This paper discusses the term 'double bind', first introduced by Gregory Bateson et al in their work entitled, "Towards a Theory of Schizophrenia". The paper explains that a double-bind describes a contradiction of sorts, especially between familial relations, and characteristically communicates a negative tone towards the subject or victim. The paper attempts to offers a more informed perspective on Bateson's double-bind theory in order to provide insight as to how people use language in order to communicate order(s) and tone. The paper uses MLA style footnotes and in-text citation but does not include a works cited page.
From the Paper:
"A double bind has three basic requirements: a first order (premise 1), a second order (premise 2), and a conclusive tone (conclusion). In the aforementioned example, the premise 1 is "go ahead, criticize me," the premise 2 is "strongly hints," and the conclusion is that "all effective criticism...will be very unwelcome." It should be noted that the second order or the premise 2 does not have to be a verbal command/order, but can be communicated in any sort of linguistic communication (by gestures, tones, and the like). This is the basic formula for a double bind, which is can obviously be seen as a part of daily interaction between people. "
Sample of Sources Used:
Bateson, G., D. Jackson, J. Haley, and J. Weakland, 'Toward a Theory of Schizophrenia', Behavioural Science I (1956), pps. 251-254.
Dictionary.com, accessed May 26, 2009. (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/double%20bind)
Deleuze, G., Guattari, F., et al. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Publishing Group, 2004, pg. 88.
Gibney, P., "The Double Bind Theory: Still Crazy-Making After All These Years," Psychotherapy in Australia, Vol. 12 No. 3, May 2006.