Culture in Animals and Humans
A sociological analysis of different definitions of culture and the functions it performs in society.
Comparison Essay # 46682 |
1,861 words (
approx. 7.4 pages ) |
13 sources |
MLA | 2004
|
$ 35.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper examines how culture has numerous definitions including beliefs and customs as well as the development of organisms and investigates different theories such as those of Marx and modernism. It looks at how culture determines peoples' behavior and interactions and how compared to humans, animals are much less complex. It shows how culture, once defined, can help us to understand the differences between human and animal societies, seen from the perspective of long-term biological evolution.
From the Paper
"The Oxford Popular Dictionary (Oxford, 1995) defines culture as a "developed understanding of literature, art, music, etc". However, sociologists study culture in various different terms and also as Raymond Williams argues in Think Sociology, (1998: 111) culture has "a range and overlap of meanings" and therefore difficult to define. Sociologists look at theories in order to make sense of culture such as, Marxism and modernism which will be discussed below."
Tags:complexity, evolution, marxism, media, modernism, religion, society
A look at Marxism's impact on the theory and practice of international relations.
Analytical Essay # 143203 |
2,000 words (
approx. 8 pages ) |
0 sources |
|
$ 38.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper discusses how Marxism has had a profound, albeit, occasionally indirect, impact on both the theory and practice of international relations, but more as a contributor of concepts than as a successful paradigm. The paper explains that Marxism had a tangible impact on the actual practice of international relations from 1917 to the early 1990s, and began to assume a more central role in the theory of international relations in the 1960s and 1970s. The paper points out that today, Marxism is an inalienable part of the debate around international studies, if no longer as vital a force in the lived politics of international relations. The paper concludes that given that Marxist international theory as practiced is indistinguishable from realism, the most enduring contributions of Marxism may be to theory rather than to practice.
From the Paper
"Marxism has had a profound, albeit, occasionally indirect, impact on both the theory and practice of international relations, but more as a contributor of concepts than as a successful paradigm. Marxism had a tangible impact on the actual practice of international relations from 1917 to the early 1990s, and began to assume a more central role in the theory of international relations in the 1960s and 1970s. Today Marxism is an inalienable part of the debate around international studies, if no longer as vital a force in the lived politics of international relations."
Tags:marxism, international, relations
A look at tensions between revisionist and revolutionary Marxism.
Term Paper # 134435 |
1,250 words (
approx. 5 pages ) |
4 sources |
MLA |
|
$ 25.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper discusses how tensions between revisionist and revolutionary Marxism demonstrate that even though each political ideology or world-view has a set of widely accepted notions, there are significant tensions within each ideology. The paper explains that the most significant tension within Marxism was bitter disagreement over how to rid the world of capitalism and replace it with communism. The paper further explains that Revolutionary Marxism held that communism could only be achieved through violent upheaval or revolution, while revisionist Marxism held that communism could be achieved through gradual and peaceful means.
From the Paper
"The tensions between revisionist and revolutionary Marxism demonstrate that even though each political ideology or world-view has a set of widely accepted notions, there are significant tensions within each ideology. The most significant tension within Marxism was bitter disagreement over how to rid the world of capitalism and replace it with communism. Revolutionary Marxism held that communism could only be achieved through violent upheaval or revolution, while revisionist Marxism held that..."
Tags:revisionist, revolutionary, marxism
An analysis of Marxism and Karl Marx.
Essay # 36875 |
2,650 words (
approx. 10.6 pages ) |
7 sources |
2002
|
$ 47.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
A paper divided so that the first part contains the life and times of Marxism, the second elaborates on the Principles of Marxism and the third is on the interpretation of Marxism by his followers.
Tags:karl, marx, marxism
A review of Marxism after the fall of the USSR.
Essay # 86224 |
900 words (
approx. 3.6 pages ) |
3 sources |
2005
|
$ 19.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper reviews the principles and teachings of Marxism as a political theory, and questions if, as a political theory, Marxism still has any credibility, relevance and meaning in today's world of global capitalism?
From the Paper
"Many people believe that the fall of the USSR signalled the end of Marxism. However, this is not necessarily true. The USSR was simply the most well known example of a state that attempted to model itself on Marxist principles. Marxism is in fact an intellectual theory and a political ideology, based on the writings and thought of Karl Marx. Therefore, it did not die with the USSR."
Tags:marxism, alive, dead
An analysis of neo-Marxism, mass culture and Bollywood.
Analytical Essay # 126166 |
1,500 words (
approx. 6 pages ) |
14 sources |
APA | 2008
|
$ 29.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
In this article, the writer discusses the theory of neo-Marxism and its significance for mass culture, using Bollywood as an example.
From the Paper
"The purpose of this assignment is to employ neo-Marxist theory concerning the significance of mass culture and the culture industry in modern capitalist society along with Herbert Marcuse's notion of one-dimensional man to a specific topic identified in a Lexis-Nexis database search. Attached to this report is an article written by Fareed Zakaria that explores the significance of India's indigenous mass culture conceptually located within the productions of Bollywood, the center of that country's film industry in which Zakaria ..."
Tags:Neo-Marxism, culture, Herbert Marcuse, Bollywood
The Relevance of Marxism
This paper discusses the relevance of Marxism after the Cold War.
