandatory by law. This was mainly to do because that's the main reason why they left England altogether, in order to be free form the king's religious laws. I think that if he saw prayer out of schools and other religious controversies he would be shocked. He would most likely be shocked that America's people are trying so hard to take God out of society especially when God was one of the main ideas this country was founded upon. I believe that eventually he would understand on some cases that yes, not everyone is a Christian and those that aren't don't want to be made to participate in the Christian practices; especially for the fact that he wouldn't want to be required to partake in a Muslim tradition or a tradition of any other religion for that matter. I'm sure that he wouldn't want to see things taken out of our society in which he helped place them there."

Tags:amendment, government, Christian

Abstract
In this essay, the writer examines the doctrine of the separation of powers. The writer discusses why it continues to be significant in the study of the law which regulates agency procedures and behavior.

From the Paper
"When the framers wrote the U.S. Constitution, one of their core beliefs was that government had to be limited in order to protect the republic from tyranny. Government was intended to derive its power from the consent of those governed. One of the framers biggest concerns was that one of the three branches of government executive judicial and legislative would usurp the power of the others, thereby upsetting the balance of power, so carefully crafted into the Constitution by them. In Hamilton's Federalist ... "

Tags:U.S. Constitution, Federalist # 78, executive, judicial, legislative branches of government, politics, foreign policy, Supreme Court, president

Abstract
This paper examines the separation of powers as they exist within the "unwritten" British Constitution. Specifically, the paper looks at how British governments cannot simply do as they wish, but rather must propose laws into existence with the support of parliament. The paper concludes by stating that the British Constitution is firmly based upon the notion that Parliament makes the laws and the Judiciary interprets the laws promulgated by the former.

From the Paper
"The following paper will look at the separation of powers as these exist within the "unwritten" British Constitution. Specifically, the paper will look at how British governments cannot simply do as they wish; rather, while they may administer statutes and programs, any legislative agenda they propose can only pass into existence with the support of parliament; in short, government might is constrained by parliamentary sovereignty. As well, case law in the United Kingdom has made it clear - at least recently - that Acts of Parliament can be classed "unconstitutional" via judicial review. Presumably, the judiciary is, in turn, constrained by the

Tags:separation, powers, constitution

Abstract
In this article, the writer presents an analysis of separation of powers as it has been interpreted by the Supreme Court that focuses on the case or controversy requirement and the major rulings.

From the Paper
"The U.S. Supreme Court first analyzed Article III of the Constitution's case or controversy limitation on the power of the judicial branch at the dawn of the Republic. In response to President George Washington's request for guidance on how best to maintain neutrality during hostilities between England and France, Chief Justice Jay informed the first President that the Constitution only authorized the Supreme Court to review a real case or controversy-and not to provide advice about current political events or the law. When deciding a case one ..."

Tags:supreme court, case, controversy, limitation, constitution, separation of powers, executive, legislative, judicial, branch

Abstract
This paper consists of two separate papers, each five pages in length drawing information from the same three sources. Both papers tackle the same issue, through from diametrically opposed viewpoints. The first argues in favor of continued government regulation of the business community, while the second argues that regulation is a detriment to economic growth.

From the Paper
"The United States has a history of government regulation of commerce traceable back to the first draft of the Constitution, which gives the federal government power to regulate interstate commerce. While the U.S. push for independence was partly in reaction to British overregulation of commerce in the colonies, this does not mean that the early United States government saw no wisdom in government regulation. Expansions of federal regulations of business and commerce since the early 19th century indicate that these regulations have been a successful means by which the..."

Tags:business, government, regulation

Abstract
This paper discusses the origin, extent and end of civil government and compares the views of Aristotle, John Locke, and Montesquieu on why we need civil government, what that civil government should be, and what that civil government does for us. The first part of the paper is very specific in describing what each philosopher thinks of the origin, extent, and end of civil government. The end examines the extent to which our Constitution was found on the political philosophies of the liberals.

From the paper:

?Nearly 2000 years elapsed between the time that Aristotle expressed his theories on political philosophy and the time that Locke and Montesquieu expressed theirs, this accounts for many of the differences in their thinking. Aristotle wrote his philosophy from an ancient point of view and when Hobbes came along during the Enlightenment, he changed political philosophy forever. Hobbes influenced both Locke and Montesquieu this is probably why they both differ so much from Aristotle. The liberals, as Locke and Montesquieu were, hold in common one fundamental premise: the freedom and equality of human beings. This is why they back away from Aristotle?s emphasis on virtue. Aristotle spends much of ?The Politics? discussing regime, while Locke and Montesquieu are simply more concerned with establishing some for of civil government.?

Tags:aristotle, based, civil, compare, constiution, end, enlightenment, extent, founded, government, john, law, locke, montesquieu, philosophers, politics, principle, regime, second, treatise

Abstract
This paper discusses the French Revolution and the events that occurred before and after August 4, 1789. The paper shows that the civil constitution of the clergy in France made it impossible to separate the Church and State. It suggests that this separation did eventually happen at the end of the revolutionary government and discusses why this was so.

Table of Contents:
The Civil Constitution of the Clergy
The Analysis
Conclusion

From the Paper
"The revolution would not have been any less violent had the Civil Constitution of the Clergy not been created. The violence was raging prior to its creation, and it was only after the bishops refused to swear the oath of the decree that they were in harm's way. The provinces and the cities were compromised of different, not like minds, and, therefore, when those men who had remained quietly in the background and allowing Robespierre to manipulate the new government in the philosophies of Rousseau felt it was time to move to their power bases by ousting Robespierre, then the atmosphere that existed between the provinces and the cities were such that it could be accomplished without threat of revolt against the government."

Tags:bishop government decree separation, church and state