Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

Fallacies


# 94742
Fallacies
This paper examines three fallacies that constrain critical thinking skills.
1,168 words (approx. 4.7 pages) | 5 sources | MLA | 2007 United States


Paper Summary:

The paper explains that critical thinking skills require a careful assessment of all of the facts and avoidance of many of the constraints introduced by various fallacies. The paper discusses the three common types of fallacy: the ad hominem arguments, the false dilemma and the straw man fallacy. The paper maintains that in a day and age where a "culture of fear" is being foisted on the American public by politicians and the media alike, critical thinking skills have become more important that ever.

Outline:
Introduction
Review and Discussion
Conclusion

From the Paper:

"According to Walton (1989), ad hominem arguments are personal attacks on the answerer himself. Not surprisingly, for many people, "It may be difficult to know how to handle such powerful and subtle attacks, and whatever the answerer does or fails to do can be tricky and dangerous. In particular, it is hard to know what form of criticism is appropriate, or even to know how to reasonably and fairly evaluate whether or why such a question is open to justifiable criticism or not" (p. 147). This author emphasizes that in ad hominem fallacies, the attackers frequently focus on the personal situation, actions, character, or affiliations of the person whose arguments or statements are the subject of criticism, an approach that has long been regarded as a fallacy and which represents a lapse in critical thinking skills (Walton, 1989)."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Baarsma, W. (2002). Shafer v. South Carolina: Another missed opportunity to remove juror ignorance as a factor in capital sentencing. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 93(1), 23.
  • Entine, J. (2001, September). The straw man of 'race.' World and I, 16(9), 294.
  • Hutchenson, M. (2006). AP English Language Definitions. Retrieved July 4, 2006 from http://annahutcheson.tripod.com/id8.html.
  • Miller, M., & Wright, R. (2002). The screening/bargaining tradeoff. Stanford Law Review, 55(1), 29.
  • Spiro T. Agnew. (2006). Rotten.com Library. Retrieved July 4, 2006 from http://www. rotten.com/library/bio/usa/spiro-t-agnew/.

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

Fallacies (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 11, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Term-Paper-Fallacies/94742

MLA Citation:

"Fallacies" 15 January 2012. Web. 11 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Term-Paper-Fallacies/94742>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 24.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

hicaliber US
Publisher Since:
Feb 28, 2007
We employ a large pool of writers that specialize in a variety of topics. In addition, they are all highly skilled researchers and editors. Our papers are of a very high quality and we have a very high satisfaction rate with our customers.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success