An examination of the basilicas in the Forum Romanum.
Essay # 62705 |
1,191 words (
approx. 4.8 pages ) |
9 sources |
MLA | 2004
|
$ 24.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper identifies and examines the three main basilicas in the Forum Romanum: Aemilia, Julia and Sempronia. The paper presents them as massive structures, generally rectangular in shape with two or more semi-circular apses or recesses. The paper explains how these basilicas were highly illuminated through the use of clerestory windows, usually greatly elevated and above the roof itself. The paper contends that in these beautiful structures, one can easily sense the Roman desire for broad, uninterrupted architectural spaces enclosed for the convenience of human transaction. The paper also explains the importance of the basilicas to the citizens of Rome, as they provided a place to meet, to converse and to witness the majesty of imperial Rome on a daily basis.
From the Paper
"During the Republican period in ancient Rome, most buildings were constructed as the need arose and were designed to serve public utility or the religious and commemorative needs of the State. And within the vast complex known as the city of Rome, the Forum Romanum served as the center of political life; it was also a place where the Roman Senate met at regular intervals and where the citizens of Rome could behold public spectacles, banquets and gladiatorial contests (Dudley, p. 48).
Thus, the Forum Romanum was, in many respects, the heart of things in ancient Rome, the administrative and social center of the city whose magnificent buildings were constructed over the site of the earliest settlements (Arnott, p. 17). In essence, the Forum Romanum was the galactic hub of Rome and allowed all of the citizens to participate in the daily activities of the city and to socialize with friends, family and, at times, enemies."
Tags:aemilia, julia, sempronia
An overview of the influence of the patronage system on English Renaissance writers.
Term Paper # 98220 |
2,603 words (
approx. 10.4 pages ) |
11 sources |
MLA | 2007
|
$ 47.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of why, in "Self-Crowned Laureates," Richard Helgerson places English Renaissance writers within a patronage system that frequently influenced the content of their works. To this end, an analysis of Ben Jonson's poem "To Penshurst" and his "Masque of Blackness"; Aemilia Lanyer's poems "The Description of Cooke-ham" and "Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum"; John Milton's masque "Comus," and Mary Wroth's "Urania" is conducted to determine what or why these works were written, as well as the specific patrons that provided these Renaissance writers with political or social favors or monetary remuneration in exchange for their services. An assessment of how women writers from this era frequently dedicated their writings to powerful figures is followed by an analysis of how the appeal to a patron authorized these writers to act and the manner in which these poets advance themselves socially through their art. A discussion of how class difference troubled or enhanced these writers is provided in the conclusion.
Outline
Introduction
Review and Discussion
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The patronage system under which Jonson created was one in which he was compelled write for the gentry but he was not that happy about it, because he thought himself the better person because of his talent, whereas the aristocracy had money but not talent. Yet he had to write such works as "To Penshurst" just to make a living and in the hopes, too, that he could raise up in society. In this regard, Loewenstein and Mueller (2002) report that, "Literature became the unofficial currency of the patronage system - well-turned sonnets, graceful compliments and effusive book-dedications being among the recognized ways by which hopeful candidates would present themselves for the job. Patronage came in all shapes and sizes, from permanent positions to more sporadic offerings, gifts or payments in kind" (346). In this regard, Briggs (1997) emphasizes that Jonson's poem, "To Penshurst," is absolutely rife with effusive praise for one such landholder who was deemed benevolent simply by virtue of not being evil. "
Tags:Aemilia, Lanyer, Ben, Johnson, milton, mary, roth
This paper looks at the themes of love and religious knowledge in the writings of three women authors.
Analytical Essay # 33163 |
1,900 words (
approx. 7.6 pages ) |
6 sources |
2002
|
$ 36.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper discusses Lady Mary Wroth's "Pamphilia and Amphilanthus", Mary Sidney Herbert's "Psalm 139", and Aemilia Lanyer's "Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum", especially in relation to themes of female agency, love, religion, and knowledge. The paper provides a brief biography of each poet and a brief look at the cultural climate of the time.