Abstract
This paper states that although some people are for plea bargaining, there are several who are against bargaining for justice. The paper then discusses the purposes that plea bargains provide and gives examples. Next, the paper describes the types of plea bargains and looks at both the advantages and disadvantages of plea bargaining. The paper concludes with the writer's opinion that plea bargains are a necessity in today's court system because there are so many people awaiting trials.

Outline:
Types of Plea Bargains
Pros and Cons

From the Paper
"I think plea bargains are a necessity in today's court system because there are so many people awaiting trials. I am also a firm believer in convicting on a lesser charge if the evidence does not support the more serious crime that has been committed. Many times the prosecutors have evidence that is not admissible in court, but it proves that they defendant is in fact guilty of the crime. I also believe in plea bargaining in order to get evidence against a person who is committing a more serious crime. For example, plea bargaining with a drug dealer in order to get to the drug lords is acceptable in my opinion."

Tags:random, basis, a, lesser, charge, admissible

Abstract
This paper explains and analyzes what a plea bargain is and suggests that the plea bargain be finished to improve the court system.

Tags:plea, bargains

Abstract
This paper addresses whether or not the practice of plea bargaining is ethical. The author is in favor of plea bargaining and believes it to be an ethical means of conviction. The paper includes a detailed explanation of what plea bargaining is and how the procedure works, as well as addressing problems that have occurred when plea bargaining is turned to for the wrong reasons. The conclusion states that, while certain changes could be made to ensure the ethical implementation of plea bargaining, it is nevertheless a necessary part of the justice system that, like all things, can be altered by human error.

Abstract
Plea bargains are a form of negotiation used in many legal systems around the world. In general, a plea bargain is reached via an informal process of negotiation, in the course of which the prosecutor and the defense counsel reach an out-of-court settlement. Using plea bargaining has become an accepted practice in both Canada and North America, as well as in many other countries. However, just because it has become commonplace does not necessarily imply that it is right. This paper begins by describing the system of plea bargaining and then goes on to present arguments against such a system.

Tags:plea, bargains, justice

Abstract
This paper takes an in-depth look at the pro's and cons of plea bargain process. It notes the large percentage of defendants accepting plea bargains in return for lesser sentences or expenses of trials.

From the Paper
"The demand by the current administration to push Congress to select more judges may be political but the fact is that the American court system is severely strained. For that reason more and more plea bargains are urged on many defendants in order to avoid lengthy court trials. The fact seems clear, however, that it is the poor and the naive and those not represented by top attorneys who succumb to plea bargains. Plea bargains may be short cuts in criminal justice and for that..."

Tags:plea bargain, Constitutional law, courts, trials

Abstract
This paper talks about the role plea bargains hold in the judicial system of the United States. The author gives reasons why plea bargaining is a necessary part of the United States' criminal justice system even though some may argue that the guilty benefit from plea bargaining and that the rights of the defendant are sacrificed by plea bargaining. The paper argues that without a plea bargaining system, the criminal justice system would simply break down due to the overcrowding conditions in jails and prisons. The paper briefly discusses some reasons defendants might agree to plea bargain and also analyzes how the rate of plea bargains can be decreased.

From the Paper
"It appears that plea bargains will remain as an integral part of our justice system. Many courts have made major headway in reducing the complexity of civil cases. However, it is more difficult to simplify criminal procedures because defendants are protected in many ways by our Constitution. Court administrators live with the fear that their budgets will be cut and are realistic in their beliefs that their chances of getting more money are few."

Tags:judicial system, criminal justice

Abstract
This paper examines how plea bargaining has been a topic of debate for many years and how advocates feel that plea bargains cut down on caseloads, while opponents feel that criminals get off to easy or are punished too harshly by the system of bargaining. It analyzes these two opposing points of view and chooses and supports the one that personally appeals to the author.

Outline
Introduction
Defining Plea Bargains
Advocates
Opponents
Personal Appeal
Conclusion

From the Paper
"A plea bargain is defined as "an agreement between the defense and the prosecutor in which a defendant pleads guilty or no contest to criminal charges. In exchange, the prosecutor drops some charges, reduces a charge or recommends that the judge enter a specific sentence that is acceptable to the defense." (Understanding Plea Bargaining? 2002). In most jurisdictions a plea bargain can be arranged at anytime after a defendant has been charged with a crime. In some cases plea bargains are even reached when there is a hung jury because most attorneys would rather arrange a plea bargain than go through an additional trial."

