From the Paper
"The purpose of this research is to examine The Battle of the Little Bighorn by Mari Sandoz, with a view toward exploring a twentieth-century interpretation of the pattern of misjudgment and what might generously be called hubris that informed the command structure of the United States Army division that encountered a massive Native American division at the Little Bighorn River in 1876. The plan of the research will be to set forth the context in which the book examines the details of the battle, and then to discuss the political social, cultural, and historiographical background and environment in which the modern understanding of the battle may be most profitably explored. Throughout, as appropriate, reference will be made to the point of view that Sandoz brings to judging events and circumstances of the incident itself and its myriad implications."

From the Paper
"The battle of the Little Bighorn has been retold so many times that any retelling would seem to suffer from preconceptions and comparisons. This has not been the case with The Battle of the Little Bighorn.
Mari Sandoz, the author of The Battle of the Little Bighorn was only known to me as the screen credit for Cheyenne Autumn; the story of three hundred starving Cheyenne men, women and children, forcibly resettled in the barren wastelands of Oklahoma, who set out in the Autumn of 1878 on a desperate 1500 mile trek back to their Yellowstone homeland. In this book she has managed to capture the essence of the major personalities and conflicts endemic to the times. She has ..."

Tags:BOOK, REVIEWS

From the Paper
"With Custer on the Little Bighorn is a recently discovered memoir by William O. Taylor (1855-1923), a trooper who served in the Seventh Cavalry in the campaign against the Sioux and the Northern Cheyenne in the Dakota Territory in 1876. He participated in the general Battle of the Little Bighorn and his is one of the very few accounts by survivors of any part of that event. Although Taylor was not, of course, a survivor of Custer's fight, in which all the troopers were killed, he participated in a nearby, simultaneous fight in which his group was in as much danger but was reinforced at the last minute and was able to keep its attackers at bay until relief arrived. Aside from its interest as an account of a battle so similar to Custer's, Taylor's text offers a fascinating glimpse of an ordinary soldier's experience in the Seventh Cavalry and ..."

Tags:BOOK, REVIEWS

From the Paper
"Every year over 200,000 people visit the site of the Battle of the Little Big Horn in Montana. Long known as the Custer Battlefield National Monument, the name of the site was changed in 1991 when Congress made it the Little Bighorn National Monument and the monument to the Indians was planned. This shift in emphasis at the popular tourist attraction is the result of changes in the perception of the battle's meanings for both Native Americans and white Americans. The change represents an outward sign of the re-thinking of history that has slowly recognized how both popular myths and supposedly objective history serve hidden agendas. Feminist and ethnic groups' critiques of the way all kinds of history has been written have gradually produced wider recognition of the fact that these underlying interests need to be brought out in the open and..."

Tags:INDIAN

Abstract
A paper which briefly analyzes the Battle of the Bulge in WWII. Topics such as opening moves, climate, terrain an opinions as to what the first targets should have been are discussed.

Tags:battle, of, ardennes

Abstract
This paper explains the effects, circumstances, causes and happenings of the Battle of the Bulge, also known as the Battle of the Ardennes. It also suggests what went wrong for the Germans and what mistakes Hitler made. Military tactics of both sides are analyzed - Germans and Allies.

From the Paper
"The Battle of the Bulge, which lasted from December 16, 1944 to January 25, 1945, was the largest battle of World War II in which the United States participated (Toland). Over a million men fought for their lives, countries and families. Although many a soldier dreamed of the day they could return to their families, many of them did not make it home. At the conclusion of the battle there were 81,000 American casualties including 23,554 captured and 19,000 killed. The British suffered 1,400 casualties, with only 200 killed. Also, the greatest number of all, there were 100,000 German soldiers killed, wounded or captured (Cole)."

