This paper addresses the Battle of Antietam in terms of its significance as a military victory, and how this battle helped to change the conduct of war during its era. This paper demonstrates that the fighting tactics used by the Union Army at the Battle
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 3 sources, 2002, $ 53.95
Abstract This paper addresses the Battle of Antietam in terms of its significance as a military victory, and how this battle helped to change the conduct of war during its era. This paper demonstrates that the fighting tactics used by the Union Army at the Battle of Antietam helped prove that a small, maneuverable fighting force could win over superior firepower, demonstrating that a lack of strategy could not be compensated through weaponry. Through doing so, it can be seen how the Battle of Antietam helped redefine war protocol to a significant degree.
Tags: AMERICAN STUDIES AND HISTORY / MILITARY, battle of antietam
This paper addresses the Battle of Antietam in terms of its significance as a military victory, and how this battle helped to change the conduct of war during its era
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 3 sources, 2002, $ 53.95
Abstract This paper addresses the Battle of Antietam in terms of its significance as a military victory, and how this battle helped to change the conduct of war during its era. This paper demonstrates that the fighting tactics used by the Union Army at the Battle of Antietam helped prove that a small, maneuverable fighting force could win over superior firepower, demonstrating that a lack of strategy could not be compensated through weaponry. Through doing so, it can be seen how the Battle of Antietam helped redefine war protocol to a significant degree.
Tags: AMERICAN STUDIES AND HISTORY / MILITARY, battleantietam impact
Abstract The Battle of Antietam, both directly and indirectly, was the most decisive battle of the U.S. Civil War. This paper examines military and political consequences of this battle and how these effected the remainder of the war and the political future of the country.
From the Paper "The battle of Antietam was a pivotal point in the American Civil War. A victory by either the Union or the Confederacy would have severe and long-lasting implications for both sides. The battle of Antietam in September of 1862 resulted in a significant military success for the Union army, the failure of Britain and France to recognize the Confederacy as an independent nation, and Lincoln's issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation, making Antietam the most decisive battle of the Civil War."
Abstract September 17, 1862, was the turning point in the Civil War. On that day, the Battle of Antietam was fought near Antietam Creek in Sharpsburg, Maryland, and it resulted in the bloodiest day of warfare in American history. Knowing as we do that the Union army was victorious, the events surrounding the Battle of Antietam may seem insignificant to some, as it was just one in a lengthy serious of battles. Antietam, however, was in fact the turning point that the North so desperately needed to secure an overall victory in the Civil War.
From the Paper "In the days leading up to the Battle of Antietam, the Confederate forces had failed to advance to the north and had no way of escaping enemy fire. Their only way of escape was the Potomac River and the Confederate army refused to retreat. The Confederate stronghold on Harper's Ferry was weakening with the advance of Union troops and a loss could turn the war at any time. Although badly outnumbered, General Robert E. Lee of the south went against his better judgment and held his troops near Antietam Creek. The Confederate soldiers were running low on morale and were in desperate need of a victory. The Union general, George B. McClellan, decided to advance his troops to Sharpsburg and attack Lee's army by dawn of the seventeenth."
Tags: Sharpsburg, Robert, Lee, George, McClellan, Burnside's, Bridge, Union, Jackson, General, Dunker, Church
Abstract The Battle of Antietam, fought during the early years of the Civil War, was significant for several reasons. t was the first battle fought on Northern soil, and it produced the largest amount of casualties in American history (23,000). This paper introduces, discusses and analyzes the Battle of Antietam. It includes a brief history of the
battle as well as eyewitness accounts of the period.
From the Paper "General Lee's divisions, consisting of about 30,000 men, were under the command of his Generals Jackson, Walker, Longstreet, and Hood. While the army's morale was excellent, Lee knew they were tired from their earlier battles, and ill equipped to travel further northward. He
wrote to Confederate President Jefferson Davis: "The army," he wrote President Davis, "is not properly equipped for an invasion of an enemy's territory. It lacks much of the material of war, is feeble in transportation, the animals being much reduced, and the men are poorly provided with clothes, and, in thousands of instances, are destitute of shoes." (Steele 260)."
Tags: Lincoln, Sharpsburg, Robert, E., Lee, Davis, Confederates, Burnside
Abstract This paper provides an insight into the Battle at Antietam in 1862 which cost more that 23,000 Union and Confederate lives, known as the "Bloodiest Day" in U.S. combat history. It recounts the events leading up to the battle, the main events during the battle and the impact and significance of the battle upon the Civil War. It analyzes the aftermath of the battle including the Emancipation Proclamation, which freed the slaves and further polarized the division between the North and the South.
