Political Theory
A review of the political theories of Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes.
905 words (
approx. 3.6 pages) |
3 sources |
MLA | 2007
|
Published on: Aug 31, 2007
Paper Summary:
This paper analyzes and discusses the theories of both Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes in an effort to better understand political theory. The paper uses and explains direct quotes.
Outline:
Abstract
Machiavelli's and Hobbes' Perceptions of the Ruler
Political Philosophies of Machiavelli and Hobbes
Conclusion
From the Paper:
"Hobbes stands in contrast to Machiavelli, at least on the surface, in terms of his theories on who should rule the state. Whereas Machiavelli advocates the ideas of absolute power, submission among subjects, and the gaining of authority through a display of force, Hobbes seems to be more attuned to the ideas of the nature of man to be essentially free, and the ruling of the state by a democratic type of a body, rather than a solitary dictator or despot. For example, one can consider the following quote from Hobbes: "The right of nature... is the liberty each man hath to use his own power, as he will himself, for the preservation of his own nature; that is to say, of his own life." (Harrison, 2003, p. 67). In other words, Hobbes is saying that every person has within them certain rights, yearnings and liberties; as such, the individual is entitled, and indeed should, pursue their own interests and not be oppressed by rulers. Likewise, rulers should not attempt to force subjects into submission or to rule by intimidation or fear- for Hobbes, power must be earned and maintained through a level of fairness (Rogers, et al, 2000). Within this scope, the ruler should be motivated, in Hobbes' opinion, by serving the interests of the people over whom they govern. Likewise, the citizens would be involved in the political process, and the ruler, having earned the right to rule, would have the duty to effectively lead with conscience rather than sheer force."
Sample of Sources Used:
- Harrison, R. (2003). Hobbes, Locke, and Confusion's Masterpiece: An Examination of Seventeenth-Century Political Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Rogers, G. A. & Sorell, T. (Eds.). (2000). Hobbes and History. London: Routledge.
- Viroli, M. (1998). Machiavelli. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Political Theory (2012, April 01). Retrieved May 26, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Term-Paper-Political-Theory/97740
"Political Theory" 01 April 2012. Web. 26 May. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Term-Paper-Political-Theory/97740>