An overview of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
Term Paper # 135977 |
1,000 words (
approx. 4 pages ) |
0 sources |
APA |
|
$ 21.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper relates that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) was founded in April 2001, as an offshoot of the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) that was formed in March of 2001 as a not-for-profit corporation incorporated in the State of Delaware in the United States. The paper describes how the IASB is an independent accounting standard setting body based in London that is committed to developing a set of high quality global accounting standards that require comparable information in general purpose financial statements. The paper relates that the IASB also cooperates with global accounting standard-setters to achieve compliance in accounting standards ("Welcome", 2007).
From the Paper
"The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) was founded in April 2001, as an offshoot of the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) that was formed in March of 2001 as a not-for-profit corporation incorporated in the State of Delaware in the United States. The IASB is an..."
Tags:international, accounting, standards
A discussion on Australia's adoption of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)'s standards.
Term Paper # 140345 |
3,250 words (
approx. 13 pages ) |
10 sources |
MLA |
|
$ 56.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper discusses how in 2003, Australia adopted the standards of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) under the impetus of the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB), following a 2002 statement by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC). The paper explains that after this, Australian accounting standards will be equivalent to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) and will be legally binding. The paper discusses how the adoption of these standards brings Australia into line with other nations and serves to smooth certain operations and improve the viability of certain financial instruments.
From the Paper
"In 2003, Australia adopted the standards of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) under the impetus of the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB), following a 2002 statement by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC). After this, Australian accounting standards will be equivalent to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) and will be legally binding. The adoption of these standards brings Australia into line with other nations and serves to smooth certain operations and improve the viability of certain financial instruments. The move has been hailed by some and criticized by others, but the adoption of international standards is likely inevitable in an increasingly globalized environment..."
Tags:australia, accounting, standards
A discussion on adopting international accounting standards.
Essay # 70589 |
2,300 words (
approx. 9.2 pages ) |
11 sources |
MLA | 2005
|
$ 42.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper discusses whether or not Quaccess should move to adopt international accounting standards. It considers the role of financial statements and international implications. The author concludes that American firms should wait and see before moving toward adopting international standards.
From the Paper
"Accounting is sometimes referred to as the language of business. Financial statements and accounting pronouncements are used by stakeholders in organizations-shareholders employees creditors ..."
Tags:Quaccess, accounting standards, international accounting standards, financial statements, balance sheet, income statement, IAS, IFRS, FAR, international financial reporting standards
This is an analytic essay on statement no. 157 released by The Financial Accounting Standards Board.
Analytical Essay # 149596 |
1,323 words (
approx. 5.3 pages ) |
5 sources |
APA | 2011
|
$ 26.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This is a short essay on the financial statement released by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. The statement is titled No. 157 and is on the lack of clarity regarding fair value within the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The writer discusses the document, stating it was incomplete or vague and this opened up to much room for the principle to be interpreted within. Statement no. 157 was originally released in 2007 and the writer discusses what happened with its release and what actions occurred afterwards.
From the Paper
"Statement No. 157 also is to be used for derivative instruments. The main thrust of this statement is that it nullifies guidance that was previously issued and amends other previously issued guidance. This reflects the FASB's objective that Statement No. 157 begins to streamline the guidance with respect to fair value. Fair value guidance had been scattered throughout a number of different statements and 157 is intended to reduce the number of different statements containing fair value guidance.
"The previously-issued statements also did not always adhere to the framework that the FASB uses when issuing its statements. That framework was created with consistency in mind, such that financial statements can different issuers can be easily compared with one another. The process of streamlining the guidance with respect to fair value is part of the move towards increased consistency, beginning with consistency at the philosophical level.
"This statement has been ascribed by some as a cause of the current financial crisis. The case has been made before government, for example, that the markets for mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations were driven down by fear and speculation. The markets, therefore, were behaving irrationally, and irrational markets should not be used as the basis to value an asset (Gross, 2008).
"For a couple of reasons, however, this argument does not hold water. The first is that financial institutions have long used mark-to-market accounting (Gelinas, 2008). Remember that Statement No. 157 did not introduce new fair value methods, it simply clarified existing practice and provided guidance with respect to technique and disclosure."
Tags:accounting, market, fair-value, finance, FASB, GAAP
An overview of financial accounting standards.
