Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

Racial Profiling and Discrimination


# 95154
Racial Profiling and Discrimination
A discussion regarding racial profiling and discrimination in the criminal justice system.
1,316 words (approx. 5.3 pages) | 13 sources | MLA | 2006 United States


Paper Summary:

This paper takes a look at how there is currently a considerable amount of debate and contention about the practice of profiling, particularly with regard to the legal and ethical implications. The paper also reviews the argument that in some cases profiling is necessary in terms of national security.

Outline:
Introduction
Profiling and Prejudice
The Results of Profiling and Discrimination
The Contemporary Problem of Profiling
Conclusion

From the Paper:

"A factor that has already been alluded to is that the result of profiling not only increases racial prejudice and social dissention, but that it can also lead to the biased overrepresentation of ethnic groups within the criminal justice system. There are numerous studies that attest to the overrepresentation of Blacks and Hispanics in the criminal system. One report state that there were "...serious findings of systematic unequal treatment of African American and Hispanic Americans and other minorities, as compared to their similarly situated white counterparts within the criminal justice system. "( Dunnaville C. 2000) Another important aspect of the study was that these disparities were found to begin with the very first stages of the process; which included the investigation of the suspected criminals by law enforcement officers, which again suggests discrimination. ( Dunnaville C. 2000) These disparities were then continued throughout the legal and criminal system. These are serious allegations as it amounts to stating that overrepresentation is in the first instance closely linked to racial and ethnic bias. "

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Bass, Sandra. Policing Space, Policing Race: Social Control Imperatives and Police Discretionary Decisions. Social Justice 28.1 (2001): 156. Questia. 6 Sept. 2006 <http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5001042403>.
  • Bork, Robert H. Civil Liberties after 9/11. Commentary July-Aug. 2003: 29+. Questia. 5 Sept. 2006 <http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5001957417>.
  • Clayton M. US plans massive data sweep. 4 September, 2006. <http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0209/p01s02-uspo.html>
  • Dunnaville C. Unequal Justice Under the Law-- Racial Inequities in the Justice System. 2000. September 4, 2006. http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:DNlNGKsjzU0J:www.vsb.org/publications/valawyer/dec00/dunnaville.pdf+Minorities+in+the+criminal+justice+system&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=4&lr=lang_en&client=firefox-a
  • Glasser, Ira. American Drug Laws: The New Jim Crow. The 1999 Edward C. Sobota Lecture. Albany Law Review 63:703. (2000)

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

Racial Profiling and Discrimination (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 13, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Term-Paper-Racial-Profiling-and-Discrimination/95154

MLA Citation:

"Racial Profiling and Discrimination" 15 January 2012. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Term-Paper-Racial-Profiling-and-Discrimination/95154>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 26.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

hicaliber US
Publisher Since:
Feb 28, 2007
We employ a large pool of writers that specialize in a variety of topics. In addition, they are all highly skilled researchers and editors. Our papers are of a very high quality and we have a very high satisfaction rate with our customers.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success