Abstract This paper identifies examples of the three different types of layers of the land: abiotic, biotic and cultural (the ABC approach) in the Agincourt area. It focuses on the relationship between those three types of layers. It then investigates how the characteristics of the ABC approach have been manifested in this particular geographical area and determines the level of integration of the various resources through the use of examples related to the ABC approach and how those examples interact.
Table of Contents:
The Area
From the Paper "As with other areas of the peri-urban zone, it is difficult at times to distinguish what is rural from what is urban in the Agincourt area. Even though the level of urban growth is severely restricted in Agincourt, commercial expansion continues at high cost to the biotic as well as certain cultural elements. The area is a combination of rural and urban, and the priority at this time needs to become the rural. The pattern since the early 1980s is the urban aspect has dominated. In order to preserve the ecological balance between the three different types of layers of the land, what remains of the rural and farmland as well as green areas have to be preserved. The basic problem is found in a scarcity of resources which are overwhelmingly allocated to the urban or development aspect. These resources now need to be directed to preserving the rural part of Agincourt. In this way, the natural life forms or the biotic forms will be able to be sustained. The main focus has to be upon sustainability for the area of Agincourt."
Abstract This paper shows how war is depicted in somewhat different terms in different time periods, just as war was conducted differently at different times. The connection between the leadership and the front line soldier also differs in different time periods. The paper explains how some of the differences can be seen in depictions of the Battle of Agincourt in the film "Henry V" (1989, Kenneth Branagh), the Battle of Waterloo in the book "The Face of Battle" by John Keegan, and World War I in the film "Paths of Glory" (1957, Stanley Kubrick).
From the Paper "The Battle of Agincourt was the key battle in the effort of England's King Henry V to consolidate his rule and protect his throne against the French. Shakespeare depicts the king as a benevolent ruler, and King Henry's own words support the view Shakespeare has of him as an inspiring leader, a man able to get the job done by marshaling his forces and attracting loyal followers. Act III Scene 1 finds him urging his troops to greater effort, for instance, and shows him once more to be able as a leader. This scene, along with others, also shows that Henry understands the people around him and so is able to get the best from them. This is an important quality in a leader, and it is one of the most important qualities Shakespeare brings out in his assessment of Henry and his accomplishments. This important speech is central in the play both physically and thematically. It is offered by Henry as a spur to action for his troops. The night before the battle his mood is quite different on the surface as he speaks to various knights and muses on the meaning of the battle to come. Preparations for battle are presented on stage, showing both the French and English camps."
Abstract This paper looks at how in the play "Henry V", Shakespeare presents a portrayal of an ideal king and discusses the qualities that he possesses. It examines how Shakespeare uses the story as a tool to depict the qualities that an ideal king would possess and how he does this by showing Henry different situations to see Henry reacts to them. It also analyzes how Shakespeare also contrasts the difference between a good king and a good man since at time Henry is forced to do things for the good of the country that would in normal situations be considered wrong, unjust and immoral.
Outline
Introduction
Transition ? Prince Hal to King Henry
Learned
Just
Merciful
Charismatic and Inspiring
Focused and Dedicated
Heroic and Brave
Problems
The Man Behind the Crown
Conclusion
"Henry V" is not the only Shakespeare play that focuses on Kings and their qualities. Shakespeare, in his historical plays, has examined many different types of leaders, from Richard II, whom he shows to be a weak, indecisive king, struggling to keep control, to Richard III, portrayed as a homicidal tyrant who never let anything or anyone get in his way.
From the Paper "In "Henry IV part II" we see the prince Hal as unruly, wild, out of control, and with friends that would certainly not be considered good enough for a future king. However, at the beginning of Henry V King Henry is respectable, learned and completely different to his former self, they could almost be considered two different people entirely. The transition between these two different personalities is never fully explained, but it seems that the catalyst was his father death, and thus his inheritance of the throne and the responsibility of being King. Henry is forced to become a good king because the country needs a good king, and Henry is loyal to his country."
Abstract In this article, the writer notes that the great, rallying speech William Shakespeare's Henry V makes to his English troops before the decisive battle of Agincourt contains some of Shakespeare's greatest heroic poetry. The writer points out that the great king Henry V in the play and later in the movie based upon Shakespeare's play becomes one of the common soldiers, and also, in his rhetoric elevates the common soldiers to the level of a king. The writer discusses that this form of motivation by teaching leadership, and showing a personal interest in others is not only applicable to a medieval scene of battle, but also to today's organizations, according to the 'Leadership Engine' by Noel M. Tichy. The writer maintains that Tichy's writings are especially applicable to "Henry V" because Tichy suggests that more so than a specific cause, fostering leadership and confidence in leadership is important.
From the Paper " In Kenneth Branagh's film, Henry V's face is smeared with dirt, and he is no longer the young, attractive, and careless leader of the beginning of the film. That king lead his nation heedlessly into a foolish war, to regain the French territories lost to Henry's predecessors. Despite the fact that the English troops were lesser in number, they proved greater in valor, and against all odds, they triumphed. But because Henry's war is based on a fairly tenuous claim, when the English army realized they were outnumbered, the men were angry and resentful. They had suffered on the long campaign, and they had forgotten what they were fighting for in the first place. Without a sense of mission, most of the men would rather go home. Shakespeare's Henry knew he needed to motivate the English soldiers, restore his legitimacy as a king and leader in their eyes, and give them a common purpose, even if the purpose is only tenuously based in rhetoric. Essentially, in the speech he rolls up his sleeves and acts like a common soldier and appeals to English grit and sense of honor. They have come so far, how can they turn back now, he asks?"