Term Paper # 148095 |
1,912 words (
approx. 7.6 pages ) |
7 sources |
APA | 2011
|
$ 36.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper presents an explanation of the USA's Statement of Financial Accounting Standards. It provides an example of how the systems works and the reasons for revisions that have been made.
Outline:
What is SFAS 123(R)
Key Reasons for Revision of Rule 123 of FSAB
The Costs and Benefits of FASB
The manner in the final inferences of this Statement corresponds to the 'Conceptual Framework' of FASB:
From the Paper
''Financial statement' users including individual persons investing as well as institutions besides a lot of other parties brought before the FASB their apprehension that enforcing the method of 'intrinsic value' of APB 25's results in 'financial statements' which could not genuinely stand for the economic financial dealings impacting the issuer, to state for instance receiving and availing services of employees against instruments that are of equity nature. 'Financial statements' that do not genuinely stand for those types of 'economic' dealings have chances to change the documented financial state of affairs of the user and outcomes of functioning which could lead towards faulty resource allocation with regard to 'capital markets'. The goals of the FASB in part are improving the criteria of accounting for financial reasons for the advantage of those using 'financial information'. FAS 123R deals with those who use as also additional parties connected by needing a company to recognize the 'employee services' expenses obtained in stock-focused 'payment' dealings, thereby reflecting the economic results of those financial dealings in the books of accounts. ("Financial Accounting Standards Board", n. d.)''
Tags:accounting, equity, stock
A summary of the concept release put out by the U.S. Security and Economic Commission (SEC) on International Accounting Standards.
Analytical Essay # 8220 |
1,005 words (
approx. 4 pages ) |
3 sources |
MLA | 2002
|
$ 21.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper shows that the increased globalization of companies has led to a dilemma for investors because accounting standards in various capital markets are not always reliable. It shows too that in an effort to increase the reliability of financial information in capital markets the SEC seeks to maintain the high quality of financial reporting in the U.S., while working towards establishing a high quality financial reporting structure worldwide. This paper summarizes the issues presented in the SEC's concept release on International Accounting Standards. These issues include: the five elements of global financial reporting; exceptions to rules for foreign private issuers using accounting standards that differ from GAAP; and the three criteria for assessing the International Accounting Standards Committee.
From the Paper
"Rigorously interpreted and applied: The development of high standards does not ensure that the standards will be upheld. In order for the standards to be practiced consistently accountants have to understand the responsibility they have in applying these standards consistently and in a manner that is needed to ensure high quality. This understanding only comes when regulators including auditors, rigorously interpret and apply these standards to accounting standards around the globe. The SEC contends that IASC standards are not used in many capital markets, which makes it impossible for them to be interpreted or applied. In addition countries that do utilize IASC standards have yet to incorporate the new changes created by the IASC."
Tags:auditing, standard, auditing, monitoring, goodwill, IOSCO
This paper examines the need for a universal set of accounting standards.
Research Paper # 99109 |
3,559 words (
approx. 14.2 pages ) |
10 sources |
MLA | 2007
|
$ 59.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper discusses the many advantages of having one global set of accounting standards that would improve the quality of financial reports and investment decisions. The paper looks at the IAS or International Accounting Standards proposal that will determine one set of accounting standards. The paper concludes that if the United States were to impose a broad and ill-defined system of accounting standards, companies would challenge every standard, trying to define the system in their favor.
Outline:
Pros And Cons Of Having One Global Accounting Standard
Preparers, Users and Regulators of the International Accounting Standards
Types of Companies; Listed vs. Unlisted, Large v. Medium v. small, Domestic v. International, Public v. Private
Political Process of Standard Setting; Rules Based, Principal Based
Examples of Three Different Countries; Compare Their Accounting Practices
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The new electronic interdependence recreates the world in the image of a global village." (McLuhan (1962 (1996, p. 31). There are many advantages of having one global set of accounting standards that will provide society with a crucial service not only in the United States, but in other countries as well. In recent years there has been shameful accounting methods used in which billions of dollars in retirement wealth and investments have had great financial losses. Because of these slanderous actions, the integrity and the ability to survive these accounting services have been questioned. Globalizing international trade by using a set of global accounting standards has had a tremendous effect in the way business is conducted. (Pagiavlas 1)"
Tags:global, marketplace, diversity, foreign, borders, regulators, financial, reports
Looks at the effectiveness of the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) accounting standards.
