Abstract Adolph Hitler rose to the head of the National Socialist (Nazi) party at a time when the socialist factions of political Germany were many and divided. Once the Nazi party had achieved some significant electoral success, Hitler became chancellor of Germany. Fascism in Germany was widely popular. German, Hitler's, fascism (National Socialism - Nazism) had its origins in conflict, violent action being the core mechanism of its power, best realized by Adolph Hitler. Adolph Hitler rose to the head of the National Socialist (Nazi) party at a time when the socialist factions of political Germany were many and divided.
Abstract This paper traces Adolph Hitler's rise to power in the 1930s, noting that Hitler was a great public speaker, which is one of the reasons why he was able to rise to power so swiftly. The paper relates that by 1931, the Nazis had begun disrupting parliament with rowdy and inappropriate behavior that caused the government to become very ineffective and then in 1932, the chancellor of Germany was forced to resign. The paper describes how Hitler became chancellor and the Nazis began to forcefully take over areas of the country and implement Nazis into positions of power. Finally, the paper relates that in 1933, a law was passed that made the dictatorship of Adolph Hitler legal.
From the Paper "Adolph Hitler's rise to power began in 1930 when the Nazi Party began its campaign, traveling all over Germany making speeches and meeting the citizens. This hands on approach was something different for the German people, as the ruling party had not done these types of things. One thing that Hitler's speeches did was give the people hope, as the country was locked in the grip of the Great Depression and poverty and hunger were widespread problems. Hitler's speeches were vague and they did not really promise anything specific, but Hitler's great power was his ability to control an audience through his speeches. He was a great public speaker, which is one of the reasons why he was able to rise to power so swiftly."
Abstract The paper shows that the careers of Napoleon Bonaparte and Adolph Hitler were alike in a number of significant ways. First and foremost, it shows that they both sought to control and dominate Europe and ultimately failed, though although Hitler's failure was more devastating and spectacular and Napoleon's was mixed with some positive effects. The paper shows that they were both driven by a powerful will to obtain power, achieved that power, and made terrible mistakes which led to their downfall. It shows that, ironically, the specific disasters which spelled the end of their careers had to do with battles in winter against Russia. The paper also shows the differences between the lives and careers of the two.
From the Paper "Napoleon was trained as a soldier and leader, unlike Hitler. He led military victories long before he became Emperor. He ended inflation, not through war but through effective economic policy, and came to peace with the Church, instead of crushing religious influence as Hitler had done. He led major victories against every power on the Continent, except for Russia, which he attacked in 1812. That was the beginning of the end, for after retreating from Russia, he was faced with a coalition of several nations (as was Hitler) which defeated him in France, just as Hitler was finally defeated in Germany. Whereas Hitler killed himself, Napoleon abdicated unconditionally, in 1814."
Abstract Adolph Hitler's classic treatise on philosophy entitled "Mein Kampf" is believed to demonstrate the political views of Hitler himself, and therefore can be used as a means to evaluate the personality of Hitler and the relevance of his views to the political and social climate of the time. This paper critically assesses "Mein Kampf" as a means of examining Hitler's personality and the social environment of the day, and how this generated Hitler's own unique perspectives on fascism. Outside sources shall be used to supplement this assessment.
Abstract In 1933, Adolph Hitler introduced to the government an act that would establish his dictatorial role in Germany. This legislation, known as The Enabling Act, provided unmitigated authority to Hitler and the Reich. As a significant moment in German history, the Enabling Act represents the culmination of Hitler's political ambition for total control over German activity both at home and abroad. This essay summarizes the events leading up to this act and considers the details of the act itself.
Abstract This paper assesses the evolution of French Canadian nationalism during the twentieth century. It begins with the theories and teachings of Lionel-Adolphe Groulx, the leading spokesman of French-Canadian nationalism during the first half of this century. It then analyses the changes that Quebec nationalism underwent during the 'Quiet Revolution' of the 1960s.
Abstract This paper compares the ideas of Adolph Hitler to those of four philosophers that dealt exclusively with the issue of race and segregation or colonization. These writers are Martin Luther King Jr., Eric Williams, Malcolm X and Franz Fanon.
