Abstract
This paper addresses the Battle of Antietam in terms of its significance as a military victory, and how this battle helped to change the conduct of war during its era. This paper demonstrates that the fighting tactics used by the Union Army at the Battle of Antietam helped prove that a small, maneuverable fighting force could win over superior firepower, demonstrating that a lack of strategy could not be compensated through weaponry. Through doing so, it can be seen how the Battle of Antietam helped redefine war protocol to a significant degree.

Tags:AMERICAN STUDIES AND HISTORY / MILITARY, battle antietam impact

Abstract
This paper addresses the Battle of Antietam in terms of its significance as a military victory, and how this battle helped to change the conduct of war during its era. This paper demonstrates that the fighting tactics used by the Union Army at the Battle of Antietam helped prove that a small, maneuverable fighting force could win over superior firepower, demonstrating that a lack of strategy could not be compensated through weaponry. Through doing so, it can be seen how the Battle of Antietam helped redefine war protocol to a significant degree.

Tags:AMERICAN STUDIES AND HISTORY / MILITARY, battle of antietam

Abstract
The Battle of Antietam, both directly and indirectly, was the most decisive battle of the U.S. Civil War. This paper examines military and political consequences of this battle and how these effected the remainder of the war and the political future of the country.

From the Paper
"The battle of Antietam was a pivotal point in the American Civil War. A victory by either the Union or the Confederacy would have severe and long-lasting implications for both sides. The battle of Antietam in September of 1862 resulted in a significant military success for the Union army, the failure of Britain and France to recognize the Confederacy as an independent nation, and Lincoln s issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation, making Antietam the most decisive battle of the Civil War."

Tags:antietam, battle, civil, confederacy, emancipation, lee, lincoln, proclamation, robert, us, war

Abstract
This paper provides an insight into the Battle at Antietam in 1862 which cost more that 23,000 Union and Confederate lives, known as the "Bloodiest Day" in U.S. combat history. It recounts the events leading up to the battle, the main events during the battle and the impact and significance of the battle upon the Civil War. It analyzes the aftermath of the battle including the Emancipation Proclamation, which freed the slaves and further polarized the division between the North and the South.

From the Paper
"Several states (Delaware, Kentucky, Missouri, West Virginia, Kentucky and Maryland) remained as "border" states not pledging their allegiance to either side. The tactical importance of these states was immeasurable to the South; if control could be gained they would act as a stepping stone to the invasion of the North. With the Union still reeling from their defeats at Bull Run, the possibility of victory for the South became a reality therefore setting the stage for the battle at Antietam."

Tags:north, south, confederates, emancipation, proclamation, civil, war, lee

Abstract
The Battle of Antietam, fought during the early years of the Civil War, was significant for several reasons. t was the first battle fought on Northern soil, and it produced the largest amount of casualties in American history (23,000). This paper introduces, discusses and analyzes the Battle of Antietam. It includes a brief history of the
battle as well as eyewitness accounts of the period.

From the Paper
"General Lee's divisions, consisting of about 30,000 men, were under the command of his Generals Jackson, Walker, Longstreet, and Hood. While the army's morale was excellent, Lee knew they were tired from their earlier battles, and ill equipped to travel further northward. He
wrote to Confederate President Jefferson Davis: "The army," he wrote President Davis, "is not properly equipped for an invasion of an enemy's territory. It lacks much of the material of war, is feeble in transportation, the animals being much reduced, and the men are poorly provided with clothes, and, in thousands of instances, are destitute of shoes." (Steele 260)."

Tags:Lincoln, Sharpsburg, Robert, E., Lee, Davis, Confederates, Burnside

Abstract
The paper discusses how the battle at Antietam ended the first attempt by the South at invading the North, with the army under the leadership of General Robert E. Lee. The paper explains that the battle was inconclusive because while Lee withdrew, the Northern army under McClellan did not follow and so did not destroy the Southern army at this time. The paper shows, however, how the battle did set the stage for the Emancipation Proclamation, making slavery a more explicit subject for the rest of the war. The paper relates that this was something President Lincoln had not wanted to do in this manner, but which he embraced once it was possible.

