Abstract
The paper reveals that racial biases permeate the criminal justice system with blacks more likely to receive the death penalty than whites. The paper goes on to prove that capital punishment does not serve as a deterrent to crime, and argues that even animals are treated more humanely at the time of death than their human counterparts, some of which are being murdered by the state for crimes they did not even commit. The paper contends that the death penalty should be abolished altogether in the United States, in lieu of more humane and more effective means of crime prevention.

Outline:
Justice for All...With a Few exceptions
Wrongful Executions: Murder by the State
Crime Deterrence
Humane Executions?
Conclusion

From the Paper
"One of the key arguments against the death penalty is that in 96% of the states where there have been reviews of the death penalty, a pattern of racial discrimination became apparent (Death Penalty Information Center, p. 2). In states that have the death penalty, 98% of the chief district attorneys are white, with only 1% black (Death Penalty Information Center, p. 2). This racial inequality in the justice system may have an impact on the administration of the death penalty and the chances that a person will pay the ultimate price for a crime."

Tags:race, deterrence, executions, costs, death, penalty

Abstract
This paper explores the reasons why the D.A.R.E. Program should not be eliminated from the curriculum in the face of strong statistical evidence that it is not effective in preventing drug abuse. The reasons explored demonstrate the positive contributions of the program in spite of its ambiguous results. The paper makes an emotional appeal for a reprieve from the budgetary axe.

From the Paper
"This paper shall explore the reasons why the D.A.R.E. Program should not be eliminated from the curriculum in the face of strong statistical evidence that it is not effective in preventing drug abuse. The reasons explored will demonstrate the positive contributions of the program in spite of its ambiguous results. In the end it will make an emotional appeal for a reprieve from the budgetary axe. Abolish D.A.R.E.? The question is posed, in light of seemingly overwhelming evidence of its ineffectiveness, why not abolish the D.A.R.E. Program. There are several..."

Tags:dare, drug abuse, abolish

Abstract
The author of this paper takes the position that juveniles should be tried as adults. The paper focuses on violent crimes committed by juveniles, why they commit these crimes and why they behave this way. Specific cases of elderly victims of juvenile crime, such as "Sullivan vs. Florida" and "Roper vs. Simmons" are discussed as well in order to support the author's contention.

Table of Contents:
Table of Contents
Abstract
Reactionary Statement
Joe Harris Sullivan
Drug Usage
Parental Influence
Phoebe's Laws
Conclusion

From the Paper
"Drugs and gang warfare are also players in juvenile crime. Many gang leaders indoctrinate their subordinates to behave in a manner entirely inappropriate for habitualizing with 'normal' society. By having a 'strong' gang member figure to look up to, juveniles feel included in something and want to impress their gang, and especially that figure. This is a huge problem when trying to combat juvenile crime, as locating gang and gang members is a monumental task. Peer pressure is not something that can be worked around; many children feel peer pressure and this can range from something minor... to cases with tragic consequences such as Phoebe Prince bullying case."

Tags:elderly deterrent, peer pressure, anti-bullying parents

Abstract
This paper explores the reasons why the D.A.R.E. Program should not be eliminated from the curriculum in the face of strong statistical evidence that it is not effective in preventing drug abuse. The paper demonstrates the positive contributions of the program in spite of its ambiguous results. The paper contends that in the absence of an effective proven alternative, it is best to continue with even a slightly effective method to prevent drug abuse.

From the Paper
"The question is posed, in light of seemingly overwhelming evidence of its ineffectiveness, why not abolish the D.A.R.E. Program? There are several reasons as why not to abolish the program, the least of which is the statistical data that supports the supposition that the program does not reduce the incidences of drug abuse by the students that participate. However, the program is profoundly popular with parents and supporters of the schools and continues to garner near religious support for its continued inclusion in the school curriculum. Exposure to the course material is not shown to be harmful or increase the instances of drug use. Further, the cancellation a drug awareness program just might send the wrong message to the students."

Tags:curriculum, police, law, enforcement

Abstract
In this article, the writer introduces and analyzes the topic of the death penalty in America. Specifically, the writer discusses why the death penalty should not be abolished, making use of the article "Should the Death Penalty Be Abolished?" "No." by Ernest van den Haag. The writer argues that the death penalty can help deter crime, and since it is used for the most heinous of crimes, it sends a clear message to criminals that murder will not be tolerated in society. The writer concludes that the death penalty should not be abolished because it is a valid form of punishment in an increasingly violent society.

