This paper addresses the Battle of Antietam in terms of its significance as a military victory, and how this battle helped to change the conduct of war during its era. This paper demonstrates that the fighting tactics used by the Union Army at the Battle
Essay # 37163 |
1,400 words (
approx. 5.6 pages ) |
3 sources |
2002
|
$ 28.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper addresses the Battle of Antietam in terms of its significance as a military victory, and how this battle helped to change the conduct of war during its era. This paper demonstrates that the fighting tactics used by the Union Army at the Battle of Antietam helped prove that a small, maneuverable fighting force could win over superior firepower, demonstrating that a lack of strategy could not be compensated through weaponry. Through doing so, it can be seen how the Battle of Antietam helped redefine war protocol to a significant degree.
Tags:AMERICAN STUDIES AND HISTORY / MILITARY, battle of antietam
This paper addresses the Battle of Antietam in terms of its significance as a military victory, and how this battle helped to change the conduct of war during its era
Essay # 37164 |
1,400 words (
approx. 5.6 pages ) |
3 sources |
2002
|
$ 28.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper addresses the Battle of Antietam in terms of its significance as a military victory, and how this battle helped to change the conduct of war during its era. This paper demonstrates that the fighting tactics used by the Union Army at the Battle of Antietam helped prove that a small, maneuverable fighting force could win over superior firepower, demonstrating that a lack of strategy could not be compensated through weaponry. Through doing so, it can be seen how the Battle of Antietam helped redefine war protocol to a significant degree.
Tags:AMERICAN STUDIES AND HISTORY / MILITARY, battle antietam impact
A discussion on the Battle of Lepanto and Muslim-Western relations.
Essay # 73426 |
1,582 words (
approx. 6.3 pages ) |
3 sources |
MLA | 2004
|
$ 31.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper discusses the 1571 Battle of Lepanto. It explores tactics of the last great battle of oared galleys. The paper expands on the significance in development of Muslim-Western relations. The author expands on the cause of War and Ottoman sea power. in conclusion, the impact of battle on Muslim power and the rise of the West in the area is explained.
From the Paper
"The Battle of Lepanto fought off the western coast of Greece on October was the last great battle between fleets of oared galleys. It was also a turning point in the balance of power between Christian and Muslim states in the Mediterranean in which the initiative shifted from Muslims to Westerners. On one side was the Ottoman Turkish along with North Africa's Barbary corsairs. They were nominally subjects of the Ottoman sultan in practice they were semi-independent allies ..."
Tags:galleys, battle, 1571, Ottoman, Turkey, Venice, Spain, Ottoman
This paper gives an analysis of the land operations that took place during the Battle of Guadalcanal.
Research Paper # 95090 |
1,739 words (
approx. 7 pages ) |
5 sources |
MLA | 2007
|
$ 33.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper examines the tactics and outcome of the World War II Battle of Guadalcanal. In particular, the paper highlights the U.S. Marine's land operations during this protracted battle in the South Pacific. The paper also describes intelligence operations. The paper includes salient quotes and a chart about the order of battle figures.
From the Paper
"Although it is still debatable whether there was enough close air support for the either the American or Japanese forces, the sheer number of air losses (615 for the Americans and 683 for the Japanese) proved that air campaigns were pivotal to the outcome of the battle. The Cactus Air Force in Guadalcanal kept the American forces protected from Japanese onslaught and Japanese commanders' reluctance at times to commit more forces proved fatal. The Marines, who bore the brunt of the battle, again proved their mettle especially in the Battle of Edson's Ridge and the utilization of marine raider battalions. Although naval and air support were available (at times the availability are debatable!), the truth is that the extraordinary leadership and the dedication of those who fought the campaign proved that training is actually a complement to the spirit and will of those are determined to meet the objectives - daunting as they may be at times."
Tags:Battle, of, Guadalcanal, World, War, II, South, Pacific, Japan
An analysis of the Battle of Platea between the Persians and the Greeks in 479 AD.
Essay # 9693 |
1,477 words (
approx. 5.9 pages ) |
4 sources |
MLA | 2002
|
$ 29.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper examines the historical background and the events of the Battle of Platea. It shows how the Greeks were able to defeat the mighty Persian Empire through superior battle tactics. The Persian style of warfare consisted of generally unorganized troops under the leadership of leaders who had shown particular bravery in battle. The Greek army was less than a tenth of the size of the Persian army, but had more advanced weaponry and were well trained.
From the Paper
"A note must be made as to the numbers of troops for this battle. Herodotus is the primary source for the documentation of this battle. He wrote about the battle after the fact. His works did not give accurate accounts of numbers. According to McGoodwin (2002), the numbers of the Greeks numbered 110,000 and the numbers of the Persians, 750,000. There are many discrepancies in secondary sources as to the number of actual troops on both sides. All of the numbers do however, reflect that the Greeks were heavily outnumbered by the Persians. The lower numbers would seem to be more consistent with other battles of the time."