From the Paper "Several states (Delaware, Kentucky, Missouri, West Virginia, Kentucky and Maryland) remained as "border" states not pledging their allegiance to either side. The tactical importance of these states was immeasurable to the South; if control could be gained they would act as a stepping stone to the invasion of the North. With the Union still reeling from their defeats at Bull Run, the possibility of victory for the South became a reality therefore setting the stage for the battle at Antietam."
Tags: north, south, confederates, emancipation, proclamation, civil, war, lee
Abstract The paper discusses how the battle at Antietam ended the first attempt by the South at invading the North, with the army under the leadership of General Robert E. Lee. The paper explains that the battle was inconclusive because while Lee withdrew, the Northern army under McClellan did not follow and so did not destroy the Southern army at this time. The paper shows, however, how the battle did set the stage for the Emancipation Proclamation, making slavery a more explicit subject for the rest of the war. The paper relates that this was something President Lincoln had not wanted to do in this manner, but which he embraced once it was possible.
From the Paper "At the time, General Lee was buoyed by his success at Bull Run but also uncertain about what to do next. He could not go after Pope's army because the later withdrew to Washington and was protected by a fort and by reinforcements. Analysts say he could have fallen back to the fortifications at Centreville, but he did not want to do this because the provisions and forage in that area had all been used up the year before. Lee had other choices he could have made, such as moving west or south, but he also faced the desire to deny the North the time to recover from recent defeats. A move to the west appealed most to Lee, and he was especially interested in an invasion of Maryland, with reasons that were military, political, and psychological."
Abstract The paper describes the Battle of Antietam as the bloodiest single-day battle of the Civil War. The paper portrays the destruction and subsequent truce and reveals that this battle sealed the fate for whoever prevailed and is considered the turning point of the Civil War.
From the Paper "After coming out of the Second Battle of Bull Run with a massive victory over the Union, General Robert E. Lee and his Confederate Army moved north with every intention of achieving another victory. Due to a few disruptions in Lee's plan, the Union gained a great advantage over the Confederates. With the Union General George McClellan in position on the east bank of the Antietam Creek, and Lee scrambling to organize his troops, the pieces of the puzzle were fit together for the bloodiest single day battle of the Civil War. McClellan stated, "One battle lost, and almost all would have been lost. Lee's army might then have marched as it pleased on Washington, Baltimore, Philadelphia, or New York." This battle sealed the fate for whoever prevailed, and is considered the turning point of the Civil War. Later viewed as a "victory" for the Union, the battle was actually ended as a truce between a general from each side after the Confederates demolished what was left of the Union."
Abstract The purpose of this paper is to introduce discuss and analyze the topic of the American Civil War. Specifically, it discusses the battles of Gettysburg and Antietam to determine which was the turning point of the war. It concludes that, although many believe the Battle of Antietam was the turning point in the Civil War, in reality the turning point was the Battle of Gettysburg, for a number of compelling reasons.
From the Paper "In geographic space, the sites of two of the greatest battles of the Civil War, Antietam and Gettysburg, are only about an hour away from the each other. The Battle of Antietam was fought on September 17, 1862, outside the small town of Sharpsburg, Maryland. (The Confederates refer to this war as the Battle of Sharpsburg.) The Battle of Gettysburg was fought over several days in July 1863 in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, culminating with a Union victory on July 3, celebrated on July 4. Neither battle ended the war, and each battle was hugely significant at the time. However, Gettysburg was the turning point of the war, ultimately leading to Union victory and Confederate defeat. The war raged on for two more years after Gettysburg, but the South was never as strong or as successful after this battle."
Abstract The paper paints a picture of how the Union and Confederate forces fought the Battle of Antietam on September 17, 1862, the most ferocious and deadly battle of the Civil war. The paper discusses General Robert E. Lee's leadership of the Confederate forces and General George B. McClellan's command of the Union forces. The paper shows how the Bloody Lane proved to be the turning point in the Battle of Antietam and notes that it could have been the turning point of the war.
From the Paper "The Union and Confederate forces fought the Battle of Antietam on September 17, 1862, outside the small town of Sharpsburg, Maryland. (The Confederates refer to this battle as the Battle of Sharpsburg.) It was the most ferocious and deadly battle of the war, and in American history - over 23,000 casualties, wounded, and missing resulted from this one bloody battle. It was also the first battle fought on Northern soil, making it quite memorable for yet another reason. "
Abstract This paper is an examination of the third battle of the Aisne. It details this excellent demonstration of the strengths of the German army during World War I as well as demonstrates why these particular strengths were not sufficient to win the war. It describes this German offensive that began on May 27, 1918. The author believes that the German success in this battle came about as the result of the finely honed German infantry tactics combined with a furiously concentrated artillery bombardment, operating under a sky dominated by the 'Jagdgeschwader' of the VII German army. But he feels that in the end, this battle did not help the Germans win the war in any way, in fact, it actually backfired at them.