Persuasive Essay # 102487 |
1,338 words (
approx. 5.4 pages ) |
12 sources |
APA | 2005
|
$ 26.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
In this article, the writer discusses that while orthodox Marxism prophesying the breakdown of capitalism and the advent of a classless society, as well as Marxist-Leninist Soviet foreign policy, became indeed obsolete as soon as the Cold War ended, in other areas Marxism continued to have a strong influence. In the second part of this analysis it is argued that Marxism remains after the end of the Cold War a major source of inspiration for alternative ways of thinking to the pre-dominant neoliberal consensus, especially in the development debate. In the third and last part it is further argued that Marxism is also of great value to the study of international relations in the area of nationalism.
From the Paper
"Thus the critique Marx made of liberal economics in the nineteenth century is today of equal importance to the critics of the present neoliberal world order in the development debate and the anti-globalisation discourse. Certain revisionist countries in Latin America led by Venezuela for instance have in the last years found Marx a great source of inspiration if not for their true policy aims at least for a markedly anti-American rhetoric. Only recently the Italian government fell because two ideologically motivated communist senators voted against the expansion of an American military base."
"Traditionally, Marxism is criticised precisely for failing to provide a coherent account of international relations. In particular, he is said to lack a theoretical framework to understand armed conflicts. Yet the international is central to Marx's thought and it therefore remains crucial to the study of international relations. While Marx does recognise the importance of the state in international relations, unlike realist theorists he regards social class rather than the state as the fundamental actor in international relations."
Tags:revolutionist, theory, foreign, policy, society
A look at Marxism in relation to the theory criminology.
Essay # 86151 |
900 words (
approx. 3.6 pages ) |
1 source |
2005
|
$ 19.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper examines the application of Marxism to the study of criminology as an academic discipline. The major points of this theoretical approach are discussed, as will some of the major reasons that Marxism fails to be widely applicable to the field unlike other theoretical approaches. According to this paper, despite Marxism's incredible appeal in other fields: labor studies, history, economics, sociology; incorporating criminology seems to be elusive for Marxists even to this day.
From the Paper
"A large number of criminology theories have developed over the years to account for people who willfully engage in criminal activity, despite the risks and despite the overall harm to the larger social fabric. Some of these theories have been psychological, citing behavioral patterns. Others are sociological and attempt to qualify crime as a function of disparities within society. Some theories even argue a biological perspective, that some of us are merely hardwired to commit crimes. It's, apparently, in our genes. One particular theory that has been less successful in criminology is Marxism. "
Tags:marx, criminology, critique
Marxism and Global Capitalism
A discussion on whether the theories of Marxism are more relevant than ever before in an age of global capitalism.
Research Paper # 53610 |
3,008 words (
approx. 12 pages ) |
8 sources |
APA | 2003
|
$ 53.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper embarks on an examination of the theories of Marxism and argues that a specific engagement with "The Communist Manifesto" should prove to be fruitful in fulfilling this task. It points out that the theories of Marxism were based on the notion that the degeneration of capitalism would contribute to its eventual downfall, however the antithesis of degeneration has occurred. Hence, one could argue that the theories of Marxism carry no more relevance in an age of global capitalism. Despite this, this paper goes on to contend that to leave ones analysis at this would make it incomplete. One needs to go below the surface and back to "The Communist Manifesto" where amongst the passages one will find Marx and Engels anticipating and providing a vivid account of the global capitalism the world is now experiencing and a number of examples to support this are cited. Further evidence is cited which explains the reasons why the proletariat have not revolted. It concludes by noting that countless changes have occurred in the world since "The Communist Manifesto" was written which may well have led to a decline in the "fashion" and significance of Marxist theories.
From the Paper
"Central to Mar's views on the capitalist system lies his notion of "surplus value" which is the difference between the value of capital at the start of the capitalist production process and the additional value of commodities, which are produced. Surplus value only occurs in capitalist societies. The critical point that Marx makes is that the bourgeoisie or the minority of individuals appropriate surplus value or profit, which is in reality, produced by the rest of society namely the proletariat. Someone else reaps the product of their labor, they have invested their time and efforts in it, yet it is taken away from them. The profits of capitalist depend on the exploitation of the worker."
Tags:bourgeoisie, communism, engels, manifesto, proletariat, revolution
This paper discusses and compares the economic theory of Marxism and the economic system of mercantilism.
Comparison Essay # 59305 |
1,480 words (
approx. 5.9 pages ) |
2 sources |
MLA | 2005
$ 29.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper explains that the key strength to the Marxist economic system is a more even distribution of wealth among its people, but its weaknesses are a poor understanding of the profit motive in human behavior and the theory's dependence on centralized planning, which in a large, modern nation can become unwieldy. The author points out that the strength of the mercantilist system is that, through competition, successful nations can grow and prosper and their citizens can benefit, but a successful mercantilist policy produces an oversupply of money and serious inflation. The paper relates that the difference between these economic approaches is that Marxists view the international economy as a collection of nations whose workers have been successful in overthrowing the capitalist system and establishing workers' economies and those who have not; mercantilists view the international economy as a zero sum game where one country, to prosper and develop, extracts, through ruthless and cutthroat completion, wealth from other countries.
Table of Contents
Marxism
Economic Aspects of Marxism
Mercantilism
Key Strengths and Weaknesses of Marxism and Mercantilism
From the Paper
"For Marx and Engels, the capitalist system and the bourgeois class that ran it was seen as filled with inherent weaknesses and many contradictions. These weaknesses and contradictions would become increasingly severe as industrialization progressed and would end up progress into increasingly relentless economic crises. Thus, for Marx and adherents of Marxism, highly industrialized nations, where the problems and crises' of capitalism and the consciousness' of the workers were far more advanced in understanding these weaknesses and divisions, would be among the first to embrace and establish Marxist societies."
Tags:strength, weakness, workers, inflation, ruthless