From the Paper
"At the time, General Lee was buoyed by his success at Bull Run but also uncertain about what to do next. He could not go after Pope's army because the later withdrew to Washington and was protected by a fort and by reinforcements. Analysts say he could have fallen back to the fortifications at Centreville, but he did not want to do this because the provisions and forage in that area had all been used up the year before. Lee had other choices he could have made, such as moving west or south, but he also faced the desire to deny the North the time to recover from recent defeats. A move to the west appealed most to Lee, and he was especially interested in an invasion of Maryland, with reasons that were military, political, and psychological."

Tags:Lee, Lincoln, Centreville, Emancipation, Proclamation, slavery

Abstract
The paper describes the Battle of Antietam as the bloodiest single-day battle of the Civil War. The paper portrays the destruction and subsequent truce and reveals that this battle sealed the fate for whoever prevailed and is considered the turning point of the Civil War.

From the Paper
"After coming out of the Second Battle of Bull Run with a massive victory over the Union, General Robert E. Lee and his Confederate Army moved north with every intention of achieving another victory. Due to a few disruptions in Lee's plan, the Union gained a great advantage over the Confederates. With the Union General George McClellan in position on the east bank of the Antietam Creek, and Lee scrambling to organize his troops, the pieces of the puzzle were fit together for the bloodiest single day battle of the Civil War. McClellan stated, "One battle lost, and almost all would have been lost. Lee's army might then have marched as it pleased on Washington, Baltimore, Philadelphia, or New York." This battle sealed the fate for whoever prevailed, and is considered the turning point of the Civil War. Later viewed as a "victory" for the Union, the battle was actually ended as a truce between a general from each side after the Confederates demolished what was left of the Union."

Tags:McClellan, Lee, Confederates, Union

Abstract
This paper presents a brief biographical account of Robert E. Lee's life and then takes a look at his military accomplishments and acumen. The paper considers how the Civil War would have been affected had Lee fought on the side of the North, discusses Lee's leadership of the Confederate Army, and examines how Lee's military career and life have had lasting impact on American history.

From the Paper
"Robert E. Lee was a significant figure in history and his actions impacted history in many ways. Lee is considered to be among other things, a great solider. He was also an ideal strategist and his decisions did lead to implications that can be seen today. Perhaps the most significant of his actions was choosing to support the Confederates. For example, had he decided to side with the North, the Civil War might have lasted less than a year. In addition, Lee's actions had a ripple effect on the Emancipation Proclamation as well as the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments. His life is a constant reminder of how individuals can shape history. "

Tags:west, point, virgina, union, whig, jackson, vicksburg, antietam, battle, plan, gettysburg

Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to introduce discuss and analyze the topic of the American Civil War. Specifically, it discusses the battles of Gettysburg and Antietam to determine which was the turning point of the war. It concludes that, although many believe the Battle of Antietam was the turning point in the Civil War, in reality the turning point was the Battle of Gettysburg, for a number of compelling reasons.

From the Paper
"In geographic space, the sites of two of the greatest battles of the Civil War, Antietam and Gettysburg, are only about an hour away from the each other. The Battle of Antietam was fought on September 17, 1862, outside the small town of Sharpsburg, Maryland. (The Confederates refer to this war as the Battle of Sharpsburg.) The Battle of Gettysburg was fought over several days in July 1863 in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, culminating with a Union victory on July 3, celebrated on July 4. Neither battle ended the war, and each battle was hugely significant at the time. However, Gettysburg was the turning point of the war, ultimately leading to Union victory and Confederate defeat. The war raged on for two more years after Gettysburg, but the South was never as strong or as successful after this battle."

Tags:Confederates, union, north, south

Abstract
This paper discusses the 1571 Battle of Lepanto. It explores tactics of the last great battle of oared galleys. The paper expands on the significance in development of Muslim-Western relations. The author expands on the cause of War and Ottoman sea power. in conclusion, the impact of battle on Muslim power and the rise of the West in the area is explained.

From the Paper
"The Battle of Lepanto fought off the western coast of Greece on October was the last great battle between fleets of oared galleys. It was also a turning point in the balance of power between Christian and Muslim states in the Mediterranean in which the initiative shifted from Muslims to Westerners. On one side was the Ottoman Turkish along with North Africa's Barbary corsairs. They were nominally subjects of the Ottoman sultan in practice they were semi-independent allies ..."

Tags:galleys, battle, 1571, Ottoman, Turkey, Venice, Spain, Ottoman