Tags:prosecutor, defense, court, criminals, judge

Abstract
This paper examines how collective bargaining is the process by which a group of people gets together and bargains together for a common goal that concerns all the people involved. In particular, it looks at how the concept has been gaining in popularity over recent years and how professionals are beginning to truly understand the role of unions and the role they play in the making of decisions in a company.
Outline
The Process of Collective Bargaining
Collective Bargaining in the Private Sector
Collective Bargaining in the Public Sector
Why is Collective Bargaining Limited?
History of the Collective Bargaining Process
Norris Laguardia Act
NLR Act
Fair Labor Standards Act
Taft-Hartley
Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act
Certification and De-Certification
How Does a Labor Management Contract Affect the Budget of an Organization
Conclusion

From the Paper
"Collective bargaining in Germany takes place at the regional level, but can also in some cases take place at the company or even at the national levels. The trade unions may sign up 'collective contracts' either with employer's associations or with individual employers, and these contracts are legally binding for everyone who has been involved in the negotiations -in part due to the principle of 'equal treatment' wherein all workers of the company are bound under any contract signed by the company after negotiations with employees and unions. The industry level collective bargaining efforts in Germany covered the construction business and the consumer non-durable business, and also the transport and communication industries, to quote a few. "

Tags:trade, unions, certification, norris, laguardia

Abstract
The paper presents the hypothesis that the public is not supportive of plea bargaining in cases of violent crimes. The paper looks at previous studies, with a focus on Sergio Herzog's study "The Relationship Between Public Perceptions of Crime Seriousness and Support for Plea-Bargaining in Israel: A Factorial-Survey Approach". The paper proposes a study where eight plea bargaining scenarios will be presented to individuals. The paper hopes to show that public opinion has impacted the sentencing decisions of courts regardless of plea bargains.

Outline:
Introduction
Prior Studies
Variables for this Study
Scenarios of Plea Bargaining
Independent Variables

From the Paper
"Plea bargaining is not a legal punishment assigned to criminal behavior, but is a tool that has been utilized by an overburdened legal system, which is poorly equipped to otherwise deal with the enormous numbers of criminal cases that filter through the system. Without plea bargaining, law enforcement, prosecutors, defense attorneys and finders of fact would be required to meet the legal definitions of the rules of evidence, which could involve lengthy processes and costs associated with bringing those cases to trial and through the court system."

Tags:crimes, trials, jury, court, sentences

Abstract
This paper examines plea bargaining and what it means for the criminal justice system. The paper presents a research proposal that analyzes public opinion regarding plea bargaining. It hypothesizes that the public is not supportive of plea bargaining in cases of violent crimes and it suggests that public opinion has impacted the sentencing decisions of courts regardless of plea bargains.

Table of Contents:
Introduction
Prior Studies
Variables for this Study
Scenarios of Plea Bargaining
Independent Variables
Control Variables

From the Paper
"Julian V. Roberts' book, Public Opinion, Crime and Criminal Justice, reports on a series of surveys that examined public opinion on certain aspects of legal procedure and processes. In 1988, a survey was conducted of public opinion in Canada, and found that four out of five people surveyed disapproved of plea bargaining (Roberts, Julian V, 1997, p. 210). "There was little demographic variance in attitudes. Moreover, the link between attitudes and plea bargaining and views of sentencing were clear. People who regarded plea bargaining as unacceptable also thought that sentences were not harsh enough (Roberts, Julian V, 1997, p. 210)." The same survey yielded information to show that the prosecutors' reasons underlying the plea bargaining impacted public opinion. "Finally, the presence of information about a plea bargain in scenarios had the impact of changing public evaluations of criminal justice professionals (Roberts, Julian V, 1997, p. 210)." It did not change their overall opinion of the use of plea bargaining. "For example, if subjects read about a case in which a plea bargain had taken place, they had more negative views of the prosecutor (Roberts, Julian V, 1997, p. 210).""

Tags:violence, punishment, enforcement, prosecution