Abstract
This paper offers a very in-depth study focusing on the fifth amendment and the Miranda rights within the law enforcement system. Firstly the paper accolades the work of law enforcement officers and continues to give many examples and situations in which officers would use the Miranda rights. The paper then offers the counter-position of the citizen and its right to enforce the fifth amendment. It then explores how officers are trained in legally coercing information and the effects of this on the citizen. In conclusion the author offers a personal opinion on law enforcement, the Miranda rights and the fifth amendment.
Preface
Prevailing Position
Countering Position
Personal Analysis
References

From the Paper
"Citizens may refute any cross interrogations as regards the answer when it comes to incriminating them. Like when an officer just emerges and cross questions you have the privilege, you are apprehended, to refute any questions if the answers have an inclination to punish you. Furthermore, anything you blurt out can be applied as evidence against you. Sometimes people are of the belief that what they are blurting out cannot punish them, when as a matter of fact, what they blurt out gives association in a continuity of information that would punish them. You have no privilege to make debate about why you are apprehended or about your involvement or innocence at the time of apprehension. Debating or resisting the police will not give you a hand in anyway. It will give meaning that the police can bring forth extra criminal accusations against you, and it may turn it difficult for you to set free or get on bail if you are incriminated."

Tags:police, Miranda, fifth, amanedment, citizen, judicial, system