Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

Split Ergativity


# 115829
Split Ergativity
An investigation of the use of split ergativity.
2,243 words (approx. 9 pages) | 8 sources | APA | 2007 New Zealand


Paper Summary:

This paper discusses how the study of case marking patterns in language has aroused considerable interest over the last decade and how the animacy hierarchy is thought to play a key role in different case marking patterns. The paper explains that most ergative languages, however, do not have exclusively an ergative-absolutive basis and that the accusative-nominative patterns are usually present somewhere in the grammar. The result is a split ergativity in which A is marked for ergative case or left unmarked depending on the certain features in a language. This paper examines syntactic features of an unspecified language in the data and investigates the case marking system at the morphological level. The paper then argues how the split ergative patterns reflect the animacy hierarchy.

Outline:
Abstract
Introduction
The Syntactic Features
The Split Ergativity
Conclusion

From the Paper:

"At the morphological level, typological research has suggested that a tendency for a split between accusative and ergative patterns occurs based on the tense/aspect of the verb, the activity of the predicate and/or the relative animacy of the noun phrases (De Lancey, 1981). It is said that ergative patterns are associated with verbs in the perfective aspect or the past tense, with stative predicates, and with noun phrases low in animacy. In addition, the distribution of ergative and accusative case marking patterns seem to be constrained by a universal hierarchy of nouns. In recent years, it is the animacy hierarchy that has received increasing attention when applied to the area of the study. "

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Blake, B. J. (1994). Case. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Crowley, T., Lynch, J., Siegel, J., & Piau, J. (1995). The design of language. Auckland: Longman Paul.
  • De Lancey, S. (1981). An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language, 57, 626-657.
  • Dixon, R. M. L. (1994). Ergativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Garrett, A. (1990). The origin of NP split ergativity. Language, 66, 261-296.

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

Split Ergativity (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 13, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Research-Paper-Split-Ergativity/115829

MLA Citation:

"Split Ergativity" 15 January 2012. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Research-Paper-Split-Ergativity/115829>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 41.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

chachacha NZ
Publisher Since:
Aug 09, 2009
- Have psychology, linguistics and Japanese studies as background - Over 80% of my written work at university was evaluated as outstanding (higher than A-) - I have received three scholarships for my academic excellence within the past two years - Writing a thesis at the moment
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success