Abstract Adolph Hitler is undoubtedly one of the most important historical figures of the 20th century. During his reign in Germany as a dictator, he made a tremendous impact on the events that happened on the European continent. His tyrannical rule, which surprisingly, had the support of the majority of the German people, coupled with his imperialistic notions, created a new chapter in European history. The paper shows that the intriguing aspect of Hitler's life is how he managed to rise from, literally, an unknown person to the position of "Fuhrer of Germany". Several historians have been interested in this meteoric rise of Hitler and have studied the sudden transition of his life, offering their own interpretations. The paper explores this aspect of Hitler's life in detail by studying the thoughts of different historians so as to gain a better picture of Hitler's life and the mystery behind his magnetic personality.
From the Paper "The Great Depression in the early 1930's was one of the main reasons contributing to Hitler's success. The Weimar government was not able to standup to the economic crisis, which left millions of German's without job. People who so far showed little interest in politics were lending their ears to new radical parties in the hope of an economic revival. There was an intense yearning for a leader of the status of "Kaiser" and the instability of the Weimar republic provided a fertile ground for Hitler and his Nazi party. The policies of the Nazi party attracted the German people who saw it as the only hope in chaotic situation. One of the main points of action promised by the Nazis was the reunion of the German people who were segregated from the mainland due to the implications of the treaty of Versailles."
Abstract This paper discusses how, out of all the Nazi leaders aligned with Adolph Hitler, Albert Speer stands out as one of the greatest mysteries. It attempts to discover how such a refined, well-educated man, from such a good background, ended up as second-in-command to one of the century's most abusive and tyrannical despots. Through a review of his autobiography, "Inside the Third Reich: Memoirs", it shows how, although he was born to a wealthy family, well-educated, son of a respected architect, and trained as an architect, Speer seems a tremendous misfit when compared to the army private who terrorized the entire Western world for more than decade.
From the Paper "Speer acknowledged that he quickly came to accept events that most people would have been appalled by. Early in Speer's new career, Hitler ordered Speer to remodel a building immediately. One official by the name of Papen asked for a few months? time, and Speer reported this back to Hitler. Hitler was enraged, so Speer began one of Papen's assistants had been executed in his office. Speer, supervising the renovations, saw the blood on the floor, but was strangely unmoved by the sight. This suggests to the reader that it wasn?t really much of a stretch for Speer to accept what many people would have found entirely unacceptable. Nevertheless, the irresistible draw the architectural opportunities had for him clearly were immense."
Abstract This paper examines the life of Adolf Hitler through his childhood, service in World War I, and the formation of the Nazi Party in Germany. It looks at his rise to power over the years against the backdrop of the changing political scene in Germany.
From the Paper "The age-old view of the Jewish people as "the Christ-killers" served as a suitable backdrop in which to place the blame for a wide variety of social ills now gripping the nation. Whether by their nature, or some cruel trick of fate, the Jewish community in Germany had largely secured their assets in durable items such as real estate, artwork, and precious stones. Thus, as the economy crashed around them, the Jewish minority remained financially secure. Resentment among Germans grew strong as they watched their children grow weak with starvation while the Jewish community thrived."
Abstract This paper considers several incidents that took place throughout the course of Hitler's childhood and youth and discusses how they may have been instrumental in shaping the future personality, philosophy and beliefs of the dictator. The paper explores the different influences that affected his psychological development, with a view to determining how his growth could have been optimized. Finally, the paper discusses two different personality theories and the writer asserts that the authoritative personality theory partly explains Hitler's behavior.
Outline:
Introduction
Background
Contradictions
Possible Personality Disorders
Conclusion
From the Paper "Psychopath, murderer, insane, and numerous other labels, have been employed to describe the behavior and actions of Adolph Hitler, as people from all walks of life try to make sense of one of the world's most infamous killer. What caused him to behave in the ways that he did? Why was he filled with so much hatred? What happened to this man throughout the course of his life? And can these events have played a part in the formation of Hitler's psychological make up?"
Abstract This paper describes and analyzes William-Adolphe Bouguereau's painting entitled "Orestes Pursued by the Furies," after relating the Orestes myth upon which the painting is based. The author describes the painting's complex composition and how its actual and implied lines continuously redirect the observer's attention to different parts of the drama being performed on the canvas. The author analyzes the use of color and tone and their effect in the painting. The author concludes that the fact that both the canvas and figures are larger than life may reflect the painter's conviction of the importance of the moral lessons depicted in the painting.