From the Paper
"There are many societies that punish crime by a like punishment, for example, in many Arab countries a thief is punished by losing a hand. Some people compare this to the death penalty, and maintain it is cruel and unusual because it perpetuates that "eye for an eye" type of punishment. However, some crimes are simply so heinous and violent that no other type of punishment seems valid. A person who violently murders an entire family, or a child, or a pregnant mother deserves to pay the ultimate price for their crimes. They took a life, and they should pay with their life, because it seems to be the only way to truly punish them for their deeds. A good example is Timothy McVeigh, who was convicted of the Oklahoma City Federal Building bombing. He killed over 160 innocent adults and children, and received the death penalty for his crime. In addition, he did not fight or appeal the penalty, and was eventually executed for the crime."

Tags:life, sentence, punishment, murders, violent

Abstract
This paper paper shows the arguments for and against the abolishment of this electoral system. It discusses the history of the electoral system in the United States and presents arguments by both parties on why this system is a non-democratic, unrepresentative one. It shows how in the recent Presidential elections, some may argue that the winning candidate was not the one who got the most votes.

From the Paper
"The Electoral College system for electing the President was widely examined and often criticized following the November, 2000 election. Two times in recent history we faced the possibility that a Presidential candidate would get most of the popular vote and yet lose in the Electoral College. The Electoral College interferes with the individual voter's opportunity to express a preference for one candidate over another because only the Electoral College votes really count."

Tags:state, federal, seats, power, popular, vote, candidate

Abstract
This argumentative essay provides an argument in favor of abolishing the death penalty because: 1) the death penalty does not serve as an effective deterrent to violent crime; 2) the death penalty often condemns innocent defendants to death row or death; and 3) the death penalty continues to be applied with racial bias in the U.S. Includes outline.

Tags:capital punishment, prison, inmates, African Americans, criminal justice, murder, cruel and unusual, Supreme Court, Racial

Abstract
In this article, the writer notes that each year there are quite a few people who die as a result of violent crimes, and each year a handful of people who commit violent crimes also die. The only difference is that in the case of the criminals, the government makes the decision and chooses the means of execution. The writer maintains that the death penalty is an abhorrent, barbaric practice from the days of kings, queens, and sorcerers, and it should be abolished immediately. The writer discusses that it is terrible that society has to live with violent crime, and that people die young or seemingly needlessly, but to deter crime there must be a system that works. The writer maintains that better jobs, less drug abuse and a better economy are all things that work, while taking another human being's life, even under the pretext of justice, is wrong.

From the Paper
"Most Americans also believe that the death penalty brings some amount of closure to the families of the victims of violent crime, but most family members who are willing to comment on the issue feel that wishing for someone to die does not help them heal. The death of the criminal only causes another family to grieve, instead of helping the family of the victim to stop grieving. Most victims' families would rather work on getting on with their lives and dealing with their pain than wait around to see if the murderer of a loved one is going to be executed. Fighting for an execution is a constant reminder to these people that they have lost someone to senseless and tragic violence. There are many issues to look at when it comes to how people react to the idea of the death penalty."

Tags:criminals, deterrent, violent, crime, execution

Abstract
The paper discusses how for ten years IKEA has been struggling with suppliers to prevent child labor. The paper describes how the first child labor accusations directed at IKEA came in 1994 and were dealt with swiftly and thoroughly, amending purchasing contracts to include the provision that no child labor could be utilized by their suppliers. The paper looks at how IKEA has designed a code of conduct, internal controls, and third-party audits as a way to abolish child labor in its supply chain.

From the Paper
"For ten years IKEA has been struggling with suppliers to prevent child labor. The first child labor accusations directed at IKEA came in 1994 and were dealt with swiftly and thoroughly, amending purchasing contracts to include the provision that no child labor could be utilized by their suppliers. IKEA has designed a code of conduct, internal controls, and third-party audits as a way to abolish child labor in its supply chain. Marianne Barner, IKEA's children's ombudsman, has the responsibility to represent the needs of the children who are affected by IKEA's carpet suppliers. IKEA has gone well beyond trying to discontinue child labor..."

Tags:ikea, child, labor

Abstract
This paper discusses the appeal made by David Walker to the American public not only to abolish slavery, but, once a slave had been freed, to accord that person all the rights the Biblical Joseph was granted by Egypt's Pharaoh when his servitude was completed. More specifically, however, it was directed toward men of color to rise up and take their place in society. The Biblical references of Walker's appeal are examined.

From the Paper
"In pre-Civil War America, it was not unusual for abolitionists and slave-owners alike to use the Bible as justification for their beliefs. Harriet Beecher Stowe was the daughter of a clergyman; surely, the knowledge of the Bible's Old Testament she learned at her father's knee would have informed and even sparked the writing of her impassioned novel, Uncle Tom's Cabin. Two decades before Stowe's 1852 book, David Walker was using the Bible not as the impetus to fiction, but as a direct appeal to the American public not only to abolish slavery, but, once a slave had been freed, to accord that person all the rights the Biblical Joseph was granted by Egypt's Pharaoh when his servitude was completed. More specifically, however, it was directed toward men of color to rise up and take their place in society."

Tags:african, independence, jefferson