Analytical Essay # 148053 |
1,925 words (
approx. 7.7 pages ) |
20 sources |
MLA | 2010
|
$ 36.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper explains that International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) accounting standards, which set rules by which financial statements are prepared, are rigid and do not vary from one business to another. Next, the author reviews the practical application of several pronouncements by the IASB called International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The paper concludes that these accounting standards diverge with the decision making process of companies and may obstruct the smooth and accurate flow of information; therefore, the IASB should develop more pragmatic accounting standards by involving people in its development process who are closer to actual companies, such as accountants and managers.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
IASB and Its Principle
Critical Analysis Of Principles Published by IASB
Conclusion
From the Paper
"According to FRS 3, every business should include the analyses of continuing operations, discontinued operation and acquisitions in their profit and loss account. Similarly, they should also make provisions for extra-ordinary items in their financial statements. This might be misleading because discontinued operations have no relevance for the business, after they are dumped and may overstate or understate the performance of the company. Similarly, extraordinary items are of little or no importance for the company, and including such items in the financial statement will only increase the burden and paper-work for accountants."
Tags:committee, cash flow statement, liquidity, subsidiary companies, pensions
A discussion of the international movement towards common accounting standards for all countries and the United States' role.
Term Paper # 75722 |
1,611 words (
approx. 6.4 pages ) |
5 sources |
MLA | 2005
|
$ 31.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper discusses the international movement towards common accounting standards for all countries, and how, as a major economic power, the United States has an important role to play in the matter. The paper further examines the standards that have been developed by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The paper concludes with an analysis of America's current practices, focusing on the four Statements of Federal Financial Accounting Concepts abd addressing the main objectives behind federal financial reporting. It looks at the identification of the organization doing the reporting and presents a discussion of issues that are related to the preparation of management's discussion. The paper also presents an analysis of the financial statements.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Analysis
Conclusion
End Notes
References
From the Paper
"The present system is to capitalize the asset as per international accounting standards. The expenses that are being talked about are under in process research and development. Apart from this FASB has decided that capitalization of IPR&D will only apply to business combinations. When assets are purchased, and they are not viewed as businesses under GAAP in US, would continue to have IPR&D as expenses."
Tags:IFRS, FAS, FASAB, GAAP
Germany's Adoption of International Accounting Standards
An analysis of the harmonization process of accounting standards in Europe in general, and in more detail in Germany.
Research Paper # 129027 |
2,677 words (
approx. 10.7 pages ) |
32 sources |
APA | 2010
|
$ 48.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper provides an analysis of the strong movement towards global harmonization of accounting standards despite various national general accepted accounting practices (GAAP), particularly German, being substantially different. The paper explains that great successes have already been achieved, such as IAS adoption in EU and Australia; however, there is still considerable work to be done in order to not only impose international standards but also achieve better compliance and interpretation. With regard to Germany, the paper notes that reasonable attempts have been made to adopt IAS; however, there are many transition difficulties due to great discrepancies between IAS and HGB that must be addressed in order to achieve successful transition. This paper contains an illustrative figure.
Outline:
Introduction
Issues Behind EU's Decision To Adopt IAS
Transition Process in Germany
German National Accounting System
Main Areas of Transition Difficulty
Evaluation of Transition Success
Conclusion
References
From the Paper
"Figure 1 serves to illustrate the amount of examinations, carried out from 2006 till 209 as well as error rate. The primary errors relate to the insufficient management report and the application of IAS/IFRS. It can be observed that the error rates are higher for the companies that are not attached to any index which implies that for larger companies the transition process is easier to accomplish. However, the index-linked companies (include DAX, MDAX, SDAX and TecDAX)
are showing tendency of increasing errors. In 2009, for the first time, there was one DAX company with a high error rate. According to DPR-FREP, the underlying reasons for this increasing rate were the financial and economic crises, which led to errors in reports on risks and forecasts (DPR-FREP, 2010, p6). It should be also noted that the amount of average individual errors per company has been reducing steadily from five individual errors in 2007 to an average three individual errors in 2009."
Tags:IAS, IFRS, GAAP, DAX, TecDAX, SDAX, MDAX, DPR-FREP