From the Paper "The Third Battle of the Aisne is most certainly not one of the best known battles of World War I. Perhaps this is merely because of that oldest of all war adages, which is that the victors get to write the histories, and that in the aftermath of the war late German victories were brushed aside. Perhaps it is not that often cited simply because, while every battle in a war is important, this one was not a turning point. And yet the battle does deserve to be examined as an excellent demonstration of the strengths of the German army during the Great War ? as well as a demonstration of why, in the end, these particular strengths would not be sufficient to win the war."
Tags: Great, War, World, I, Aisne, River, Battle, Germans, French, Belgian, Canadian, American, Allies
Abstract This paper explains the effects, circumstances, causes and happenings of the Battle of the Bulge, also known as the Battle of the Ardennes. It also suggests what went wrong for the Germans and what mistakes Hitler made. Military tactics of both sides are analyzed - Germans and Allies.
From the Paper "The Battle of the Bulge, which lasted from December 16, 1944 to January 25, 1945, was the largest battle of World War II in which the United States participated (Toland). Over a million men fought for their lives, countries and families. Although many a soldier dreamed of the day they could return to their families, many of them did not make it home. At the conclusion of the battle there were 81,000 American casualties including 23,554 captured and 19,000 killed. The British suffered 1,400 casualties, with only 200 killed. Also, the greatest number of all, there were 100,000 German soldiers killed, wounded or captured (Cole)."
Tags: allies, ardennes, army, battle, belgium, casualties, germans, hitler, ii, offensive, red, russian, war, world, wwii
Abstract This paper examines the historical background and the events of the Battle of Platea. It shows how the Greeks were able to defeat the mighty Persian Empire through superior battle tactics. The Persian style of warfare consisted of generally unorganized troops under the leadership of leaders who had shown particular bravery in battle. The Greek army was less than a tenth of the size of the Persian army, but had more advanced weaponry and were well trained.
From the Paper "A note must be made as to the numbers of troops for this battle. Herodotus is the primary source for the documentation of this battle. He wrote about the battle after the fact. His works did not give accurate accounts of numbers. According to McGoodwin (2002), the numbers of the Greeks numbered 110,000 and the numbers of the Persians, 750,000. There are many discrepancies in secondary sources as to the number of actual troops on both sides. All of the numbers do however, reflect that the Greeks were heavily outnumbered by the Persians. The lower numbers would seem to be more consistent with other battles of the time."
Abstract This paper discusses the 1571 Battle of Lepanto. It explores tactics of the last great battle of oared galleys. The paper expands on the significance in development of Muslim-Western relations. The author expands on the cause of War and Ottoman sea power. in conclusion, the impact of battle on Muslim power and the rise of the West in the area is explained.
From the Paper "The Battle of Lepanto fought off the western coast of Greece on October was the last great battle between fleets of oared galleys. It was also a turning point in the balance of power between Christian and Muslim states in the Mediterranean in which the initiative shifted from Muslims to Westerners. On one side was the Ottoman Turkish along with North Africa's Barbary corsairs. They were nominally subjects of the Ottoman sultan in practice they were semi-independent allies ..."
Abstract This paper examines the tactics and outcome of the World War II Battle of Guadalcanal. In particular, the paper highlights the U.S. Marine's land operations during this protracted battle in the South Pacific. The paper also describes intelligence operations. The paper includes salient quotes and a chart about the order of battle figures.
From the Paper "Although it is still debatable whether there was enough close air support for the either the American or Japanese forces, the sheer number of air losses (615 for the Americans and 683 for the Japanese) proved that air campaigns were pivotal to the outcome of the battle. The Cactus Air Force in Guadalcanal kept the American forces protected from Japanese onslaught and Japanese commanders' reluctance at times to commit more forces proved fatal. The Marines, who bore the brunt of the battle, again proved their mettle especially in the Battle of Edson's Ridge and the utilization of marine raider battalions. Although naval and air support were available (at times the availability are debatable!), the truth is that the extraordinary leadership and the dedication of those who fought the campaign proved that training is actually a complement to the spirit and will of those are determined to meet the objectives - daunting as they may be at times."
Tags:Battle, of, Guadalcanal, World, War, II, South, Pacific, Japan