Tags:allies, ardennes, army, battle, belgium, casualties, germans, hitler, ii, offensive, red, russian, war, world, wwii

Abstract
This paper is an examination of the third battle of the Aisne. It details this excellent demonstration of the strengths of the German army during World War I as well as demonstrates why these particular strengths were not sufficient to win the war. It describes this German offensive that began on May 27, 1918. The author believes that the German success in this battle came about as the result of the finely honed German infantry tactics combined with a furiously concentrated artillery bombardment, operating under a sky dominated by the 'Jagdgeschwader' of the VII German army. But he feels that in the end, this battle did not help the Germans win the war in any way, in fact, it actually backfired at them.

From the Paper
"The Third Battle of the Aisne is most certainly not one of the best known battles of World War I. Perhaps this is merely because of that oldest of all war adages, which is that the victors get to write the histories, and that in the aftermath of the war late German victories were brushed aside. Perhaps it is not that often cited simply because, while every battle in a war is important, this one was not a turning point. And yet the battle does deserve to be examined as an excellent demonstration of the strengths of the German army during the Great War as well as a demonstration of why, in the end, these particular strengths would not be sufficient to win the war."

Tags:Great, War, World, I, Aisne, River, Battle, Germans, French, Belgian, Canadian, American, Allies

Abstract
This paper examines the life of Jonathon Swift from his youth in Ireland to his adulthood in England. It discusses the experiences and events in Swift's life that inspired him to write "Battle of the Books". It goes on to discuss the influence the "Battle of the Books" had on the Enlightenment and Renaissance ideals that were so popular in Swift's day.

From the Paper
"Swift not only had a deep ambition of taking part in the English politics he was also very critical of the corruption in English politics. Swift in this period of shuttling between England and Ireland started to write satires on the political and religious corruption surrounding the English politics and Church. "A Tale of a Tub" had been his first satire in which he writes and support the Anglican Church. This Church had thwarted its critics from all over the region. Swift's second satire was "The Battle of the Books" in which Swift argues for the supremacy of classical literature against those of the modern ones."

Tags:modern, satire, the, Renaissance, and, humanists, ancient, literature

Abstract
This paper supplies a description of the role of the Ordnance Corps. It shows their importance and explains their specialty - responsibility for all explosives. It explains how this corps' expertise contributed to the success of the Allies winning the Second World War. It shows that the Battle of the Bulge was a turning point of the war and how this corps was extremely involved in its success.

From the Paper
"As we move into this new phase of warfare where anthrax is being mailed to civilians and we bomb Afghanistan daily we are reminded of past wars and battles that we have taken part in and come out the victor. The Battle of the Bulge is one of the most famous battles in history. It happened during World War II and the role the Ordnance Corps played in the battle-helped drive us to success."

Tags:war, explosive, battle, world, bulge, weapon

Abstract
The paper examines the battle that became the turning point in World War Two, greatly aiding the efforts of the Allied forces to bring a quick and decisive end to the war and to the Third Reich. On December 16, 1944 the German army began their "Ardennes Offensive" in the Ardennes region of Belgium and Luxembourg. The "Battle of the Bulge", as it became known, is Adolph Hitler's "last stand" against the Allied forces. Hitler knew that if the Americans managed to penetrate the German front lines, it would signal the beginning of the end for the Third Reich. The paper takes the student through the history of the battle and how the Allied forces, though ill-prepared and utterly taken by surprise, managed to fight back to victory. This battle serves as one of the greatest military engagements in the war in Europe, and some historians compare it to the Battle of Gettysburg during the Civil War. It is also the worst battle, in terms of loss, to the American forces during World War II.

From the Paper
"According to John Kline, the biggest and most costly battle of World War II began on December 16, 1944 which the German army referred to as their Ardennes Offensive. On this eventful day, "the (American) 106th Infantry Division. . . were hit with full force" by the German army, and after three days of fighting, "two of the Regiments, the 422nd and 423rd, were surrounded" which forced the 424th Regiment to join the 112th Regiment, part of the 28th Infantry Division. And working together as a massive armed team, these regiments and divisions "countered the German attack (by) driving the Germans back through the same area where the 106th had been in position in mid December 1944." Thus, "this German offensive became known in the U.S. Forces journals as the Battle of the Bulge." "

Tags:allied, onslaught, forces, nazi, counteroffensive, manteuffel, battalions, ss, troops, fortification