From the Paper "Bouguereau balanced this painting, creating unity as well as discord via many methods including the use of several perceived triangles. Traditionally, the main character would be placed at the apex of the triangle thus creating a hierarchy of people within the painting. In this painting there is an inverted triangle with Clytemnestra and the three Furies creating the long line of the triangle and the lower point of Orestes' white robe creating the apex. There may be many reasons for the inverted triangle, however, it makes sense that Orestes would be the apex as he is the center of the story, the inversion of the triangle creates a discord in the theme of the painting. A triangle created by Orestes' legs on the ground serves to visually stabilize the painting as is traditional in classical painting."
Tags: chiaroscuro background palette, focal point, dramatic vengeance Clytemnestra pain
Abstract Timothy Mo's novel "The Redundancy of Courage", as narrated by the character of Adolph Ng, makes use of ironic literary devices, as well as creates a new form of irony, an ideological irony of the post-modern, post-colonial condition of the author and protagonist. The paper explains how Adolph Ng lives in Danu, an ex-Portuguese colony and over the course of the book, the land is shown before and after an invasion by its neighbors. Thus the first kind of irony that the reader is exposed to is a kind of irony of place, or a narrative irony of thwarted expectations.
From the Paper "The Redundancy of Courage thus exposes an ironic narrative and ideological tension between a particular set of cultural expectations and the actual realization of those expectations. Ironies of character and of speech are also used throughout Timothy Mo's work, to further expose such post-colonial narrative and ideological ironies. For instance, the narrator of the novel experiences a personal sense of division between who he is and what his world is composed of, between what he says and who he actually is. Rather than view his identity in a nationalistic fashion, Ng constantly switches his alliances out of a desire for self-preservation. There is always a tension between what Ng says and what the reader knows means."
An evaluation of some of the principles stated in "The Prince", and their relation to two leaders of the past: Charles V of the Holy Roman Empire, and Adolf Hitler.
7,350 words (approx. 29.4 pages), 17 sources, 2000, $ 162.95
Abstract This detailed paper provides history on Machiavelli, Hitler, and Charles V. Hitler and Charles V are held to five of Machiavelli's core principles, and for each are measured by how Machiavellian their acts were. Further comparisons are drawn between the teachings of Locke and Rousseau. Machiavelli set forth ideas on how a leader should rule, this paper addresses whether or not leaders should follow his advice.
From the Paper "Through the ages, Machiavelli has been remembered in mostly a negative sense. His book, The Prince, has many controversial opinions in it about how a leader should rule, and it has even been called a book inspired by the devil. The Prince is considered by many to be the Bible of realpolitik, a belief that politics is based on practical and material factors rather than on theoretical or ethical objectives. This paper will evaluate some of the principles stated in The Prince, and their relation to two leaders of the past: Charles V of the Holy Roman Empire, and Adolf Hitler. Charles V lived at a time of change, during the pinnacle of the Protestant Reformation. He spent his life trying to deal with this problem, before ultimately reaching a conclusion shortly before his death. Adolf Hitler is perhaps the most well-known ruler in history. He was a German Dictator whose need for power and glory spawned World War II. He is remembered not only for his excellent leadership skills, but also for the atrocities he committed against his fellow man during the Holocaust. By comparing these leaders to the Prince, one can assess to what degree they are Machiavellian. "
From the Paper "Without a word of regret, on April 30, 1945, Hitler committed suicide. He shot himself through the mouth. He had left instructions for the disposal of his body; it was to be burned with petrol in the garden. Even in the end his infantilism shows through, he would rather die than admit defeat or wrongdoing, or express remorse for what he had done (Sowards 233-34). ... The life of Gandhi is quite a contrast to that of Hitler. Mahatma Gandhi was born in 1869, the fourth and youngest child of his fathers fourth wife. He was born in the poor little provincial capital of Porbandar on the west coast of India. His father was an official in the state administration of the Indian ruling prince and his mother was a deeply religious woman. Gandhi was raised as a devout Hindu (Sowards 299). Gandhi was one of the best-known people in the world in the 1930s and 1940s; he was a moral leader for millions in India."