Tags:battle, tactics, army, athens, xerxes, mardonius, phalanx
An examination of the tactics used by the Germans during the Battle of the Bulge of WW2 and how it lead to them into losing this battle.
Cause and Effect Essay # 7293 |
2,040 words (
approx. 8.2 pages ) |
11 sources |
MLA | 2001
|
$ 38.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper explains the effects, circumstances, causes and happenings of the Battle of the Bulge, also known as the Battle of the Ardennes. It also suggests what went wrong for the Germans and what mistakes Hitler made. Military tactics of both sides are analyzed - Germans and Allies.
From the Paper
"The Battle of the Bulge, which lasted from December 16, 1944 to January 25, 1945, was the largest battle of World War II in which the United States participated (Toland). Over a million men fought for their lives, countries and families. Although many a soldier dreamed of the day they could return to their families, many of them did not make it home. At the conclusion of the battle there were 81,000 American casualties including 23,554 captured and 19,000 killed. The British suffered 1,400 casualties, with only 200 killed. Also, the greatest number of all, there were 100,000 German soldiers killed, wounded or captured (Cole)."
Tags:allies, ardennes, army, battle, belgium, casualties, germans, hitler, ii, offensive, red, russian, war, world, wwii
An exploration of the wide-reaching impact on U.S. history of the Battle of Antietam during the Civil War.
Analytical Essay # 6924 |
1,205 words (
approx. 4.8 pages ) |
2 sources |
MLA | 2002
|
$ 24.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The Battle of Antietam, both directly and indirectly, was the most decisive battle of the U.S. Civil War. This paper examines military and political consequences of this battle and how these effected the remainder of the war and the political future of the country.
From the Paper
"The battle of Antietam was a pivotal point in the American Civil War. A victory by either the Union or the Confederacy would have severe and long-lasting implications for both sides. The battle of Antietam in September of 1862 resulted in a significant military success for the Union army, the failure of Britain and France to recognize the Confederacy as an independent nation, and Lincoln s issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation, making Antietam the most decisive battle of the Civil War."
Tags:antietam, battle, civil, confederacy, emancipation, lee, lincoln, proclamation, robert, us, war
This paper is a description of the third battle of the Aisne River, a German victory in World War I.
Research Paper # 5405 |
3,035 words (
approx. 12.1 pages ) |
6 sources |
APA | 2001
|
$ 53.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper is an examination of the third battle of the Aisne. It details this excellent demonstration of the strengths of the German army during World War I as well as demonstrates why these particular strengths were not sufficient to win the war. It describes this German offensive that began on May 27, 1918. The author believes that the German success in this battle came about as the result of the finely honed German infantry tactics combined with a furiously concentrated artillery bombardment, operating under a sky dominated by the 'Jagdgeschwader' of the VII German army. But he feels that in the end, this battle did not help the Germans win the war in any way, in fact, it actually backfired at them.
From the Paper
"The Third Battle of the Aisne is most certainly not one of the best known battles of World War I. Perhaps this is merely because of that oldest of all war adages, which is that the victors get to write the histories, and that in the aftermath of the war late German victories were brushed aside. Perhaps it is not that often cited simply because, while every battle in a war is important, this one was not a turning point. And yet the battle does deserve to be examined as an excellent demonstration of the strengths of the German army during the Great War as well as a demonstration of why, in the end, these particular strengths would not be sufficient to win the war."
Tags:Great, War, World, I, Aisne, River, Battle, Germans, French, Belgian, Canadian, American, Allies
A battle analysis of the Battle of Ardennes.
Essay # 36372 |
1,400 words (
approx. 5.6 pages ) |
4 sources |
2002
|
$ 28.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
A paper which briefly analyzes the Battle of the Bulge in WWII. Topics such as opening moves, climate, terrain an opinions as to what the first targets should have been are discussed.
Tags:battle, of, ardennes
An examination of the battle and its significance to American politics and military tactics
Research Paper # 3161 |
3,475 words (
approx. 13.9 pages ) |
10 sources |
2001
$ 58.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The author of this paper discusses the significance of the battle at Dien Bien Phu as the place where the first Vietnamese revolutionaries found their power and became a force to be reckoned with and argues that had the United States learned from this battle and adopted the successful tactics in this terrain and situation, it might have had a better chance of winning its own conflict in Vietnam.
From the Paper
"The end of World War II brought vast political changes throughout Asia. In previously colonial areas, nationalists used the opportunity present in the Japanese surrender and the temporary weakness of European powers to demand self-determination. The August Revolution brought the Vietminh to power in Vietnam, and the clash between French and Vietminh was inevitable, as neither side was willing to concede sovereignty to the other. A few months after the close of World War II, France sought to re-establish its discredited and unpopular colonial rule in Indochina. Encouraged by words of support from President Truman, the French committed almost a million military men to their effort."
Tags:battle, war, chinese, american, fight, conquer, territory